logo
BREAKING NEWS Fake millionaire who bragged family were like the British Kardashians admits defrauding his friends and businesses out of £200K with Hermes handbag scam

BREAKING NEWS Fake millionaire who bragged family were like the British Kardashians admits defrauding his friends and businesses out of £200K with Hermes handbag scam

Daily Mail​12 hours ago

A self-proclaimed 'rich kid of Instagram ' who once bragged his family were the 'British Kardashians' is facing jail after being convicted of scamming rich friends and relatives out of almost £200,000.
Jack Watkin posed as a millionaire on social media to persuade people – including his own father - to invest in his fake designer handbag business.
The 26-year-old former public schoolboy promised his victims a share of the profits if they loaned him cash to buy and sell expensive Hermes bags.
But Chester Crown Court heard neither the handbags or any profit ever materialised and instead Watkin used the cash to fund his extravagant lifestyle.
At one stage he spent weeks living at the five-star Dorchester Hotel, in London 's Mayfair, where rooms cost up to £3,000-a-night. Police said his bill topped £136,000 in just six months.
He also paid more than £22,000 to travel around the capital in a chauffeur-driven Rolls Royce and regularly visited Harrods, where he 'scouted' for victims and spent almost £68,000.
Following his arrest, officers also executed warrants on his self-storage 'wardrobe' in Knightsbridge where he kept his extensive collection of designer goods and clothes.
Pony-tailed Watkin went on trial yesterday for fraud but this morning dramatically changed his pleas. He admitted six counts of fraud against six victims between December 2019 and August 2024, totalling more than £195,000.
Another count of fraud and two of theft were ordered to lie on his file.
Today the Mail can reveal that earlier this year Watkin stood trial and was convicted at the same court of child pornography charges, including five counts of making indecent images of children, two counts of possession of indecent images of children, plus one count of possession of a prohibited image of a child and another charge of possession of an extreme pornographic image.
He will be sentenced for both the fraud and child porn charges in September.
Police discovered the child porn on his mobile phone when they seized his device following his arrest for the fraud allegations, in March last year.
Remanding Watkin into custody, Judge Simon Berkson told him a prison sentence was inevitable.
'You have pleaded guilty to a number of charges of fraud, they are serious and involve a significant amount of loss to your victims,' the judge said.
'There is only one sentence that must follow from those guilty pleas, particularly as you have already been found guilty of other serious matters involving indecent images of children.'
Watkin, who also has a previous conviction for drink driving, was featured in the Channel 4 documentary Rich Kids Of Instagram, which first aired in 2016, aged 17.
In the programme, he likened his family to the wealthy US Kardashian dynasty, and bragged about having a fleet of supercars, including a Rolls-Royce, Bentley, Mercedes-Benz, Porsche and Range Rover, worth £1.7m.
He also claimed he regularly flew on his father's private jet, splurged £500,000 on a Bulgari watch and was living in a mansion with a swimming pool in Alderley Edge, one of the exclusive towns and villages made famous as the home of Premier League footballers which is part of Cheshire's exclusive 'golden triangle.'
He told the documentary: 'My life is not easy. My dad has worked very hard to make sure I can have all these nice things. Our private jet doesn't just fly itself; our pool doesn't just clean itself; all my cars don't automatically fill themselves with petrol.'
But earlier this week it became evident that Watkin's privileged upbringing and extravagant lifestyle had dramatically fallen apart.
Police said the catalyst came in 2019 when his parents split up and Watkin was effectively cut off by his property mogul father, Jason Watkin, 55, who disapproved of his extravagant spending.
Prosecutor Matthew Kerruish-Jones told the court that Watkin cooked up the scam, which centred around the high-end French designer brand Hermes and involved promising investors the chance of making a quick profit out of the handbags - but failed to deliver.
The fashion house only allows select customers to buy their exclusive handbags, which often have a higher second-hand resale values than when bought new.
Mr Kerruish-Jones said Watkin persuaded one family friend to invest by claiming he had a 'personal relationship' with the director of Hermes that afforded him special access to their luxury bags.
He also posed as a millionaire on social media to persuade his victims to handover cash.
Opening the trial, Mr Kerruish-Jones said: 'The prosecution allege that this defendant defrauded multiple individuals with the offer of a legitimate business venture to purchase and sell exclusive handbags.
'The defendant put forward the outward façade of a glamorous and luxurious lifestyle. This it seems engendered trust and led a number of individuals to loan him large sums of money on the promise of either a financial return, or luxury items. Neither of which materialised.
'The reality was once he had been provided the money it would not be repaid as agreed, leaving multiple individuals in this case out of pocket for large sums of money. The defendant would make excuses and avoid the complainants, all the while spending large sums of money on maintaining his seemingly lavish lifestyle.'
The court heard that Watkin's defrauded Hannah Jakes, one of his long-time friends, out of more than £98,500, while businesswoman Christine Colbert, who owns a designer boutique, lost £43,800.
Watkin was also accused of stealing a blue Hermes bag, worth £21,000, and a Goyard alligator handbag, worth £8,000 from Ms Colbert's store, Dress Cheshire, in Prestbury, Cheshire.
He also defrauded his own father out of almost £14,000.
The jury heard Watkin's relationship with his father 'soured' around December 2019 when he refused to loan his son £100,000 for his luxury goods business. Watkin also claimed his father was 'unsympathetic' when trading became difficult during the Covid pandemic.
But Mr Kerruish-Jones said: 'Mr Watkin was concerned by the amount of money the defendant appeared to be spending on his social life, despite having no formal employment.'
Another victim was businessman James Irlam, who was introduced to Watkin via his mother-in-law. She was a friend of Watkin's mother, Jo Stringfellow.
Mr Irlam initially bought a Hermes Birkin bag off Watkin for his wife's birthday but subsequently lost around £24,500 after being persuaded to invest in his 'business proposal.'
But when no handbags or any returns on his investment emerged, Mr Irlam began legal proceedings against Watkin.
Barman Andor Farkas, who worked in Harrods, also lost around £14,000 in the scam.
Watkin told Mr Farkas he was a millionaire and, after the pair became friends, promised him a 'financial return' if he allowed him to spend money on his personal credit card.
But, Mr Kerruish-Jones said, Watkin never repaid any of the money back.
The final victim, Naheem Akhtar, was introduced to Watkin via social media.
Mr Akhtar said Watkin gave the 'perception' on social media that he was a millionaire and involved in the fashion industry.
He agreed to transfer £840 to Watkin's bank account for him to source a pair of 'summer walk' shoes by the Italian designer brand Lora Piana. But Mr Akhtar never received the shoes and when he chased Watkin he was met with 'endless excuses including that he was in hospital'.
Watkin was finally caught in March last year when Ms Colbert, who had been repeatedly requesting her money back, lost patience and put a post on Instagram warning the public to stay away from him because 'she had been defrauded.'
Ms Jakes saw the post and got in touch with Ms Colbert. The pair realised they had both been duped and agreed to 'turn Miss Marple' together.
Ms Jakes, who had been friends with Watkin for more than a decade, set up a meeting with him in Alderley Edge. When he arrived she contacted Ms Colbert who in turn called detectives from Cheshire police, who arrived to arrest him.
When questioned Watkin claimed his lifestyle was funded by his mother and a partner, who he refused to name.
He claimed it was his intention to repay Ms Colbert, but he needed more time. He also suggested she owed him cash and Ms Jakes was 'flexible' about the outstanding money he owed.
But when officers began to investigate Watkin's finances they discovered that he had been pawning some of the luxury goods and had been made bankrupt a year earlier.
Detective Constable Gareth Yates said: 'Jack Watkin is a male who has built a lifestyle on social media, on Instagram, and that lifestyle is one of exuberance.
'So, if anyone was to look at that profile, you would see fancy hotels, luxury cars, designer clothing, and he created a following, and that following allowed him to create a ruse to be the fraudster we now know, and convicted fraudster.'
He added: 'He often described himself as the Kardashian of Cheshire. What my understanding from that would be is that he is a an individual of wealth and has the ability to purchase wealthy items. As a result of that he then gets notoriety, from an Instagram perspective, followers, people. People follow him with the desire to be him.'
Senior crown prosecutor Laura Atherton said Watkin was 'incredibly charismatic' and 'persuasive.'
'Some of these frauds span several years, and so clearly, to be able to convince an individual for that length of time that you are going to repay money and you are going to provide goods, you have to be an incredibly charismatic and persuasive person to keep that up,' she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Post Office scandal: Insufficient action on compensation, say MPs
Post Office scandal: Insufficient action on compensation, say MPs

BBC News

time41 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Post Office scandal: Insufficient action on compensation, say MPs

The government has taken "insufficient action" to ensure people entitled to compensation as a result of the Post Office scandal have applied for it, a report has Public Accounts Committee of MPs, which has scrutinised payouts, noted that many of the wrongly-accused or convicted sub-postmasters were yet to receive "fair and timely" committee revealed the government had no current plans to follow up with people eligible for compensation, after just one in five letters sent to sub-postmasters about compensation received a Department for Business and Trade said it had paid out more £1bn in compensation to date. There are four main schemes that sub-postmasters can apply to for compensation, and individual eligibility depends on the circumstances of each 1999 and 2015, more than 900 sub-postmasters were wrongly prosecuted after the faulty Horizon IT system made it look like money was missing from branch sub-postmasters ended up going to prison, while many more were financially ruined and lost their livelihoods. Some died while waiting for scandal has been described as the biggest miscarriage of justice in British legal history, but many victims are still waiting for financial redress, despite government pledges to speed up payouts. The Department for Business and Trade said the PAC report was based on a "period before last year's election".However, the committee said that while the report did scrutinise the annual accounts for the Department for Business and Trade from April 2023 to March 2024, while the Conservatives were in power, the report also reflected the record of the current report includes evidence heard in April this year and reflected some figures as recent as committee said:By March this year, the Post Office, which is owned by the government, had written to 18,500 people, regarding applications for the Horizon Shortfall Scheme (HSS), but the majority had not responded. The Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme (HCRS), which offers 800 eligible people a choice between applying for a £600,000 flat-rate settlement or the option to pursue a "full claim assessment", had received 536 applications by May this year. Of those, 339 had chosen the flat payout sum. The report said the government had yet to receive any full claim assessment applicationsIn relation to the Overturned Convictions Scheme, 25 eligible individuals out of 111 people had not yet submitted a claim. Some 86 had submitted full and final claims, of which 69 had been PAC report said the government had "no plans for following up with people who are, or may be, eligible to claim under the schemes but who have not yet applied".It added the government did not yet have clarity on the value of claims expected through the HSS and HCRS figures showed a total of £1.039bn has been awarded to just over 7,300 sub-postmasters across all the redress Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chair of the committee, said it was "deeply dissatisfactory" to find that the compensation schemes were still moving "far too slowly, with no government plans to track down the majority of potential claimants who may not yet be aware of their proper entitlements"."It is entirely unacceptable that those affected by this scandal, some of whom have had to go through the courts to clear their names, are being forced to relitigate their cases," he committee has made several recommendations to the government with the broad message that every postmaster be made fully aware of the options for claiming Department for Business said: "We will consider the recommendations and work with the Post Office, who have already written to over 24,000 postmasters, to ensure that everyone who may be eligible for redress is given the opportunity to apply for it." Chris Head, who ran a Post Office in West Boldon, South Tyneside, was wrongly accused of stealing £88,000 and when the criminal investigation against him was dropped, the Post Office later launched a civil said the current compensation processes were not working."You have Sir Alan Bates, offered less than 50% of his claim… you have other people on the Overturned Convictions Scheme, who are the worst affected people... not been fully compensated. "How can you tell people to come forward, to make a claim when the worst people affected are not being paid?"The long-running public inquiry into the Post Office scandal, which has examined the treatment of thousands of sub-postmasters and sought to establish who was to blame for the wrongful prosecutions, will publish its final report on 8 July. 'No incentive' to recover fraudulent Covid loans As part of its annual report, which was compiled in April this year, but covers the period from April 2023 to March 2024, the PAC also found that the government's efforts to recover fraud losses incurred through the Bounce Back Loan Scheme introduced to help businesses recover from Covid-induced losses had been "largely unsuccessful".It said it was estimated at least £1.9bn had been lost to fraud through the scheme, with just £130m in payouts from lenders recovered, though it is unconfirmed how much of the amount related to report said the government had been "too passive by placing primary responsibility on lenders to recover losses"."As lenders' losses are 100% underwritten by government, there is no commercial incentive to assist with recovery of taxpayers' money," it added.

Foreign criminals to be deported after serving just 30 per cent of their jail terms to free up space in prisons and save taxpayer millions
Foreign criminals to be deported after serving just 30 per cent of their jail terms to free up space in prisons and save taxpayer millions

Daily Mail​

time44 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Foreign criminals to be deported after serving just 30 per cent of their jail terms to free up space in prisons and save taxpayer millions

Foreign prisoners will be deported after serving just a fraction of their jail sentences to save the taxpayer millions. Labour will today bring forward legislation which will allow overseas offenders to be removed after serving 30 per cent of their sentence, down from the current 50 per cent. It is the first element of a controversial series of sentencing changes to be implemented by the Government in the wake of its review by former Tory minister David Gauke. The move will help create space in the overcrowded jails. It is estimated the move will free up 500 prison spaces a year which cost £54,000 a year on average, meaning the scheme could save up to £27million annually. There are currently more than 10,000 foreign nationals in jail in England and Wales making up 12 per cent of the total. Prisoners eligible for the so-called 'early removal scheme' will also see other discounts under Labour's other sentencing reforms, as reported by the Mail last month, meaning they could be eligible for deportation after serving just 10 per cent of the sentence handed down by a court. Offenders who are deported are also permanently barred from re-entering Britain. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said: 'With prisons close to bursting, I'm clear we shouldn't be giving bed and board to foreign criminals with no right to be here. 'These changes will get more of them on planes out of the country much sooner, saving taxpayers' money and keeping our streets safe as part of our Plan for Change. 'This Government's message is crystal clear - if you come here and break our laws, you'll be sent packing in record time.' The existing early removal scheme came into operation in 2004. It only applies to those serving a 'determinate sentence' – in other words, a specific period of time. Inmates sentenced to life are ineligible. Anyone deported under the scheme is free upon arrival in their home country and is not required to serve any further jail time there. Currently inmates can only be freed 18 months at the earliest before the end of their sentence but this will now be extended to four years. The changes are expected to come into force in September after parliamentary votes. Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick has repeatedly urged Labour to cut the number of foreign offenders in the jails. However, the moves may cause consternation among victims' groups because they will lead to some offenders serving very short sentences before being deported. The proposal came as part of Mr Gauke's review which also set out how killers, rapists and other criminals will be freed from jail earlier. In recommendations already adopted by Labour, it said criminals convicted of serious violence or sex offences could win their freedom after serving half their jail term, rather than at the current three quarters point. The Government's while the Tories dubbed it a 'recipe for a crime wave'.

Woman is charged after toddler's arm ripped open in dog attack outside primary school
Woman is charged after toddler's arm ripped open in dog attack outside primary school

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Woman is charged after toddler's arm ripped open in dog attack outside primary school

A woman has been charged after a toddler's arm was ripped open by a dog which attacked her outside of a primary school. Bunnie, three, was walking home with her father and two siblings last Tuesday when the Cockapoo attacked her outside Miers Court Primary School in Rainham, Kent, at around 3.30pm. Her father Rowen Skinley told KentOnline he had to to hold the skin on her arm together with his hands before people nearby rushed to help. Bunnie was taken to Medway Maritime Hospital in nearby Gillingham before being transferred to St Thomas' Hospital in Westminster, London, the following morning. There, she had several X-rays to ensure the puncture had not hit her bone, before undergoing the reconstructive surgery. Mr Skinley explained: 'She also has a lung condition and really bad asthma so she had to be marked down as a high-risk category for sedation.' Police launched an investigation and have now announced they made an arrest yesterday in connection with the incident. Officers also seized a dog, believed to be a Cockapoo. Tracie Inkpen, 50, from Gillingham, was charged the same day with being in charge of a dog dangerously out of control causing injury. She was later bailed and will appear before Medway Magistrates' Court at a later date. Mr Skinley last week said his daughter is 'doing well now', adding: 'She's just a bit shaken and keeps talking about how scared she is of the dog.' Speaking about the attack, he said: 'It happened parallel to the school on the main road. I was just walking home after the school run. 'The path is quite narrow and a woman was walking her dog on the actual road itself. 'Then, out of nowhere, the dog just lunged for my daughter and pulled her to the floor.' Bystanders rushed over to help: 'People who saw what happened came over and said that my daughter hadn't even put her hand out to the dog.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store