logo
EXCLUSIVE Hero policewoman blown up by IRA bomb as she saved Harrods shoppers reveals she was forced to quit the police because of her injuries but didn't qualify for a medal because she didn't die

EXCLUSIVE Hero policewoman blown up by IRA bomb as she saved Harrods shoppers reveals she was forced to quit the police because of her injuries but didn't qualify for a medal because she didn't die

Daily Mail​04-05-2025

A police officer hurt when an IRA bomb killed six people in Harrods including three cops has revealed she was forced to quit the police because of her injuries but didn't qualify for a medal because she didn't die.
Pam White, then-24, was blown off her feet just days before Christmas on December 17, 1983, by an IRA car bomb that took the lives of her colleagues Inspector Stephen Dodd, 34, Sergeant Noel Lane, 28, and PC Jane Arbuthnot, 22.
However, although she performed the same role as her colleagues who were killed that day, only they and their families will receive medal recognition.
That is because while there is a medal for emergency service workers killed in the line of duty, the Elizabeth Emblem created last year, and other medals for gallantry, there is not one for those who have not died but were forced to quit the force because of the injuries they sustained.
Pam, from Tabley, Cheshire, is now backing fellow former police officer Tom Curry's campaign for a medal for injured members of the emergency services who have been forced to quit the police because of their injuries.
She said: 'It would mean a lot to me because the bravery shown on that day would be recognised.
'I really feel that all the officers who were there at the bombing should have received an award for their bravery.
'People might say that it is only a medal but it's an actual recognition that all that you've gone through wasn't in vain.
'Nobody knows what I did on that day. Nobody knows what the other officers did.
'All I can say is that all the officers that were injured stayed at the scene. Not one of the officers thought, 'Oh, I've been injured. I'm going to get out of here.'
'We all stayed. Didn't think of ourselves. We were thinking of keeping the members of the public safe and try to limit any further casualties. That went beyond our duty.
'All we received at the time was a letter from the commissioner. Having this award would mean so much to me and the other officers.
'I was 24 years old with everything going for me and then I didn't. I have had some tough times - everybody does but I have fought through them.'
PC Pam White did not hesitate in guiding members of the public to safety despite being 'absolutely terrified' that a second device could detonate at any moment.
She said her police emergency training kicked in and she was determined evacuate shoppers and help the injured.
The bombing had a dramatic impact on her life, with Pam eventually losing her job, her health, her fiancé and her home.
Pam never fully recovered from the horrific ordeal and was medically discharged from the Met three years later.
Pam held on to the anger she felt for both the police and the IRA for nearly two decades until she became a Christian and took part in peace and reconciliation work, which finally gave her the strength to forgive.
Pam, then aged 24, and other officers had been deployed to Harrods department store in London, on December 17, 1983, after the Met received a bomb warning. They had sealed off the streets and were attempting to evacuate the area when the blast ripped through the Hans Crescent entrance at 1.21pm – just 36 minutes after the IRA's alert that it had planted a bomb.
Three members of the public, Kenneth Salvesen, 28, Jasmine Cochrane Patrick, 25, and Philip Geddes, 25, were also killed and 90 others injured after the explosion sent rubble, glass and other debris raining down on to the streets.
Pam and PC Arbuthnot were just 12ft away from the bomb when it exploded.
'I still to this day don't know how I survived,' she said.
'We had just sealed the road off to cars. I had just spoken to Jane and turned my back and the bomb went off.
'Me turning my back could have possibly saved my life. I was later told that if you are facing a blast, the air is sucked out of your lungs and you are killed that way.
'Jane was killed instantly.
'I don't know why I survived. For many years I had survivor's guilt, which I wasn't aware of at the time.
'I couldn't answer the question why I survived. My partner was also a police officer, and he just basically said ''just get on with it''. But I couldn't.
'It was absolute carnage that day. People were lying injured everywhere.
'All the windows at Harrods had been blown out and there was a lot of damage.
'One of my colleagues had cufflinks from a shop mannequin embedded in his kidneys following the blast.
'Those officers not killed by the blast just carried on with their duties.
'We didn't think of doing anything else.
'There was building nearby and I just got people into there. I'd got into the building because the doors had been blown off. Once in there I just got them to lie down.
'I was in total shock that the bomb had exploded.
'There was a Mini parked right opposite the bomb car and we had been informed of another bomb, because it was very common then for the IRA to plant the secondary device.
'I was absolutely terrified that another bomb would go off.
'The sole purpose of the bomb was to lure the police officers to the death.
'The IRA saw it as a war and we were in uniform so they thought we were part of the problem, where I just thought I was a bobby on the beat.
'The IRA said they didn't want to civilian casualties but planting a bomb outside Harrods on the last Saturday before Christmas, what did they expect?
'It's a miracle more weren't killed.
'If people hadn't come out of the other entrance more would have been killed.'
Pam and her colleagues finished their shift and returned to the station. The next day she returned for duty.
'I was told to take a couple of weeks off, which I did.
'I returned to work but it wasn't the same.
'There wasn't any debriefing back then. Now officers would receive very heavy debriefing.
'We've got nothing. They gave us alcohol that the public had donated, told us to have few drinks, forget about it and move on.'
Pam did not suffer any physical injuries following the bombing.
'I didn't have a scratch on me,' she said.
'I couldn't hear anything and the ambulance officer who treated me said that if my hearing didn't return after three days, I'd be permanently deaf. Fortunately, it did but I have suffered from tinnitus ever since.'
She added: 'I was ostracised by some of my colleagues because I didn't suffer any physical injuries.
'They thought I was putting in on. I looked OK on the outside but inside I was different.
'Until the bombing, I was a very confident person. I was young, fit, excited and proud to be a MET police officer.
'I had everything going for me and then it was gone.'
'I joined the Met because my brother was in the police and I saw it as an exciting career.
'But after the bombing that all changed.
'I had to carry on as normal because you couldn't show any weakness but inside I was terrified about doing the job.
'I dreaded calls regarding sudden deaths or something gory because of all the maiming I had seen.
'It affected me badly. I couldn't admit I had a problem because I thought I would lose my job.
'I didn't realize at the time but my career had ended then. I wasn't the same person.
'I was suffering from PTSD.'
A few months after the bombing Pam's health deteriorated.
She said: 'I began suffering from stomach problems and began losing weight.
'I went to see my superintendent and I was dripping with sweat. It was dripping onto his desk.
'He picked up the phone and sent me to the nursing home at Hendon.
'It was a medical facility for officers and I was in there from February to August.
'I was told I had severe anxiety state and I was forced to see a shrink.
'In those days, if you had those kinds of issues in the police, nobody would trust you or want to work with you.
'It was a very tough time.'
'The experience of the bombing was such a shock to my body and that your adrenals produce noradrenaline for no reason.
'That was the reason for the sweating but I didn't know that then. I thought I was dying. I thought I was having a heart attack.
Pam returned to work but was put on restrictive duties in the station's property store.
She was finally medically discharged in July 1986.
Pam said: 'I was very angry because I wasn't given a choice.
'I was discharged on the grounds that I had tinnitus and severe anxiety state, which is now PTSD.
'I'd also developed stomach problems, which was all related to the bomb blast.
'Everything had been taken away from me.
'I was very proud to be a Met Police officer and have many happy memories.
'In the time between the bombing and leaving the police, I lost my relationship as I was engaged, I lost my home, my health, and my career.
'I thought 'why has this happened to me?' I didn't realise how lucky I was to have survived.'
Pam finally let go of her hatred in 2001.
She said: 'I was angry with the IRA for many years. But I found faith and realised that all the internal pain was not good for me.
'You can't vent at an organisation like the IRA. I met the IRA's commander-in-chief on a trip to Ireland and I went up to him to say I forgave the IRA. He said that was appreciated.'
Yet despite this, Pam still suffers flashbacks every time there is a terrorist attack.
'Each bombing takes me back there,' she said. 'I am not good with loud noises and this is a weird one but if I go to the cinema I have to sit on the end seat, or stay in a hotel room at the end of the corridor.'
And while she is glad her colleagues are eligible for the Elizabeth Emblem, she hopes one day police officers like herself who have to leave the job they love because of injuries sustained in the line of duty will receive medals as well.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Corbyn says police ‘picked on him to silence democratic rights' as case dropped
Corbyn says police ‘picked on him to silence democratic rights' as case dropped

South Wales Argus

time7 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

Corbyn says police ‘picked on him to silence democratic rights' as case dropped

The former Labour leader and John McDonnell were called for interview after a pro-Palestine protest in London earlier this year. Mr McDonnell revealed in the Commons that police had dropped their investigation into the pair, but said the Metropolitan Police had originally tried to charge them because MPs were held to have 'a greater culpability'. Nine people face no further action after a demonstration on January 18, according to the Met, which has told the PA news agency it will not confirm whether either politician was involved. Raising a point of order, Mr McDonnell told the Commons: 'You may be aware that (Mr Corbyn) and I were called for interview by the Metropolitan Police following our participation in a demonstration in January calling for peace and justice for the Palestinian people and an end to the genocide in Gaza. 'It was alleged that we failed to follow police restrictions on the protest. This is untrue, and at all times we followed police instructions. 'We can now report that the police have dropped the case against us and there will be no charges.' Mr McDonnell alleged that 'the Metropolitan Police informed us that our case was referred to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) because as MPs we were to be held to have, and I quote, 'a greater culpability'.' The independent MP for Hayes and Harlington, who was once Mr Corbyn's shadow chancellor, added: 'This is an unacceptable practice which flies in the face of the principle that we are all equal before the law.' Mr Corbyn, now the independent MP for Islington North, said: 'I don't intend to let it rest just there.' John McDonnell said the Met had originally tried to charge him and Jeremy Corbyn because MPs were held to have 'a greater culpability' (Jordan Pettitt/PA) He told MPs: 'If there are elements in the police and possibly in the Crown Prosecution Service who want Members of Parliament to be held to a different standard of account than the general public, that removes us from the normality of law in this country. 'And I think that would be a very, very bad step indeed.' He later added: 'We have to all – all of us – have the right to take part in public protest about human rights abuse, about war, about peace, about anything else. That is what democracy is about. 'And I saw this whole effort as being a means to try and silence the democratic rights of everybody in our society by picking on us two as Members of Parliament, and I'm grateful for the decision that's been made today.' Father of the House Sir Edward Leigh said he had 'not often taken part in demos in central London' but spoke to 'show that opinion in this House of Commons is absolutely united'. 'We've always proclaimed what is very much the British way that Members of Parliament are no different from any other member of the public,' the Conservative MP for Gainsborough said. 'If they do wrong, they will be held to account, but they should not be subject to some greater test of culpability just because they're Members of Parliament.' A Met Police spokesperson said: 'No further action will be taken against nine people who were interviewed as part of an investigation into alleged breaches of Public Order Act conditions during a protest on Saturday January 18. 'The decision in two cases was taken following a review of the evidence by the Crown Prosecution Service, while the remaining seven cases were decided on by police officers. 'While we are aware of names being attributed to those who were the subject of our investigation, we will not be confirming their identities given that matters did not result in any charges.' Two individuals have been charged with breaching the same conditions as well as inciting others to do so, according to the force, with a further two individuals still under investigation.

Corbyn says police ‘picked on him to silence democratic rights' as case dropped
Corbyn says police ‘picked on him to silence democratic rights' as case dropped

Glasgow Times

time7 hours ago

  • Glasgow Times

Corbyn says police ‘picked on him to silence democratic rights' as case dropped

The former Labour leader and John McDonnell were called for interview after a pro-Palestine protest in London earlier this year. Mr McDonnell revealed in the Commons that police had dropped their investigation into the pair, but said the Metropolitan Police had originally tried to charge them because MPs were held to have 'a greater culpability'. Nine people face no further action after a demonstration on January 18, according to the Met, which has told the PA news agency it will not confirm whether either politician was involved. Raising a point of order, Mr McDonnell told the Commons: 'You may be aware that (Mr Corbyn) and I were called for interview by the Metropolitan Police following our participation in a demonstration in January calling for peace and justice for the Palestinian people and an end to the genocide in Gaza. 'It was alleged that we failed to follow police restrictions on the protest. This is untrue, and at all times we followed police instructions. 'We can now report that the police have dropped the case against us and there will be no charges.' Mr McDonnell alleged that 'the Metropolitan Police informed us that our case was referred to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) because as MPs we were to be held to have, and I quote, 'a greater culpability'.' The independent MP for Hayes and Harlington, who was once Mr Corbyn's shadow chancellor, added: 'This is an unacceptable practice which flies in the face of the principle that we are all equal before the law.' Mr Corbyn, now the independent MP for Islington North, said: 'I don't intend to let it rest just there.' John McDonnell said the Met had originally tried to charge him and Jeremy Corbyn because MPs were held to have 'a greater culpability' (Jordan Pettitt/PA) He told MPs: 'If there are elements in the police and possibly in the Crown Prosecution Service who want Members of Parliament to be held to a different standard of account than the general public, that removes us from the normality of law in this country. 'And I think that would be a very, very bad step indeed.' He later added: 'We have to all – all of us – have the right to take part in public protest about human rights abuse, about war, about peace, about anything else. That is what democracy is about. 'And I saw this whole effort as being a means to try and silence the democratic rights of everybody in our society by picking on us two as Members of Parliament, and I'm grateful for the decision that's been made today.' Father of the House Sir Edward Leigh said he had 'not often taken part in demos in central London' but spoke to 'show that opinion in this House of Commons is absolutely united'. 'We've always proclaimed what is very much the British way that Members of Parliament are no different from any other member of the public,' the Conservative MP for Gainsborough said. 'If they do wrong, they will be held to account, but they should not be subject to some greater test of culpability just because they're Members of Parliament.' A Met Police spokesperson said: 'No further action will be taken against nine people who were interviewed as part of an investigation into alleged breaches of Public Order Act conditions during a protest on Saturday January 18. 'The decision in two cases was taken following a review of the evidence by the Crown Prosecution Service, while the remaining seven cases were decided on by police officers. 'While we are aware of names being attributed to those who were the subject of our investigation, we will not be confirming their identities given that matters did not result in any charges.' Two individuals have been charged with breaching the same conditions as well as inciting others to do so, according to the force, with a further two individuals still under investigation.

I know the ingredients of Ulster's riots only too well
I know the ingredients of Ulster's riots only too well

The Herald Scotland

time10 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

I know the ingredients of Ulster's riots only too well

When I saw images of the homes of immigrant families in Ballymena with loyalist flags placed in their windows to ward off racist mobs, and fearful handmade posters reading 'I work in a care home', I felt as if I was back there. It was all so horribly, desperately, familiar. I grew up about ten miles from the epicentre of the anti-immigrant rioting, in my hometown Antrim. Ballymena and Antrim are like twins. Same people, same problems, same hate. Loyalism runs strong here, as it does in other towns where violence spread: Larne, Portadown, Newtownabbey, Carrickfergus. As a young reporter, I covered crime and terrorism in these places. Read more from Neil Mackay: Back then, the towns of County Antrim were dominated by loyalist paramilitaries. Other areas had Republican gunmen and the IRA. Where I grew up, the UVF and UDA were in charge. Though there's always exceptions to the rule. Republican areas had loyalist pockets, and vice versa. Nothing is ever simple in the north of Ireland. My own family history was far from simple. On my maternal side, it was all Irish, Republican and Catholic. On the paternal side, all British, Loyalist and Protestant. Only in a place like Northern Ireland could the term 'mixed marriage' exist into the 21st century. So I got to know what makes both sides tick. I learned to understand – not accept, just understand – their hatreds. When I learned enough, I'd had enough. That's why I left and have lived in Scotland these last 30 years. I couldn't bear the place anymore. Though, in my heart, I still love its beauty, and its people. When my people are good – on both sides – they're very, very good. When they're bad, they're monsters. There's a terrible truth about what has happened in Northern Ireland, which might help folk in Scotland, bewildered by the labyrinthine history and tribal complexity of my country, understand the deep roots of recent events. Read more: The truth lies in what's called the 'siege mentality' of Ulster's loyalists. I deliberately differentiate between loyalism and unionism. Unionism is a perfectly respectable, mainstream political position. Loyalism has much darker shades to it. Everything is on a spectrum in Northern Ireland. There is, after all, a world of difference between an Irish nationalist who believes in gaining a United Ireland through democratic means, and an advocate of the IRA and armed republicanism. Loyalism's siege mentality has deep roots in the past. It goes back to the Plantation of Ulster in the 1600s, when mostly Scottish Protestants settled lands once owned by Irish Catholics. In effect, Ireland became the first 'British' colony, and Ulster was ground zero. To take someone's land you must fight them, and that means you must kill them and they'll kill you back. To kill people, you must learn to hate them. Therein lies the source of loyalism's siege mentality. Loyalists just never felt safe on the land they took. Why would someone from Ireland, like me, have a name like 'Mackay'? The plantation is your answer. Sometime, long ago, my paternal Scottish ancestors colonised the land which my maternal Irish ancestors owned. Siege mentality requires a sense of your own supremacy. You must think: this is my land, nobody else deserves it. Wars and bloodshed have come and gone, but such ancestral traits are hard to shake. All of us carry some burden inherited from our grandfathers and grandmothers. The Troubles are over. Such a ghastly euphemism for what it was: an ethnic civil war of neighbour against neighbour. But grievance and supremacy linger on. To many hardline loyalists, this land is still their land and nobody can claim any right to it; others do not belong, just as Catholics once didn't belong. You can see how such deep psychological currents can easily wash up against the shores of present-day racism and anti-immigrant hate. Thus, all those loyalist flags placed in immigrant windows; thus, all those signs saying 'we're local, we work in care homes'. It was an attempt to say 'we don't threaten you', 'we aren't here to take what you believe is yours'. Even after the riots began, politicians from the hardline Traditional Unionist Voice party talked of 'the influx of Roma' and 'very real grievances' among the people of Ballymena. So far, it appears that loyalist paramilitaries are not orchestrating the violence. Yet. Though the burning of homes has called to mind images of loyalist mobs burning Catholics out of Belfast at the start of the Troubles: the trigger for the arrival of the British army. Aaron Edwards, a Northern Irish security analyst and author who I know and whose work on loyalism I respect, says the absence of loyalist paramilitaries 'may not last for long'. The areas where rioting happened are poor. It is easy for violent men to exploit marginalisation and deprivation. Evidently, supremacy and poverty are a combustible mix. Nor can we forget the long links between loyalist terrorists and the British far-right. That truth came roaring into sight during last summer's far-right riots, which spread from England to Ulster. These are dangerous times in Northern Ireland, where violence and hatred are never far from the surface. What we're seeing may look very new – very 21st century – but the tragedy is that this is a very old toxin still poisoning the country that I both love and loathe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store