logo
Leaders warn mineral race could turn seabed into 'wild west'

Leaders warn mineral race could turn seabed into 'wild west'

Daily Tribune2 days ago

AFP | Nice
World leaders yesterday called for global rules to govern the seabed and warned against racing to exploit the ocean floor in a thinly-veiled rebuke of US President Donald Trump.
G r o w i n g a n x i e t y o v e r Trump's unilateral push to fast-track deep-sea mining in international waters shot to the surface at the opening of the UN Ocean Conference in France.
"I think it's madness to launch predatory economic action that will disrupt the deep seabed, disrupt biodiversity, destroy it and release irrecoverable carbon sinks -- when we know nothing about it," said French President Emmanuel Macron. Imposing a moratorium on seabed mining was "an international necessity", said Macron.
The number of countries opposed to seabed mining rose to 36 on Monday, according to a tally kept by the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition, an umbrella group of non-governmental organisations.
Trump was not among the roughly 60 heads of state and government in Nice but his spectre loomed large as leaders defended the global multilateralism he has spurned.
Of particular concern, his move to sidestep the International Seabed Authority (ISA) and issue permits directly to companies wanting to extract nickel and other metals from waters beyond US jurisdiction.
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva called for "clear action" from the seabed authority to end a "predatory race" to exploit the ocean floor.
"We now see the threat of unilateralism looming over the ocean. We cannot allow what happened to international trade to happen to the sea," he said. The deep sea, Greenland and Antarctica were "not for sale", Macron said in further remarks directed clearly at Trump's expansionist claims.
The ISA, which has jurisdiction over the ocean floor outside national waters, is meeting in July to discuss a global mining code to regulate mining in the ocean depths.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said he supported these negotiations and urged caution as countries navigate these "new waters on seabed mining".
"The deep sea cannot become the wild west," he said, to applause from the plenary floor.
'Wave of hope'
Island nations also spoke out against seabed mining, which scientists warn could result in untold damage to ecosystems largely unexplored by humanity. "Here in Nice, we can feel that the looming threat of deep sea mining, and the recent reckless behaviour of the industry is seen by many states as unacceptable," said Megan Randles from Greenpeace.
Macron said a global pact to protect marine life in international waters beyond national jurisdictions had received enough support to become law and was "a done deal".
The high seas treaty struck in 2023 requires ratifications from 60 signatory countries to enter into force, something France hoped to achieve before Nice.
Macron said the treaty "would be implemented" after roughly 50 nations ratified and 15 others formally committed to joining them. His office said this would happen by the end of the year, but did not name the countries.
"Today's surge of ratifications for the High Seas Treaty is a tidal wave of hope and a huge cause for celebration," Rebecca Hubbard, director of the High Seas Alliance, told AFP.
'Prove you're serious'
On Monday, the United Kingdom announced plans to extend a partial ban on bottom trawling in some of its protected marine areas.
Greece and French Polynesia announced Monday the creation of new protected marine parks, following similar action from Samoa this week.
Just eight percent of global oceans are designated for marine conservation, despite a globally agreed target to achieve 30 percent coverage by 2030.
But even fewer are considered truly protected, as some countries impose next to no rules on what is forbidden in marine zones or lack the finance to enforce any regulations.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Frustrated As Iran 'Much More Aggressive' In Nuclear Negotiations
Trump Frustrated As Iran 'Much More Aggressive' In Nuclear Negotiations

Gulf Insider

time8 hours ago

  • Gulf Insider

Trump Frustrated As Iran 'Much More Aggressive' In Nuclear Negotiations

President Donald Trump said Tuesday in a Fox News interview that Iran is becoming 'much more aggressive' in nuclear negotiations. The day prior, Trump told reporters that the Iranians are 'tough negotiators' and sought to clarify that he would not allow Tehran to enrich uranium on its soil, after some recent contradictory reports suggested the White House had backed off this demand. Washington is awaiting a formal response from the Islamic Republic, which is expected to submit a counter-proposal in the coming days, just ahead of an expected sixth round of indirect talks with the US in Muscat, Oman, slated for Sunday, June 15. 'Iran is acting much differently in negotiations than it did just days ago,' Trump told Bret Baier. 'Much more aggressive. It's surprising to me. It's disappointing, but we are set to meet again tomorrow — we'll see.' And previously, on Monday, the president had this to say: 'They're just asking for things you can't do. They don't want to give up what they have to give up,' Trump told reporters at the White House. ' 'They seek enrichment. We can't have enrichment. We want just the opposite, and so far they're not there. I hate to say that, because the alternative is a very, very dire one.' Iran's Ayatollah just last week made very clear that Tehran won't give up its enrichment program, which it says is only for peaceful nuclear energy purposes. Trump has blasted this position as 'unacceptable' and has warned that Tehran could face bombs if a deal isn't reached. This also as Israel is threatening potential preemptive strike. But Iran has responded by warning that its advanced, long-range missiles could target Israel's secretive nuclear facilities if the Iranians come under attack. Israel has for decades maintained an undeclared nuclear weapons program, which the United States has never formally acknowledged, also with the State Department consistently refusing to answer questions on it. The nuclear arsenal is commonly estimated to be somewhere in the range of 90 to 300 warheads, and it being undeclared means it remains completely outside international oversight. Iran's Ayatollah just last week made very clear that Tehran won't give up its enrichment program, which it says is only for peaceful nuclear energy purposes. Trump has blasted this position as 'unacceptable' and has warned that Tehran could face bombs if a deal isn't reached. This also as Israel is threatening potential preemptive strike. But Iran has responded by warning that its advanced, long-range missiles could target Israel's secretive nuclear facilities if the Iranians come under attack. Israel has for decades maintained an undeclared nuclear weapons program, which the United States has never formally acknowledged, also with the State Department consistently refusing to answer questions on it. The nuclear arsenal is commonly estimated to be somewhere in the range of 90 to 300 warheads, and it being undeclared means it remains completely outside international oversight. ⚡️BREAKINGIran now knows how Israel is getting the names of its nuclear scientistsClassified Israeli documents obtained by Iran's security apparatus show that IAEA (operated by UN) disclosed to Israel the names of Iranian nuclear scientists, who were later assassinated — Iran Observer (@IranObserver0) June 10, 2025 Regional Muslim-majority nations have long called out Western hypocrisy on the issue. Iran's nuclear energy program has been tightly monitored under the prior Obama JCPOA nuclear deal, and current talks with Washington aim to reestablish a similar monitoring regimen. It was Trump himself who unilaterally pulled the US out of that deal in April 2018 – and this is a big reason why Tehran doesn't trust this current administration.

World Cup 2026 host cities say fans ‘welcome'
World Cup 2026 host cities say fans ‘welcome'

Daily Tribune

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Tribune

World Cup 2026 host cities say fans ‘welcome'

AFP | Miami American World Cup host city officials assured Monday that overseas fans would be welcome at next year's tournament in the United States, Canada and Mexico despite 'uncertainty' amid ongoing concerns over visas, border controls and social unrest. In a briefing in New York that came just over a year from the opening game of the tournament on June 11, 2026, officials said President Donald Trump's administration remained 'extremely supportive' of the World Cup. Since returning to power, Trump has started a global trade war, threatened to annex Canada and launched a border crackdown that has led to harsh treatment of foreign visitors attempting to enter the United States. Trump's immigration offensive has in turn led to civil unrest, with clashes in Los Angeles over the weekend triggered by large-scale raids last week. Eleven American cities will host the bulk of the games at next year's World Cup, which is being co-hosted by three nations for the first time and has been expanded to include 48 teams. Executives from the local organising committees for the 11 US World Cup venues gathered in New York on Monday to brief on logistical aspects of the tournament, including transportation, stadium access, fan zones as well as general access to the United States. 'For each of our cities, we want to be prepared to make any person that is coming and makes the decision to come to the United States or come to this World Cup feel that they are welcome,' said Meg Kane, head of the Philadelphia organising committee. 'Extremely supportive' Kane said while officials were planning 'within uncertainty' due to matters taking place at national and international level, the Trump administration was firmly behind the tournament. 'We do not play a role necessarily in what is happening in terms of the decisions that are made,' Kane said. 'What we can say is that the current administration -- while there are certain situations that we are monitoring closely -- has been extremely supportive of FIFA World Cup.' Alex Lasry, the chief executive of the New York/New Jersey World Cup committee said officials were bracing for 'millions' of fans inside and outside the stadiums irrespective of the political climate. 'I think sports transcends geopolitics,' Lasry told AFP. 'I think we've seen that for Olympics. We've seen it for other World Cups, in Qatar or Russia. 'People want to come to these mega sporting events, and they're going to travel to ensure that they're able to cheer on and see their team play. 'Our job as a host committee is to make sure that we are putting on an event and making sure that our city and our region is ready to welcome everyone who's able to come to the World Cup,' added Lasry, who was previously an assistant secretary for tourism in President Joe Biden's government. Los Angeles World Cup committee vice-president Jason Krutzsch said organisers were working to ensure fans 'understand that they are welcome in Los Angeles and will have an amazing World Cup experience.'

Trump Travel Ban, Restrictions Go Into Effect On 19 Nations
Trump Travel Ban, Restrictions Go Into Effect On 19 Nations

Gulf Insider

time17 hours ago

  • Gulf Insider

Trump Travel Ban, Restrictions Go Into Effect On 19 Nations

A travel ban signed by President Donald Trump has gone into effect, barring nationals from 12 countries from entering the United States and restricting entry by nationals from seven others. The ban, instituted through a presidential proclamation rather than an executive order, went into effect at 12:01 a.m. ET on June 9. As a proclamation, it isn't legally binding but signals a shift in federal policy.A total of 12 countries face complete bans under the proclamation, including Afghanistan, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Burma (also known as Myanmar), the Republic of the Congo, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. People from these nations are barred from entering the United States for immigration or other reasons. The seven countries that the president partially restricted travel from are Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Trump suspended the entry of individuals from those seven countries 'as immigrants, and as nonimmigrants,' on B-1, B-2, B-1/B-2, F, M, and J visas, according to the directive. Those who are already in the country from these nations with a valid visa will be permitted to remain. Trump tied the proclamation to national security and public safety. In a video on social media, Trump linked the new ban to the June 1 terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The suspect in that attack, Mohammed Sabry Soliman, was an Egyptian national who overstayed his visa, according to the Department of Homeland Security. 'It is the policy of the United States to protect its citizens from terrorist attacks and other national security or public-safety threats,' Trump's order reads. 'Screening and vetting protocols and procedures associated with visa adjudications and other immigration processes play a critical role in implementing that policy.' He tied the Afghanistan ban to the Taliban's current control of the nation, the Iran ban to the Islamic state's status as a 'state sponsor of terrorism' and noncooperation with the United States, and Somalia's to the nation's internal terrorism issues. The proclamation also mentions the significant influx of illegal immigrants from Haiti. 'This influx harms American communities by creating acute risks of increased overstay rates, establishment of criminal networks, and other national security threats,' the proclamation reads. Others were tied to noncooperation by foreign governments, including not accepting deported foreign nationals. For example, according to the White House, Chad had visa overstay rates of 37 percent, 49 percent, and 55 percent, depending on the type of visa, in 2022 and 2023. 'The high visa overstay rate for 2022 and 2023 is unacceptable and indicates a blatant disregard for United States immigration laws,' the directive said. The travel ban results from a Jan. 20 executive order that Trump issued requiring the departments of State and Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to compile a report on 'hostile attitudes' toward the United States and whether entry from certain countries represented a national security risk. The order met with criticism from some international and immigrant groups, including the International Refugee Assistance Project. In a statement, the group said that the ban 'weaponizes and distorts immigration laws to target people that the president dislikes and disagrees with' and would create 'chaos.' The African Union Commission also expressed concerns about the 'potential negative impact' of the move. 'The African Union Commission respectfully calls upon the U.S. administration to consider adopting a more consultative approach and to engage in constructive dialogue with the countries concerned,' the commission said in a statement. Also read: Trump Orders Additional 2,000 National Guardsmen To LA As Riots Continue

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store