Birmingham residents say rubbish still piling up on some streets
Residents in some parts of Birmingham have said there are still piles of rubbish on their streets, with the city's bin strike in its third month and no sign yet of a deal.Bin workers from the Unite union, who began an all-out strike on 11 March, are in a stand-off with the Labour-run city council over proposed changes to roles and pay.Basmin Khan, who lives on Kenelm Rd in Small Heath, said things had improved since the strike's early weeks but there was "still a lot of rubbish around" and she felt the council was not giving residents detailed updates on the deal negotiations.Birmingham City Council has been contacted for a response.
In a video posted on X on Monday, council leader John Cotton said the authority was working to "clear the backlog of waste" and it had "put a new deal on the table" to end the strikes.A Unite spokesperson said the latest deal had been presented two weeks ago, with the union saying at that time the proposal had been "watered down" from a "ballpark offer" made at conciliation talks.Residents' anger over the strikes disrupted a council meeting on Tuesday, with one man escorted from the public gallery after shouting questions at Cotton.
"The mountain of rubbish was removed but it has accumulated again," Gerry Moynihan, who lives on Colonial Rd in Bordesley Green, told BBC Radio WM.Mr Moynihan said the current pile at the end of his road was due to a combination of fly-tipping, people dumping their recycling in black bags, and some household waste that had not been collected.The council is collecting household waste, partly by using agency workers, but recycling is not being collected during the industrial action.Mr Moynihan added that, once a few people put bin bags down on a street corner, it soon became a hotspot for others to do the same."We get people who drive [past] with cars, see the pile, think it's acceptable, stop their cars and dump their bags," he said.Mr Moynihan said there were piles of rubbish on several roads in Bordesley Green, including Cherrywood Road, Imperial Road, and Grove Cottage Road.
Ms Khan in Small Heath said she still often saw bin bags on her street corner, adding that there had also recently been fly-tipping of larger items including a sofa."This is a walkway for children to get to school," she said, adding that she had reported the fly-tipping via the Fix My Street website, which sends reports on to councils, but it had not yet been cleared after three weeks.
Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Assisted dying bill does 'not meet needs of patients', says Royal College of Psychiatrists
The Royal College of Psychiatrists' lead on assisted dying has told Sky News she is approaching Friday's vote by MPs "with professional trepidation". The medical organisation said the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in its current form did "not meet the needs of patients". It has also expressed concern over the shortage of qualified psychiatrists to take part in assisted dying panels, concerns around capacity assessment, and whether or not assisted dying will be interpreted as a treatment – because that would have a profound impact on the psychiatrist's decision-making process. Friday will be the first time the bill has been voted on in its entirety since last year's yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55. MPs are allowed to have a free vote on the bill, meaning they can decide based on their conscience instead of following party lines. The bill's supporters have said it is coming back to the Commons with better safeguards after more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent on it to date. But opponents claim the process has been rushed and that changes to the bill mean it is weaker than when it was first introduced. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Dr Annabel Price, the lead for the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill at the Royal College of Psychiatrists ( RCPsych), said: "We know that there is a strong association between a wish to hasten death and depression, and that there isn't adequate opportunity within the bill to assess somebody's needs and also to make sure that those needs are met, which might have an impact on their continued wish to want to end their life." The RCPsych was one of the first royal colleges to voice concerns about the bill in its current form. These fears have since been echoed by two more royal colleges, physicians and pathologists. It has provided written evidence to the bill's scrutiny committee, while Dr Price has provided oral evidence. She said the organisation had "actively engaged with parliamentarians throughout the process" and expressed concerns in two public statements. But despite all of this, the concerns raised have not been addressed, it is claimed. This has prompted worries because, under the bill, psychiatrists would have a leading role in assessing a patient's mental capacity when an assisted death has been requested. They would be on a panel alongside doctors, social workers, and a legal expert. The panel would not be expected to meet the patient during the process. Panel role 'doesn't map on to job of psychiatrist' Dr Price said the idea of making a clinical assessment of a patient's mental health ran contrary to everything a psychiatrist had been trained to do. She said: "The panel role doesn't really map on to the professional job and training of a psychiatrist. What psychiatrists are trained to do is the assessment and treatment of mental illness. "The panel role is really to check what the two other doctors have done and whether that patient meets the eligibility criteria. "And if they do, then they must be granted assisted dying. That doesn't really give room to identify meeting an unmet need, like depression for example, but there are lots of things that may be unmet, social difficulties, untreated pain and other physical symptoms, where that person might no longer want to die. "And it doesn't really give room for a psychiatrist to do what they're trained to do and where their expertise lies, which would be essentially a checking role." Clarification call Dr Price said other areas of the bill also needed urgent clarification. She said: "When somebody has a mental illness, our job is to see if we can treat that mental illness. The other area in the bill that hasn't really been addressed is the psychiatrist's responsibility around suicide prevention. "When we meet somebody who wants to end their life, we have a duty to that patient and that duty may involve assessing that patient under the Mental Health Act to try to manage the mental health aspects that may be making them want to die. And there really isn't enough detail as to how we do that, how we square those two roles and duties. That needs more attention." Dr Price added: "The Mental Capacity Act was designed to support people who can't make decisions for themselves to be able to have decisions made in their best interest for them. "There is nothing in the provision of the Mental Capacity Act that talks about a decision to end one's own life, so this is a new decision. "We don't currently have anything that maps on to that clinically and so the Mental Capacity Act, we have stated very clearly, is not sufficient to be a sufficient safeguard in assisted dying and that we need to rethink how capacity is assessed."
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Welfare reform marks moment of compassion, says Kendall amid backbench anger
The introduction of proposed legislation to reform the welfare system 'marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity', the Work and Pensions Secretary has said. Liz Kendall's words come amid a backlash from some Labour MPs who have criticised the 'awful' cuts to welfare – which the Government hopes can save up to £5 billion a year. The reforms – aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work – are set to include the tightening of criteria for personal independence payment (Pip), which is the main disability benefit, as well as a cut to the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC) and delayed access to only those aged 22 and over. Ministers are likely to face a Commons stand-off with backbench Labour MPs over their plans, with dozens of them last month saying the proposals were 'impossible to support'. In what could be seen as an attempt to head off some opposition, the legislation – known as the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill – will give existing claimants a 13-week period of financial support. The Department for Work and Pensions said this will apply to those affected by changes to the Pip daily living component, including those who lose their eligibility to Carers Allowance and the carer's element of UC. But campaigners, including disability equality charity Scope, said the longer transition period, up from an originally expected four weeks, 'will only temporarily delay a cut and disabled people will continue to be living with extra costs when it comes to an end'. Food bank network Trussell said: 'The last-minute details on protections offer something for a small proportion of people, but even they will still see a real-terms cut. 'The reality of this Bill is still record cuts in support for disabled people, and the biggest cuts to social security since 2015.' Contrary to Ms Kendall's words, learning disability charity Mencap accused the Government of having 'confirmed the choice to turn its back on thousands of disabled people and by pushing ahead with these welfare reforms, they are causing a huge amount of anxiety'. Ms Kendall said: 'Our social security system is at a crossroads. Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it. 'This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity. 'This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot – putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth as part of our Plan for Change.' As the Bill was formally introduced to the Commons on Wednesday, and the question asked as to what the next date for debate will be, Labour backbencher and former shadow chancellor John McDonnell could be heard to say 'Never'. A date has not yet been confirmed. Louise Murphy, senior economist at the Resolution Foundation think tank said the longer period of protection for those affected by Pip cuts is 'a sensible tweak that should ease the blow for those who are no longer eligible for support'. But she criticised extra funding for employment support not coming fully into effect until 2029 at the earliest, saying: 'While ministers have softened the stick of welfare cuts, they have not strengthened the carrot of greater employment support.' Sir Keir Starmer said he was 'determined' to ensure the reforms go through because he feels the welfare system 'doesn't work for anyone'. 'It doesn't work for those that want to get back to work, and it certainly doesn't work for the taxpayer,' the Prime Minister told Good Morning Britain, saying 'those that need to be protected should be protected'. 'If you need help in support to get into work, the Government should be providing that support and help to get into work,' he said. 'If you do have conditions, disabilities that mean it is impossible for you to work, then you need to be properly protected and supported.' The latest data, published on Tuesday, showed that more than 3.7 million people in England and Wales are claiming Pip, with teenagers and young adults making up a growing proportion. The figures, published by the Department for Work and Pensions, showed there were a record 3.74 million people in England and Wales claiming Pip as of April this year. The figure is up from 3.69 million in January and a jump of 200,000 from 3.54 million a year earlier. Data for Pip claimants begins in January 2019, when the number stood at 2.05 million. Pip is a benefit aimed at helping with extra living costs if someone has a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability and difficulty doing certain everyday tasks or getting around because of their condition. An impact assessment published alongside Wednesday's Bill introduction, confirmed previously published estimates that changes to Pip entitlement rules could see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year. Ms Kendall previously said there are 1,000 new Pip awards every day – 'the equivalent of adding a city the size of Leicester every single year'. The impact assessment also confirmed a previous estimate that some250,000 more people, including 50,000 children, are likely to fall into relative poverty after housing costs in 2029/2030, although the Government repeated that this does not take into account the potentially positive impact of £1 billion annual funding by then for measures to support people into work. Changes to UC are expected to see an estimated 2.25 million current recipients of the health element impacted, with an average loss of £500 per year. But the Government said around 3.9 million households not on the UC health element are expected to have an average annual gain of £265 from the increase in the standard UC allowance. While all of the Bill applies to England and Wales, only the UC changes apply to Scotland. The Government said there are equivalent provisions to legislate for Northern Ireland included in the Bill.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
SNP ‘slap in the face' to pensioners after scrapping universal winter fuel payment plan
SNP ministers have been accused of delivering a 'slap in the face' to Scottish pensioners after scrapping plans to give them a winter fuel payment. John Swinney, the First Minister, had promised that every pensioner would receive at least £100 regardless of their income, arguing that the benefit should be universal. But the SNP Government announced it had ripped up the plan and only pensioners with income of less than £35,000 would receive help. OAPs with higher incomes will still receive the payment, but will have to hand back the sum via their tax return or PAYE. Less well-off pensioners will get £203.40 if they are aged under 80, and £305.10 if they are older – marginally higher amounts than the £200 and £300 paid in England and Wales. The announcement came only weeks after Mr Swinney argued that the winter fuel payment should be restored to 'all pensioner households'. Speaking ahead of a meeting with Sir Keir Starmer on May 23, he called for a 'national mission' to raise living standards and a 'restoration' of the benefit 'so all pensioners get a payment'. 'Policy abandoned in a heartbeat' Mr Swinney's U-turn means eligibility for the benefit in Scotland is now the same as south of the border, where the UK Government has already announced a £35,000 income threshold. Control over the winter fuel payment, however, is devolved to the Scottish Government, meaning Mr Swinney had the power to introduce a universal benefit instead. More than 720,000 pensioners are expected to receive the payment, but Age Scotland, a charity for the elderly, estimated that 160,000 would miss out. Liz Smith, the Scottish Tories' shadow social security secretary, said: ' The SNP, like Labour, shamefully betrayed pensioners by axing universal winter fuel payments, before being forced into a humiliating climbdown by the public outcry. 'But this latest announcement means that hundreds of thousands of Scots will not have the payment even partially restored – despite John Swinney's promise that they would. This latest slap in the face will not be forgotten or forgiven by the pensioners affected.' Adam Stachura, policy director at Age Scotland, said: 'The policy making on this payment has been guddled, lacked consultation, and politically charged throughout. 'While this is partly to do with the speed of the UK Government's original change and subsequent U-turn, the Scottish Government's repeated commitment to universality and its benefits has been abandoned in a heartbeat.' He also argued that the Scottish payment being £3 or £5 higher than in England was 'pretty meek', as the colder climate north of the border meant energy bills were higher. Shirley-Anne Somerville, the SNP's Social Justice Secretary, said: 'Following careful consideration of the options available, the Scottish Government will mirror the approach taken by the UK Government. We will bring forward regulations to ensure that, from this winter onwards, all pensioners will receive either £203.40 or £305.10 per household, depending on age. 'We are in discussion with the UK Government to extend the proposed arrangements in England and Wales to recover payments from those pensioners with an individual income of more than £35,000 through the tax system. The intention is that the payment will be recovered automatically, and pensioners will not need to register with HMRC for this or take any further action.' UK Government's major U-turn The Treasury has said that the 'vast majority' of pensioners south of the border with income over £35,000 will have the benefit automatically clawed back through PAYE, while a minority will have to fill out a self-assessment tax return. The Labour Government announced last July the introduction of a means-tested cap to the payment for pensioners in England and Wales. This meant that millions of OAPs were no longer eligible. Although control over the benefit is devolved, Mr Swinney argued that he had no choice but to follow suit as the cut led to a £147 million reduction in the SNP Government's funding through the Barnett formula. The payment of between £100 and £300 only went to 130,000 Scottish OAPs in receipt of pension credit and other means-tested benefits last winter – 900,000 fewer than the previous year. Mr Swinney then used the record Budget settlement the SNP Government received from Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, to announce that all pensioners would receive a payment of at least £100 ahead of the winter. In a major U-turn last week, Ms Reeves said OAPs in England and Wales with an income below £35,000 per year would receive a higher sum. The Chancellor announced that households with a pensioner aged under 80 would get £200, while those with someone over 80 would get £300. However, those with an income of more than £35,000 would receive nothing. The announcement prompted Labour to demand that Mr Swinney review his plan to ensure that 'no struggling Scottish pensioners will be left out of pocket'. On Monday, the First Minister announced that Scottish pensioners would be no worse off than their English counterparts but refused to repeat his pledge that everyone would get at least £100.
