Women leaders warn against anti-DEI push, urge unity and inclusion at Mackinac Policy Panel
Skillman Foundation President and CEO Angelique Power and U.S. Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Holly) at the Mackinac Policy Conference's Women in Leadership panel on May 28, 2025. | Kyle Davidson
During the annual women in leadership panel at the Mackinac Policy conference, leaders from the public and private sectors spoke out against growing federal efforts opposing diversity, equity and inclusion or practices, emphasizing that diversity remains a value within the state.
The panel, led by Laura Granneman, the executive director of Rocket Community Fund and Gilbert Family Foundation, hosted U.S. Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Holly); Tina Kozak, CEO of the PR firm Franco; and Angelique Power, president and CEO of the Skillman Foundation, which advocates for Detroiters' perspectives in education policy.
Looking across the nation at the push against diversity, Slotkin said there's a narrative circulating that diversity is a bad thing rather than a good thing.
'It's sending shock waves of fear through the system and the conversations I'm having with Michigan organizations is like, 'Please don't over index', right? Don't bend over backwards to, like, go the opposite direction. We're in Michigan. You know diversity is a value,' Slotkin said, warning that organizations are going too far in responding to anti-DEI sentiments and actions.
While the federal government has taken action to end DEI policies in the federal government, the sentiment goes beyond that, Slotkin said, pointing to President Donald Trump blaming diversity initiatives for January's deadly aircraft collision at Washington Reagan National Airport.
'This isn't about DEI, right? This is about saying that in order for me to champion one group of people, I have to put down a whole bunch of other groups of people,' Slotkin said.
'The challenge for us in Michigan, is to say, how do we communicate and call balls and strikes on what we know is right for our state and for our institutions. And you just have to look around at this conference and say, like, there is value in having a different group of voices around a table,' Slotkin said.
Power noted that it had been five years since the murder of George Floyd, and that a tremendous amount of work on diversity, equity and inclusion work followed.
'I don't want us to lose that. That the work that was done was different than the DEI work — or the DI the diversity and inclusion work — that was done before,' Power said.
'These last five years, there was such a introspective lens that institutions took, that individuals took to say, like, 'What can I do differently?' There was a realization that it isn't about solely representation, it was about ownership and agency and voice. It was about creating new tables. And that worked so well that there is this tremendous backlash against it now,' Power said.
The issue now is not about defending an acronym, but rather defending American values, Power said.
'In two years we're going to celebrate the 250th anniversary of our country. 'We the People'. That's our chance to say, when we first said, 'We the People,' it really meant, like, you know, white men. Now we get a chance to say who we really mean by 'We the People',' Power said.
While Kozak said she didn't have much to add, she noted it was frustrating to see a resistance to forward motion.
However, she remained hopeful, arguing that the state and businesses understand the importance of diversity.
'Investing in women is good business. And I believe that, and I believe that corporations know that. I think they're calling it different things to your point, to sort of over-correct and protect, but I'm hopeful,' Kozak.
Later in the panel Power detailed the importance of coalition building in the philanthropic realm, with foundation presidents working in coalitions all across the nation.
However, President Trump's executive order opposing DEI has targeted universities and foundations with more than $500 million in assets, accusing these groups of illegal discrimination in order to strip their nonprofit status and fine them into submission, Power said.
This includes Black Lives Matter-oriented organizations and groups working to support climate justice in low income areas and communities of color who are disproportionately impacted by climate change, she said.
'Truthfully, I think all of us watched the university presidents and we saw what happens when you go it alone, when an attack comes at you and you try to handle it with talking points that were handed to you,' Power said.
'Whether it's nationally, or whether it's locally, whether it's within this current context, or whether it has to do with the education system, we have to solve this together,' Power said. 'And that's actually one of the best things about Michigan. We're a proudly purple state. We are not going to make progress unless we have bipartisan ideas that we move through and that we can sustain.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wilders's exit leaves Dutch government on brink of collapse
Geert Wilders has brought the Dutch government to the brink of collapse after pulling out of the governing coalition because it would not back his plans for tougher migration rules. The Dutch hard-Right leader withdrew his Party for Freedom (PVV) from the Right-wing alliance, formed eight months after his victory in the November 2023 general election. The country now faces fresh elections or it must scramble to find a majority to form a new coalition. Mr Wilders demanded his three coalition partners agree to a new 10-point migration plan, which included using the army to close land borders, the deportation of Syrian asylum seekers and an end to family reunification, without prior consultation. 'Close the borders for asylum-seekers and family reunifications. No more asylum centres opened. Close them,' he told them. He also demanded a 'one strike you're out' policy that would ensure migrants convicted of violent or sexual crimes were deported. But after the allies refused to back the plan, the divisive anti-Islam firebrand later wrote on X: 'No signature for our asylum plans ... PVV leaves the coalition.' Mr Wilders's PVV was the largest party in the coalition alongside the conservative-liberal People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), the Farmers' Citizen Movement (BBB) and the centrist New Social Contract. The 'Dutch Trump' was frustrated with the slow pace in introducing the 'strictest-ever asylum policy' agreed with his coalition allies, which has been slowed by legal hurdles. The policy was agreed after months of contentious coalition negotiations that forced Mr Wilders to give up his dream of being prime minister. He agreed to stay out of the cabinet, along with other party leaders, as part of the deal. Dick Schoof, the former spy chief who has never held elected office, became prime minister instead and made the PVV's Marjolein Faber minister for migration. The coalition pledged a two-year asylum crisis act to drive down numbers arriving in the Netherlands and demanded an opt-out from EU asylum rules, which put it on a collision course with Brussels. It planned a maximum reduction in migrant numbers, without giving a hard figure. The agreement included austere reception centres, a hold on processing asylum applications and only temporary asylum being granted. In the first quarter of this year, 4,500 people applied for asylum in the Netherlands – half the applications in the same period in 2024. But Ms Faber has struggled to implement the plan, parts of which have been deemed illegal or unworkable by experts. But courts had ordered that funds for overnight asylum shelter continue and budget cuts to asylum aid organisations were reversed. The other three party leaders refused to sign up to the plan during an hour-long crisis meeting on Monday night and successfully urged Mr Wilders to sleep on his decision. But on Tuesday morning, after a second meeting lasting less than 15 minutes, Mr Wilders told Mr Schoof he was removing Ms Faber from the government. 'I signed up to the strictest asylum policy, not the downfall of the Netherlands,' he told reporters. There are slim hopes that Mr Schoof could still smooth things over but sources predict that the government would collapse. The latest poll, from gives Mr Wilders a narrow lead of 1 per cent over Groenlinks-PVDA, the biggest Left-wing party and opposition, by 31 per cent to 30 per cent. Frans Timmermans, the former EU climate chief and leader of Groenlinks-PVDA, called for elections as 'soon as possible'. Mr Wilders's decision to leave the coalition has angered his former allies. Caroline Van der Plas, the BBB leader, criticised him for a 'reckless kamikaze action'. Dilan Yesilgöz, the VVD leader, said: 'The Netherlands needs a mature and responsible leader who will keep us safe. But Wilders is abandoning the Netherlands.' In the afternoon as the Cabinet met for crisis talks, Ms Yesilgöz, who came third in the 2023 elections despite expectations of victory, echoed calls for an election as 'soon as possible', making a minority government highly unlikely. The government crisis comes just weeks before the Netherlands is due to host world leaders for a Nato summit on June 24 and 25. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘We have no plans to attack Britain,' say Russia's London diplomats as defence review lays out Putin threats
Russia's embassy in London said on Tuesday that Moscow had no intention of attacking Britain after the UK's Strategic Defence Review highlighted a series of threats from Vladimir Putin's regime. The SDR mentions Russia 33 times and tells of the 'immediate and pressing threat' posed by it. In an introduction to the 144-page document, Sir Keir Starmer stressed: 'In this new era for defence and security, when Russia is waging war on our continent and probing our defences at home, we must meet the danger head on.' The SDR emphasised: 'Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine makes unequivocally clear its willingness to use force to achieve its goals, as well as its intent to re-establish spheres of influence in its near-abroad and disrupt the international order to the UK and its allies' disadvantage. 'While the Ukraine conflict has temporarily degraded Russian conventional land forces, the overall modernisation and expansion of its armed forces means it will pose an enduring threat in key areas such as space, cyberspace, information operations, undersea warfare, and chemical and biological weapons.' Defence Secretary John Healey has warned that Britain's military is coming under daily cyber attacks from Russia, as well as other countries. But the Russian Embassy in London rejected the claims against the Putin regime of aggression, criticising what it described as "a fresh salvo of anti-Russian rhetoric". In a statement, it said: 'Russia poses no threat to the United Kingdom and its people. 'We harbour no aggressive intentions and have no plans to attack Britain. We are not interested in doing so, nor do we need to.' However, the statement will be treated with scepticism in Whitehall and at Westminster given the repeated denials that Russia was planning to invade Ukraine, before doing so in February 2022. Mr Healey has told how laser weapons will be installed on Royal Navy ships within two years to protect the UK against a missile attack by Russia, or other aggressor. The Cabinet minister has also warned of the threat of a biological attack on Britain's streets by Russia, following the poisoning of Russian double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia with Novichok in Salisbury in March 2018. They both survived but Dawn Burgess, 44, died after also coming into contact with the nerve agent. British prosecutors identified two Russians who they said were operating under aliases, Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov, who they believe tried to murder the Skripals with the military-grade nerve agent. Relations between Russia and Britain are at their lowest level since the Cold War. They deteriorated further after Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The UK has led moves to arm Ukraine, first with anti-tank weapons, then Challenger II tanks and Storm Shadow long-range missiles. China's embassy in London also criticised Britain's defence review, saying that the document deliberately misrepresented Beijing's defence policy to justify British military expansion. The SDR had described China as "a sophisticated and persistent challenge", citing its rapid military modernisation, including an expanded nuclear arsenal, and saying Beijing was likely using espionage and cyberattacks, and stealing intellectual property. The review, which included 62 recommendations, proposed sweeping changes, including a greater focus on new technology including drones, laser weapons to protect the UK, artificial intelligence, as well as more nuclear-powered submarines, but the Government has been accused of not guaranteeing sufficient funding.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bulgaria close to adopting the euro: What stands in the way?
Bulgaria is close to realising its decades-old goal of joining the euro currency union and deepening ties with the more prosperous countries of Western Europe. But the government faces a populist backlash against the shared currency on the eve of a key decision by European Union authorities. Fears of inflation, poverty and the unknown are mingling with disinformation spread on social media that aims to turn people against the euro. The discontent tracks with increased support for populist and anti-EU parties across Europe, which is exploited by nationalist and pro-Russian politicians in a country that remains one of Europe's poorest and most afflicted with corruption. 'Adopting the euro will make us feel the threshold of poverty. After all, prices will be in euros,' said 78-year-old retiree Tanya Ignatova. 'Bulgaria is not ready for the euro. Someday we may be ready, but not now," said another retiree, Mario Georgiev. Several thousand people rallied against the euro in the capital on Saturday, urging a referendum on whether to transition from the lev currency to the euro. The head of the pro-Russian Varazhdane party, Kostadin Kostadinov, told the crowd: 'Bulgaria has risen and declared: Freedom, we choose the Bulgarian lev!' Others in Bulgaria say the country already benefits from EU membership and it does not matter what the currency is. "We have inflation now and we will have it in the future,' said 26-year-old Konstantin Bozhinov. Aiming at deepening European integration amid growing geopolitical tensions, the government is pressing ahead. It has asked for a review of whether it meets the requirements of low inflation, sound government finances and legal conformity to EU institutions. On Wednesday, the European Commission will announce the results. If the commission gives a green light, other member states will decide on Bulgaria's candidacy in the coming weeks. At the last review in 2022, Bulgaria failed on the inflation requirement. Inflation has since fallen. President Rumen Radev has encouraged the anti-euro voices by proposing a referendum on the currency, citing public concerns over inflation and purchasing power. This followed a protest in February that saw the offices of the EU's executive commission in Sofia spattered with red paint and its entrance set on fire. Related Thousands protest in Bulgaria against Euro and to maintain national currency Bulgaria's president to submit request to parliament to call eurozone referendum The president's proposal was turned down by the pro-European majority in parliament, which accused Radev of acting in favour of Russia with his last-minute attempt to sabotage the euro adoption. According to the EU's multi-country Eurobarometer survey released last week, 50% of Bulgarians are against the adoption of the euro, while 43% are in favor. In contrast, trust in the euro continues to grow across the rest of the EU. Bulgaria joined the EU in 2007. It has been plagued by political instability and corruption that have fuelled euroscepticism among its 6.4 million citizens. Analysts say disinformation campaigns from abroad have fed fears of economic changes that could worsen poverty. Scores of false claims by opponents of the eurozone have been published on social networks. One claim says the EU plans to take away people's savings if they fail to spend them within a certain period. Another claims that plans to introduce a digital version of the euro are part of a plan to control everyone. 'There is a powerful brainwashing of the average Bulgarian. Illusory fears are being spread, lies are being told wholesale, unscrupulously and brazenly," said Ognyan Minchev, director of the Institute for Regional and International Studies in Sofia. Economists say joining the euro will not bring massive change to Bulgaria's economy in the short run. That's because the government has pegged the currency to the euro by law, at a fixed rate of 1 lev for every 51 euro cents. Joining the euro can bring lower borrowing costs, greater ease in comparing domestic and foreign prices, and no need to exchange money when vacationing in another euro country. More than that, it's a sign of integration into the EU and its large economy. Members get a seat on the European Central Bank's interest rate-setting committee. Countries agree to join the euro when they join the EU, but so far 20 of 27 members have taken the step. Croatia was the last to join in 2023. Bulgaria's government has very little debt, at 24.1% of GDP — the second lowest in the EU and well below the 60% level in euro membership criteria. That's a sharp contrast to its neighbour, Greece, which entered the euro in 1999 with high debt that was concealed through complex financial transactions. Greece's broken finances eventually triggered a eurozone-wide crisis. Bulgaria's government has been 'fiscally super conservative ... the risk of Bulgaria becoming a fiscal risk to the eurozone is essentially zero,' said Zsolt Darvas, senior fellow at the Bruegel think tank in Brussels. Fears of inflation are not entirely without basis. Experience in other countries shows that 'whenever there is a changeover from national currency to the euro, there is often a minor inflation effect, but it's typically less than 1%,' said Darvas Economists say a one-time increase occurs as service providers such as restaurants, which don't adjust prices as often as other sectors, take advantage of re-doing menus and price lists to implement hikes.