Delhi court adjourns hearing in National Herald case involving top Congress leaders
New Delhi, May 8 (UNI) A Delhi court on Thursday adjourned the hearing in National Herald case involving Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and others as proposed accused under Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
The court adjourned the matter for May 21-22 for hearing the submissions on the aspect of cognisance.
Special Judge for MPs/MLAs cases Dr. Vishal Gogne said, " The notices have been served upon all proposed accused persons in terms of the previous order. Vakalatnama has been separately filed on behalf of four of the proposed accused, Memo of appearance has been filed on behalf of proposed accused Nos.6 and 7".
The court said, " However, since the notice has purportedly been served upon an alternative email ID upon one proposed accused only today, it is appropriate that submissions on the aspect of cognisance are heard on the next date of hearing".
Dr. Subramanian Swamy, the complainant in the proceedings relating to the predicate offence, had mentioned his presence before the court and submitted that an application for being supplied with a copy of the present complaint and documents shall be moved by him in due course.
In the previous order, the court directed that notice be issued to the proposed accused persons in order that they may be heard on the question of cognizance upon the present complaint.
On the previous date of hearing, the court said the complaint and accompanying documents should be sent in digital form along with the notice to the proposed accused through all permissible modes and listed the matter for consideration upon the aspect of cognizance for today.
The case relates to the allegations of financial irregularities involving the National Herald newspaper which has been investigation by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).
The complainant, Directorate of Enforcement (ED) has instituted the complaint under sections 44 & 45 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) in relation to the alleged commission of the offence of Money Laundering as defined under section 3, punishable under section 4 of PMLA.
The complaint has named Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, M/s Young Indian, M/s Dotex Merchandise Pvt. Ltd and Sunil Bhandari the persons/ entities as the proposed accused in this case.
The scheduled offence which forms the basis of the present complaint is stated to have arisen upon the order of Metropolitan Magistrate -2, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi dated June 26, 2014 whereby, upon a complaint filed by Dr. Subramanian Swamy, the court issued summons to accused persons therein with respect to commission of offences under sections 403 (offences against computer resources), 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating) read with section 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
The seven accused who thus came to be summoned in the predicate offence were Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Moti Lal Vohra, Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda and the company by the name M/s Young Indian.
UNI XC ANV SSP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Police question Angadias in illegal call centre case
1 2 3 Pune: The Pune city police have questioned Angadias, who ferry cash between Pune-Ahmedabad and Pune-Jaipur, in connection with the transfer of money to the illegal call centre in Kharadi that extorted millions of dollars from American citizens by posing as US law enforcement officials. However, the police are yet to trace the main cash peddler in the case. Police have now focused attention on the person who converted cryptocurrencies to cash or transferred money to the accounts of the call centre operators. On the intervening night of May 23 and 24, a police team raided the illegal call centre facility in Kharadi and found 123 people, including 12 women, on the premises. Investigations revealed that the call centre executives — numbering 118 — threatened US citizens with digital arrest in fake cases of narcotics or other fraud by posing as US law enforcement officials and extorted millions of dollars from them. They accepted online gift vouchers and cryptocurrencies. Additional commissioner of police (crime) Pankaj Deshmukh, deputy commissioner of police (crime) Nikhil Pingale, and inspector Ajay Waghmare have questioned the Angadias. Pingale said, "The company, which runs the illegal call centre, has been officially registered in Jaipur. The three main suspects are on the run, and our teams are trying to locate them." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Thuisbatterij in 2025: wat huiseigenaren niet weten Zonnepaneel Experts Meer lezen Undo Five people — Sarjitsingh Girawatsingh Shekhawat (26), Abhishekh Ajaykumar Pande (29), Shrimay Paresh Shah (31), Laxman Amarsingh Shekhawat (28), and Aron Arumugan Christian (29) -- all residing in Kharadi for about a year, were arrested on May 24. They were from Jhunjhunu in Rajasthan and Ahmedabad in Gujarat. "The call centre was extorting US$30,000 to US$40,000 per day in the form of cryptocurrencies or online gifts. Hence, ED initiated a parallel probe," police said. "The call centre operators diverted these cryptocurrencies and gifts to third-parties who used to encash them. They sent the money to the call centre operators using the services of Angadias," Pingale said. The facility was in operation since July 2024, and the agreement to run it from the hired premises was signed and executed in Jaipur, Rajasthan, police said. Pune: The Pune city police have questioned Angadias, who ferry cash between Pune-Ahmedabad and Pune-Jaipur, in connection with the transfer of money to the illegal call centre in Kharadi that extorted millions of dollars from American citizens by posing as US law enforcement officials. However, the police are yet to trace the main cash peddler in the case. Police have now focused attention on the person who converted cryptocurrencies to cash or transferred money to the accounts of the call centre operators. On the intervening night of May 23 and 24, a police team raided the illegal call centre facility in Kharadi and found 123 people, including 12 women, on the premises. Investigations revealed that the call centre executives — numbering 118 — threatened US citizens with digital arrest in fake cases of narcotics or other fraud by posing as US law enforcement officials and extorted millions of dollars from them. They accepted online gift vouchers and cryptocurrencies. Additional commissioner of police (crime) Pankaj Deshmukh, deputy commissioner of police (crime) Nikhil Pingale, and inspector Ajay Waghmare have questioned the Angadias. Pingale said, "The company, which runs the illegal call centre, has been officially registered in Jaipur. The three main suspects are on the run, and our teams are trying to locate them." Five people — Sarjitsingh Girawatsingh Shekhawat (26), Abhishekh Ajaykumar Pande (29), Shrimay Paresh Shah (31), Laxman Amarsingh Shekhawat (28), and Aron Arumugan Christian (29) -- all residing in Kharadi for about a year, were arrested on May 24. They were from Jhunjhunu in Rajasthan and Ahmedabad in Gujarat. "The call centre was extorting US$30,000 to US$40,000 per day in the form of cryptocurrencies or online gifts. Hence, ED initiated a parallel probe," police said. "The call centre operators diverted these cryptocurrencies and gifts to third-parties who used to encash them. They sent the money to the call centre operators using the services of Angadias," Pingale said. The facility was in operation since July 2024, and the agreement to run it from the hired premises was signed and executed in Jaipur, Rajasthan, police said.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
No compromise on women's dignity: SC tells lawyer who abused judge
The judiciary cannot compromise when it comes to the safety and dignity of women judges, the Supreme Court said on Tuesday, refusing to interfere with the conviction and 18-month jail sentence of a Delhi-based lawyer who verbally abused and threatened a woman judicial officer in court. 'There can be no leniency in ensuring a safe workplace for women judges…Most of the judicial officers in Delhi today are women. They must feel safe at their place of work,' a bench of justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan emphasised. Rejecting an appeal by advocate Sanjay Rathore, the bench added: 'They (women judges) won't be able to function if someone like him gets High Court is right.' The top court's decision comes weeks after the Delhi High Court delivered a scathing verdict, describing Rathore's conduct as 'an assault on justice itself' . The trial court had originally sentenced Rathore to a total of two years' imprisonment for using gendered abuse against a woman magistrate in 2015, but the high court reduced the term to 18 months. Rathore had already undergone six months in jail by the time his appeal was heard in the Supreme Court. His lawyer argued that the incident was a 'spur-of-the-moment' outburst and that further incarceration would be harsh. But the top court remained unmoved. 'Your sentence has already been reduced to 18 months. We can't bring it down. Your matter was duly dealt with by the high court and a strong judgment was issued. We have to ensure the safety of women judicial officers,' the bench said during the hearing. The court also took note of the testimony given under oath by the woman magistrate, who corroborated the charges. 'Look at the kind of language you have used. How will judges work if we entertain your petition?' the bench asked. In its brief order, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and granted Rathore two weeks to surrender. The case dates back to October 2015, when Rathore, aggrieved by an adjournment in his case that was passed in his absence, verbally abused a woman magistrate in Karkardooma court, including using gender-specific slurs. The incident prompted the judicial officer to lodge an FIR at Farsh Bazar police station. In 2023, a trial court found Rathore guilty under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code -- 509 (word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman), 189 (threat of injury to a public servant), and 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of duty) -- and sentenced him to two years in jail. The high court, while upholding the conviction in May 2025, modified the sentence to 18 months. In her May 26 judgment, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the high court minced no words in rejecting Rathore's plea for leniency. She observed that 'the act of outraging the modesty of a judicial officer while she was presiding over court proceedings… attacks the very foundation of judicial decorum and institutional integrity.' Justice Sharma emphasised that Rathore, being an officer of the court, was expected to uphold its dignity, not undermine it. 'This is not merely a case of individual misbehaviour, but a case where injustice was done to justice itself where a judge… became the target of personal attack while discharging her official duties.' The judgment went on to highlight the larger systemic issue: 'Any act that seeks to threaten or intimidate a judge, especially through gender-specific abuse, is an assault on justice itself and must be met with firm accountability. To trivialise such conduct under the garb of emotional outburst or momentary lapse is to reflect a patriarchal mindset — one that struggles to respect women in authority and seeks to normalise the unacceptable. This cannot be permitted. Not in law. Not in court.' Calling the woman magistrate's experience a reflection of 'a mindset where even women in empowered roles are not seen as immune from humiliation or indignity,' the high court warned that no judicial officer, especially women at the district level who form the 'backbone of our justice delivery system,' should ever feel unsupported or unsafe. 'If a woman holding judicial office is made to feel that her authority is conditional on the civility or restraint of others, the very foundation of judicial independence would get shaken,' Justice Sharma wrote.
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
Boy missing since 2015 from Noida traced in Haryana; identified by injury marks, say police
A case of kidnapping was registered under Indian Penal Code Section 363 (punishment for kidnapping) on November 6, 2015, but despite sustained efforts over the years, no leads emerged and the final report was submitted in December 2022, police said. The boy, who was seven when he went missing in 2015 from Gejha village in the Phase-2 area, is now around 17 years old, a Central Noida police officer said. Noida, Jun 11 (PTI) A boy who went missing from Noida nearly a decade ago was traced to Haryana and reunited with his family on Tuesday after police identified him by his old injury marks, officials said. Deputy Commissioner of Police (Central Noida) Shakti Mohan Awasthy said a breakthrough came when Surajkund police in Haryana arrested a man named Mangal Kumar on May 28 in connection with a separate kidnapping case. During interrogation, Kumar revealed that he had abducted another child from Noida and changed his name The Surajkund police informed their counterparts in Noida, but the child's changed name made it difficult for police to immediately identify him. The boy, currently in custody, was questioned by police about his family and childhood. Officers studied records for six continuous hours and eventually linked him to FIR No. 723/2015. He remembered his parents' names but not the address. A mobile number from the FIR, registered in the name of the father's friend, led police to Agra, where the family had since moved. The family came for physical identification and confirmed the child based on a cut on one finger of his right hand and a mark under his left eye, police said. He will be handed over to the family after completing legal procedures and a DNA test for final confirmation, officials added. DCP Awasthy announced a cash reward of Rs 25,000 for the police team for their efforts in the case. PTI COR OZ OZ This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
