
Lawsuit filed against L.A. over lack of bike lanes, claiming Measure HLA violations
A lawsuit was filed Wednesday against the city of Los Angeles over a lack of updated bike lanes along the county's busiest bus route.
The suit, filed by Streetsblog L.A. editor Joseph Linton in L.A. County Superior Court, appears to be the first lawsuit filed over a measure that voters approved last year, which demands the city implement a 2015 mobility plan. Among the requirements were new bike lanes on Vermont Avenue amid ongoing and planned improvements.
Linton alleges violations of Measure HLA in the summer 2024 when the city repaved portions of Vermont Ave. without installing 'protected bike lanes and pedestrian enhancements,' and a violation over the Metro board of directors' recent decision to move forward on plans for the Vermont Transit Corridor to implement bus lanes without including new bike lanes.
The measure gave residents the right to sue over alleged violations.
'It is my hope that this lawsuit will bring the city to the negotiating table and will result in street improvements that save lives, foster public health, stem climate-harming emissions, and improve the quality of life for Vermont Avenue's pedestrians, bus riders, and bicyclists,' Linton said in a statement on Streetsblog.
The suit does not seek monetary payment beyond recouping legal fees.
Metro's project will add dedicated bus lanes and 26 stations at 13 locations along a 12.4- mile stretch on Vermont Avenue between 120th Street and Sunset Boulevard. The route sees 38,000 daily bus boardings, according to Metro, and will especially help disadvantaged communities who rely heavily on public transit.
The project is included in the Measure M expenditure plan, which allocated $425 million for construction.
The plan has been at the center of debate for months. Safe streets advocates have argued that it ignores the voter mandate while the transit agency and city officials have said the measure only applies to city-led projects. Metro has argued that the addition of bike lanes would increase cost and timeline for the project, which has been under study for nearly a decade.
'Measure HLA does not apply when non-city entities, public or private, carry out their own projects in the City's streets,' city attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto wrote in a letter in November to Streets for All, the advocacy group behind the the ballot measure.
The city attorney's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit.
But citing a partnership agreement between the city and Metro, Linton alleges that the city can't separate itself from Metro's plan since it will fund portions of the project, review the project and be involved in the permitting process.
'Ultimately, the city is the guarantor of HLA,' Linton's attorney Mike Gatto said. 'The city also has a relationship with Metro — a contractual relationship based on certain provisions that the Los Angeles City Council and the Metro board both approved.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
2 days ago
- New York Times
How a Times Reporter Eluded a Ban on the Word ‘Gay'
In the In Times Past column, David W. Dunlap explores New York Times history through artifacts housed in the Museum at The Times. The Advocate, a national L.G.B.T.Q. newsmagazine, took The New York Times to task in its issue of Dec. 9, 1986, for what the magazine regarded as this newspaper's indifference, if not hostility, to the gay community. Among the articles in The Advocate was 'The 'G' Word,' about The Times's refusal to adopt the word 'gay.' At the time, there was an explicit prohibition in The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage: 'gay. Do not use as a synonym for homosexual unless it appears in the formal, capitalized name of an organization or in quoted matter.' Gay men found this rule to be demeaning. I know, because I was one of them. As a closeted young reporter on The Times's Metro desk, however, I didn't stand a chance of persuading the publisher, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger (1926-2012), or the executive editor, A.M. Rosenthal (1922-2006), to overturn a ban they had put in place in 1976. So I waged guerrilla warfare instead. Whenever I wrote articles of particular concern to gay readers, I peppered the text with 'gay' as much as I could — in accordance with the stylebook rule. I also tried to limit use of the clinical, antiquated 'homosexual.' The point was not to be subversive, but to leave readers with the impression that my articles were written in idiomatic English. For instance, 42 years ago, I covered the transformation of a former New York City public school in Greenwich Village into what is now the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Community Center. 'Homosexual' appeared only once in the article (apart from the headline, 'Sale of Site to Homosexuals Planned,' which I didn't write). But 'gay' appeared six times, in the names of organizations and in direct quotations. That 1986 Advocate issue is in the Museum at The Times, as is a copy of the old stylebook, opened to the 'gay' entry. The editor to whom the book belonged, Thomas Feyer, drew an 'X' through the entry in June 1987, when the rule was superseded by a memo from Allan M. Siegal (1940-2022), an assistant managing editor. 'Starting immediately,' Mr. Siegal wrote, 'we will accept the word gay as an adjective meaning homosexual, in references to social or cultural patterns and political issues.' That made my life easier, in many ways. Today, the stylebook says: 'gay (adj.) is preferred to homosexual in most contexts.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Metro Inc.: Buy, Sell, or Hold?
Written by Joey Frenette at The Motley Fool Canada Shares of Montreal-based grocery firm Metro (TSX:MRU) have been faring quite well in the past year, now up a solid 17% year to date and close to 40% in the past year. Undoubtedly, the 'boring' grocery play has been anything but amid its robust rally. And while the stock may be starting to get just a bit pricey, at least compared to its historical valuation metrics, I think the quality defensive is well worth the slightly higher price of admission at just north of $105 per share. Undoubtedly, Metro, which primarily operates in the provinces of Quebec and Ontario, isn't the only grocery stock that has been firing on all cylinders of late. Indeed, the broad basket of grocery names has been on the ascent in recent years, seemingly undeterred by the threat of heftier food inflation and the impact of tariffs. Although you could do quite well by owning any one of the grocery plays or the broad basket, I think that shares of MRU stand out for their incredibly low beta, which is currently at 0.3. Indeed, for those seeking a less volatile ride for the second half, MRU stock seems to be a name to pick up while it yields a relatively attractive (and growing) 1.4% dividend yield. At the time of writing, shares trade at 23.75 times trailing price to earnings (P/E), which is not cheap for Metro standards. However, if you're in the market for a steady consumer staple that can move higher under its own power (the lower beta entails Metro is less likely to follow in the footsteps of the TSX Index), I'd not be against buying the stock at above $100 per share. Arguably, Metro still has the growth drivers in place to make higher highs going into year's end. Recently, Metro's top boss and CEO noted that the weakness in the Canadian dollar has been adding fuel to inflation. As the loonie gains a bit of ground again as the U.S. dollar looks to sink further (some pundits see the greenback falling by a high single-digit percentage point from here), I think Canadian consumers could be in for a bit of modest relief. And if Trump's tariffs go away in the back half of the year, either due to a friendly deal or perhaps some sort of blockage by the U.S. court, perhaps food inflation could have the chance to really cool off for a change. Either way, Metro's managers are doing a fantastic job of navigating the tariff environment. They've done their best to source more local products to help customers get a better deal for their dollar. And though there's no eating all of the tariff impact on imported goods, I think that the firm is better equipped than most other retailers to continue higher, regardless of what's in store on the trade front for the next 18 months. Most definitely not. But if you're a cautious investor looking for a resilient defensive dividend grower, I'd not sleep on the name. It's a buy, in my books. The post Metro Inc.: Buy, Sell, or Hold? appeared first on The Motley Fool Canada. Before you buy stock in Metro, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor Canada analyst team just identified what they believe are the Top Stocks for 2025 and Beyond for investors to buy now… and Metro wasn't one of them. The Top Stocks that made the cut could potentially produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider MercadoLibre, which we first recommended on January 8, 2014 ... if you invested $1,000 in the 'eBay of Latin America' at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $21,345.77!* Stock Advisor Canada provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month – one from Canada and one from the U.S. The Stock Advisor Canada service has outperformed the return of S&P/TSX Composite Index by 24 percentage points since 2013*. See the Top Stocks * Returns as of 4/21/25 More reading Made in Canada: 5 Homegrown Stocks Ready for the 'Buy Local' Revolution [PREMIUM PICKS] Market Volatility Toolkit Best Canadian Stocks to Buy in 2025 Beginner Investors: 4 Top Canadian Stocks to Buy for 2025 5 Years From Now, You'll Probably Wish You Grabbed These Stocks Subscribe to Motley Fool Canada on YouTube Fool contributor Joey Frenette has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
LAX Metro Transit Center opens, connecting millions to the Los Angeles International Airport
LOS ANGELES - The long-awaited LAX Metro Transit Center station in Westchester opened Friday, marking a new era of transit in Los Angeles. After a decade of planning and four years of construction, the station promises to enhance connectivity for over a million daily Metro riders. What we know The new transit hub provides direct access to the Los Angeles International Airport, one of the busiest airports in the country and the busiest in Southern California. Edna Stanley, deputy chief operations manager at Metro, highlighted the significance of the project, stating, "This is our new LAX Metro Transit Center station. It serves as a connection and traveling hub for Angelenos and travelers alike." The station connects the C and K Metro lines to the broader network, allowing travelers from Redondo Beach and Norwalk to reach the airport seamlessly. The facility features a mezzanine level with a customer service center, where ambassadors and representatives assist passengers with transit inquiries and connections to the Lava shuttle, which departs every 10 minutes. Additionally, the station boasts a large bus plaza servicing six Metro bus routes and eight municipal bus routes, further expanding transit options for commuters. The backstory The opening of the LAX Metro Transit Center is a significant milestone in Los Angeles' efforts to improve public transportation infrastructure. The project aims to reduce traffic congestion and provide a convenient alternative for airport access. The station officially opens at 5 p.m. Friday, with free rides available throughout the weekend. Metro encourages residents and travelers to explore the new facility and take advantage of the enhanced transit options. The Source Information provided by Metro and on-site interviews conducted on Friday, June 6.