
Alleged US plans to deport people to Libya 'inhuman,' rights groups say
Human rights defender David Yambio recalls his time in Libya as one of 'perpetual fear'.
Yambio fled Sudan in 2016 after he was forcibly recruited as a child soldier, and wound up in a series of detention centres and prisons in Libya.
'I was tortured, I was enslaved. I saw an enormous level of violence that I cannot describe,' he told Middle East Eye.
He managed to escape and cross the central Mediterranean to Europe, and has since painstakingly documented abuses against refugees in Libya through his organisation Refugees in Libya.
The news that US President Donald Trump is seeking to deport migrant people to Libya left him 'deeply troubled'.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
CNN has reported that Trump officials discussed with a Libyan delegation the possibility of sending non-nationals with criminal records to the country.
One source said that administration officials are also seeking to strike a formal 'safe country' agreement with Libya which would allow the US to send asylum seekers apprehended at the US border to Libya to process their claims.
'As someone who has lived through this harsh reality of life in Libya, and the fact that I work every single day to address the ongoing crisis there, what I can say with certainty is that it's a dangerous, unacceptable and inhuman proposal,' Yambio said.
'Libya has never been a safe place for migrants, and I don't see it in any foreseeable future. The number of abuses we're documenting against migrants, refugees and Libyans is enormous,' he told MEE.
Giulia Messmer, a spokesperson for the monitor Sea-Watch, said the move is 'tantamount to condemning refugees to a violent cycle of torture, slavery and sexual violence.'
According to the report, no final agreement has been struck, and it is currently unclear which nationalities would be eligible for deportation.
A State Department spokesperson and a Libyan official denied that deportations were discussed at the meeting.
'The most vile people on earth'
During his election campaign, Trump pledged to launch the largest mass deportation operation in US history, and has deported and detained thousands of people since taking office.
In January, he signed an executive order instructing officials to facilitate international agreements that would enable the US to deport migrant people.
'Libya has never been a safe place for migrants... The number of abuses we're documenting against migrants, refugees and Libyans is enormous'
- David Yambio, co-founder of Refugees in Libya
Since then, his administration has reportedly struck deals with a number of central American countries including El Salvador, Mexico, Costa Rica and Panama, and is pushing to expand the list.
His administration is also reportedly also seeking a deal with Rwanda, which will see the country accept individuals with criminal records who have already served sentences in the US.
Under the agreement, the deportees would be integrated into Rwandan society.
In March, a refugee from Iraq, Omar Abdulsattar Ameen, was deported from the US to Rwanda.
Also in March, the US deported 200 Venezuelan men, whom it claimed were gang members, to an El Salvadoran mega prison, Cecot, shortly after the countries struck a $6m deal for El Salvador to detain around 300 migrants at the prison for one year.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said at a US Cabinet meeting on Wednesday that the administration is 'actively searching for other countries to take people from third countries'.
'We're working with nations to ask: would you take in some of the most vile people on Earth as a favour to us? The farther they are from America, the better - so they can't come back across the border,' he added.
Continuous abuse
Rights groups have long documented abuses perpetrated against thousands of people who arrive in Libya in the hope of boarding a boat to Europe and are abducted by traffickers and held to ransom.
Libya is a key transit country for thousands of refugees, often from Sub-Saharan Africa, with 760,000 estimated to have arrived in the country as of July 2024.
There, they are subjected to prolonged arbitrary detention, torture, sexual violence, forced labour and financial extortion, at the hands of both smuggling gangs and state actors.
The Libyan Coast Guard, which is trained and equipped by the European Union and member states, has long intercepted refugees attempting to cross the central Mediterranean and sent them to unofficial detention centres.
Libya: Video reveals young Ethiopian woman being tortured for ransom Read More »
'What we are documenting is continuous human trafficking of migrants but also continuous abuse,' Yambio said.
'We are speaking about innumerable human trafficking hubs that belong to people who are affiliated either with the Ministry of Interior or with the government itself. This is the huge chain of human trafficking,' he added.
According to a recent report by Doctors Without Borders (MSF), refugees in the country are stripped of protections, which prevents them from accessing healthcare.
The NGO warned that the lack of healthcare access for refugees risked worsening the trauma and injuries they had sustained in detention.
In April, the Libyan authorities accused aid groups - including MSF and the UN refugee agency, UNHCR - of plotting to 'change the demographic composition of the country,' ordering several to shutter their offices.
In mid-March, MSF was forced to wind down its operations in the country, citing a campaign of harassment targeting its staff.
Yambio highlighted that the potential deal with the US would grant yet more impunity to those committing abuses.
Rights groups have repeatedly highlighted the role of EU funding and support in perpetuating abuses against people on the move in Libya.
A UN fact-finding mission in March 2023 concluded that the EU had 'aided and abetted' Libyan authorities' crimes against migrants, through its bolstering of the Libyan Coast Guard and funding of Libyan border management programmes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Cambridge students hit out at injunctions 'criminalising' Palestine encampment
Activists have hit out at a number of University of Cambridge colleges after they obtained court injunctions "criminalising" pro-Palestine encampments on campus. Interim injunctions were obtained by Trinity College and St John's College earlier this week after campaigners re-established encampments in protest at what they said was a failure by the university to divest from Israeli companies. A lawyer for the colleges has asked for the injunctions to be made final and to last 12 months, arguing that the protests have been disruptive to students taking exams and that the colleges are "concerned about the environment of fear and intimidation created by masked protesters". Cambridge for Palestine (C4P) said the move amounts to "criminalising" protests on campus. The group posted footage on their Instagram page appearing to show police earlier this week threatening protesters with imprisonment. Speaking to Middle East Eye on Saturday, a spokesperson for C4P, who preferred to remain anonymous, said the university was aiming to obscure a consensus among the student body that "rejects the university's long-standing partnership in genocide". New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "Just months ago, when Cambridge enacted its first anti-protest injunction, over a thousand students, faculty and staff members united to condemn the university's repressive and racist action," they said. "Our university is isolating itself with its blatant defence of Zionist violence, and we will not allow it to go unchecked as it bankrolls scholasticide and mass murder." 'Our university is isolating itself with its blatant defence of Zionist violence' - C4P activist MEE contacted the University of Cambridge for comment, but had received no response at the time of publication. C4P says Trinity College holds investments in companies such as Elbit Systems, Caterpillar, L3Harris Technologies, and Barclays despite the university's previous commitment to review its 'responsible investment' policy following a similar months-long encampment last year. The group said the renewed protest last week came after months of student, faculty and community "frustration" over the university's failure to honour those pledges. The group has outlined four core demands, including full disclosure of financial ties to companies implicated in Israeli violations of international law, full divestment from them and reinvestment in Palestinian communities. In March, the university was granted a High Court order barring pro-Palestine actions from three locations on its campus until the end of July 2025 - a reduced version of its original bid to secure a five-year ban, which was rejected in court on 27 February. The University of Cambridge is made up of 31 self-governing colleges that operate autonomously, including in their financial investments. Many of them have faced protests over their investments since the launch of Israel's war on Gaza in October 2023. On 20 May, King's College announced it would divest millions from the arms industry and companies complicit in "the occupation of Ukraine and Palestinian territories", becoming the first Oxford or Cambridge college to take such measures. Since the beginning of Israel's war on Gaza in October 2023, pro-Palestinian students around the world have launched encampments in support of Gaza and in opposition to university links to Israel. The actions have been met with a fierce crackdown by security and police on several campuses.

The National
4 hours ago
- The National
US-backed GHF claims it has distributed nearly nine million meals
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation claimed on Saturday that it has distributed nearly nine million meals since launching its aid operations in Gaza, days after halting work in response to a series of deadly shootings close to its operations. Israel eased an 11-week blockade on Gaza last month, but only a limited amount of humanitarian assistance has since entered through the UN and newly established GHF – a controversial US and Israeli-backed private organisation that is overhauling aid distribution in the strip. The foundation began distributing aid last week as Gaza 's 2.3 million people face widespread hunger, with many having been displaced by the conflict. But its operations, which circumvent traditional humanitarian agencies, have drawn criticism from the UN and major aid groups, which say it does not obey humanitarian principles. In its daily operational update, GHF said it delivered 471,240 meals on Friday in 8,160 food parcels, bringing the total number of meals distributed to 8,952,142 through 140,640 parcels since the start of the campaign. GHF said the foundation was working to increase its delivery capacity, with the goal of reaching 4.5 million meals a day. 'GHF remains dedicated to securing the necessary quantities of food and essential items for all the good people of Gaza,' the organisation said in a statement. The foundation also issued a public appeal for co-operation at distribution sites to ensure safety. Residents were urged not to crowd entry points, to respect the timing of official openings and to prioritise the elderly and women, according to the statement. The organisation halted distributions on Wednesday and said it was pressing Israeli forces to improve civilian safety beyond the perimeter of its operations after dozens of Palestinians were shot dead near the Rafah site over three consecutive days. The Israeli military said on Sunday and Monday its soldiers had fired warning shots, while on Tuesday they also fired warning shots before firing towards Palestinians that it said were advancing towards troops. GHF said that aid was safely handed out from its sites without any incident. On Saturday, Reuters reported that the State Department is considering giving $500 million to GHF, citing two sources and two former US officials. The sources and former US officials said that the money would come from the US Agency for International Development, which is being folded into the US State Department. The plan has met resistance from some US officials concerned with the killings of Palestinians near aid distribution sites and the competence of the GHF, the two sources said. Israel has faced mounting international criticism recently over its actions in Gaza, with the EU, in particular, adopting a noticeably tougher tone. Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prevot told The National this week that his government had urged EU partners to expand the current sanctions list, which includes violent Israeli settlers and some Hamas figures, to include political and military leaders from Israel and Hamas. 'This is currently under discussion and we hope it will be possible to reach a common decision among all EU member states,' he said. He also noted that Belgium was exploring the possibility of using aircraft to drop aid into Gaza. 'We are trying to push, together with other European partners, to open a broader corridor for aid lorries coming from international donors through Israel to enter Palestinian territories,' said Mr Prevot, who is also Belgium's Deputy Prime Minister. 'In parallel, we are studying whether it is possible and pertinent to drop additional aid by aeroplane. What we are seeing on the ground is shameful and we urgently need to improve the international community's response.'


Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
UK and France abandon plans to recognise Palestinian state at conference
The UK and France will abandon previous plans to recognise a Palestinian state at an upcoming conference, according to diplomats. France had been lobbying the UK and other European allies to recognise a Palestinian state at the conference in New York, due to be held between 17 and 20 June. President Emmanuel Macron had described the move as 'a moral duty and political requirement', suggesting it could come in return for Saudi Arabia recognising Israel at the conference. However, The Guardian has reported that French officials briefed their Israeli counterparts this week that the conference would not be the moment for recognition. Instead, it will now focus on outlining steps towards recognition, contingent on a series of measures and concessions from the Palestinians. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters These will include a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, the release of Israeli captives, reform of the Palestinian Authority, economic reconstruction and the end of Hamas rule in Gaza. Although 147 countries recognise the state of Palestine, much of Europe has been reluctant and long stated that such a move could only come with Israel's approval and reciprocal moves from Arab states. Ireland, Spain and Norway recognised a Palestinian state last year, and there has been an increasing consensus that recognition should come unilaterally as a means of pressuring Israel to change tack. Last week, Israeli diplomat Alon Pinkas told Middle East Eye that France's push to recognise Palestine was "serious and has the backing of most of the European Union and Saudi Arabia'. However, both the UK and France have faced pressure from the US over the plans, while Israel has said it would expand its settlements in the occupied West Bank in response. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said plans to build a further 22 settlements in the occupied territory were "a strategic move that prevents the establishment of a Palestinian state". In July last year, the Israeli parliament voted overwhelmingly to oppose the establishment of a Palestinian state, with only Palestinian lawmakers and a single left-wing Jewish MP voting in support. Pinkas told MEE that while there was no meaningful domestic support in Israel or the parliament for Palestinian statehood, the international community's pitch to Israel over ending the war should be that 'we are your friends, we want you to succeed, this cannot go on... Netanyahu is driving you to unmitigated and irreparable disaster. Wake up, we are here to help".