Labour-run council plots to seize 11,000 empty homes
Is your council seeking to confiscate your home? Get in touch: money@telegraph.co.uk.
A central London council is plotting to seize control of thousands of empty homes and use them to shelter homeless families.
Labour-run Westminster council has urged the Government to relax rules that allow local authorities to confiscate empty properties from two years to six months.
The power, known as an empty dwelling management order (EDMO), was earmarked for reform by Angela Rayner, the housing secretary, in a policy announcement in December.
Adam Hug, the leader of Westminster council, described the two-year rule as 'extremely limited', and said that the local authority's 11,000 empty properties could be used to tackle the borough's housing crisis.
He said: 'Investment properties in Westminster are nothing new, but we are past the crisis point in a world where this council has just agreed to spend £140m on temporary accommodation to try and contain our housing lists.'
But property experts warned the move was an 'attack' on foreign investors, and would drive down prices in the capital amid an already 'challenging market' triggered by Labour's non-dom reforms.
Britain's 700,000 vacant homes
Approximately a quarter of all residential properties in Westminster are not occupied by full-time by residents, according to the council. This amounts to roughly 34,400 homes.
Once short-term lets, migrant accommodation and other categories of housing are factored in, around 11,000 Westminster properties have been identified by the council as long-term vacant.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
15 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Welfare cuts: SNP accuse Sir Keir Starmer of creating 'two-tier disability system' with U-turn
The UK Government has confirmed it will make major concessions to its benefit reforms after 120 backbenchers threatened to rebel. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Sir Keir Starmer is being accused of 'creating a two-tier disability system' after U-turning on his proposals to cut disability benefits. The UK Government has confirmed it will now make major concessions to its planned benefits reform after over 120 Labour backbenchers threatened to rebel. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This now means those who currently receive personal independence payments or the health element of Universal Credit will continue to do so. Instead, the cuts will only hit future claimants. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer | Eddie Mulholland/Press Association Disability benefits are devolved in Scotland as the adult disability payment, but any cuts at UK level would impact how much cash the Scottish Government gets to pay for this. The government had hoped the cuts would save the Treasury £5 billion a year by 2030. However Scottish MPs say this will create a system where young disabled people are left worse off than older disabled people. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Labour backbencher Brian Leishman MP said: 'This is not 'caving in'. This would be a two-tier welfare programme that would still put people into poverty. 'This is not the society we should try to build. I will not support this.' Stephen Flynn MP, the SNP's Westminster leader, said: 'Keir Starmer is on the brink of creating a two-tier disability system where the young will be treated worse than the old. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'The message from the Labour Party is clear - if you have an accident that causes a disability, develop a disability over time or if you have a child with a disability you will receive less support than those who have come before you. SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn. | House of Commons 'I was a perfectly fit and healthy kid when I collapsed at school before spending 18 years on crutches - to think that a child in the same position now would be treated differently than I was, simply to save the Prime Minister's reputation, is disgusting. 'If these rebels truly care about the cause in the way that they suggest, then they will tell the Prime Minister to think again, again.' The Scottish Greens have also said it is 'astonishing' the Labour government is pushing ahead with 'such cruel and inhuman cuts'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Maggie Chapman MSP said: 'We've seen over the past 11 months of Starmer in Number 10 that he's nothing more than a Tory in Labour clothing. 'We must keep up the pressure to ensure that new claimants get what they need, because these reforms will still hurt thousands of disabled people around the country for generations to come.' This is the third U-turn the Prime Minister has been forced to make in just a month after reversing the government's decisions on cutting winter fuel payments and on a grooming gangs scandal.
The Herald Scotland
19 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Starmer makes U-turn in bid to head off Labour welfare revolt
Some 126 Labour backbenchers had signed an amendment that would halt the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill in its tracks when it faces its first Commons hurdle on July 1. Rebels now believe the concessions on offer, which include protecting personal independence payments (Pip) for all existing claimants, will be enough to win over a majority. Asked on Friday morning whether the Government now expected the Bill to pass, health minister Stephen Kinnock told Times Radio: 'Yes.' The Government's original package had restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, and cut the health-related element of Universal Credit, saying this would save around £5 billion a year by 2030. Now, the changes to Pip eligibility will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only while all existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. The changes represent a major climbdown for the Prime Minister, just days after he insisted to reporters he would 'press on' with the cuts, arguing there was a 'moral case' for them. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall confirmed the U-turn in a letter to MPs late on Thursday night, along with plans for a review of the Pip assessment to be led by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms and 'co-produced' with disabled people. A Number 10 spokesperson said: 'We have listened to MPs who support the principle of reform but are worried about the pace of change for those already supported by the system. 'This package will preserve the social security system for those who need it by putting it on a sustainable footing, provide dignity for those unable to work, supports those who can and reduce anxiety for those currently in the system.' Dame Meg Hillier, one of the leading rebel voices, described the concessions as 'a good deal' involving 'massive changes' to protect vulnerable people and involve disability people in the design of future reforms. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall confirmed the U-turn in a letter to MPs late on Thursday night (Ben Whitley/PA) She said: 'It's encouraging that we have reached what I believe is a workable compromise that will protect disabled people and support people back into work while ensuring the welfare system can be meaningfully reformed.' Not all the rebels have been satisfied with the changes, with several suggesting they would create a 'two-tier system' and raising questions about who would be classified as a new claimant after November 2026. Another told the PA news agency the U-turn would probably be enough to see off the rebellion, but warned that discontent and low morale among the backbenches would 'continue to fester' without a 'wider reset' of relations between Number 10 and the Parliamentary Labour Party. The concessions could also leave Chancellor Rachel Reeves scrambling to fill a hole in her budget come the autumn, with the Institute for Fiscal Studies suggesting they could reduce the projected savings by at least £1.5 billion per year. Ruth Curtice, chief executive of the Resolution Foundation think tank, suggested the changes could cost as much as £3 billion and raised the prospect of further tax rises. On Friday morning, Mr Kinnock declined to be drawn on how that reduction would be covered, saying it was 'very much the Chancellor's job as we move into the budget in the autumn'. He also declined to comment on whether it was fair that two people with the same condition would receive different amounts of money depending on when they started their claim. Mr Kinnock told Times Radio there were 'many different individual circumstances' and it was 'not possible to generalise'. There was a mixed reaction among charities to the prospect of concessions. Learning disability charity Mencap said the news would be a 'huge relief to thousands of people living in fear of what the future holds'. Director of strategy Jackie O'Sullivan said: 'It is the right thing to do and sends a clear message – cutting disability benefits is not a fair way to mend the black hole in the public purse.' The MS Society urged rebels to hold firm and block the Bill, insisting any Government offer to water down the reforms would amount to 'kicking the can down the road and delaying an inevitable disaster'. Charlotte Gill, head of campaigns at the charity, said: 'We urge MPs not to be swayed by these last-ditch attempts to force through a harmful Bill with supposed concessions. 'The only way to avoid a catastrophe today and in the future is to stop the cuts altogether by halting the Bill in its tracks.' The Tories described concessions as 'the latest in a growing list of screeching U-turns' from the Government. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Under pressure from his own MPs, Starmer has made another completely unfunded spending commitment. 'Labour's welfare chaos will cost hardworking taxpayers. We can't afford Labour.'
South Wales Guardian
24 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Starmer makes U-turn in bid to head off Labour welfare revolt
In a late-night climbdown, the Government offered Labour rebels a series of concessions in an effort to head off Sir Keir's first major Commons defeat since coming to power. Some 126 Labour backbenchers had signed an amendment that would halt the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill in its tracks when it faces its first Commons hurdle on July 1. Rebels now believe the concessions on offer, which include protecting personal independence payments (Pip) for all existing claimants, will be enough to win over a majority. Asked on Friday morning whether the Government now expected the Bill to pass, health minister Stephen Kinnock told Times Radio: 'Yes.' The Government's original package had restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, and cut the health-related element of Universal Credit, saying this would save around £5 billion a year by 2030. Now, the changes to Pip eligibility will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only while all existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. The changes represent a major climbdown for the Prime Minister, just days after he insisted to reporters he would 'press on' with the cuts, arguing there was a 'moral case' for them. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall confirmed the U-turn in a letter to MPs late on Thursday night, along with plans for a review of the Pip assessment to be led by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms and 'co-produced' with disabled people. A Number 10 spokesperson said: 'We have listened to MPs who support the principle of reform but are worried about the pace of change for those already supported by the system. 'This package will preserve the social security system for those who need it by putting it on a sustainable footing, provide dignity for those unable to work, supports those who can and reduce anxiety for those currently in the system.' Dame Meg Hillier, one of the leading rebel voices, described the concessions as 'a good deal' involving 'massive changes' to protect vulnerable people and involve disability people in the design of future reforms. She said: 'It's encouraging that we have reached what I believe is a workable compromise that will protect disabled people and support people back into work while ensuring the welfare system can be meaningfully reformed.' Not all the rebels have been satisfied with the changes, with several suggesting they would create a 'two-tier system' and raising questions about who would be classified as a new claimant after November 2026. Another told the PA news agency the U-turn would probably be enough to see off the rebellion, but warned that discontent and low morale among the backbenches would 'continue to fester' without a 'wider reset' of relations between Number 10 and the Parliamentary Labour Party. The concessions could also leave Chancellor Rachel Reeves scrambling to fill a hole in her budget come the autumn, with the Institute for Fiscal Studies suggesting they could reduce the projected savings by at least £1.5 billion per year. Ruth Curtice, chief executive of the Resolution Foundation think tank, suggested the changes could cost as much as £3 billion and raised the prospect of further tax rises. On Friday morning, Mr Kinnock declined to be drawn on how that reduction would be covered, saying it was 'very much the Chancellor's job as we move into the budget in the autumn'. He also declined to comment on whether it was fair that two people with the same condition would receive different amounts of money depending on when they started their claim. Mr Kinnock told Times Radio there were 'many different individual circumstances' and it was 'not possible to generalise'. There was a mixed reaction among charities to the prospect of concessions. Learning disability charity Mencap said the news would be a 'huge relief to thousands of people living in fear of what the future holds'. Director of strategy Jackie O'Sullivan said: 'It is the right thing to do and sends a clear message – cutting disability benefits is not a fair way to mend the black hole in the public purse.' The MS Society urged rebels to hold firm and block the Bill, insisting any Government offer to water down the reforms would amount to 'kicking the can down the road and delaying an inevitable disaster'. Charlotte Gill, head of campaigns at the charity, said: 'We urge MPs not to be swayed by these last-ditch attempts to force through a harmful Bill with supposed concessions. 'The only way to avoid a catastrophe today and in the future is to stop the cuts altogether by halting the Bill in its tracks.' The Tories described concessions as 'the latest in a growing list of screeching U-turns' from the Government. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Under pressure from his own MPs, Starmer has made another completely unfunded spending commitment. 'Labour's welfare chaos will cost hardworking taxpayers. We can't afford Labour.'
