‘No Kings' protest set for Saturday at Toomer's Corner in Auburn
AUBURN, Ala. (WRBL) —A peaceful protest is planned for this Saturday, June 14, from 4 to 6 p.m. at Toomer's Corner, as part of a national day of action dubbed 'No Kings.'
The nationwide protest counters President Donald Trump's military parade in Washington, D.C. The demonstrations coincide with Trump's 79th birthday and the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, which organizers say underscores their concerns about rising authoritarianism and use of military spectacle for political purposes.
'We're protesting because President Trump and his enablers have gone too far,' said Kristin Hinnant, an organizer with Indivisible. 'From defying court orders to staging a $45 million self-glorifying parade, they've shown us exactly who they are. This protest is a peaceful, powerful response to a president who thinks he's untouchable. He's not.'
The nationwide movement includes more than 1,400 rallies across the country, as citizens prepare to speak out on issues ranging from military force against protesters to threats to vital programs like Medicaid and Social Security.
'ICE doesn't belong in our neighborhoods. Tactical teams with military-grade equipment don't make communities safer, they terrorize them. Trump is turning federal agents into a political militia and it's happening in broad daylight. It's the latest example of authoritarian overreach designed to rule by fear, not serve the people,' said Hinnant.
Organizers say they chose Toomer's Corner for its deep significance to the Auburn community.
'It's where we celebrate our victories and mourn our losses. It's been the site of a daily civil rights protest since George Floyd's murder,' Hinnant said. 'What better place to rally our people to oppose tyranny?'
Hinnant voiced strong concern over the Trump administration's use of federal force in American cities.
'Trump is turning federal agents into a political militia. Tactical teams with military-grade equipment don't make us safer—they terrorize neighborhoods,' she said. 'This is about ruling by fear, not serving the people.'
According to Hinnant, local support has been strong. Hundreds have RSVP'd, and both Auburn Police and campus security are aware and supportive of the peaceful demonstration.
'We've proven who we are—nonviolent, focused, and united,' she said. 'We expect a joyful, peaceful show of courage and solidarity.'
Indivisible Auburn-Opelika is also calling on elected leaders, including Congressman Mike Rogers, to take a stand.
'We need leaders to reject authoritarianism and restore accountability. That means protecting the rule of law—and protecting people, not power,' Hinnant said.
As communities across the country rise up for 'No Kings' Day, organizers in Auburn say their message is clear: democracy belongs to the people, not to any one man.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Protest safety 101: How to protect yourself when exercising your First Amendment rights
Donald Trump will be facing the largest protests of his second presidency this weekend — at least, the largest protests of his second presidency so far. Over 2,000 No Kings protests are scheduled for June 14 to voice opposition to the Trump Administration's illegal actions, which organizers say include "defying our courts, deporting Americans, disappearing people off the streets, attacking our civil rights, and slashing our services." The rallies will also overlap with Trump's 79th birthday celebration, which is set to feature a military parade. If Trump continues down his path, backlash will only continue to grow. Several protests against his administration have already taken place within the few months he's been in office, and several more are already scheduled through movements like No Kings and 50501. Here are some tips to help protect your safety and privacy if you plan on attending any upcoming demonstrations. It's best to leave your phone at home during protests so your location cannot be tracked. You can also leave it on while you're away so it shows your location as your residence. If you need to bring your phone with you to a protest, be sure to turn it off to stop your GPS from tracking you, and to have a password or pin. Also be sure to turn off your biometrics — face ID and fingerprint — so law enforcement can't force you to unlock your phone without a warrant. U.S. courts have previously ruled that using biometrics to unlock phones does not violate the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination. However, police can't compel you to unlock your phone with a password or pin without a warrant. It's best to wear plain clothes without distinguishable symbols or patterns so that you cannot be as easily identified by law enforcement or in videos and pictures. You should also consider covering your tattoos for similar reasons. It is important that you do not wear makeup or contacts, as physicians stress that they can further irritate or damage your eyes if you come into contact with tear gas. Goggles or glasses are the best forms of eye protection. Accessories like masks and sunglasses can also help conceal your identity if you do not wish to be identified by police or online. You should also blur the faces of other protestors if you take pictures or videos, out of both respect for their privacy and caution for their safety. While Trump claimed recently on Truth Social that "MASKS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED to be worn at protests," no such law currently exists at a federal level. Some states have mask bans over a century old that were enacted in response to the Ku Klux Klan, but courts have issued varying rulings regarding their constitutionality. For example, California Code, Section 185 makes it illegal to wear a mask in order to avoid being identified while breaking the law, but this does not apply to actions protected under the First Amendment, such as protests. Before you leave for a protest, you should find an attorney you can call if you get arrested and write their phone number on your body in sharpie. That way, you'll have the number even if your possessions are taken, and the permanent marker will not come off as easily due to water or sweat. The National Lawyers Guild has protest support hotlines for chapters located in 35 states plus Washington D.C.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Trump wants to cut federal housing funds in half, and even Republicans are questioning it
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Scott Turner kept repeating the same phrases to Congress in defense of President Donald Trump's proposal to cut the agency's budget by 51%. "It's time for a paradigm shift." "We have to refocus." "We want to be efficient and effective, not bloated and bureaucratic." Democrats on House and Senate appropriations subcommittees were outraged — and even some Republicans were skeptical. Turner was tasked with explaining what Trump's proposed $45 billion cut to HUD's funding would look like in practice. The agency would be among the hardest hit parts of the federal government under Trump's plan to eliminate $163 billion in federal spending. But the secretary offered little detail on plans for how his agency would continue serving millions of older, disabled, and low-income Americans, people struggling to recover from disasters like hurricanes and wildfires, and those experiencing homelessness. "The goal here is not to serve less Americans. The goal here is to serve Americans better," Turner said during his testimony before the House subcommittee on Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development on June 10. While Democratic lawmakers were particularly critical of Turner's approach and Trump's massive budget cut request, some Republicans also probed Turner for more detailed explanations he didn't provide. The hearings highlighted how the nation's major housing affordability challenges have become a bipartisan concern. "The federal government doesn't have all the answers, and the budget empowers collaboration with states and localities," HUD spokesperson Kasey Lovett told Business Insider. Few details, lots of frustration During the House hearing, Republican Rep. David Joyce asked Turner how HUD plans to continue helping victims of disasters, like flooding and fires, if the agency slashes funding for the Community Development Block Grant — Disaster Recovery program, as the budget proposes. The agency has long helped FEMA rebuild homes destroyed in natural disasters that lack sufficient insurance, as well as repair roads and bridges. In response, Turner insisted that HUD "will not allow disaster recovery and those that need assistance in disaster recovery to be lost on us" and that HUD is simply pursuing a "different way of distributing these funds." Joyce, who represents Northeast Ohio, wasn't satisfied. "Thank you, sir, that was a great answer, but it didn't demonstrate a plan. Do you have a plan?" the congressman responded. Turner ultimately conceded that the plan for supporting disaster victims "is forthcoming." Joyce ended the exchange by warning that the agency has a role to play. "The one thing I know is, you're right. Disasters come. All over the country, disasters come. And you need to be ready for them." Rep. Rutherford, a Florida Republican, pressed Turner on how states will help support homeownership in low-income communities when the president's budget proposes eliminating HUD's Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP), a competitive grant program that Rutherford said has been successful in his district. "Everywhere that homeownership went up, violent crime went down," said Rutherford, a former sheriff. "How are we going to address this issue if we're doing away with SHOP?" Turner replied by saying that states can support homeownership programs if they see fit going forward, but didn't clarify where that funding would come from. Spokespeople for Rutherford and Joyce didn't immediately return BI's requests for comment. 'People will die' Democratic lawmakers expressed more direct frustration about the program cuts and lack of detail the secretary presented. "People will die," Rep. Mike Quigley, an Illinois Democrat, told Turner of HUD's proposed cuts to homelessness services, including the elimination of the Housing for Persons with AIDS program. "If you just want to say we've got to cut these things because that's our plan, I'd respect you a lot more than telling us that you care about people as you put them on the street." Turner replied that the agency isn't just cutting funding but is "going to be more effective and more efficient." "How?" Quigley asked. "It's a new paradigm. It's a new way to do things," Turner replied. During Turner's testimony before the Senate on June 11, Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz, who's made housing a key priority, urged Turner to reinstate a bipartisan program Schatz championed that incentivizes states and localities to cut red tape that hampers housing construction. "It's the most significant pro-housing deregulatory mechanism that we've passed," Schatz said. Turner didn't answer Schatz's question on the eliminated program, and simply said he's encouraging local leaders to find ways to cut regulations. But the president's budget isn't law. Government funding is set to run out in September, and Congress has the final say on what the federal budget looks like. The House hearing concluded with the chairwoman, Republican Rep. Stephanie Bice, suggesting that Turner hasn't had enough time in the few months he's been in office to nail down more specifics about where HUD funding will go and how programs will be reformed. "Is it safe to say that you have a framework for a plan that you want to move forward, but maybe not all of the nuts and bolts that you need to be able to present those details?" Bice asked Turner. "Yes, ma'am," Turner replied.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
The Big Gulf AI Deal That's Divided the White House
Listen to Odd Lots on Apple Podcasts Listen to Odd Lots on Spotify Back in May, President Trump announced this big plan whereby American tech giants would participate in major AI projects in both Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The announcement has created divisions within the White House, and more generally among people who are thinking about the intersection of artificial intelligence and geopolitics. One argument is that this is great news geopolitically, because it gives American technology a beachhead in this crucial region. Another argument is that by exporting the chips abroad, it creates a possibility that some of the technology will leak to China, or benefit China in some way. On this episode we speak with Bloomberg News reporter Mackenzie Hawkins, who covers tech and geopolitics in Hong Kong, about the deals, the divisions, and what to watch next as the US looks to maintain its edge in these key areas.
