logo
Why Is the Associated Press Suing Trump Officials?

Why Is the Associated Press Suing Trump Officials?

Yahoo24-02-2025

The Associated Press and the Trump administration are locked in a showdown — all because the AP refused to call the body of water formerly known as 'Gulf of Mexico' the 'Gulf of America,' per Trump's executive order. The news organization is sticking with its stance, and that decision has caused a domino effect.
Trump retaliated by banning the news agency from the White House and other key spaces, prompting the AP to fire back with a lawsuit, arguing that the move threatens press freedom.
The dispute has even caught international attention, with Germany's top opposition leader Friedrich Merz criticizing Trump's decision. 'We would never kick a news agency out of the press room of our Chancellery,' said Merz (his country's presumptive election winner, as of press time).
Here's what's behind the controversy and why the AP believes Trump's actions are illegal.
On his first day back in office, Trump signed an executive order to rename the Gulf of Mexico, a body of water which stretches beyond U.S. territory, and has been known by that name since the 1500s. His preferred moniker? The Gulf of America. (Trump followed his order with a proclamation declaring Feb. 9 'Gulf of America Day.')
But just a few weeks later, on Jan. 23, the AP updated its widely referenced stylebook to say it would continue calling the area the Gulf of Mexico, while acknowledging Trump's name change.
'The Gulf of Mexico has carried that name for more than 400 years,' the AP explained. 'The Associated Press will refer to it by its original name while acknowledging the new name Trump has chosen. As a global news agency that disseminates news around the world, the AP must ensure that place names and geography are easily recognizable to all audiences.'
While the AP complied with Trump's order to revert the name of North America's tallest peak, Denali in Alaska, back to Mount McKinley — citing the U.S. jurisdiction over the area — the administration wasn't pleased with the AP's stance on the Gulf of Mexico. In retaliation, it blocked the AP from covering several White House events, including Trump's press conference with Indian Prime Minister Modi. Trump even made it clear in a Feb. 18 press conference that the AP reporters would be kept out of key events until they agreed to refer to the Gulf as the 'Gulf of America.'
Amid the fallout last week, AP executive editor Julie Pace met with Trump's chief of staff, Susie Wiles, on Wednesday to discuss restoring the news organization's access to the Oval Office and Air Force One. But tensions escalated just days later, when the White House barred an AP reporter and photographer from boarding Air Force One for a weekend trip with Trump, over the name dispute.
Although other major outlets like The Washington Post and The New York Times also plan to keep using 'Gulf of Mexico,' the AP seems to have been singled out due to its significant influence on mainstream news and journalists.
After being shut out of White House events and spaces, the AP hit back with a lawsuit against the Trump administration, arguing that the move threatened freedom. Although AP reporters and photographers can still access the White House, they're barred from the press pool — a smaller group of journalists who cover the president at events with limited space, like in the Oval Office, or when he travels on Air Force One.
'The press and all people in the United States have the right to choose their own words and not be retaliated against by the government,' reads the AP's lawsuit. 'The Constitution does not allow the government to control speech. Allowing such government control and retaliation to stand is a threat to every American's freedom.'
The AP isn't standing alone, either: About 40 news organizations, including conservative outlets like Newsmax and Fox News, signed a letter organized by the White House Correspondents Association, urging the White House to reverse its policy against the AP. Several journalism organizations have also spoken out against the ban, calling on the Trump administration to change course.
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, one of three Trump officials named in the lawsuit, found out about the issue while returning from an appearance at the Conservative Political Action Conference. After talking with White House counsel, she told the AP she believes they 'are in the right,' adding, 'We're going to ensure that truth and accuracy are present at that White House every single day.'
Even so, the Trump administration isn't backing down. White House spokesperson Steven Cheung was more dismissive about the lawsuit, calling it 'frivolous and demented.'
With the battle lines drawn, the lawsuit could set a significant precedent for press freedom and government power — one that may echo far beyond the White House gates.
The post Why Is the Associated Press Suing Trump Officials? appeared first on Katie Couric Media.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

L.A. immigration protests latest: California sues Trump admin. over National Guard deployment, president says he would support arresting Newsom
L.A. immigration protests latest: California sues Trump admin. over National Guard deployment, president says he would support arresting Newsom

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

L.A. immigration protests latest: California sues Trump admin. over National Guard deployment, president says he would support arresting Newsom

California is suing the Trump administration over its National Guard deployment in Los Angeles without the consent of the state's governor amid immigration protests that escalated over the weekend, leading to dozens of arrests. The Los Angeles Police Department has since declared all of downtown L.A. an unlawful assembly area. The lawsuit was filed Monday by California Attorney General Rob Bonta and accuses President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth of "unlawfully" federalizing the state's National Guard, and infringing on California Gov. Gavin Newsom's authority as commander-in-chief of the state's military reserve force. "Every governor, red or blue, should reject this outrageous overreach," Bonta said. "It is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism. We will not let this stand.' Bonta also alleged in a televised statement Monday that protests escalated after National Guard troops arrived on Sunday. 'We'll never know what might have been had the president left our state and local authorities to continue the important work they were already doing and were more than capable of doing,' Bonta said. Before the lawsuit was announced, Trump on Monday said he would support his border czar arresting Newsom over possible obstructions to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions in the state amid protests. At least 44 people were arrested by federal ICE agents during a raid at several locations around Los Angeles on Friday, including Ambiance Apparel in the garment district and a Home Depot in the Westlake District. These areas are known to have significant migrant populations and labor-focused industries. Protests then erupted in Los Angeles in response to Trump's immigration crackdown that has seen federal agents arrest a student on his way to volleyball practice and erroneously deport a man to El Salvador. Sunday marked the third straight day of protests over the wave of immigration raids. Crowds gathered in downtown Los Angeles and Boyle Heights. Protesters marched from Boyle Heights to the Metropolitan Detention Center, a federal building in downtown L.A. This led to the LAPD declaring the area an unlawful assembly. Protesters moved from outside the federal building and walked onto the 101 Freeway around 3:30 p.m. local time. Police fired tear gas and other projectiles into the crowd and cleared the area by 5 p.m. Meanwhile, another protest started on Sunday outside of Los Angeles City Hall Protesters outside the city's prison in the Alameda neighborhood of L.A. were arrested, according to the LAPD. Around 300 National Guard troops arrived in Los Angeles County on Sunday after Trump deployed them to protect federal property and personnel, without the consent of Newsom, a Democrat with whom he often spars. As governor, Newsom would normally retain control and command over the California National Guard. The White House said the deployment was necessary to 'address the lawlessness' in the state, and initially stated that 2,000 troops were being deployed. About 500 Marines are also prepared to deploy to the area, the Northern Command said. It's the first time in nearly 60 years that a president has called in the National Guard without a state's request or consent. The last time was when President Lyndon Johnson sent the Guard to protect a 1965 civil rights march in Alabama. Newsom said California is suing the Trump administration over the federal mobilization of the National Guard. Newsom told MSNBC that Trump's federal mobilization of the National Guard was 'an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.' The governor also alleged that Trump is the one to blame for the escalation in California, saying, 'He's exacerbated the conditions. He's lit the proverbial match. He's putting fuel on this fire.' Tom Homan, Trump's border czar, told NBC News that anyone who obstructs immigration enforcement would be arrested. When asked if that would include Newsom or Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, he replied, 'I'll say it about anybody. … You cross that line, it's a felony to knowingly harbor and conceal an illegal alien. It's a felony to impede law enforcement doing their job.' Newsom responded to Homan's NBC interview on Sunday by saying: 'He knows where to find me.' Homan later clarified those remarks in an interview with Fox News. 'The reporter asked me, well, could Governor Newsom or Mayor Bass be arrested? I said, 'Well no one's above the law — if they cross the line and commit a crime, absolutely they can.'' He added: 'There was no discussion about arresting Newsom.' Meanwhile, Trump said he would support the arrest of Newsom. "I would do it if I were Tom. I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity but I think it would be a great thing," Trump said Monday. In response, Newsom said: "This is a day I hoped I would never see in America." "I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism," he wrote on X. The peaceful protests escalated into vandalism, autonomous cars set ablaze, fireworks and other objects thrown at law enforcement, police firing rubber bullets (including at an Australian journalist), and dozens of arrests by the LAPD. 'In recent days, many protests across the city have been peaceful and we thank the community for expressing their views and their frustration in a responsible manner,' LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell said in a Sunday news conference. 'However, when peaceful demonstrations devolve into acts of vandalism or violence, especially violence directed at innocent people, law enforcement officers and others, we must respond firmly.' McDonnell said that a total of 39 people had been arrested — 29 on Saturday and 10 on Sunday. He also said the LAPD was not given advance notice that federal operations would occur in the area. On Sunday, several Waymo driverless vehicles were vandalized and set on fire in downtown Los Angeles. A Waymo spokesperson told USA Today Monday morning that its autonomous vehicles have been removed from the area and the company has temporarily suspended its ride-hailing service 'out of an abundance of caution.' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told CNN on Monday that the situation has since calmed in the city. 'If you dial back time and go to Friday, if immigration raids had not happened here, we would not have had the disorder that went on last night,' Bass said. 'We do not know where and when the next raids will be. That is the concern because people in this city have a rapid response network.' 'If they see ICE, they go out and they protest, and so it's just a recipe for pandemonium that is completely unnecessary,' she added.

IAEA chief relays Iran warning against Israeli strikes on nuclear facilities
IAEA chief relays Iran warning against Israeli strikes on nuclear facilities

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

IAEA chief relays Iran warning against Israeli strikes on nuclear facilities

CAIRO (Reuters) -International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi said Iranians warned him that an Israel strike on the country's nuclear facilities could cause Iran to be more determined about developing a nuclear weapon, according to an interview broadcast and published on Monday. 'A strike could potentially have an amalgamating effect, solidifying Iran's determination – I will say it plainly – to pursue a nuclear weapon or withdraw from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,' Grossi said in the interview, published on the Jerusalem Post website and broadcast on i24 TV on Monday. Grossi, however, doubted that Israel would strike Tehran's nuclear facilities, the Jerusalem Post reported. The Iranian nuclear program "runs wide and deep," Grossi told the Jerusalem Post. "Disrupting them would require overwhelming and devastating force." Tehran and Washington have recently engaged in Oman-mediated nuclear talks. Iran is set to hand a counter-proposal for a nuclear deal to the United States via Oman, Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said on Monday, in response to a U.S. offer that Tehran deems "unacceptable". Last week, U.S. President Donald Trump said he had warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to take actions that could disrupt nuclear talks with Iran. "I told him this would be inappropriate to do right now because we're very close to a solution now," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "That could change at any moment." Trump and Netanyahu are expected to speak over the phone on Monday.

NIH scientists condemn Trump research cuts
NIH scientists condemn Trump research cuts

The Hill

time32 minutes ago

  • The Hill

NIH scientists condemn Trump research cuts

Hundreds of staffers from across the National Institutes of Health (NIH) are speaking out against the politicization of their research and termination of their work while demanding that the drastic changes made at the agency be walked back. In a letter addressed to NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, more than 2,000 signatories stated, 'we dissent to Administration policies that undermine the NIH mission, waste public resources, and harm the health of Americans and people across the globe.' The letter was titled 'The Bethesda Declaration' in reference to where NIH's campus is located. The signatories cited Bhattacharya's stated commitment to academic freedom that he made in April and called on him to push back against the changes Trump administration has implemented at NIH under his leadership. 'Academic freedom should not be applied selectively based on political ideology. To achieve political aims, NIH has targeted multiple universities with indiscriminate grant terminations, payment freezes for ongoing research, and blanket holds on awards regardless of the quality, progress, or impact of the science,' they wrote. They pointed to U.S. law and prior research that has shown that the participation of diverse populations in studies is necessary for NIH's work. The NIH staffers further blasted the canceling of nearly completed studies. 'Ending a $5 million research study when it is 80% complete does not save $1 million, it wastes $4 million,' they wrote. The researchers called on Bhattacharya to restore foreign collaborations with the global scientific community, put independent peer reviews back in place, bring back terminated NIH staffers and rethink the 15 percent cap on indirect study costs that the Trump administration enacted. 'Combined, these actions have resulted in an unprecedented reduction in NIH spending that does not reflect efficiency but rather a dramatic reduction in life-saving research,' they stated. 'Some may use the false impression that NIH funding is not needed to justify the draconian cuts proposed in the President's Budget. This spending slowdown reflects a failure of your legal duty to use congressionally-appropriated funds for critical NIH research.' NIH research is not solely centered in Bethesda. The agency is responsible for funding research projects across the country and abroad. Numerous lawsuits have been filed to combat the pulling back of billions of dollars in NIH funding. Last week, a federal judge allowed a suit filed by university researchers and public health groups challenging the cuts to move forward. Bhattacharya responded to the letter on the social media platform X. 'We all want @NIH to succeed and I believe that dissent in science is productive. However, the Bethesda Declaration has some fundamental misconceptions about the policy directions NIH has taken in recent months,' he wrote. Bhattacharya said the actions taken at NIH have been to 'remove ideological influence from science' and further argued the agency hasn't halted international scientific collaboration but is instead 'ensuring accountability.' 'Claims that NIH is undermining peer review are misunderstood. We're expanding access to publishing while strengthening transparency, rigor, and reproducibility in NIH-funded research,' he wrote. 'Lastly, we are reviewing each termination case carefully and some individuals have already been reinstated. As NIH priorities evolve, so must our staffing to stay mission-focused and responsibly manage taxpayer dollars.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store