Will Fountain Wind farm plan prevail in Shasta? California decision coming soon
While Shasta County continues to fight California to stop a revived controversial wind energy project that supervisors rejected more than three years ago, the draft environmental impact report for the proposed Fountain Wind is expected to be published this spring.
After the draft EIR is released, a public workshop on the project will be scheduled in Shasta County. Such meetings happen within 60 days of the report's publication, California Energy Commission officials said.
The state cannot at this time give an estimate when a final decision on the project will come.
Shasta County and the Pit River Tribe teamed up to sue the state over the project, which would feature 48 wind turbines on 4,500 acres in the Montgomery Creek-Round Mountain area, about 35 miles east of Redding. The turbines would have the capacity to generate 205 megawatts, enough power to about 80,000 homes, according to project applicant Texas-based ConnectGen.
County officials announced the lawsuit in late November 2023 at a public meeting in Anderson that was hosted by the California Energy Commission.
In October 2021, the Shasta County Board of Supervisors voted down the project, denying ConnectGen's appeal of the county Planning Commission's decision not to approve the wind farm. The supervisors' meeting featured more than 10 hours of public comment.
But the California Legislature in 2022 approved AB 205, which allowed the Energy Commission to consider approving the project, even though Shasta County rejected it.
To date, Shasta has spent more than $1 million to fight the project. The largest amount, about $968,000, has gone to legal fees. Shasta also has spent about $55,000 of the $100,000 it budgeted for its marketing campaign about the project's negative impacts on the community, county spokesman David Maung said.
'I have kept spending under the allotted $100K in anticipation of the decision being delayed, to give us flexibility for another marketing push in the near future,' Maung wrote in an email to the Record Searchlight.
During the November 2023 public meeting in Anderson, the California Energy Commission was told the water source for the project was no longer viable. The commission verified this information in December 2023.
ConnectGen then submitted information on a new water source on March 18, 2024.
Ten days later, the commission informed ConnectGen that the change triggered more environmental review, state officials said.
That meant a decision on the project would be delayed from the original estimate of mid- to late 2024.
Meanwhile, last April a Shasta County Superior Court judge ruled that a judge from outside of the area will preside over the lawsuit filed against the wind project.
Rather than move the case to a court in another county, Judge Stephen Baker ruled that a judge from a county other than Shasta or Sacramento counties will hear the case, but it will remain in-county.
The California Attorney General's Office had objected to having a lawsuit filed against the California Energy Commission heard in Shasta County because of possible prejudice against the commission.
Shasta County has received support from other counties.
The San Bernardino County Land Services Department in a September 2023 letter to California Energy Commission Executive Director Drew Bohan wrote that the CEC lacks the jurisdiction to consider an application for an energy project that the state, local, regional or federal agency, collectively acting as the local agency, has denied.
Any other interpretation 'would create absurd results, invite manipulation, and directly conflict with the intent and processes of AB 205,' the San Bernardino County letter in part states.
Supporters of what ConnectGen is doing include California Unions for Reliable Energy, which argued in a letter sent in August 2023 to the CEC that Shasta County's interpretation of AB 205 "is contrary to the statue's plain language, inconsistent with the bill's legislative history and statutory scheme, and unsupported by case law."
David Benda covers business, development and anything else that comes up for the USA TODAY Network in Redding. He also writes the weekly "Buzz on the Street" column. He's part of a team of dedicated reporters that investigate wrongdoing, cover breaking news and tell other stories about your community. Reach him on Twitter @DavidBenda_RS or by phone at 1-530-338-8323. To support and sustain this work, please subscribe today.
This article originally appeared on Redding Record Searchlight: Shasta's spent $1M fighting wind farm, but California decides on plan
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
15 minutes ago
- New York Times
BlackRock Is Accused of a Plot Against Coal. The Firm Says That's ‘Absurd.'
Did some of the biggest investors in the world buy up shares in coal companies to force them to produce less coal? An unusual lawsuit in Texas claims that investment firms including BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street did just that, illegally colluding with one another to reduce coal production as part of a conspiracy to fight climate change. In a federal court in Texas on Monday, a lawyer for BlackRock told a judge that the claims 'defy economic reality' and that the lawsuit should be dismissed. 'The complaint ignores that the coal market has been declining for decades for a host of reasons well before this alleged conspiracy,' said Gregg Costa, a lawyer with the firm Gibson Dunn, speaking on behalf of all three defendants. A lawyer for Texas, which filed the suit late last year along with 10 other states, said BlackRock's chief executive, Laurence D. Fink, has written in the past that corporations should set targets for greenhouse-gas reductions. For coal companies, that means 'reducing output,' said the lawyer, Brian Barnes of the firm Cooper & Kirk. Texas, a major oil- and gas-producing state, has taken aggressive action against financial companies over climate issues, including enacting a law that bars state entities from doing business with investment firms that the comptroller says are boycotting energy companies. In January, the Texas attorney general, Ken Paxton, and 10 other state attorneys general sent a letter to financial institutions warning that their policies on climate and environment, as well as diversity, 'could lead to enforcement actions.' As power has changed in Washington, financial firms have walked back their messaging and participation in climate action groups. The complaint in the Texas case noted that BlackRock and State Street had already withdrawn from a trade association known as Climate Action 100+. (Vanguard had not been a member.) The firms have also exited the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative, which had been a target of criticism from the right. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Calavo (NASDAQ:CVGW) Reports Sales Below Analyst Estimates In Q1 Earnings, Stock Drops 15.3%
Fresh produce company Calavo Growers (NASDAQ:CVGW) fell short of the market's revenue expectations in Q1 CY2025 as sales rose 3.3% year on year to $190.5 million. Its non-GAAP profit of $0.40 per share was 25% below analysts' consensus estimates. Is now the time to buy Calavo? Find out in our full research report. Revenue: $190.5 million vs analyst estimates of $192.8 million (3.3% year-on-year growth, 1.1% miss) Adjusted EPS: $0.40 vs analyst expectations of $0.53 (25% miss) Adjusted EBITDA: $11.4 million vs analyst estimates of $14.74 million (6% margin, 22.7% miss) Operating Margin: 4%, in line with the same quarter last year Market Capitalization: $493.7 million 'Our second fiscal quarter performance reflects the strength of our commercial strategy and disciplined operational execution amid continued volatility in the avocado market. Revenue grew year-over-year, driven by strong pricing performance,' said Lee Cole, President and Chief Executive Officer of Calavo Growers, Inc. A trailblazer in the avocado industry, Calavo Growers (NASDAQ:CVGW) is a pioneering California-based provider of high-quality avocados and other fresh food products. A company's long-term performance is an indicator of its overall quality. Even a bad business can shine for one or two quarters, but a top-tier one grows for years. With $694.5 million in revenue over the past 12 months, Calavo is a small consumer staples company, which sometimes brings disadvantages compared to larger competitors benefiting from economies of scale and negotiating leverage with retailers. As you can see below, Calavo's demand was weak over the last three years. Its sales fell by 15.8% annually, a tough starting point for our analysis. This quarter, Calavo's revenue grew by 3.3% year on year to $190.5 million, falling short of Wall Street's estimates. Looking ahead, sell-side analysts expect revenue to decline by 1.8% over the next 12 months. it's tough to feel optimistic about a company facing demand difficulties. Software is eating the world and there is virtually no industry left that has been untouched by it. That drives increasing demand for tools helping software developers do their jobs, whether it be monitoring critical cloud infrastructure, integrating audio and video functionality, or ensuring smooth content streaming. Click here to access a free report on our 3 favorite stocks to play this generational megatrend. If you've followed StockStory for a while, you know we emphasize free cash flow. Why, you ask? We believe that in the end, cash is king, and you can't use accounting profits to pay the bills. Calavo broke even from a free cash flow perspective over the last two years, giving the company limited opportunities to return capital to shareholders. We struggled to find many positives in these results as Calavo fell short of Wall Street's estimates across all key metrics. Overall, this quarter could have been better. The stock traded down 15.3% to $23.42 immediately after reporting. The latest quarter from Calavo's wasn't that good. One earnings report doesn't define a company's quality, though, so let's explore whether the stock is a buy at the current price. If you're making that decision, you should consider the bigger picture of valuation, business qualities, as well as the latest earnings. We cover that in our actionable full research report which you can read here, it's free. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Business Wire
18 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Culp Enters Into Multi-Year Agreement With Largest Shareholder
HIGH POINT, N.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Culp, Inc. (NYSE: CULP), a leading provider of fabrics for bedding and upholstery fabrics for residential and commercial furniture, announced today that it has entered into a new, multi-year cooperation agreement with its largest shareholder, Seattle-based 22NW, LP. Among other voting, governance and standstill provisions, 22NW will provide its voting support to CULP at its 2025 and 2026 Annual Meetings of Shareholders pursuant to the agreement. In addition, new independent director candidates, Doug Collier and Lynn Heatherton will be nominated for election to the Company's board of directors at its 2025 and 2026 Annual Meetings of Shareholders along with Alexander B. Jones of 22NW, who joined the board in 2024 as part of an agreement between CULP and 22NW. The current size of the Company's board of directors will not be increased in connection with these nominations. Robert G. Culp, IV, President and Chief Executive Officer of CULP, commented, 'This new cooperation agreement with 22NW will provide support for CULP's management, employees and customers and, once again, demonstrates our willingness and ability to work constructively with investors to generate positive outcomes for all stakeholders.' Aron R. English, Portfolio Manager and Founder of 22NW, commented, 'CULP is an important investment for 22NW, and we welcome the opportunity to support the Company as it positions itself for future growth opportunities.' The complete agreement between CULP and 22NW will be filed with the SEC as an exhibit to a form 8-K. About the Company Culp, Inc. is one of the largest marketers of mattress fabrics for bedding and upholstery fabrics for residential and commercial furniture in North America. The company markets a variety of fabrics to its global customer base of leading bedding and furniture companies, including fabrics produced at Culp's manufacturing facilities and fabrics sourced through other suppliers. Culp has manufacturing and sourcing capabilities located in the United States, China, Haiti, Turkey, and Vietnam.