
Chicago may be ‘the place quarterbacks go to die,' but Cubs pitcher Cade Horton is thriving
Cade Horton did not cross paths with Caleb Williams at the University of Oklahoma, where the future Chicago Cubs pitcher was once recruited by the football program and as a two-way baseball player. Horton, though, did hear the recent buzz about Da Bears, how Williams' father is quoted in a forthcoming book saying, 'Chicago is the place quarterbacks go to die.'
Advertisement
Sitting at his Wrigley Field locker the other day, Horton laughed and understood the reference. Williams starred for the Sooners in 2021, the same year that Horton underwent Tommy John surgery and missed the entire baseball season. Williams then transferred to USC and won the 2022 Heisman Trophy, months after Horton led Oklahoma to the championship round of the College World Series, emerging as the No. 7 pick in the Major League Baseball Draft.
How about Chicago for a pitching prospect? 'It is a really good environment,' Horton said. Indeed, the Cubs have made so much progress in several areas that the point is no longer up for debate.
Before and after Horton made his major-league debut in New York last month, established pitchers such as Jameson Taillon and Justin Steele sent him text messages offering encouragement and support. Once acclimated, Horton observed how players follow their routines and listened to teammates share perspectives from their introductions to The Show.
Cubs players enjoy talking ball and studying the little details within the game. This is not a clubhouse of 26 guys, 26 Ubers, to paraphrase Peter Gammons. The atmosphere is conducive to playing without the fear of making mistakes.
Just throw strikes and Gold Glove defenders will run all over the field to make plays. When MVP candidates are stacked in the everyday lineup, giving up a couple of runs in the early innings isn't crushing. By early June, the Cubs had already notched 17 comeback victories and 12 wins that saw the offense score double-digit runs.
'If you're a young starter,' Taillon said, 'it does feel like a great spot.'
Cubs manager Craig Counsell developed a strong reputation for handling young pitchers with the Milwaukee Brewers, taking a careful, open-minded approach that helped Corbin Burnes and Josh Hader land huge contracts as free agents. Tommy Hottovy, the longtime Cubs pitching coach, was a key behind-the-scenes coordinator for the 2016 World Series team. Hottovy later became an important figure in the merger of the organization's major- and minor-league pitching groups into a more unified program.
The Cubs are 5-0 in Horton's five outings since he was promoted from Triple-A Iowa to replace All-Star pitcher Shota Imanaga, who remains on the injured list with a strained left hamstring. In order to keep playing into October, maintaining enough pitching depth is essential.
Cade Horton has appeared in 5 games this season. The Cubs have won all of them.
✅NYM✅CWS✅MIA✅COL✅WSH pic.twitter.com/8Ckf2hksOF
— Chief Cub (@ChiefCub) June 4, 2025
While president of baseball operations Jed Hoyer would always be reluctant to give up the organization's highest-drafted pitcher in a generation, trading Horton ahead of the July 31 deadline becomes virtually impossible when he's a fully functional part of a first-place team.
Counsell, a straight shooter who does not speak in hyperbole, gave Horton one of his highest compliments, describing the traits of a 'clear-headed competitor' who can put maximum focus on the moment, and then honestly assess each performance, separating the good from the bad.
Advertisement
'He wants to be great,' Counsell said. 'Despite being this highly thought of prospect, he went through some big adversity last year. And I think that's a good thing. Growth comes from those places. But he's still new at this job — being a professional baseball player. You have to realize that and acknowledge that. In the long run, that's a good thing for us. There's a lot of room for growth left here.'
That will come through repetition. Horton already has a solid foundation of athleticism and ability, but last year was largely a wasted season. The pain and discomfort he felt around his right shoulder due to a subscapularis muscle strain limited him to only 34 1/3 innings in the minors last season. The Cubs, however, are not putting a hard cap on his innings this year, believing that they can use data and insights from different departments to make collaborative decisions as the season unfolds.
So far, Horton has covered 25 2/3 innings for the Cubs, posting three wins, a 4.21 ERA and only five walks against 108 major-league batters. It is a small sample, but it is also impressive given the gaps in his experience. The Cubs can afford to be patient.
'It's all about just slowing the game down and taking it one pitch at a time,' Horton said. 'It's just like anything else you do. The more you do it, the more comfortable you're going to feel. It comes from the preparation I put in. My bullpens, my routine, that's what gives me confidence to go out there and pitch.'
Unless a 'Hard Knocks' camera crew gets access to the building, those types of moments are difficult to capture and appreciate. Ultimately, the Cubs, Bears and every other professional franchise will be judged by their record. But perception often matters, and players can tell when things are headed in the right direction.
'There's a winning culture,' Horton said. 'Everybody in here is pulling for each other. It's a special group.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI Can't Replace Education
Credit - Tingting Ji—Getty Images As commencement ceremonies celebrate the promise of a new generation of graduates, one question looms: will AI make their education pointless? Many CEOs think so. They describe a future where AI will replace engineers, doctors, and teachers. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently predicted AI will replace mid-level engineers who write the company's computer code. NVIDIA's Jensen Huang has even declared coding itself obsolete. While Bill Gates admits the breakneck pace of AI development is 'profound and even a little bit scary,' he celebrates how it could make elite knowledge universally accessible. He, too, foresees a world where AI replaces coders, doctors, and teachers, offering free high-quality medical advice and tutoring. Despite the hype, AI cannot 'think' for itself or act without humans—for now. Indeed, whether AI enhances learning or undermines understanding hinges on a crucial decision: Will we allow AI to just predict patterns? Or will we require it to explain, justify, and stay grounded in the laws of our world? AI needs human judgment, not just to supervise its output but also to embed scientific guardrails that give it direction, grounding, and interpretability. Physicist Alan Sokal recently compared AI chatbots to a moderately good student taking an oral exam. 'When they know the answer, they'll tell it to you, and when they don't know the answer they're really good at bullsh*tting,' he said at an event at the University of Pennsylvania. So, unless a user knows a lot about a given subject, according to Sokal, one might not catch a 'bullsh*tting' chatbot. That, to me, perfectly captures AI's so-called 'knowledge.' It mimics understanding by predicting word sequences but lacks the conceptual grounding. That's why 'creative' AI systems struggle to distinguish real from fake, and debates have emerged about whether large language models truly grasp cultural nuance. When teachers worry that AI tutors may hinder students' critical thinking, or doctors fear algorithmic misdiagnosis, they identify the same flaw: machine learning is brilliant at pattern recognition, but lacks the deep knowledge born of systematic, cumulative human experience and the scientific method. That is where a growing movement in AI offers a path forward. It focuses on embedding human knowledge directly into how machines learn. PINNs (Physics-Informed Neural Networks) and MINNs (Mechanistically Informed Neural Networks) are examples. The names might sound technical, but the idea is simple: AI gets better when it follows the rules, whether they are laws of physics, biological systems, or social dynamics. That means we still need humans not just to use knowledge, but to create it. AI works best when it learns from us. I see this in my own work with MINNs. Instead of letting an algorithm guess what works based on past data, we program it to follow established scientific principles. Take a local family lavender farm in Indiana. For this kind of business, blooming time is everything. Harvesting too early or late reduces essential oil potency, hurting quality and profits. An AI may waste time combing through irrelevant patterns. However, a MINN starts with plant biology. It uses equations linking heat, light, frost, and water to blooming to make timely and financially meaningful predictions. But it only works when it knows how the physical, chemical, and biological world works. That knowledge comes from science, which humans develop. Imagine applying this approach to cancer detection: breast tumors emit heat from increased blood flow and metabolism, and predictive AI could analyze thousands of thermal images to identify tumors based solely on data patterns. However, a MINN, like the one recently developed by researchers at the Rochester Institute of Technology, uses body-surface temperature data and embeds bioheat transfer laws directly into the model. That means, instead of guessing, it understands how heat moves through the body, allowing it to identify what's wrong, what's causing it, why, and precisely where it is by utilizing the physics of heat flow through tissue. In one case, a MINN predicted a tumor's location and size within a few millimeters, grounded entirely in how cancer disrupts the body's heat signature. The takeaway is simple: humans are still essential. As AI becomes sophisticated, our role is not disappearing. It is shifting. Humans need to 'call bullsh*t' when an algorithm produces something bizarre, biased, or wrong. That isn't just a weakness of AI. It is humans' greatest strength. It means our knowledge also needs to grow so we can steer the technology, keep it in check, ensure it does what we think it does, and help people in the process. The real threat isn't that AI is getting smarter. It is that we might stop using our intelligence. If we treat AI as an oracle, we risk forgetting how to question, reason, and recognize when something doesn't make sense. Fortunately, the future doesn't have to play out like this. We can build systems that are transparent, interpretable, and grounded in the accumulated human knowledge of science, ethics, and culture. Policymakers can fund research into interpretable AI. Universities can train students who blend domain knowledge with technical skills. Developers can adopt frameworks like MINNs and PINNs that require models to stay true to reality. And all of us—users, voters, citizens—can demand that AI serve science and objective truth, not just correlations. After more than a decade of teaching university-level statistics and scientific modeling, I now focus on helping students understand how algorithms work 'under the hood' by learning the systems themselves, rather than using them by rote. The goal is to raise literacy across the interconnected languages of math, science, and coding. This approach is necessary today. We don't need more users clicking 'generate' on black-box models. We need people who can understand the AI's logic, its code and math, and catch its 'bullsh*t.' AI will not make education irrelevant or replace humans. But we might replace ourselves if we forget how to think independently, and why science and deep understanding matter. The choice is not whether to reject or embrace AI. It's whether we'll stay educated and smart enough to guide it. Contact us at letters@
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Letters to Sports: Dodgers must figure out their injured pitcher problem
Injured Dodgers pitcher Tyler Glasnow throws in the outfield at Dodger Stadium before a game against the New York Mets on June 4. (Gina Ferazzi/Los Angeles Times) The Dodgers now have 15 pitchers on the injured list. This team, with all of its talent, is going nowhere without frontline pitching. Andrew Friedman realized this when he emptied Fort Knox during the offseason. But, like previous seasons, they are dropping like flies, with shoulder and forearm issues. Other MLB teams don't seem to have these issues, at least not to this degree. Advertisement At what point do we begin to look at the training staff, starting with pitching coach Mark Prior? What is it that he's asking (and teaching) these guys to do with their arms, to get that extra 'something' out of them? Too often that extra something becomes nothing at all. Rodger Howard Westlake Village The underperforming, injury-plagued — and very well-paid — Dodger pitching staff illustrates the true financial advantage of big-market teams willing and able to spend. Yes, the Dodgers can afford to sign and pay frontline players, but, just as important, they can also afford to set aside or simply eat the contracts of those expensive players if they become hurt or ineffective, and replace them with additional highly (over)paid players. It's almost a lock that, if their staff isn't healthier and more reliable come August, the Dodgers will probably trade for pitching help and take on even more salary. Small-market teams such as the Reds, Guardians and Pirates can't sign many top-tier players in the first place, let alone replace them if they don't pan out. John Merryman Redondo Beach Instead of spending hundreds of millions on pitchers to sit on the injury list for the majority of every year, I recommend the Dodgers instead allocate those funds to put nine All-Star offensive players in the lineup. Then just do what the team always winds up doing anyway — rely on inexpensive, lower-tier and journeyman pitchers for the season. Advertisement Jerry Leibowitz Culver City Time to say goodbye It's about time that the Dodgers separate from Clayton Kershaw. Yes he has been with them forever, and was very good. But that was then, not now. The Dodgers separated from Chris Taylor, and Austin Barnes, long-term team members, now it's time to do the same with Kershaw. Deborah R. Ishida Beverly Hills Dear Clayton, It's time to say goodbye. Injuries have taken their toll. Don't ruin what has been a first-ballot Hall of Fame career by performing at a level that is a shadow of yourself. It's been a great run, but you are hurting the team. Announce that you're leaving so the fans can give you the send-off you deserve. Please don't hang around and make us watch you continue to pad the worst stats of your career. Advertisement Geno Apicella Placentia At 37 and having pitched more than 3,000 innings, there's no doubt Clayton Kershaw still has the smarts if not the scintillating fastball of days gone by to help the Dodgers race toward another World Series appearance. Manager Dave Roberts says he trusts him to keep taking the mound, and so do I. Like the headline reads, 'History says don't count out Kershaw.' Marty Zweben Palos Verdes Estates Max retention While we all lament and understand the need to move on from fan favorites, thank goodness the Dodgers resisted the urge to go the youth route with Max Muncy. And it's not his glasses. Have you seen his swing of late? Probably not — it's too fast for the naked eye. Advertisement Robert Gary Westlake Village Too much Ohtani praise? Look, I get it. Ohtani is great. Amazing. Remarkable. Fill-in-the-blank with any superlative. But it seems like every week Dylan Hernández writes the exact same column, praising Ohtani for his greatness and saying how important he is to the Dodgers. And it was the same when he was on the Angels. Everyone knows that. I'd like to see Dylan mix it up with his critique and commentary a bit more. Greg Wagner Huntington Beach It looks like "Plaschkeitis" has spread to another LAT sportswriter. In his report of the Dodgers' 18-2 win over the Yankees, Jack Harris writes, "It was a statement, a reminder and a warning all wrapped into one." It was also just one game, and 24 hours later, the Dodgers lost to the Yankees. Advertisement Try to hold it down fellas; you're giving everybody whiplash. Ralph Martinez Arcadia Don't run from rivalry An easier path to the playoffs is no reason to cancel the most storied intersectional rivalry in sports. If USC cannot defeat Notre Dame, USC does not belong in the playoffs. Recruit and coach a team to beat them. Don't look for a way to claim success by running away from them. Jay McConnell Los Angeles USC football coach Lincoln Riley makes excuses why his team can't or won't play Notre Dame. I think the truth is he's scared to play Notre Dame because he feels overmatched. USC lost to Notre Dame in 2023 and 2024, and Riley can't handle another loss. Advertisement Neil Snow Manhattan Beach Verdict on Bauer There are two subjects I hope never to read about again in The Times' Sports section: 1. The 2017 Houston Astros.* 2. Trevor Bauer. Jim Lawson Santa Barbara Night terrors Got an unused night light? Send it to Mookie Betts. Mike Eberts Los Feliz The Los Angeles Times welcomes expressions of all views. Letters should be brief and become the property of The Times. They may be edited and republished in any format. Each must include a valid mailing address and telephone number. Pseudonyms will not be used. Email: sports@ Get the best, most interesting and strangest stories of the day from the L.A. sports scene and beyond from our newsletter The Sports Report. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cantor Says These 2 SaaS Stocks Are Top Picks as AI Rewrites the Software Playbook
AI and cloud services have already made their mark on the tech landscape, and the next iteration is taking shape: artificial intelligence software as a service, or AI SaaS. Simply put, it refers to the use of cloud technology to deliver advanced AI tools while minimizing cost and resource demands for end users. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter The cloud can already reach a wide range of customers, users who require high-end computing but can't support the infrastructure themselves. Adding AI to the mix will put advanced functions – think machine learning and natural language processing – into the cloud's toolbox. From a user perspective, putting AI tools into the subscription-based SaaS model will also give advantages in flexibility and scalability. The opportunity here is substantial. According to Zion Market Research, last year, the AI SaaS market was estimated to be worth $115.22 billion – and it's predicted to see a CAGR of 38% or more over the next decade, to reach $2.97 trillion by 2034. Covering the AI/SaaS segment from Cantor, analyst Matthew VanVliet sees major upside in this space – and in the stocks poised to benefit. 'We believe there is ample upside for the group ahead, as AI represents a much greater catalyst than anything in the past couple of years, more significant and sustainable than pandemic-era work-from-anywhere investments. Our view is the opportunity for growth to re-accelerate points to upside for the AI winners, unlocking multiple expansion if this plays out as we are expecting,' VanVliet opined. Building on that bullish outlook, the analyst has singled out two top picks he believes are especially well-positioned to ride this next wave of AI-driven growth – a view echoed by the broader analyst community. According to the TipRanks database, both stocks carry Strong Buy consensus ratings from the Street. Let's take a closer look. Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO) The first company we'll look at here is Klaviyo, a software firm that brings CRM (customer relationship management) to the B2C world. The company fields a proprietary data platform with AI insights, to give its customers effective marketing automation, data analysis, and customer service. The aim here is personalized service – Klaviyo's customers can use the company's software packages to improve their own customers' interactions: customer profiles, omnichannel campaigns, web forms, and more. Klaviyo has built its operations and reputation on the quality of its data-based services – which positioned the company well to integrate AI into its offerings. The company's email and SMS marketing services already make use of AI tech to smooth out customization and targeting, to automate content generation, and to optimize send times. Klaviyo's clean data library is a key support for the AI services. Strong services have allowed this company to build a solid customer base. In its last financial release, Klaviyo defined a customer as 'a distinct paid subscription to our platform;' by that definition, the company stated that it had over 169,000 customers as of this past March 31. Within that customer base, the number of large customers – defined as those generating more than $50,000 in annual recurring revenue (ARR) came to 3,030, up 40% year-over-year. In addition to building a strong customer base, Klaviyo's 1Q25 financial release also showed quarterly revenue of $279.8 million, up 33% year-over-year and $11.89 million ahead of the forecasts. The company ran a net loss in the quarter, of 5 cents per share, but that was one cent per share better than had been anticipated. Turning to Cantor's VanVliet, we find the analyst upbeat on Klaviyo, citing the company's strong position and its large total addressable markets and potential for growth. He writes of the stock, 'KVYO's core ecommerce/retail SAM is ~$16b, with a clear eye to more of the market as the platform expands, uptake of its CRM increases, such that it becomes a true system of record, and AI broadens its reach. KVYO's TAM also keeps expanding as it moves upmarket and diversifies across new industries and geographies. Within the US, it sizes the TAM at $34b and the global opportunity at $68b. At $1b+ of revenue today, KVYO's penetration remains low, providing it a long runway of potential future growth.' VanVliet's comments back up his Overweight (i.e., Buy) rating here, and his $48 price target implies a potential gain of 41% for the shares in the year ahead. (To watch VanVliet's track record, click here) The Strong Buy consensus rating on KVYO shares is based on 18 recent Wall Street recommendations, which break down to 15 Buys and 3 Holds. The stock's $33.95 current trading price and $43.41 average target together suggest a one-year upside of 28%. (See KVYO stock forecast) HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) Next on our list of Cantor's Top Picks is HubSpot, the well-known marketing software platform. The company has a reputation for innovation and has developed a solid stable of marketing software packages offered through a unified platform. HubSpot's software solves problems and smooths out processes in CRM, content management, social media management, and SEO – in fact, in pretty much any area of online direct marketing, inbound sales, and customer service. HubSpot introduced its Breeze AI toolkit last year as an AI enhancement of the company's existing services – and as an independent set of AI-powered marketing tools. The company's Breeze Customer Agent is billed as a '24/7 AI concierge,' capable of independently automating features in marketing, sales, and service. The system is designed to act on the human operator's instruction, with the AI agent handling the implementation. HubSpot claims that client teams using the AI agent see a 10% higher close rate on work orders, a 39% faster ticket resolution, and upwards of 50% of customer contact conversations resolved automatically – with the top users reaching 90%. In addition to streamlining marketing outreach, HubSpot also makes AI systems available in the content field. The company's Breeze Content Agent can scale content marketing efforts, create and publish landing pages, and generate search-optimized blog posts – and all in minutes rather than hours. The AI can even handle scripting and voiceover for video content. In its 1Q25 financial report, HubSpot reported what it described as a 'solid start' to the year. The company's customer count as of March 31 was up 19% year-over-year, a growth figure that offset a 4% decline in average subscription revenue per customer. At the top line, HubSpot reported $714.1 million in revenue, up 16% year-over-year and $13.7 million ahead of the pre-release estimates. HubSpot runs a quarterly profit, and in Q1 it realized a non-GAAP EPS of $1.84 – 8 cents better than expected. The company finished Q1 with $2.2 billion in cash and liquid assets on hand. Checking in again with VanVliet and the Cantor view of this CRM firm, we find him impressed by HubSpot's record of success. The analyst says of the company, 'HUBS is one of the few CRM industry players that has successfully moved into adjacent sub-categories (started in Marketing, expanded to Sales, Service, Content, and increasingly Commerce). We think this is a testament to HUBS's mgmt., which we view as best-of-breed. By methodically building the platform breadth and depth, HUBS is now gaining traction upmarket, which is key to sustaining mid-to-high teens growth over the medium term. HUBS is also building a more robust partner network, which is further accelerating upmarket traction.' Looking ahead, and specifically looking at HubSpot's use of AI to chart a new path ahead, the Cantor analyst remains upbeat, adding to his comments above, 'HUBS' organically built platform is well-positioned to leverage AI and strengthen its competitive edge. Breeze AI is already driving higher Content Hub attach rates (tripled y/y in 1Q). Further, we think Breeze will play an important role in unlocking Service Hub traction, which is critical to HUBS' next leg of growth.' Unsurprisingly, VanVliet rates HUBS stock as Overweight (i.e., Buy). His price target, set at $775, indicates room for an upside potential of 28.5% on the one-year horizon. HubSpot has picked up 28 recent analyst recommendations, which include 24 to Buy against just 4 to Hold, for a Strong Buy consensus rating. The stock is selling for $602.61, and its $749.32 average price target implies a potential one-year gain of 24%. (See HUBS stock forecast) To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks' Best Stocks to Buy, a tool that unites all of TipRanks' equity insights. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured analyst. The content is intended to be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment. Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data