No class action for Google privacy lawsuit, judge rules
10 June 2025 23:24
(REUTERS)People who accused Google of illegally collecting their personal information - after they chose not to synchronise their Google Chrome browsers with their Google accounts - cannot sue the Alphabet unit as a group in a class action, a US judge ruled.In a decision on Monday, US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, California agreed with Google that it was appropriate to address case-by-case whether millions of Chrome users understood and agreed to its data collection policies."Inquiries relating to Google's implied consent defense will overwhelm the damages claims for all causes of action," Rogers wrote.She dismissed the proposed damages class action with prejudice, meaning it cannot be brought again. The judge also said Chrome users cannot seek policy changes as a group.Class actions let plaintiffs seek potentially greater recoveries at lower cost than they could in individual lawsuits.The decision followed a ruling last August by the federal appeals court in San Francisco, which said Rogers should consider whether reasonable Chrome users consented to letting Google collect their data when they browsed online.Chrome users pointed to Chrome's privacy notice, which said they "don't need to provide any personal information to use Chrome" and Google would not collect such information unless they turned on the "sync" function.Rogers had dismissed the case in December 2022. She said she oversees two other privacy cases against Mountain View, California-based Google, but the claims in those cases differed "significantly."
The appeals court ruling followed Google's 2023 agreement to destroy billions of records to settle a lawsuit claiming it tracked people who thought they were browsing privately, including in Chrome's "Incognito" mode.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
Rising Asia temperatures bode well for US LNG export prospects: Maguire
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.) LITTLETON, Colorado - U.S. exports of LNG are already at record highs so far in 2025, but forecasts for above-average temperatures across key Asian import markets could lift them even higher this summer. Average temperatures for Japan, South Korea and China are all forecast to hold above normal through the end of August, likely boosting use of power-hungry air conditioners. That higher demand load will in turn spur utilities to lift generation from all available sources, including from natural gas plants fed mainly by imported liquefied natural gas (LNG). That upbeat demand outlook is good news for U.S. LNG exporters, who are riding a wave of strong demand from Europe but face a potential slowdown in European buying this summer. HOT AND STICKY Temperatures across East Asia are already hovering above long-term averages, and are expected to continue trending higher over the next two months. Average temperatures in Japan - the second largest LNG importer after China in 2024 - are expected to register around 6% above the long-term average from now through the end of August, data from LSEG shows. South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and several cities in China are forecast to register similar readings. As the northern hemisphere summer coincides with the rainy season across much of Asia, the forecasted hot temperatures are likely to be mixed with high humidity levels. That in turn will likely spur heavy use of air conditioning systems, which can push power demand levels sharply higher during heatwaves and strain regional power grids. GAS HEAVY Asia's electricity producers are used to the summer climb in electricity demand and adjust output levels accordingly. In 2024, average electricity demand during June, July and August - the hottest months of the year - was around 9% above the monthly average for the year as a whole. To accommodate that higher load, utilities lifted output from all power sources, but especially from fossil fuel plants which supply power that can be dispatched on command when output from renewable sources drops off. Both gas-fired and coal-fired generation across Asia during June, July and August last year averaged around 5% more than the 2024 monthly average, Ember data shows. LNG RELIANCE To feed the higher demand for power anticipated during June, July and August, Asian LNG importers tend to book higher LNG volumes during May, June and July than during other months. Between 2021 and 2024, U.S. LNG exports to Asia during May, June and July averaged around 7.8 million metric tons a month, according to data from commodity intelligence firm Kpler. That compares to an average of 2.23 million tons a month to Asia overall for the 2021 to 2024 period, and underscores how important LNG is as a power fuel during the Asian summer. PRICE POINT A key driver of potential Asian purchases will be the price of LNG, which needs to compete with coal in power generation and has recently proved too dear for many Asian consumers. U.S. LNG export prices have averaged around $8.54 per thousand cubic feet so far in 2025, up 35% from the 2024 average, according to data from LSEG. That said, any rise in Asian LNG purchases would likely come just as LNG orders by Europe tend to retreat to their annual lows, which could apply downward pressure to prices. Over the first half of 2025, European markets accounted for 70% of all U.S. LNG exports, Kpler data shows, while Asian markets accounted for just under 20%. Average monthly volumes of U.S. LNG dispatched to Europe during January to June were around 6 million tons, compared to around 1.6 million tons a month to Asia. A key caveat that will govern Europe's LNG appetite going forward is how quickly gas storage operators there want to replenish inventories, which were depleted over the past winter and must be restocked ahead of next winter. Currently, Europe's gas stockpiles are around half full, which compares to around 70% full at this time of year in 2023 and 2024, according to LSEG. If gas storage operators opt to restock as quickly as possible, then Europe's imports of LNG could remain quite strong over the coming months. But if Europe's storage firms opt instead to wait until the autumn to replenish stocks, or refill tanks from pipelined supplies, then Europe's LNG purchase volumes could drop sharply. Such a sudden wilt in European orders would likely trigger an aggressive markdown in prices, however, and in turn lure fresh buying interest in Asia where power firms are already primed to boost output. That suggests that overall U.S. LNG export volumes should remain fairly robust for the near term at least, regardless of where the buyers reside. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. (Reporting by Gavin Maguire; Editing by Sonali Paul)
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
No longer the big outlier, Italy sees bond renaissance: Mike Dolan
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.) LONDON - As investors wring their hands about mounting public debt loads across the G7, Italy - a country traditionally seen as a poster child for profligacy and unsustainable debts - is enjoying a relative bond market rejuvenation. Italy's borrowing premium over Germany, which typically reflects relative credit risk, bond supply and political risks, has halved in just two years to less than 100 basis points. More remarkably, this spread - seen by many as the pivotal intra euro zone debt metric - is within a few basis points of post-pandemic lows reached in early 2021 and it's fast homing in on the smallest premium since before the euro debt crisis exploded in 2010. While some investors may wonder if there's any more juice left in this trade, Italy traded with a premium of just 20bps over Germany before the global banking crash of 2008. And yet after a decade and half of existential euro debt crises, domestic political upheaval, European Central Bank intervention, a pandemic and the invasion of Ukraine - the nearing milestones are remarkable. Helped by recent European Central Bank easing, nominal 10-year Italian government borrowing rates of 3.5% are back at the average of the entire 26-year euro zone period. IT'S ALL RELATIVE G7 debt markets are often a relative game. Italy's debt-to-GDP ratio - long in excess of 100% - is no longer such an extreme outlier. Even though its current 137% tally remains historically high, the figures for other advanced economies are fast catching up. Italy's debt burden is also one of the few in the G7 that's not projected to keep rising over the rest of the decade. Japan comfortably retains that mantle as the most indebted G7 nation relative to its economic size. But U.S. sovereign debt has zoomed through 100% of GDP, and U.S. President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' making its way through Congress is expected to make that worse. More obviously within Europe, once frugal Germany has also lifted its self-imposed 'debt brake' and committed to fiscal stimulus that will arguably buoy euro zone growth at large even as some see its debt-to-GDP ratio hitting at least 100% within 10 years. And what is just as notable for European investors is that France's deficit and debt struggles mean Italy's risk premia have all but converged with those in Paris. At just 20bps on 10-year debt, it's the lowest since 2008. And Unicredit strategists point out that the 3-year Italy-France spread briefly turned negative earlier this year for the first time in more than 20 years. Once Europe's largest debt pile, Italy's gross government debt outstanding was overtaken by France four years ago. At 3.3 trillion euros last year, according to Eurostat, France's debt pile was last year some 300 billion euros bigger than Italy's. Aided by a relatively stable government by Italy's fractious post-war standards, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's administration has been in power since 2022 and Italy's credit ratings are starting to turn up. In April, rating agency S&P Global raised its rating on Italy to "BBB+" from "BBB" in a surprise move and last month Moody's upgraded the outlook on its 'Baa3' rating to "positive". Moody's cited a "better-than-expected" fiscal performance last year and a "stable" political environment, providing a boost for Meloni's plan to keep a lid on annual budget deficits - projected at 3.3% of GDP this year and 2.8% in 2026. "The positive outlook is also supported by a robust labor market, sound household and corporate balance sheets and a healthy banking sector," Moody's said in its report. Goldman Sachs economists this month raised questions about whether the increasingly benign Italian government bond pricing had gone too far given still much-needed structural changes in the economy and a rising European defense spending. But it said there were three 'ameliorating factors' - ongoing fiscal space provided by European Union recovery funds through next year, higher 'real' rates due to disinflation, and continued stable government. What's more, they said higher defense spending may lift Italy's deficit and debt metrics along with other euro countries but joint EU bond sales to fund that meant Italian bond issuance would not increase and the average maturity of its debt could extend further. On top of that, Goldman pointed out, the Italian fiscal balance is improving at the fastest pace among the biggest four euro zone governments - bringing the gap with the euro zone average to its lowest in almost 10 years. Once again, it's all relative. Italy still has a debt problem - but increasingly so too do all its peers. Rome is getting rewarded for keeping it in check at least. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. (by Mike Dolan; editing by Deepa Babington)
Zawya
3 hours ago
- Zawya
What's up with the wacky CBOT corn spreads?
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a market analyst for Reuters.) NAPERVILLE, Illinois - U.S. corn supply estimates for the waning 2024-25 marketing year have been dwindling in recent months, though a notable rebound is expected for 2025-26. But the futures market might not be reflecting these trends, leading many to wonder if old-crop stockpiles are actually larger than the government has predicted. Normally, that supply trajectory might put Chicago futures in an inverse, where old-crop corn is pricier than new-crop. But so far this month, CBOT July corn has traded at an average of around 3 cents per bushel cheaper than December corn , reflecting a small carry in the market. Analysts think the U.S. Department of Agriculture on Thursday will trim its forecast for 2024-25 U.S. corn ending stocks to 1.392 billion bushels, rendering stocks down 21% on the year. In past Junes, such a decline in corn stocks has been associated with July-December inverses exceeding 50 cents. The closest comparison in terms of stock declines would be 2018, when July-December corn traded at a 21-cent carry during the first two weeks of June. At that time, U.S. 2017-18 ending stocks were pegged to ease 8% on the year, but the actual estimate was more than ample at 2.1 billion bushels. This demonstrates that contracting year-on-year supplies can be associated with market carry in June. Additionally, there are examples (2008, 2018) where this carry existed despite a reduction in stock estimates over the previous several months. Still, the current setup may suggest that either July futures are too cheap versus December, old-crop stocks are being understated, or some combination of both. PARSING PROBABILITIES Given the present market structure, what might this mean for old-crop corn stocks – and trade expectations – moving forward? If old-crop stocks are too low, it may not come to light on Thursday. There is no relationship between the old-new crop futures spread and the trend in USDA's old-crop ending stock estimates from May to June. Fast-forward to June 30, when USDA publishes its June 1 stock survey, and the chance for a bearish bomb increases. Since 2008, whenever July-December corn traded near flat or in a carry during early June, analysts underestimated June 1 corn stocks about 73% of the time. On the flip side, analysts underestimated June 1 corn stocks in just one out of six years when old-new crop corn featured a strong inverse relationship. Since 2008, there is also a 73% hit rate for final corn ending stocks to be the same or higher than was estimated in June whenever July-December corn traded near flat or in a carry during early June. This same early June spread, however, does not suggest that final ending stocks will be bearish as the trade has gone on to both underestimate and overestimate September 1 corn stocks. WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS The outcome is still wide open for the end of September, when USDA will publish final 2024-25 corn ending stocks. But right now, CBOT corn for expiration in mid-September is the cheapest of the bunch. July-September corn is trading at an inverse averaging 12 cents per bushel so far this month, which is unusual given the slight carry in July-December. The historical relationship between these spreads suggests that one or both are a bit out of sync. With multiple anomalies in the futures market setup having been identified, this might simply mean that 2025 is an outlier year. And if that's the case, historical odds may be increasingly less reliable from here. Karen Braun is a market analyst for Reuters. Views expressed above are her own. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. (Writing by Karen Braun; Editing by Matthew Lewis)
