Orange CEO pushes for European sovereignty on satellites, to maintain Starlink ties
Feb 13 (Reuters) - France's Orange (ORAN.PA), opens new tab is pushing for European sovereignty on satellites and wants that ecosystem to grow in strength, while also continuing to collaborate with Elon Musk's Starlink, the CEO of the telecoms group said on Thursday.
WHY IT'S IMPORTANT
European companies are ramping up their efforts to compete with Starlink's network of over 7,000 low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites providing internet connection to more than 100 countries.
Last year, French satellite company Eutelsat (ETL.PA), opens new tab chose Airbus (AIR.PA), opens new tab to build 100 small satellites for its OneWeb constellation extension, as it seeks to challenge Starlink.
The French government deployed some 200 Starlink antennas in storm-ravaged Mayotte last year.
Orange also initially used Starlink to immediately restore internet connection while waiting for its network to be operational again. This option is especially used in emergencies.
KEY QUOTES
"(On satellites) we're more in line with the logic of a European sovereignty, but we also deal with Starlink in certain geographies, particularly in Africa," CEO Christel Heydemann said during a press conference in Paris, while presenting Orange's annual results.
She said Orange was working with OneWeb and Eutelsat on satellites, while also working on a "sovereign solution" with its satellite broadband unit Nordnet.
Heydemann added there were ongoing initiatives related to direct-to-cell technology, a service also offered by Starlink that beams phone signals from space to smartphones, but said Orange had not yet launched offers for it in France.
CONTEXT
Orange, France's largest telecoms provider by market share, already offers satellite broadband to customers in mainland France.
The service relies on Eutelsat's Konnect VHTS geostationary satellite, which is different from LEOs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Chelsea warn AC Milan over Mike Maignan deal as transfer talks drag on
Chelsea will not revisit a deal for AC Milan goalkeeper Mike Maignan if the move is not completed before Tuesday's transfer deadline. The Blues have been in negotiations with the Serie A giants for the French stopper as they haggle over a transfer fee. An opening offer of €15million (£12.6m) was rejected by Milan and it is believed that a deal could be struck for just €18m (£15m), meeting in the middle as the Italians value him at €25m (£21m). In the grand scheme of football transfer fees it seems like a tiny hurdle to overcome, but a deal is proving more difficult than you might think. Sky Sports report that negotiations have been continuing throughout Monday and an agreement has not been reached. Wake up to find news on your club in your inbox every morning with Metro's Football Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your team in the link we'll send you so we can get football news tailored to you. The report states that unless a transfer has been finalised by 7pm on Tuesday June 10 then Chelsea will walk away from a deal. Chelsea offered one of Djordje Petrovic or Kepa Arrizabalaga to Milan in a proposed swap deal for Maignan, but the Rossoneri have no interest in either goalkeeper, favouring a cash-only agreement. The 32-cap France international is out of contract at the San Siro in 2026 and could leave on a free transfer next summer. The transfer window closing on Tuesday evening is unusual and has been brought in to allow clubs participating in the Club World Cup to bring in players before it starts. There are now two transfer windows this summer, with the first running from June 1-10 before the Club World Cup starts on June 15. There is then a second window which runs from June 16 till September 1. The Sky Sports report states that the Maignan deal is different to the one that Chelsea are pursuing for Borussia Dortmund's Jamie Gittens in that Tuesday's deadline is not a final one. More Trending Discussions are ongoing over a move for the English winger and the Blues are happy to revisit them after the first transfer window closes if the transfer is not done in time. Dortmund turned down an initial bid worth €35m (£29.5m) for the 20-year-old and want a significantly bigger offer, closer to €50-60m (£42-50m). Much like with Maignan, it is just the transfer fee that is the issue, with Gittens keen on the switch to west London. Personal terms have been agreed between Chelsea and the winger, but club-to-club negotiations have some way to go. MORE: Man Utd, Liverpool and Tottenham battling it out for Bournemouth standout MORE: Arsenal struggle for breakthrough in latest Benjamin Sesko talks with RB Leipzig MORE: Chelsea told to sign 'exciting' €28m Norway international star in summer window
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Trump said he would not drop Elon Musk's Starlink service
WASHINGTON, June 9 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday that he would not drop the Starlink service made by Elon Musk's SpaceX company, calling it a good service. He told reporters he wishes Musk well.
Belfast Telegraph
an hour ago
- Belfast Telegraph
NI hotels join compensation action against Booking.com's ‘anti-competitive' practices
The action — involving more than 25 European countries and which could cost millions of euros — follows the judgment by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on September 19 last year, which found that the platform's parity clauses breached EU competition law. However, has previously said it is unaware of any pending legal action and suggested the case appeared to be based on 'incorrect and misleading' information. 'This is a chance for hoteliers to stand up for their rights, recover financial losses, and promote a fairer online marketplace,' said Janice Gault, Chief Executive of the Northern Ireland Hotels Federation (NIHF). 'This legal action is unprecedented, and the Federation is supporting it on behalf of its members to secure full compensation for hotels affected by anti-competitive practices. 'For over 20 years, the platform's parity clauses have posed serious challenges for the local hotel sector, leading to significant financial harm through inflated commission fees. 'This is not only about exposing unfair business conduct but also about seeking meaningful financial redress.' In 2021, unilaterally terminated corresponding compensation negotiations with the German Hotel Association (IHA) and started legal proceedings against several hundred German hotels before the Amsterdam District Court. An interim result of this (pending) process is the ruling of the European Court of Justice from September 19 2024, which confirmed findings of the German Federal Cartel Office that the platform's parity clauses breached EU competition law. This has resulted in claims for damages for hotels throughout Europe, which are now to be asserted with the class action supported by HOTREC, an umbrella group representing hotels, restaurants and cafes in Europe. The federation said that over the past 20 years, these parity clauses placed Northern Ireland hotels at a significant competitive disadvantage and that they suppressed price competition between and other online platforms, leading to inflated commissions paid by hotels. In addition, the clauses restricted hotels from offering better prices or availability on their own websites, limiting direct sales and autonomy. The federation added that use of anti-competitive parity clauses caused 'substantial financial harm to hotel businesses across Northern Ireland'. Under the general principles of European competition law, hotels in Northern Ireland are entitled to claim compensation from for the financial losses suffered. Affected hotels may also be eligible to recover a significant portion of commissions paid to in any period from 2004 to 2024, plus interest. The NIHF said they are actively working with affected hotels, guest accommodation providers and guesthouses across Northern Ireland to guide them through the next steps in joining the collective legal action against The case will be led and handled by a team of competition lawyers, litigators, and competition economists, who have already successfully achieved the ECJ's judgment last September. The legal claim will be brought before the courts in the Netherlands, with hotels having until July 31 to sign up to the damages litigation. The Irish Hotels Federation is one of dozens around Europe involved in the action. In a statement to RTÉ News last week, said it is 'not aware of any European wide legal action being taken by hotels'. It added that: 'The ECJ judgment relates specifically to questions asked by the Amsterdam District Court in relation to litigation between and some German hotels disputing the legality of price parity clauses in Germany between 2006 and 2016 — the court did not conclude that German parity price clauses were anti-competitive or had an effect on competition. The Amsterdam Court will now need to make a decision specifically on German parity clauses only.'
