Harvard tells court Trump's funding freeze is illegal; seeks fast ruling citing cuts hurting critical research
Harvard University lawyers urged a federal judge to swiftly rule the Trump administration's $2.6 billion funding freeze as illegal, citing violations of free speech and regulatory rights.
Harvard, in a court filing Monday, noted that the Trump administration failed to produce enough evidence to show that their action was a legally justified to address antisemitism and a perceived liberal bias on campus. It further urged the US District Judge Allison Burroughs to fast-track a ruling to restore its federal funding.
'The government's rush to freeze and terminate billions of dollars in current and future federal funding to Harvard for critical research lacks the basic requisites of reasoned decisionmaking,' Harvard's lawyers wrote in the filing in Boston federal court, a Bloomberg report cited.
It further claimed that the US violated the Administrative Procedure Act and its First Amendment rights by seeking to dictate decisions on faculty hiring, academic programs and student admissions. It also claims Trump retaliated against Harvard for refusing his demands to make sweeping changes at the school.
'The government fails to acknowledge, let alone engage with, the dozens of steps Harvard has taken and committed to take to address antisemitism and bias,' the lawyers wrote in the filing on Monday.
Harvard in its Monday filing also said, as reported by Reuters, that it had received 957 orders since April 14 to freeze funding for research pertaining to national security threats, cancer and infectious diseases and more since the country's oldest and wealthiest school rejected a White House list of demands.
Harvard had detailed the terminated grants, including $88 million for research into pediatric HIV, $12 million for increasing Defense Department awareness of emerging biological threats and $8 million to better understand dark energy. The school said ending the funding would destroy ongoing research into cancer treatments, infectious disease and Parkinson's.
Harvard is a key target of President Trump's push to curb antisemitism, end political bias, and scrap diversity programmes. He also wants to limit its foreign student intake to 15%, revoke its tax-exempt status, and cancel federal contracts.
(With inputs from Reuters and Bloomberg)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
34 minutes ago
- Mint
Why Elon Musk turned against Donald Trump and his ‘One Big Beautiful Bill' - Here are the 5 reasons
Once close allies, now at odds: Elon Musk's once-robust relationship with Donald Trump appears to be crumbling amid growing policy clashes, public criticism, and mounting fallout for Musk's companies. The turning point seems to be Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill,' a sweeping Republican legislative package that Musk claims undermines innovation and economic discipline. Here's a breakdown of the key reasons behind the falling out: Elon Musk's sharp break from Donald Trump finds its most immediate pain point in Tesla's bottom line: the proposed elimination of federal electric vehicle (EV) tax credits. Under current policy, buyers of new EVs are eligible for up to $7,500 in federal tax credits, with an additional $4,000 available for used EVs. These credits, part of the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act, have been a critical incentive driving EV adoption—and by extension, Tesla's sales. But Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill,' backed by GOP lawmakers, aims to gut those incentives entirely for manufacturers that have already sold over 200,000 qualifying vehicles between 2009 and 2025. Tesla, by far the EV market leader, is directly in the firing line: the company sold over 336,000 vehicles in just Q1 of 2025 alone. According to JPMorgan analyst Ryan Brinkman, the removal of these credits could represent a $1.2 billion headwind for Tesla—a significant blow as the company battles slumping demand, falling profits, and political backlash from Musk's government role. So, Musk became increasingly vocal in criticising Trump's massive federal spending bill—nicknamed the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Musk called the bill 'a disgusting abomination' and accused GOP lawmakers of abandoning fiscal responsibility. 'I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly… which increases the budget deficit… I don't know if a bill can be big and beautiful,' Musk told CBS previously. Musk's discontent escalated after Trump abruptly withdrew the nomination of private astronuat and his ally Jared Isaacman—as NASA Administrator. Trump cited 'prior associations' in his decision, which Musk might have seen as a betrayal. Isaacman had broad support in the space community and was seen as Musk's pick to align NASA policy with SpaceX's interests. His removal coincided with Musk's own exit as a 'special government employee' running the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted,' Musk said in support of Isaacman, signaling the depth of his frustration. Elon Musk's foray into federal governance as a 'special government employee' under the Trump administration has left a lasting dent in his personal and public image. What began as a high-profile effort to 'streamline government efficiency' quickly turned into a political and reputational minefield for the billionaire CEO. As head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk was tasked with cutting what the Trump administration called 'wasteful spending.' But the resulting actions—including mass layoffs in federal departments, rumored threats to Social Security and Medicare programs, and abrupt budget slashes—sparked widespread backlash. Despite Musk's repeated clarifications that DOGE had no authority over entitlement programs, public anger snowballed. 'It's a bit unfair because DOGE became the whipping boy for everything,' Musk told CBS. 'I've had people think DOGE is going to stop them from getting their Social Security check, which is completely untrue.' The political blowback triggered a sharp decline in Musk's public approval. Protests, online campaigns, and lawsuits followed, along with a string of death threats and acts of violence targeting both Musk and Tesla facilities. As public anger grew, Tesla became a target: Showrooms were vandalised Tesla vehicle sales plummeted Shares fell 50% from record highs Net worth dropped by $100 billion Musk lamented being made the scapegoat: 'DOGE became the whipping boy for everything... People thought it would stop their Social Security checks.' His candid remarks reflect a man caught between two identities—visionary entrepreneur and political appointee. 'I don't want to speak up against the administration,' he said, 'but I also don't want to take responsibility for everything this administration is doing.' Musk recently escalated pressure on the FAA to drop Verizon's $2.4 billion contract for air traffic control upgrades, claiming the system is failing. He offered Starlink as an emergency solution, suggesting the FAA should shift the contract to SpaceX. But critics flagged this as a possible conflict of interest—especially since Musk had been advising on federal spending.
Economic Times
39 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Chinese 'kill switches' found in equipment at US solar firms trigger national security fears. What are they?
Engineers have discovered 'kill switches' embedded in Chinese-manufactured parts on American solar farms, raising fears Beijing could manipulate supplies or 'physically destroy' grids across the US, UK and Europe. Rogue communication devices found in Chinese solar inverters have triggered fears of national security concerns. But what exactly are kill switches? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What are kill switches? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Chinese "kill switches" that could allow Beijing to cripple power grids and trigger blackouts across the West were found in equipment at US solar farms earlier this month, raising fears that China could manipulate supplies or 'physically destroy' grids across the US, UK and Europe. US energy officials re-assessed the risk posed by small communication devices in power inverters - an integral component of renewable energy systems that connects them to the power to Times, the rogue devices, including cellular radios, were discovered in Chinese-made power inverters that are used to connect solar panels and wind turbines to electricity grids across the world, including the UK. The hidden communications equipment could be deployed remotely to switch off inverters with potentially catastrophic US experts found rogue communication devices in some solar power inverters not listed in product documents, Reuters reported citing these devices to skirt firewalls and switch off inverters remotely, or change their settings, could destabilise power grids, damage energy infrastructure and trigger widespread blackouts. The discovery has sparked concerns that Beijing could potentially disrupt power grids in Western nations, given the heavy reliance of renewable energy systems on Chinese-manufactured solar panels incorporate parts from various countries, including China. However, it remains unclear whether any power converters installed at UK wind or solar farms contain the suspected Chinese "killswitches." kill switch is a mechanism used to shut down or disable a device or program, according to Tech Target. A kill switch is typically used to prevent the theft of equipment or data, or to shut down machinery in emergency situations. The extent to which it restricts, modifies, or halts an action or process depends on the specific system, operation, or software it is designed to switch is a broad term when it comes to the types of technology, software and tools used to create and facilitate it. In manufacturing, for example, a factory might use a kill switch -- also called a big red button -- to shut down machinery if a worker is in danger. Kill switch software, on the other hand, can sometimes include software-encoded kill switches such as anti-piracy radios, acting as kill switches, were discovered embedded in power inverters produced by Chinese manufacturers and supplied to US power inclusion of these remotely controllable devices introduces potential cybersecurity vulnerabilities within the nation's power infrastructure. Power inverters are essential components in solar and wind farms, converting renewable energy into a form compatible with the national grid. This makes them a critical point of vulnerability. If compromised, these devices could be manipulated—potentially by China—to cause widespread blackouts across the West or even disrupt the entire power grid."We know that China believes there is value in placing at least some elements of our core infrastructure at risk of destruction or disruption," said Mike Rogers, a former director of the US National Security Agency."I think that the Chinese are, in part, hoping that the widespread use of inverters limits the options that the West has to deal with the security issue."Over the last nine months, US experts discovered suspicious devices hidden inside inverters and batteries from several Chinese manufacturers. These specialists carefully dismantle the equipment to identify potential security threats before the products are integrated into power typically have remote access capabilities through cellular networks, and utility companies usually install firewalls to block unauthorized access and prevent communication with China. However, these unauthorized components were not disclosed in the product documentation when the equipment was shipped to the United States.(With inputs from Reuters)
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's sweeping bill to cut taxes by $3.75 trillion but will burden millions of Americans. Check details
President Donald Trump's major legislative proposal currently moving through Congress is projected to cut taxes by $3.7 trillion while increasing the federal deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next ten years, according to a report released Wednesday by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). The CBO also estimates the bill would result in 10.9 million more people without health insurance, including 1.4 million undocumented immigrants currently covered under state-funded programs. Additionally, the package is expected to reduce federal spending by $1.3 trillion over the same period. This analysis arrives at a pivotal time, as Trump is urging lawmakers to finalize the legislation in time for him to sign it by the Fourth of July. As the official legislative scorekeeper for Congress, the CBO's assessment will be closely scrutinized by both lawmakers and analysts trying to grasp the full fiscal implications of the sweeping bill, which spans over 1,000 pages. In anticipation of the report, the White House and Republican leaders launched a preemptive effort to discredit the CBO's findings and cast doubt on its conclusions. It is estimated that 8.6 million people will lose health coverage due to Medicaid changes. SNAP (food stamp) participation would drop by 4 million monthly. ALSO READ: Under Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill, over 10 million more Americans projected to lose insurance Live Events Elon Musk calls bill 'disgusting abomination' Billionaire Elon Musk blasted the massive tax and immigration bill at the heart of President Donald Trump's agenda on Tuesday, calling the measure 'a disgusting abomination' that would burden the country with 'crushingly unsustainable debt.' Although Musk — who stepped down Friday as head of the US DOGE Service, part of Trump's cost-cutting initiative — had earlier voiced mild criticism of the bill, his recent posts on X, the social media platform he owns, marked his most pointed rebuke of the Trump administration to date. For months, Musk had acted as the president's close ally, often appearing alongside Trump in the Oval Office and urging the administration to rein in government spending. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk posted on X. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' He wrote minutes later: 'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' That post appeared to confuse the annual deficit with the overall increase to the debt over 10 years. ALSO READ: Elon Musk attacks Trump's 'big, beautiful bill': Tesla CEO's sudden outburst explained Shortly after that, he wrote, 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.' The bill would extend tax cuts enacted during Trump's first term and make good on new campaign promises — including no taxes on tips or overtime wages — while devoting hundreds of billions of dollars in new spending to defense and immigration enforcement. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed Elon Musk's recent comments. 'The president is well aware of Musk's stance on the bill,' she said. 'It hasn't changed his perspective. This is a strong, ambitious piece of legislation, and he's fully committed to it.' ALSO READ: Elon Musk's DOGE army left 'drugs, roaches and rats' in 'trashed' offices: Bombshell report amid Ketamine claims The proposed law would roll back much of the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act, which provided major federal tax incentives for electric vehicles, battery production, and solar energy — key areas for Musk's businesses. Tesla, in particular, has taken a hit amid declining enthusiasm for Musk's DOGE initiatives, reporting a 71% drop in profits in the first quarter. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) pushed back on Musk's criticism. 'With all due respect, my friend Elon is terribly wrong about the One Big Beautiful Bill,' Johnson told reporters. ALSO READ: Social Security Fairness Act big update given on expanded benefits. Here's how it will impact millions of Americans The speaker said that he and Musk talked about the legislation and other topics for 20 minutes Monday and that the two appeared to end the phone conversation on common ground. 'Elon is missing it, okay?' Johnson added. 'And it's not personal. I know that the EV mandate [is] very important to him; that is going away because the government should not be subsidizing these things as part of the Green New Deal. And I know that has an effect on his business, and I lament that. … But for him to come out and pan the whole bill is, to me, just very disappointing, very surprising, in light of the conversation I had with him yesterday.' Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
