
How did Ukraine manage to sneak 117 drones into Russian territory?
Ukrainian officials have announced what they describe as the most extensive long-range strike operation of the ongoing war with Russia, targeting key military airbases and causing substantial damage to strategic aircraft.
According to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) coordinated a complex attack, dubbed "Spider's Web," involving 117 drones aimed at four Russian airfields. The drones reportedly struck approximately 34 percent of Russia's strategic cruise missile carriers. The president praised the SBU's chief, Vasyl Maliuk, for delivering an 'absolutely brilliant result.'
The daring operation had been under preparation for over 18 months, according to SBU sources. The drones were allegedly smuggled into Russia in stages—first the devices themselves, followed by mobile wooden cabins with remotely operated roofs. Once in place, the drones were hidden inside these modified transport trucks and launched remotely near the targeted airbases.
Zelensky also revealed that the operational command center was located alarmingly close to the regional headquarters of Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB). 'The most interesting thing – and we can already say this publicly – is that the 'office' of our operation on Russian territory was located right next to the FSB of Russia in one of their regions,' he said. He added that all operatives involved in the mission had safely left Russian territory before the attack.
The SBU estimates that the damage inflicted on Russian military assets amounts to approximately USD 7 billion. Among the aircraft reportedly struck were strategic bombers such as the Tu-95 and Tu-22M3, along with A-50 airborne early-warning planes.
The four targeted bases included:
Belaya Airbase in Irkutsk (Siberia)
Olenya Airbase in Murmansk (northwest Russia)
Dyagilevo in Ryazan (central Russia)
Ivanovo Airbase (central Russia)
Footage circulating on social media appeared to show drones being launched from trucks, including one near a gas station. Irkutsk Governor Igor Kobzev confirmed the use of truck-based drone launchers, stating that the area had been secured and there was no ongoing risk to civilians.
Russia's defense ministry acknowledged that military installations in five regions were targeted. While claiming most attacks were repelled, the ministry admitted that "several aircraft caught fire" in Irkutsk and Murmansk, with blazes quickly extinguished and no casualties reported. It also stated that 'some of the participants in the terrorist attacks have been detained.'
Meanwhile, both sides continue to launch strikes. Ukrainian officials reported a separate barrage of 472 drones and multiple ballistic and cruise missiles launched by Russia over the weekend—one of the largest aerial assaults to date. Ukraine claimed it intercepted 385 incoming threats.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Jordan News
15 hours ago
- Jordan News
Calls in Moscow for a 'Proportional Response' to Ukrainian Drone Attack - Jordan News
Calls in Moscow for a 'Proportional Response' to Ukrainian Drone Attack While the Russian Ministry of Defense refrained from commenting on a possible response to Ukraine's largest drone attack on Sunday — which reportedly targeted airports and airbases and caused significant damage to the Russian Air Force, according to Kyiv — voices in Moscow have emerged calling for a 'strong and proportional' retaliation. اضافة اعلان Despite assurances that the assault will not directly impact ongoing negotiations in Istanbul, Russian politicians and parliamentarians have vowed a 'large-scale field response targeting Ukrainian military and security institutions, as well as drone manufacturing centers and the technologies used in the attack.' Meanwhile, the second round of direct talks between Moscow and Kyiv concluded yesterday in Istanbul without any major breakthrough regarding a ceasefire. The Russian delegation stated that both sides agreed to exchange all military prisoners under the age of 25. Moscow also proposed a partial ceasefire for 'two to three days' in specific frontline areas. However, Kyiv remains firm in its demand for a full, unconditional ceasefire. For its part, the Ukrainian delegation reported an agreement to exchange the bodies of 6,000 soldiers from each side and proposed holding a new round of talks between June 20 and 30. —(Agencies)


Al Bawaba
17 hours ago
- Al Bawaba
Video: Ukraine blows up Kerch bridge in Crimea
Published June 3rd, 2025 - 12:29 GMT ALBAWABA - Ukraine has blown up the Kerch bridge in the Crimea region, a video released by Ukraine's Security Service was shared on social media on Tuesday. Kyiv used underwater explosives to carry out the attack. According to the Euro News website, the Kerch bridge was "illegally" constructed by Russia following the unilateral annexation of the Ukrainian peninsula. Media reports revealed that the Kerch bridge in Crimea is considered a main bridge made by Russia after its unilateral annexation of the Ukrainian peninsula back in 2014. Holy shit Ukraine's SBU security service behind the audacious drone attack deep inside Russia now says it has attacked the Kerch bridge in occupied Crimea in a months-long operation. It says SBU agents "mined the supports" of the bridge with 1,100kg of TNT under the water line… — Saint Javelin (@saintjavelin) June 3, 2025 According to Ukrainian media, planning the bridge operation took months. In the official statement on Telegram, the SBU said: "The operation lasted for several months. SBU agents mined the supports of this illegal construction." It added: "Without inflicting any civilian casualties, the first explosive was activated at 4:44 a.m." © 2000 - 2025 Al Bawaba (


Roya News
17 hours ago
- Roya News
Man convicted for Quran burning outside Turkish consulate in London
A 50-year-old man has been convicted of a religiously aggravated offence after burning a copy of the Quran in front of the Turkish consulate in London earlier this year. Hamit Coskun, who traveled from Derby to Knightsbridge, set fire to the Islamic holy book while making offensive remarks about Islam on February 13. The act, which took place outside the consulate on Rutland Gardens, was deemed both inflammatory and hostile by Westminster Magistrates Court. District Judge John McGarva found Coskun guilty of a religiously aggravated public order offence as well as disorderly behaviour, handing down a 240 pound (USD 324) fine and imposing an additional statutory surcharge of 96 pounds (USD 130). In court, Judge McGarva criticized the nature of Coskun's actions, describing them as 'provocative and taunting,' and stated, 'You have a deep-seated hatred of Islam and its followers.' The judge said Coskun's motivations were rooted in personal and familial experiences in Turkey, adding, 'It's not possible to separate your views about the religion from your views about the followers.' He further noted, 'Your actions in burning the Quran where you did were highly provocative, and your actions were accompanied by bad language… motivated at least in part by hatred of followers of the religion.' Coskun, who is of Kurdish and Armenian descent, had argued that his protest was aimed solely at the Turkish government, particularly President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whom he accused of turning Turkey into a haven for "radical Islamists". Prosecutors cited social media posts where Coskun denounced Erdogan's government and voiced concern about alleged moves toward establishing a 'Sharia regime.' Following his conviction, Coskun issued a statement calling the ruling 'an assault on free speech' and warning that it could discourage others from exercising their rights to protest. His legal defense has received backing from both the National Secular Society and the Free Speech Union (FSU), who have vowed to challenge the verdict through every legal channel. An FSU spokesperson said the organization is prepared to take the case to the European Court of Human Rights if necessary, arguing, 'Religious tolerance is an important British value, but it doesn't require non-believers to respect the blasphemy codes of believers.' The case has also drawn attention from political figures. Equalities Minister and Conservative MP Kemi Badenoch took to X, stating, 'De facto blasphemy laws will set this country on the road to ruin. Freedom of belief, and freedom not to believe, are inalienable rights in Britain.' While a spokesperson for the prime minister refrained from commenting on the specific case, they reaffirmed that 'there are no blasphemy laws and no plans to introduce any.' Judge McGarva emphasized in his ruling that the conviction was not an attempt to revive blasphemy laws, which were officially abolished in 2008. He acknowledged that burning a religious book is not inherently unlawful but said the combination of Islamophobic remarks and inflammatory conduct rendered Coskun's actions criminal in this instance. Humanists UK also weighed in, expressing concern about the legal threshold for such prosecutions. A spokesperson stated, 'We must make sure that public order legislation is not used to disproportionately target speech – even offensive speech – on religious matters, thereby chilling legitimate criticism and expression.'