logo
McIlroy explains his silence over failed driver test

McIlroy explains his silence over failed driver test

Yahooa day ago

Rory McIlroy has explained his decision not to speak to the media during last month's PGA Championship, saying he was annoyed that news had leaked about his driver failing to pass inspection before the tournament.
McIlroy said the results of equipment tests are supposed to be confidential, noting that Scottie Scheffler's driver had also failed before the championship, but that was not reported until afterwards.
Scheffler revealed after he won the PGA for his third major title that he had been forced to use a back-up driver.
"I didn't want to get up there and say something that I regretted," McIlroy said in a news conference at the Canadian Open, which begins on Thursday.
"I'm trying to protect Scottie. I don't want to mention his name. I'm trying to protect (equipment manufacturer) TaylorMade. I'm trying to protect the USGA, PGA of America, myself."
It was a strange week for McIlroy, who arrived at the PGA as the most celebrated player in golf after completing the career grand slam with his triumph at the Masters.
Instead of taking a victory lap at Quail Hollow - a course where he has won four times - McIlroy was in a bad mood all week, and his refusal to discuss the driver test was much debated.
McIlroy gave a day-by-day breakdown of his decisions not to talk to reporters, saying he wanted to practise after his poor first round.
He finished his second round late and wanted to put his daughter, Poppy, to bed.
McIlroy didn't want to talk about his driver, he was tired after his weather-delayed third round, and after his week concluded with a tie for 47th place, he just wanted to go home.
He reiterated that PGA Tour players are not required to speak to the media.
"I talk to the media a lot," McIlroy said.
"I think there should be an understanding that this is a two-way street, and as much as we need to speak to you guys - we understand the benefit that comes from you being here and giving us the platform and everything else, I understand that - but again, I've been beating this drum for a long time.
"If they want to make it mandatory, that's fine, but in our rules it says that it's not, and until the day that that's maybe written into the regulations, you're going to have guys skip from time to time, and that's well within our rights."
McIlroy also declined to talk to reporters after he blew a late lead and lost to Bryson DeChambeau in last year's US Open at Pinehurst No.2.
He is a two-time winner of the Canadian Open, and skipped a PGA Tour signature event last week at the Memorial to play in Canada as his tune-up for next week's US Open at Oakmont.
Whether he'll be interested in discussing his performance at the storied western Pennsylvania venue remains to be seen.
"If we all wanted to, we could all bypass you guys and we could just go on this," McIlroy said, holding up his phone.
"We could go on social media and we could talk about our round and do it our own way.
"We understand that that's not ideal for you guys and there's a bigger dynamic at play here."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. Open 2025: Hole-by-hole look at Oakmont Country Club
U.S. Open 2025: Hole-by-hole look at Oakmont Country Club

NBC Sports

timean hour ago

  • NBC Sports

U.S. Open 2025: Hole-by-hole look at Oakmont Country Club

OAKMONT, Pa. — A hole-by-hole look at Oakmont Country Club, site of the 125th U.S. Open to be played June 12-15: No. 1, 488 yards, par 4 Nothing says 'Welcome to Oakmont' quite like the opening hole, one of the toughest starts in major championship golf. The narrow fairway is lined by bunkers on both sides. The downhill approach is to a green that is partially blind and slopes away from the fairway. The ideal shot is short the green to allow the slope to carry it onto the green. Stroke average in 2016: 4.453. Rank in difficulty: 1 No. 2, 346 yards, par 4 Short but difficult, accuracy is everything on a shot that has five bunkers on the right and a ditch to the left. The green has bunkers on both sides, and the putting surface slopes sharply from back to front, with several undulations. The USGA likely will move the tee forward for one weekend round and tempt players to try to reach the green. Stroke average in 2016: 4.126. Rank in difficulty: 13 No. 3, 462 yards, par 4 The famous Church Pew bunkers are on the left side. The deep bunkers on the right are no picnic, either. The second shot with a short iron is uphill, making it a blind approach to a green that slopes gently away from the fairway. Anything short could roll back down the hill. Anything long will go through the green to a closely mown area. Stroke average in 2016: 4.320. Rank in difficulty: T-6 The Fourth Hole of Oakmont Country Club in the Oakmont, Pennsylvania on Wednesday, Oct. 9, 2024. (Copyright USGA/Fred Vuich) Fred Vuich/USGA Museum No. 4, 611 yards, par 5 The Church Pews are still on the left side as this par 5 runs adjacent to the previous hole, with more deep bunkers on the right. A big drive in the fairway allows for players to go for the green in two. Otherwise, laying up requires a shot that must avoid bunkers on the right, though that's the best angle to approach the green. Stroke average in 2016: 4.971. Rank in difficulty: 17 No. 5, 408 yards, par 4 Another short par 4 that plays tough. The fairway narrows about 160 yards from the green, and the approach shot is to a green that is well below the fairway. This is where Dustin Johnson's ball moved on the green, eventually leading to a two-shot penalty that wasn't assessed until after he had won. Stroke average in 2016: 4.131. Rank in difficulty: 12 No. 6, 200 yards, par 3 The first par 3 is slightly downhill to a narrow green that slopes toward the tee. The worst place to miss is the bunker to the right. Stroke average in 2016: 3.142. Rank in difficulty: 11 No. 7, 485 yards, par 4 The fairway is parallel to the Pennsylvania Turnpike and is pinched by deep bunkers. The approach is to a green that slopes from back to front, and staying below the hole is important. Missing to the left is the toughest spot from which to save par. This was the hardest green to hit in 2016 among par 4s. Stroke average in 2016: 4.327. Rank in difficulty: 5 No. 8, 289 yards, par 3 This par 3 is so long that a good short game is required. At full length, it is the longest in U.S. Open history. While the green is open, a bunker juts out some 80 yards before the green. Carry that, and the ball is likely to run all the way onto the green. The putting surface is not as heavily contoured as others at Oakmont. Expect the hole to tip out at 300 yards one round just because. Stroke average in 2016: 3.304. Rank in difficulty: 8 The Ninth Hole of Oakmont Country Club in the Oakmont, Pennsylvania on Thursday, Sept. 5, 2024. (Copyright USGA/Fred Vuich) No. 9, 472 yards, par 4 This hole runs the other direction next to No. 1, with a narrow landing area that can't be seen from the green. There is a ditch left and bunkers to the right, and the fairway slopes to the right. The green is large and unlike any other — the back portion, which is in play, is the practice green. Stroke average in 2016: 4.432. Rank in difficulty: 2 No. 10, 461 yards, par 4 The tee shot is downhill to a narrow landing area, and the fairway slopes from right to left. Now there is a ditch intersecting the fairway for anyone driving it too far. There are deep bunkers on the left side of the fairway. The green slopes from front right to back left, and it is among the hardest at Oakmont. Stroke average in 2016: 4.333. Rank in difficulty: 4 No. 11, 400 yards, par 4 The tee shot is uphill toward the clubhouse, so the landing area can't be seen from the tee. The green is slightly diagonal and guarded by deep bunkers. This should yield more birdies than usual for Oakmont. After the previous four holes, it might feel like a breather. Stroke average in 2016: 4.072. Rank in difficulty: 14 No. 12, 632 yards, par 5 The longest hole on the course, so the power hitters might have a chance to reach in two, but keeping it in the fairway is difficult because the ball rolls out. Second shots are played to a narrow landing area guarded by ditches and bunkers. The green slopes from front to back. This should be a true three-shot hole and all the shots have to be precise. Stroke average in 2016: 5.144. Rank in difficulty: 10 The 13th Hole of Oakmont Country Club in the Oakmont, Pennsylvania on Wednesday, Oct. 9, 2024. (Copyright USGA/Fred Vuich) No. 13, 182 yards, par 3 The shortest of the par 3s typically plays the easiest. The green is surrounded by bunkers, some that appear to be as large as the green. The putting surface slopes from back to front, and it is critical to be below the hole for a good chance at birdie. Stroke average in 2016: 2.989. Rank in difficulty: 16 No. 14, 379 yards, par 4 The fairway slopes from right to left and narrows about 270 yards from the tee, just as a group of bunkers ends. The green is long and divided into sections by ridges. Because players will have a wedge, this should be a shot easily controlled. Stroke average in 2016: 3.991. Rank in difficulty: 15 No. 15, 507 yards, par 4 The longest par 4 on the course, this has a blind tee shot to the landing area, and the fairway slopes to the right. The approach is to a green that is deepest on the course and framed by one of the longest bunkers at Oakmont. Stroke average in 2016: 4.387. Rank in difficulty: 3 No. 16, 236 yards, par 3 The large green has a deep bunker on the right. But anything to the left makes for a tough par save because the green slopes to the right. Anyone choosing to play short of the green has a straightforward shot at saving par. Larry Nelson holed a 60-foot birdie putt here on his way to victory in 1983. Stroke average in 2016: 3.241. Rank in difficulty: 9 The 17th Hole of Oakmont Country Club in Oakmont, Pennsylvania on Friday, May 31, 2024. (Copyright USGA/Fred Vuich) No. 17, 312 yards, par 4 This is a reachable par 4, and it can be a problem for anyone who misses. Players can lay up with a mid-iron and take on a precise approach with a wedge. Missing the green presents trouble because of the slopes around the putting surface, five bunkers and deep rough. The most troublesome bunker is short and right of the green, and it's called 'Big Mouth.' Stroke average in 2016: 3.887. Rank in difficulty: 18 No. 18, 402 yards, par 4 The closing hole is renowned for great drives by the winners, Angel Cabrera in 2007 and Dustin Johnson in 2016. The tee shot must be long and straight, and it narrows about 260 yards off the tee. The second shot is uphill to a large green so undulated that playing it safe could also mean the player faces a difficult two-putt.

Coco Gauff v Aryna Sabalenka start time: When is French Open final?
Coco Gauff v Aryna Sabalenka start time: When is French Open final?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Coco Gauff v Aryna Sabalenka start time: When is French Open final?

World No 1 Aryna Sabalenka faces World No 2 Coco Gauff in the French Open final, with a new women's singles champion set to be crowned at Roland Garros. Sabalenka ended three-time defending champion Iga Swiatek's winning run with a dominant final-set in the semi-finals to progress to her first French Open final. Advertisement Gauff defeated French wildcard Lois Boisson 6-1 6-2 to reach her second final at Roland Garros, having lost to Swiatek in the 2022 final in Paris. Gauff won her first grand slam title when she defeated Sabalenka in the US Open final in 2023, while Sabalenka will be aiming to her her first grand slam title outside of the hard-courts. Here's everything you need to know When is Coco Gauff vs Aryna Sabalenka? The French Open women's final will be played from 2pm BST (3pm local) on Saturday 7 June. What happened in the semi-finals? Sabalenka halted three-time defending champion Swiatek's 26-match winning run, running away with the final set to win 7-6 4-6 6-0 and reach her first French Open final. 'It was a big match, and it felt like a final,' Sabalenka said. 'But I know that the job is not done yet, and I have to go out there on Saturday. I have to fight and I have to bring my best tennis. I have to work for that title, especially if it's going to be Coco. I'm ready. I'm ready to go out, and I'm ready to fight. And I'm ready to do everything it's going to take to get the win.' Advertisement Gauff ended the run of French wildcard Lois Boisson, silencing the crowd and shutting out the noise on Court Philippe-Chatrier to win 6-1 6-2 and reach her second French Open final. 'My first final here I was super nervous, and I kind of wrote myself off before the match even happened,' Gauff said. 'Obviously here I have a lot more confidence just from playing a grand slam final before and doing well in one. I think going into Saturday I'll just give it my best shot and try to be as calm and relaxed as possible. Whatever happens, happens, and knowing that I put the best effort forward.' Coco Gauff vs Aryna Sabalenka head-to-head Gauff won her first grand slam final when she defeated Sabalenka in the 2023 US Open final, but they have met four times since then - including on clay in last month's Madrid Open final. The overall head-to-head is 5-5. 2025: Madrid Open, clay - Sabalenka won in two sets Advertisement 2024: WTA Finals, hard - Gauff won in two sets 2024: Wuhan, hard - Sabalenka won in two sets 2024: Australian Open, hard - Sabalenka won in two sets 2023: US Open, hard - Gauff won in three sets 2023: Indian Wells, hard - Sabalenka won in two sets 2022: Toronto, hard - Gauff won in three sets 2021: Rome, clay - Gauff won in two sets 2020: Ostrava, hard - Sabalenka won in three sets 2020: Lexington, hard - Gauff won in three sets

The hidden strength that makes Coco Gauff such a danger to Aryna Sabalenka in French Open final
The hidden strength that makes Coco Gauff such a danger to Aryna Sabalenka in French Open final

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The hidden strength that makes Coco Gauff such a danger to Aryna Sabalenka in French Open final

As Coco Gauff prepared for first French Open final, at the age of 18, the American was overcome with nerves and had already written off her chances when she walked out onto Court Philippe-Chatrier. It was no surprise, then, that Gauff was beaten 6-1, 6-3 by Iga Swiatek in a one-sided final three years ago. The morning after, Gauff stepped out onto the Paris streets and reflected on the pressure she had put on herself. 'At first I thought it would be the end of the world if I lost, and the sun still rose the next day,' Gauff said. Coco Gauff will play in her third grand slam final at the age of 21 (Getty Images) Three years later, Gauff, now the World No 2, will return for her second French Open final against World No 1 Aryna Sabalenka. The 21-year-old does so as a grand slam champion, having beaten Sabalenka to win the 2023 US Open, but again as the underdog. While Sabalenka is also chasing her first Roland Garros title, the Belarusian ended Swiatek's dominant winning streak in the semi-finals to underline her status as the best player in the world. Advertisement To take Gauff at her word, compartmentalising the emotional demands of another grand slam final will be key against Sabalenka, who has won three of the last four matches against her since their US Open final. Gauff exhibited supreme mental toughness in her semi-final win over Lois Boisson, denying the fairytale run of the French wildcard and home crowd in a masterful 6-1 6-2 win over the World No 361 who had beaten back-to-back top-10 opponents. Boisson's loopy forehand and the noise of the French fans had fried the minds of two of the best players in the world in Mirra Andreeva and Jessica Pegula. Even as Boisson trailed, a break of serve could have changed the momentum of the match but Gauff resisted while deploying a mental trick previously used by Novak Djokovic. "When you were chanting her name, I was saying to myself my name!' she told the crowd. Gauff was also better than Boisson in every area and the tactics that had got the 22-year-old Frenchwoman so far were used against her. 'She played really great,' Boisson said. 'I don't know how to say, but she played on the right and on the left and on the right. I just feel like I was running everywhere on the court today.' Gauff defeated Lois Boisson 6-1 6-2 in a one-sided semi-final (Getty Images) Against the power of Sabalenka, Gauff will be the one who is doing the chasing, but the American is also the best mover in the game and it was her resilient defence that turned the tide in their 2023 US Open final. Having to play so many extra balls to finish the points, Sabalenka started to give away many errors and unravelled from a set up. Advertisement Sabalenka is now a different player, however, with Gauff highlighting the 27-year-old's mentality as one of her three biggest strengths, along with her huge ball-striking and serve. Sabalenka's mental transformation led to two Australian Open titles and the US Open in 2024 and was evident again in her semi-final win over Swiatek. Once erratic and prone to outbursts, Sabalenka controlled her temperament after Swiatek levelled the match and was clearly superior as she ran away with a dominant final set. Gauff defeated Sabalenka in three sets to win the US Open final in September 2023 (Getty Images) But Sabalenka has won three of the last four matches against Gauff, including the Madrid final (Getty Images) Sabalenka completely outplayed Swiatek in the biggest demonstration yet of the improvements she has made to her game on the natural surfaces. While the key to her victory may have still been her aggressive returns, Sabalenka has added variety to her attacking game. '[My] whole life I've been told it is not my thing and then I didn't have any confidence,' Sabalenka said. 'We've been able to develop my game so much.' Advertisement But for all that Sabalenka has improved physically, while adding spin and slice to her range of shots, her final against Gauff may come down to a pure battle between attack and defence, between first-time ball-striking and counter-punching. 'I know that the job is not done yet,' said Sabalenka, who spoke as if she and Gauff were preparing for 12 rounds. 'I'm ready to go out and I'm ready to fight, and I'm ready to do everything it's going to take to get the win.' The World No 1 will be the favourite but Gauff has been here before and can take confidence from the experience. 'Regardless of the result,' she said, 'the sun will still rise.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store