Starmer could allow Trump use of British bases to attack Iran, says Harriet Harman
Sir Keir Starmer could end up allowing Donald Trump to use British bases to launch strikes on Iran, Harriet Harman has said.
Speaking to Beth Rigby on the Electoral Dysfunction podcast, Baroness Harman said this was despite the prime minister being part of a generation "shaped" by opposition to the Iraq War.
Baroness Harman was solicitor general when Sir Tony Blair decided to take Britain to war in Iraq alongside the United States in 2003.
She said the decisions made by Sir Tony would be "burning bright" in Sir Keir 's mind.
"He's part of the political generation of the Labour Party that grew up, which was shaped by its opposition to what Tony Blair was doing in relation to Iraq," Baroness Harman said.
"So it would be a massive change for him."
Asked if the UK could end up giving permission for US aircraft to use British military bases on Cyprus and Diego Garcia, but not go any further than that, Baroness Harman said: "Exactly".
Sky News reported on Thursday that Attorney General Richard Hermer has raised questions over whether Israel's actions in Iran are lawful, potentially limiting what support he believes the UK could offer the US.
Baroness Harman said that for Sir Keir, the "rules-based international order is the most important thing".
"If the attorney general says that the government can't do something because it's illegal, it can't do it. So he's in a very crucial position," she added.
But Baroness Harman said it would be difficult for Sir Keir to say "thank you for the trade deal" to Mr Trump and then deny the president use of the airbases.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Taxpayers hand over £8bn more as Reeves's raids kick in
Taxpayers have forked out an extra £8.6bn in just two months as Rachel Reeves' Budget starts to bite, new figures show. Data from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) shows that tax receipts hit £142.8bn for April and May, a rise of more than 6pc compared to the same period last year. Almost £3 in every additional £4 raised came from income tax and National Insurance, alongside increased revenue from capital gains and inheritance tax. Tax expert Rachel Griffin called the increase 'another chapter in the Government's stealth tax strategy', while retirement specialist Stephen Lowe said Labour's 'tax train showed absolutely no signs of running out of steam'. In her maiden Budget in October, the Chancellor raised employers' National Insurance contributions from 13.8pc to 15pc and reduced the salary at which they become due from £9,100 to £5,000. She also retained the Conservatives' plans to freeze income tax thresholds. The moves came despite Labour's manifesto promise not to raise taxes on working people. As a result of the changes, HMRC received an extra £6.1bn in revenue for the two measures over April and May compared to last year, with £3.6bn in additional income tax and another £2.5bn in National Insurance contributions. Ms Griffin, of Quilter, said: 'HMRC's latest figures for May 2025 mark another chapter in the Government's stealth-tax strategy. Despite no new headline tax rises, receipts continue to climb thanks to frozen thresholds and slashed allowances. 'With income tax thresholds still frozen, many workers are paying a larger share of their earnings in tax simply due to modest pay rises, even when those increases fail to match inflation. 'This month's figures also capture the first full month's impact of the April changes to employer National Insurance contributions. While the policy may help shore up the public finances, it could also influence hiring decisions and wage growth in the months ahead.' There was also a £97m increase in inheritance tax receipts. The amount is expected to increase quickly next year after the Chancellor's decision to halve agricultural and business property relief after the first £1m of assets. From April 2027, pensions will also be considered for inheritance tax. Mr Lowe, of Just Group, said: 'The Treasury's inheritance tax revenues continue to surge with this tax train showing absolutely no signs of running out of steam through the first couple of months in this financial year. 'The reforms announced at the autumn Budget, which included further extending the threshold freeze and tightening the exemptions for pension wealth, will likely tip more estates into paying the tax and further boost the Chancellor's coffers.' There was also an increase of £106m in capital gains receipts, which have continued to rise following changes implemented in October last year. The Chancellor increased the lower rate from 10pc to 18pc and the higher rate from 20pc to 24pc for shares and other non-property assets. Richard Bate, of law firm Weightmans, said: 'With inheritance tax thresholds frozen and key reliefs due to be curtailed from 2026, families and business owners are acting early – restructuring their estates while current capital gains tax rates and allowances remain in place. 'But in doing so, many are facing an unwelcome double tax hit – capital gains tax now, followed by potential inheritance tax later if planning isn't carefully managed.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
How deeply would you have to hate Britain to damage our means of defending it?
How deeply would you have to hate Britain to damage our means of defending it? Last night, activists broke into RAF Brize Norton on electric scooters and sprayed red paint into the engines of two Airbus Voyager aircraft that are used to refuel airborne fighter jets. In an additional flick of symbolism, one of the planes bore the Union flag and had previously carried the Royal Family. The answer to my question, of course, is quite a lot. These people detest our country, our values, our traditions, our history, and evidently our national security. Two weeks ago, RAF Typhoons were scrambled to intercept a Russian Su-24 that was buzzing an American logistics vessel in the Baltic Sea. This is the sort of vital, unglamorous, everyday mission that these activists are disrupting. Do they want us to start learning Russian? Or Farsi, or Arabic? What lies behind such moral confusion? It will come as no surprise that these benighted souls belonged to a group called 'Palestine Action', a hyper-radical militant group known for acts of extreme vandalism involving red paint. Ostensibly, they tried to destroy British planes in the name of Gaza. Only it wasn't about Gaza, was it? For one thing, although Sir Keir Starmer has shamefully refused to deploy the RAF to defend Israel's skies, preferring to sit back and watch as a hospital was hit in Beer Sheva and a world-leading cancer research unit was destroyed in Rehovot, he has recently said that our planes may go into action to 'defend allies' and interests in the region, which presumably no longer include Israel. So this is about weighing the scales in favour of Iran, which is an entirely different matter to Gaza. The totalitarian regime in Tehran, which has done nothing to cure cancer by the way, is one of the most malignant on Earth. Its people live under the threat of torture, execution and amputation – I can show you a photograph of Iranian authorities cutting off a man's hand with a circle saw – if they dare to speak their minds, dance in public, eschew the hijab or otherwise break the law, but the Ayatollah is the head of the octopus whose malevolent tentacles grip the region and the world. Iran is the world's biggest state sponsor of terrorism. At rallies, speeches by the supreme leader are greeted by chants of 'death to England' and 'death to America' as well as 'death to Israel'. The driving ideology of the regime is to plunge the globe into apocalyptic war by destroying Israel, thus enabling a mythical Messiah figure called the 'Mahdi' to emerge from invisibility and lead the faithful to victory. This is not mere fantasy. It informs the Ayatollah's foreign policy, and a recent tweet shows that he believes this showdown is happening right now. The true problem, however, is not the activists. It is the hesitancy in the mainstream to condemn them with their whole chests. How much does the public care about the vandalism of RAF planes? Forty-eight per cent of Britons say they would not take up arms to defend our country 'under any circumstances'. We have been taught to demean ourselves for so many decades that society has lost its immune system. This spirit has been successfully connected with antipathy towards Israel. The gratuitous coverage of collateral damage in Gaza, which tragically resembles that of any war, has comprehensively turned people's hearts and minds against the Jewish state, even those who previously supported it. If the same level of attention to civilian suffering had been applied to the far bigger wars in Sudan and Yemen, public sympathies would take a different form. But it is all directed at Gaza. And it's one-sided. When the Israeli hospital was hit – a hospital, guys! Anyone? Anyone? – it received no condemnation by the UN and barely made the news. This is information warfare and the widespread public hostility towards Israel is testament to its success. As a result, many people feel deep down that the thugs from Palestine Action, and those who deface our streets with rallies on Saturday afternoons, are making a point that the country supports, albeit in especially vivid terms. The unconscionable vandalism overnight at RAF Brize Norton should serve as an important reminder that when the keffiyeh slips, the hatred of these activists doesn't stop at the Jews. Israel's success is a consequence of the fact that it has not discarded the spirit that formerly animated the West as a whole. Just like the generation of our grandparents, the Jewish state is unafraid to stand upon its history, identity, culture and values and defend them against those who wish it harm. It is a place of love: love of family, love of country, love of life and humanity. Just like Britain of 1940, these are the principles for which it sends its young men to war. Yes, all conflict is ugly, but the operations in Iran, which have incurred so few civilian casualties, show the extent to which the Jewish state protects the innocent, and the effectiveness of its operations when the enemy is not placing his own people in the line of fire. The gulf that has opened between the Britain of our grandparents and the Britain of today is matched only by the gulf between our country and the Middle East's only democracy. People hate Israel because it has retained those values that they have come to hate in ourselves. I'm only glad that my Jewish grandfather, who fought for our country during the D-Day landings, is no longer alive to see it.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Will British holidaymakers have to pay more than £120 for a passport? Officials say the cost of renewing travel documents should RISE
British holidaymakers could see a major rise in the cost of renewing their passports under plans put forward by government officials. The National Audit Office says that the current £94.50 cost of a new travel document should increase because the Passport Office is losing so much money. The department, which has been credited with reversing a huge backlog of delays in issuing new passports, has racked up a deficit of almost a billion pounds over the past five years, including £223million last year alone. The NAO argued that without increasing the one-off payment made every 10 years taxpayers more generally would have to cover the shortfall. It did not give a figure for the rise but the Telegraph suggested it would have to rise £32 to £126.50 to recoup the lost money. A Home Office spokesperson said there were no 'immediate plans' to increase fees and any changes would almost certainly not come into effect this year. But it would be an additional financial burden for Britons at a time when the cost of living remains high. Gareth Davies, head of the National Audit Office said: 'Government bodies provide important services for the public and businesses, including issuing passports and driving licences, and filing company information. 'But many are not consistently recovering their costs - posing risks to the financial resilience of these services and fairness between users. 'HM Treasury should strengthen how it oversees cost recovery processes and provide more comprehensive guidance to charging bodies.' The cost of renewing passports has already risen significantly in recent years. The department drastically hiked prices for adult passports in February 2023 - from £75.50 to £82.50. Fees then rose again by 7 per cent last year - before an inflation-busting increase of 6.7 per cent in April to the current level for digital renewals. Renewing an adult passport using a paper form already costs £107, while fast track services will get you your passport in a week for £178 or a day for £222. The Home Office previously said the new fees were necessary to ensure the cost of passport operations is met without relying on taxpayer funding. It added that fees help cover passport processing, consular services for lost or stolen passports, and border operations. Nearly seven million new passports were issued last year. Adult passports are valid for ten years, while passports for children are valid for just five. The call for higher passport renewal fees came in a wider report by the National Audit Office into government services. A total £340million shortfall was found across all the services looked at - including UK Visas and Immigration, the Court and Tribunals Service and the Driver & Vehicle Licensing Agency. The National Audit Office's report concluded: 'Many government departments rely on charging fees to recover the costs of providing services to people and businesses. 'But none of the services we looked at recovered costs consistently, and the charges for the services may not accurately reflect the costs.' 'The government is missing opportunities to deliver efficiencies and share good practice,' it added. 'This poses risks to the financial resilience of public services, the costs of which are likely to be borne by future fee payers.'
