logo
As the Great Lakes warm, researchers say more winter science is crucial

As the Great Lakes warm, researchers say more winter science is crucial

CBC23-05-2025

The climate is changing. Weather patterns are shifting. The globe is warming — and that includes the Great Lakes.
The five interconnected freshwater North American lakes attract significant study in the summer, but they are not such a magnet in the winter — and a group of scientists says that needs to change as air and water temperatures rise, resulting in a shorter winter season.
As it stands, almost all monitoring on the lakes is done during the spring, summer and early fall months when there's easier access to research vessels and equipment like buoys.
But no matter the season, one researcher says it's been her experience that studying the Great Lakes is treated like a second-class science.
"It is a little more complicated to study the Great Lakes because they are so large and they are underfunded compared to the oceans," said Marguerite Xenopoulos, one of the authors of a new report about addressing research gaps and enhancing winter science on the Great Lakes.
The report released earlier in May outlines to Canadian and U.S. governments what a group of environmental scientists say needs to happen next for winter research on the Great Lakes.
An advisory board within the International Joint Commission (IJC) — a binational organization that helps provide science-based advice to governments over transboundary waterways — penned the document after two years of study.
It offers a look at why winter science is needed, and the barriers to it.
"Without winter science, we cannot get a complete picture of Great Lakes water quality. Winter data, especially long-term time series data, is necessary to better understand the impacts of changing winter conditions on the health of the Great Lakes," authors note in part of the IJC report.
Drew Gronewold is an associate professor with the University of Michigan's school for environment and sustainability.
He says winter measurements of the lakes are critical to saving human lives and protecting the ecosystem.
There are some resources devoted to the issue currently: satellite information and the use of underwater temperature readers called thermistors anchored to the bottom of lakes.
But, he says, more year-round monitoring is needed because of "dramatic" changes from January until the summer months.
"A lot of large lakes around the world don't undergo the sort of same seasonal changes in terms of temperature, ice formation, even what we would call heat content — that's like temperature integrated across the depths," said Gronewold.
He points to ice cover in the winter and its impact on evaporation that happens in the spring and summer, saying: "That can then affect how much water levels decline in the following fall."
Referring to it as a "master variable" of the Great Lakes, Xenopoulos, a professor of biology at Trent University and member of the IJC, says ice cover controls a number of factors, such as oxygen in the water.
Less ice can also result in warmer water and the greater chance of low levels of dissolved oxygen, known as hypoxia.
"Of course, fish don't like not [having] any oxygen. This is one of the reasons why we need to keep studying winter and connect it to the summer conditions."
Warmer winters are not only affecting the amount of ice on the lakes, but they're also impacting the amount of water that's flowing in — bringing in more phosphorus, the most bio-available nutrient, she says.
"Although it hasn't been directly linked yet, it could be one reason why we are now seeing more algae blooms on Lake Superior, which is really unexpected," she said. "It's a very pristine lake."
New winter science study
Xenopoulos says it's expensive to capture the Great Lakes' spatial variability and the lakes require a lot of complicated infrastructure — even more so in the wintertime.
"The infrastructure is not necessarily there so we do need ice-breaking capabilities to sample ... It's unsafe, it requires special training."
The heightened danger of winter science is another obstacle in the way of expanding surveillance, said Xenopoulos.
"Some of the early data that we're looking [at] right now that we're going to hopefully publish soon is showing that there [are] more winter drownings than there are summer drownings. And it's because ice maybe looks safe, but it's not. Ice is a beautiful thing, but it's very dangerous."
According to Xenopoulos, over the past five years or so there's also been a surge in winter limnology — the study of lakes and other bodies of fresh water.
"For the longest time we actually thought lakes were dormant in the winter. Life was still or sleeping. I think [partly] for that reason, winter was understudied."
Tracking lake health, climate variation
Mike McKay says winter is the season we know the least about, yet it's the season changing most rapidly.
However, the University of Windsor environmental researcher — who also sat on the IJC's advisory panel for winter science — says there are some examples of winter sampling already taking place, including with the utilization of coast guard icebreakers in the Windsor, Ont., area.
He says that's been going on since 2009 and gives a glimpse into what the lake may look like in the future.
"We get this extreme variability and with those record low ice years which are happening at higher frequency now we're starting to see … a window into what many think will be a future ice-free Lake Erie," McKay told Windsor Morning host Amy Dodge.
When lakes such as Erie don't consistently freeze like they used to, Xenopoulos says it can also result in more moisture in the air, resulting in lake-effect snow.
"This can cause big ice snowfalls. Especially in areas like Buffalo … so there's that to worry about, too."
When lakes freeze over, Gronewold says they also serve as a barrier, protecting the shorelines of coastal communities.
"When there is less ice in the wintertime, when these storms come in, it can greatly exacerbate erosion."
According to Gronewold, the ice cover can also serve as a stabilizer to protect spawning habitats for whitefish and other organisms.
Government science funding
Canadians re-elected a Liberal government in the recent federal election, albeit a minority one, though as of yet it's unclear what, if anything, that could mean for Great Lakes research funding.
On the U.S. side of the Great Lakes, hundreds of weather forecasters and other National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) employees were let go in late February.
McKay says the moves make him concerned about other potential science-related cutbacks from the Trump administration.
"Unfortunately, monitoring surveillance is often one of the first things to be cut when budgets are tight, especially when there's not a big problem, a crisis, that you're dealing with," McKay said.
Gronewold says the science information in the IJC's report largely relies on existing funding through federal agencies.
Xenopoulos says she's trying to remain optimistic about future funding and winter monitoring: "We want to do it and we want to collaborate."
IJC physical scientist Matthew Child is also holding out hope when it comes to longer term progress on winter science.
"Awareness is up," he said. "The project itself is sort of boring, but the intellectual output … Both on the agency and the academic side, the personnel capacity is being developed and I think many of us thought that was quite encouraging."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘A very simple idea' might make a big difference for stroke patients
‘A very simple idea' might make a big difference for stroke patients

CTV News

time3 hours ago

  • CTV News

‘A very simple idea' might make a big difference for stroke patients

A research team at LHSC and Western University has found a new way to identify blood clots which cause strokes. Dr. Luciano Sposato admits that a simple change in procedure may have a significant impact on stroke patients. His research team at London Health Sciences Centre and Western University's Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry has found a new way to identify blood clots responsible for strokes. When a stroke patient arrives at the hospital, time is of the utmost critical. Sposato states a CT scan of the brain is often underway within 10 minutes to determine underlying causes. Frequently a cause is never found, making it difficult to predict future strokes. In 2023, researchers began to wonder if expanding scans further down the body might make a difference. 'We always suspected that clots came from the heart. So, we said, why don't we just go a little bit lower with the acquisition of the images and see if the clots were there?' said Sposato. It turned out they often were. An eight-month study found that clots were hiding in the hearts of a large number of patients. 'We know exactly like that we can increase the detection of parts of the heart by 500%, and we would only need to scan 14 patients to find one clot. So, it is a very high-yield type of detection study,' said Sposato. While the implantation phase of the study will soon begin, policies will take time to change. Sposato told CTV News the research has attracted interest from the US, Europe and Asia. He is hopeful that, in time, it will make a significant difference towards preventing future medical events. 'By preventing future strokes, people will not be as disabled as they might have been, and we can also prevent dementia by reducing brain damage, that 10 years later could cause dementia in these patients as well,' Sposato said.

Canada should invest in its research talent pipeline, says Canadian Institute For Advanced Research president
Canada should invest in its research talent pipeline, says Canadian Institute For Advanced Research president

Globe and Mail

time5 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

Canada should invest in its research talent pipeline, says Canadian Institute For Advanced Research president

Stephen Toope, president of the Canadian Institute For Advanced Research, is a former vice-chancellor of Cambridge University and president of the University of British Columbia. He spoke to The Globe and Mail about the role of CIFAR, which brings people together from a range of disciplines to consider problems on the horizons of research, as a builder of scientific all-star teams. Dr. Toope also discussed the state of research in Canada and the U.S., as President Donald Trump has slashed billions in research funds and attacked several of the most prominent American universities, including Harvard. Q: What do you make of what has been happening between the U.S. government and Harvard? A: It's appalling. And it's not just about Harvard. Billions of dollars of research funding have been removed, arbitrarily, from a whole range of different universities, always for slightly different reasons that don't meet the desires of the U.S. administration. Q: You were invited to Ottawa for the Throne Speech. What are you hearing from the Government of Canada about its plans for research? A: There was a brief mention of research and innovation, rather high level, which was 'to build Canada into the world's leading hub for science and innovation.' That's great. We've also seen the decision to have a minister for artificial intelligence, which suggests a comfort level with trying to deploy new technologies. The proof will be in the pudding. Canada has some catch-up to play here. We have great strengths. We have a lot of solid and sometimes excellent universities. A lot of work needs to be done to make sure that our own ecosystem is strong and supporting research at an adequate level. Q: What does CIFAR do? We create networks of the very top people in the world who are interested in particular subjects. We bring them together across disciplines to try to unlock new approaches, new ideas, that are going to shape the future of research for decades to come. We're focused on some of the hardest questions facing science and humanity in the longer term. We draw the people who are in CIFAR networks from the university world – you might think of them as the all-star team – to work on these really tough questions. Q: How do you do manage an all-star team, and what are the challenges that come with it? The first thing is to conceptualize where we should be expending our resources and what kinds of networks should we bring together. Looking at the horizon and trying to figure out what are the really difficult questions that CIFAR should be looking at now, because they're going to play out importantly in the world over the next 20 to 50 years. That's job one. Job two is talent identification, making sure that we are well connected around the world, so that we know who's doing really exciting work and who has the impulse to work across disciplines collaboratively. Q: Can the world make up for the money being pulled out of U.S. research? No, that's a really important point to make. There's been some talk about how the universities will use some of their endowments, or the foundation world will step up. All of that money is a drop in the bucket, honestly, in relation to what has historically been the U.S. research endeavour. Q: What should Canada be doing in response? What do you think is a wise way to invest? I would start by analyzing where we are before we start inviting lots of new people into the system. Are we actually funding our research at the level that is necessary for a country with an advanced economy? I'm sad to say, I think the answer is no. There was a modest bump up in research funding in the last federal budget of the previous government, but we're still really not operating at the same level of support that many other countries are. We've got to analyze where we should be making core investments to ensure that our whole ecosystem is strong. If we do that, we could then think about some targeted investment to bring in new talent. If I were going to target the investment, I would say early- to mid-career researchers. I wouldn't be going after just two or three big names. Q: Why do you say early-career is better than an established star? Because you've got a longer runway if you can identify truly rising stars, and we've been good at that at CIFAR. If the government could think about a program designed to do that, then you've got people who are more likely to stay. If you invest in a person who's really very far advanced in their career, and then everything switches back with a new government in the U.S., it may be hard to hold on to those people. Q: Tell me about this year's Azrieli scholars, whose names were announced last month? This program is celebrating its 10th anniversary, and it's designed to identify really outstanding young researchers. What we're trying to do is wrap them around with support. So there's financial support to conduct their research, but more importantly there's skills support. How do you set up a lab effectively? How do you manage people? How do you establish priorities and stick with them? We encourage them to be bold, to work across disciplines and to be really ambitious. There are a number of published studies to indicate that despite all of the investment in science, we're actually getting results which are more and more incremental. We want to make sure that the next generation is encouraged to go for the breakthroughs. So we try to identify people from anywhere on the planet, and what they have in common is an aspiration to work across disciplines and a real, bold sensibility. Q: How do you know what a 'bold sensibility' looks like? It's usually around the ambition of the questions they're asking. One of the things CIFAR has been good at historically is pushing people to ask hard questions. Our very first program, 43 years ago, was artificial intelligence, robotics and society. That's pretty darn good in terms of foresight. We're trying to look for people who have that kind of questioning mind. They see an opportunity or challenge that other people haven't noticed yet. This interview has been edited and condensed.

University of Calgary celebrates 75 years of field research, history in Kananaskis Country
University of Calgary celebrates 75 years of field research, history in Kananaskis Country

CTV News

time8 hours ago

  • CTV News

University of Calgary celebrates 75 years of field research, history in Kananaskis Country

A sign marking the entrance to Kananaskis Country in Canmore, Alta., Monday, April 24, 2023. Covering an area of approximately 4,000 km Kananaskis Country was formed by the Alberta Government in 1978 to provide an assortment of land uses. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh KANANASKIS COUNTRY – Eighty kilometres west of Calgary, in the heart of eastern Kananaskis Country, is a remote field research station. What began in 1950 as a couple tents pitched near Sheep River, serving as a base for trout research, is now the Research Base (RB) Miller Station – an internationally known research base that marks the earliest beginnings of the University of Calgary. 'The historians of this university decided to trace back our roots to the creation of that field station. There is something kind of cool to me as a field station person, as an ecologist that [RB Miller] is viewed as the birth of what would then become the UofC,' said Dr. Steven Vamosi, director of the University of Calgary's Biogeoscience Institute. Fast forward 75 years, RB Miller and the Barrier Lake Field Station – built in 1967 – make up the only two field research stations in the foothills of the Canadian Rockies. Operated under the umbrella of the UofC's Biogeoscience Institute (BGI), the research institute is celebrating decades of scientific discovery, mountain research, learning and teaching in K-Country dating back to May 1950. As a research-only facility, the RB Miller station is known as a prime location for the study of large and small mammals, according to Vamosi. The most recent studies out of the station have looked at the behaviours of bighorn sheep and Columbian ground squirrels in the area. As long-term research projects become increasingly uncommon, according to Vamosi, the station's reach goes beyond the Kananaskis Valley, drawing researchers from across Canada and internationally to take part in both short- and long-term projects, some of which have spanned decades. 'We have a really broad reach,' said Vamosi. 'Most of our field courses are based out of Alberta and Saskatchewan, but we also bring in people from Germany, Ontario [and] groups from the States, so it really is an internationally used and recognized facility and program.' University of Calgary celebrates 75 years of field research, history in Kananaskis Country The hiking trail on Yamnuska in Alberta's Bow Valley Wildland Provincial Park, part of Kananaskis Country, is shown in June 2017. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Colette Derworiz (Colette Derworiz/The Canadian Press) Bighorn sheep research out of RB Miller is one of these decade-long projects. With studies dating back to the 50s and continuing today, according to Dr. Kathreen Ruckstuhl, UofC professor and researcher. From humble beginnings in the '50s, BGI has increased focus on environmental science research over the years while also supporting scientific literacy in the broader community. Research still a primary focus, the Barrier Lake Station also functions as a base for education, giving school groups and undergraduate students what is often their first glimpse into mountain research. 'You can take an ecology degree at the UofC and the two weeks you spend at the field station might be one of the only times in those four years that you're really on the land interacting with organisms, plants, animals [and] ID-ing them, hearing their calls, figuring out how you might trap them … so that's really important,' said Vamosi. Along with post-secondary courses, field study programs for junior high and high school students have been offered at the Barrier Lake Station for close to 40 years, giving students access to hands-on experiences while teaching them about surrounding mountain ecosystems. 'The site is really inspiring to young students who maybe this is their first time out doing a little bit of field work or experiencing field work and just connecting them with the natural world. It doesn't have to be in science [but] whatever topic that they're exploring,' said Adrienne Cunnings, field research manager at BGI. The Barrier Lake station has also formed partnerships with several non-profits like The Howl Experience and The Resilience Institute over the years, facilitating programs for young people, climate research and integrating Indigenous ways of knowing in education. Eesha Haris Eesha Haris, left, uses her phone to photograph Upper Kananaskis Lake while attending the Rockies Journey camp run by Howl in Kananaskis, Monday, July 3, 2023. Howl is a nonprofit organization offering unique learning experiences across Canada for youth who don't know what comes next in life. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh (Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian Press) While normally closed to the public, the BGI is opening several walking paths to visitors at the Barrier Lake Station this summer with the introduction of two guided walking tours, according to Cunnings. The first, a scientific walking tour, takes visitors through ongoing research projects conducted out of the station. The second is a historical tour of the area, highlighting the Barrier Lake site's history as a prisoner of war camp during the second World War. The app-guided walking tours will be open to the public as of July 1. By: Leah Pelletier, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Rocky Mountain Outlook The Local Journalism Initiative is funded by the Government of Canada. The position covers Îyârhe (Stoney) Nakoda First Nation and Kananaskis Country.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store