Trump's pope image brings condemnation from some; others call it a jest
Bishop Thomas J. Paprocki of Springfield, Illinois, said Trump should apologize for the image May 05, 2025
Snapshot of US President Donald Trump's post of an AI-based image depicting him as the pope on Truth Social. (Photo: @realDonaldTrump / Truth Social)
By Kate Scanlon, OSV News
President Donald Trump posted an image that appeared to be created by artificial intelligence depicting himself as the pope just days after he had commented to reporters that he would like to become the next pope.
The image drew condemnation from some church leaders and commentators, while some defended it as a jest.
Trump posted the AI image of himself in what appeared to be the traditional vestments of the pope late in the evening on May 2 on his website, Truth Social, with no caption. However, the image sparked controversy when it was shared on the official White House X account.
Bishop Thomas J. Paprocki of Springfield, Illinois, said Trump should apologize for the image, which he called "deeply offensive to Catholics, especially during this sacred time that we are still mourning the death of Pope Francis and praying for the guidance of the Holy Spirit for the election of our new Pope."
"He owes an apology," Bishop Paprocki said, arguing, "'Make no mistake: God is not mocked' (Galatians 6:7). The Pope is the Vicar of Christ. By publishing a picture of himself masquerading as the Pope, President Trump mocks God, the Catholic Church, and the Papacy."
Joshua Mercer, vice president of CatholicVote, a right-leaning political advocacy organization that endorsed Trump's presidential bid, argued in a statement, "Trump's joking meme depicting himself as the pope was obviously intended to be humorous."
"There is no need to imagine that he believes he could be pope, or that he intended to mock the papacy," Mercer said. "Memes depicting famous people as the new pope have been playfully circulating on social media everywhere for the past week."
But the New York State Catholic Conference wrote on X, "There is nothing clever or funny about this image, Mr. President."
"We just buried our beloved Pope Francis, and the cardinals are about to enter a solemn conclave to elect a new successor of St. Peter," the conference's post said. "Do not mock us."
Asked for comment, Dennis Poust, executive director of that organization, said, "It is difficult to say what the president's intent was in posting the photo, but a reasonable person would easily conclude that it would likely be offensive to Catholics, especially as we are still mourning Pope Francis."
"I don't believe President Trump is anti-Catholic, but the post was definitely shocking and offensive to many, and I hope he pulls it down and stops this peculiar line of trolling or whatever it is he is doing," Poust said.
"The fact that the official White House X account shared it made the whole thing worse in my mind, since it gave the post the weight of the Office of President, as opposed to just being perhaps a crude joke by Donald Trump, the individual."
The post came a few days after Trump was asked by a reporter who he would like to see become the next Catholic pope. In reply, he appeared to joke, "I'd like to be pope. That would be my No. 1 choice."
But then Trump said he had no preference, adding, "I must say, we have a cardinal that happens to be out of a place called New York who's very good, so we'll see what happens," in reference to Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan of New York, whom Trump named to a religious liberty commission the same week.
In his statement, Mercer argued, "Today's loudest critics were shamefully silent for four years as President (Joe) Biden, himself a Catholic, was a manifest scandal to the Church."
"That said, this is a solemn time of prayer and discernment for the whole Catholic Church that should not be diminished," Mercer said. "The Church has survived far worse over the past two millennia."
Vice President JD Vance defended Trump on X, arguing, "As a general rule, I'm fine with people telling jokes and not fine with people starting stupid wars that kill thousands of my countrymen," Vance wrote in response to a post from Bill Kristol, editor-at-large of The Bulwark, asking whether Vance was "fine with this disrespect and mocking of the Holy Father."
But Bishop Daniel E. Flores of Brownsville, Texas, wrote on X in an apparent reference to the controversy, "Just when you thought it was safe to go back to checking your timeline once in a while."
"Read a good book, folks, go visit an elderly relative, anything to keep the algorithms from eating your soul," he said.
Trump attended the funeral of the late Pope Francis on April 26.--ucanews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
‘We can't do this again': Trump faces MAGA backlash over possible Iran strike
WASHINGTON, June 19 — The prospect of a US strike against Iran has exposed divisions in the coalition of supporters that brought President Donald Trump to power, with some of his base urging him not to get the country involved in a new Middle East war. Some of Trump's most prominent Republican allies, including top lieutenant Steve Bannon, have found themselves in the unusual position of being at odds with a president who largely shares their isolationist tendencies. Bannon, one of many influential voices from Trump's 'America First' coalition, yesterday urged caution about the US military joining Israel in trying to destroy Iran's nuclear programme in the absence of a diplomatic deal. 'We can't do this again,' Bannon told reporters at an event sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor in Washington. 'We'll tear the country apart. We can't have another Iraq.' The anti-interventionist part of the Republican Party is watching with alarm as Trump has moved swiftly from seeking a peaceful diplomatic settlement with Iran to possibly having the United States support Israel's military campaign, including the use of a 30,000-pound 'bunker buster' bomb. The criticism shows the opposition Trump could face from his right-leaning 'Make America Great Again' flank should he join the fight, a step that Iran has warned would have big consequences for Americans without specifying what that might be. A decision by Trump to enter the conflict would be a sharp departure from his usual caution about foreign entanglements. It could impact his campaign to foster good relations in the Gulf and could be a distraction from his efforts to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine and make tariff deals with countries around the world. The MAGA coalition propelled Trump into office in the 2016 and 2024 elections and remains critically important to him even though he is prevented by the US Constitution from running for a third term. Upsetting that base could erode Trump's popularity and factor into whether Republicans hang on to control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections. Iran cannot have a 'nuclear weapon' Asked about the rift yesterday, Trump appeared unconcerned that some in his base could be turning its back on him, at least on this issue. 'My supporters are more in love with me today, and I'm in love with them more than they were even at election time,' Trump told reporters at the White House. 'I only want one thing: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.' He said some of his supporters 'are a little bit unhappy now' but that others agree with him that Iran cannot become a nuclear power. 'I'm not looking to fight. But if it's a choice between them fighting or having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do,' Trump said. Marc Short, an ally of former Vice President Mike Pence who served as Trump's legislative director during his first term, called the division over Iran within Trump's party a 'pretty large rift.' He said he thought Trump's base would stay with him despite the differences, however. 'The divisions are obviously coming out in the open in this moment, but ultimately I think that most of the president's followers are loyal to him more so than any worldview,' he said. Short said standing with Israel could help Trump politically, too. Traditionally conservative voters favor standing by Israel. In a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in March, 48 per cent of Republicans agreed with a statement that the US should use its military power to defend Israel from threats no matter where the threats come from, compared to 28 per cent who disagreed. Among Democrats, 25 per cent agreed and 52 per cent disagreed. International experts believe Iran has been intent on developing a nuclear weapon, despite Tehran's denials, and Israel believes it would be at risk as a result. US officials believe if Iran possessed an atomic weapon it would trigger an nuclear arms race in the Middle East. Israelis need to get job done Bannon, host of the popular War Room podcast, said 'the Israelis need to finish what they started' and that Trump should slow down deliberations over US involvement and explain his decision-making. 'This is one of the most ancient civilisations in the world, okay, with 92 million people. This is not something you play around with. You have to think this through at this level, and the American people have to be on board. You can't just dump this on them,' he said. Other influential MAGA voices with similar messages of worry include former Fox News Channel host Tucker Carlson and US Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican and long-time Trump ally. 'Anyone slobbering for the US to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA,' Greene said in a social media post on Sunday. 'We are sick and tired of foreign wars. All of them.' But another Trump ally, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, said on Fox News on Tuesday that he hopes Trump will help Israel 'finish the job' because Iran represents 'an existential threat to our friends in Israel.' The rift was on full display when Carlson, on his streaming programme, clashed with Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas late on Tuesday. A clip from Carlson's interview with Cruz went viral with Carlson strongly criticising the senator for seeking regime change in Iran, and Cruz expressing support for the president. 'You don't know anything about Iran!' Carlson told Cruz. 'I am not the Tucker Carlson expert on Iran,' Cruz fired back. 'You're a senator who's calling for the overthrow of the government,' Carlson retorted. Vice President JD Vance tried to tamp down talk of a rift on Monday with a social media post defending the president. 'People are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy. But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue,' he said. Now allies and opponents are waiting on Trump's decision-making process. The president said yesterday afternoon he had some ideas on how to proceed but had not made a final decision. — Reuters
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Putin dismisses Nato buildup as no threat to Russia, vows more gains in Ukraine
MOSCOW, June 19 — Russian President Vladimir Putin said today that Nato's push to ramp up defence spending was not a 'threat' to Russia, days before the alliance was set to sign-off on a plan to boost its military capacity across Europe. In a late-night press conference, the Russian leader also said his troops would not stop pushing forward in Ukraine and sought to undermine his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky. The Western military alliance will hold a crucial summit in The Hague next week to discuss increasing defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP, under pressure from US President Donald Trump. Putin has cast his offensive in Ukraine as part of a wider conflict between Russia and US-led Nato, which has been Ukraine's staunchest backer since Russia launched its offensive in February 2022. 'We do not consider any rearmament by Nato to be a threat to the Russian Federation, because we are self-sufficient in terms of ensuring our own security,' Putin said at a televised press conference in Saint Petersburg. Russia is 'constantly modernising our armed forces and defensive capabilities,' Putin said, adding that it made 'no sense' for Nato to spend more money on arms. Though he conceded higher spending by Nato would create some 'specific' challenges for Russia, he brushed them off. 'We will counter all threats that arise. There is no doubt about that,' Putin added. Kyiv is seeking security guarantees from Nato as part of any deal to end the fighting, more than three years after Russia ordered its full-scale military offensive. Zelensky meeting? Moscow has shown little willingness to back down, with Putin saying today that Russia had the 'strategic advantage' on the battlefield. 'Our troops are advancing along the entire line of contact. Every day, more or less, but every day they go forward. And the advance will continue,' he said. Putin also sought to justify his three-year campaign against Ukraine, questioned Zelensky's legitimacy and dismissed civilian deaths from Russia's daily aerial attacks. He said he was ready to meet with his Ukrainian counterpart, but only during a 'final phase' of negotiations on ending the three-year conflict. He also suggested Zelensky had no right to sign a peace agreement given his five-year mandate had expired, a notion Kyiv has dismissed as baseless propaganda. 'We need to find a solution that would not only put an end to the current conflict, but also create conditions that would prevent similar situations from recurring in the long term,' Putin said. 'I am ready to meet with everyone, including Zelensky. That is not the issue — if the Ukrainian state trusts someone in particular to conduct negotiations, for God's sake, it can be Zelensky,' the Russian leader said. 'We don't care who negotiates, even if it is the current head of the regime,' Putin said. But he added that this would only happen at a 'final phase, so as not to sit there and divide things up endlessly, but to put an end to it.' Putin has rejected Zelensky's calls for a face-to-face meeting to agree a peace deal. Moscow has also rejected proposals for a full and unconditional ceasefire, and outlined a raft of hardline peace demands — including that Kyiv cede more territory and renounce Western military support. Kyiv has dismissed them as 'ultimatums' and accused Moscow of deliberately sabotaging peace efforts to prolong the conflict. Russia has escalated its aerial attacks on Ukraine amid the stalled talks. Russian strikes on the Ukrainian capital killed at least 28 people yesterday, Kyiv said. Despite widespread evidence of massive civilian deaths amid the campaign and the destruction of apartments, schools, hospitals and other sites, Putin today claimed that his forces did not target civilian areas. Hours earlier, AFP journalists in Kyiv had watched rescuers carry body bags with victims out of a destroyed apartment block across piles of debris. — AFP
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Asian stocks slip, gold gains with yen as Middle East conflict rages
TOKYO: Stock markets in Asia edged lower on Thursday while safe havens such as gold and the Japanese yen gained, as investors remained on edge over the possible entry of the United States into the week-old Israel-Iran air war. President Donald Trump kept the world guessing about whether the US will join Israel's bombardment of Iranian nuclear sites, telling reporters outside the White House on Thursday, "I may do it. I may not do it." The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump had told senior aides he approved attack plans on Iran but was holding off on giving the final order to see if Tehran would abandon its nuclear programme. Japan's Nikkei sank 0.80 per cent, with additional downward pressure stemming from a stronger yen, which reduces the value of overseas revenues for the country's heavyweight exporters. Taiwan's stock benchmark slid 0.90 per cent, and Hong Kong's Hang Seng declined 0.80 per cent. US S&P 500 futures pointed 0.40 per cent lower, although most US markets – including Wall Street and the Treasury market – are closed on Thursday for a national holiday. Gold advanced 0.30 per cent to US$3,378.00 per ounce. "Market participants remain edgy and uncertain," said Kyle Rodda, senior financial markets analyst at "Speculation remains rife – fed probably strategically by the Trump administration – that the US will intervene, something that would mark a material escalation and could invite direct retaliation against the US by Iran," he said. "Such a scenario would raise the risk of a greater regional conflict, with implications for global energy supply and probably economic growth." Brent crude edged down to US$76.32 per barrel, but remained not far from the four-and-a-half-month peak of US$78.50 reached on Friday. The yen gained 0.20 per cent to 144.92 per dollar, while the US currency itself was also in demand as a haven, gaining 0.10 per cent to US$1.1472 per euro and 0.20 per cent to US$1.3398 versus sterling. The Swiss franc edged down 0.10 per cent to 0.8193 per dollar. The Bank of England and Swiss National Bank both announce policy decisions later in the day, with the BOE widely expected to keep interest rates steady while the SNB is seen as likely to cut rates by 25 basis points. Overnight, the Federal Reserve delivered some mixed signals to markets. Policymakers held rates steady, as expected, and retained projections for two quarter-point rate cuts this year. However, Fed Chair Jerome Powell struck a cautious note about further easing ahead, saying at his press conference later that he expects "meaningful" inflation ahead as a result of Trump's aggressive trade tariffs.
