EU lawmakers vote to bar carry-on luggage fees on planes
BRUSSELS: European lawmakers pushed on Tuesday to ban airlines from charging passengers for small carry-on luggage in a move strongly opposed by the aviation sector.
The European Parliament's transport committee adopted a proposal that would allow travellers to bring a personal item into the cabin, such as a handbag or backpack, and a hand luggage of up to seven kilogrammes (15 pounds) at no extra fee.
The measure sought to spare passengers 'unjustified extra costs', said Matteo Ricci, a centre-left lawmaker and bill's lead sponsor.
Many low-cost air carriers include only one small on-board item in the ticket, charging extra for other hand baggage.
Airlines for Europe (A4E), an industry association, condemned the proposal, suggesting it would result in higher flight prices, upping costs for those who travel light.
'Forcing a mandatory trolley bag... obliges passengers to pay for services they may not want or need,' A4E managing director Ourania Georgoutsakou said ahead of the vote.
The measure, which would apply to all flights departing or arriving within the 27-nation European Union, was adopted as part of a package of amendments to passenger rights rules put forward by the European Commission.
The transport committee also voted to introduce a common form for compensation and reimbursement requests as well a defined list of extraordinary circumstances, such as natural disasters or war, under which airlines can deny those.
The proposals must next go to a vote by the full parliament.
They are subject to change as they will need to be negotiated with and approved by member states before they can enter into force.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
NATO chief: US ‘totally committed' to collective defence pledge
THE HAGUE: NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said on Wednesday that the United States was 'totally committed' to the alliance's mutual defence clause, after President Donald Trump appeared to cast doubt on it. 'For me, there is absolute clarity that the United States is totally committed to NATO, totally committed to Article Five,' Rutte told reporters ahead of a summit meeting of alliance leaders. On his way to the summit, Trump refused to commit to NATO's Article Five clause, the basic agreement that says an attack on one member is an attack on all. 'Depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article Five,' Trump told journalists in comments sure to rattle America's European allies. 'I'm committed to being their friend,' he said. Rutte said that there was, however, an 'expectation' that the Canadians and the Europeans would ramp up their spending, with the US long complaining that it paid too much to defend countries in Europe. NATO allies, later on Wednesday, are to sign off a pledge to spend 3.5 percent of GDP on core defence spending -- just over the current US level -- plus another 1.5 percent on broader security-related areas such as cybersecurity and infrastructure. 'This is fair, that we spend the same as the US is spending,' said Rutte.
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
NATO eyes 5% defence goal amid Trump pressure, Russia threat
THE HAGUE: NATO leaders gathered in The Hague on Wednesday for a summit tailor-made for U.S. President Donald Trump, with European allies hoping a pledge to hike defence spending will prompt him to dispel doubts about his commitment to the alliance. The summit is expected to endorse a higher defence spending goal of 5% of GDP - a response to a demand by Trump and to Europeans' fears that Russia poses an increasingly direct threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte acknowledged that it was not easy for countries to find the money for extra defence spending but said it was vital to do so. 'There is absolute conviction with my colleagues at the table that given this threat from the Russians, given the international security situation, there is no alternative,' he told reporters on Wednesday morning. NATO officials are hoping the conflict between Israel and Iran, and the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend, will not overshadow the gathering, hosted by Rutte in his home city. Trump has threatened not to protect NATO members if they fail to meet spending targets and he raised doubts about his commitment again on his way to the summit by avoiding directly endorsing the alliance's Article 5 mutual defence clause. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, he said there were 'numerous definitions' of the clause. 'I'm committed to saving lives. I'm committed to life and safety. And I'm going to give you an exact definition when I get there,' he said. The new target - to be achieved over the next 10 years - is a big increase on the current goal of 2% of GDP, although it will be measured differently. It would amount to hundreds of billions of dollars in extra annual spending. Countries would spend 3.5% of GDP on core defence - such as troops and weapons - and 1.5% on broader defence-related measures such as cyber security, protecting pipelines and adapting roads and bridges to handle military vehicles. All NATO members have backed a statement enshrining the target, although Spain declared it does not need to meet the goal. Madrid says it can meet its military commitments to NATO by spending much less - a view disputed by Rutte. But Rutte accepted a diplomatic fudge with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez as part of his intense efforts to give Trump a diplomatic victory and make the summit go smoothly. UNUSUAL INSIGHT INTO SUMMIT DIPLOMACY Trump gave an unusual insight into those efforts on Tuesday by posting a private message in which Rutte lavished praise on him and congratulated him on 'decisive action in Iran'. 'You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done,' Rutte told Trump. 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way as they should, and it will be your win.' To satisfy Trump, Rutte has also kept the summit and its final statement short and focused on the spending pledge. The text is expected to cite Russia as a threat and reaffirm allies' support for Ukraine but not dwell on those issues, given Trump has taken a more conciliatory stance towards Moscow and been less supportive of Kyiv than his predecessor, Joe Biden. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy had to settle for a seat at the pre-summit dinner on Tuesday evening rather than a seat at the main meeting on Wednesday, although Trump said he would probably meet with Zelenskiy separately. Zelenskiy and his aides have said they want to talk to Trump about buying U.S. weapons including Patriot missile defence systems and increasing pressure on Moscow through tougher sanctions. The Kremlin accused NATO of being on a path of rampant militarisation and portraying Russia as a 'fiend of hell' in order to justify its big increase in defence spending.
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
UK to buy fighter jets for tactical nuclear capability
THE HAGUE: Britain said it would buy a dozen F-35A fighter jets capable of firing tactical nuclear weapons in what it described as the biggest expansion of its nuclear deterrent in a generation. The purchase of the Lockheed Martin jets would allow Britain's air force to carry nuclear weapons for the first time since the end of the Cold War, Downing Street said. 'In an era of radical uncertainty we can no longer take peace for granted,' Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a statement. Britain's nuclear deterrent is currently limited to the continuous deployment of at least one nuclear-armed submarine patrolling at sea. Starmer's government is increasing defence spending and upgrading its military forces, including its submarine fleet, as it faces increasing hostility from Russia and as the United States retrenches from its traditional role as a defender of Europe. The announcement by Britain on expanding its nuclear deterrence was made at a NATO summit in The Hague where European members are set to agree an ambitious new target to spend 5% of national income on defence and security. The U.S. will supply B61 tactical nuclear weapons for use on the planes as part of a plan for Britain to take on more responsibility for European security, said a British official who declined to be named. Britain said the purchase of the jets would allow it to contribute so-called dual-capable aircraft to NATO to carry nuclear weapons in the event of a conflict. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said 'this is yet another robust British contribution to NATO'. NEW CAPABILITY The cost of each F-35A jet is about 80 million pounds ($109 million), putting the total bill for the 12 planes at just under 1 billion pounds, according to another British official, who asked not to be named. Britain's nuclear deterrent currently rests solely on the Trident submarine-based system, which misfired during a test last year, the second successive test failure after one veered off course in 2016. The last time Britain possessed an independent air-launched nuclear capability was in 1998 when the WE-177 free fall bomb was withdrawn from service, according to Britain's parliament. Tactical nuclear weapons are intended for battlefield use, as opposed to strategic weapons designed to be fired across vast distances. By purchasing the F-35A fighter jets, Britain would be able to diversify its military options and align more closely with NATO allies such as France, and the United States, which maintains land, sea, and air-based nuclear capabilities. The United States withdrew its last nuclear weapons from Britain in 2008, in a sign at that time that the threat of conflict following the end of the Cold War was receding. Downing Street said buying the new jets would support about 20,000 jobs in Britain and underline its commitment to NATO. The government has pledged to boost overall defence and security spending to 5% of economic output by 2035 to meet a NATO target and said on Tuesday it must 'actively prepare' for war at home for the first time in years. ($1 = 0.7342 pounds)
