logo
Aurora mayoral candidates: Karina Garcia wants to show community representation in bid for mayor

Aurora mayoral candidates: Karina Garcia wants to show community representation in bid for mayor

Yahoo21-02-2025

Editor's Note: This is one in a series of stories looking at candidates for mayor of Aurora in the Feb. 25 primary election.
Karina Garcia, the current president and CEO of the Aurora Regional Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, is running for mayor.
Early voting is currently available for the Feb. 25 primary election, which includes the Aurora mayoral primary. Also on the ballot for mayor of Aurora in the primary are incumbent Richard Irvin, Ald. John Laesch, Judd Lofchie, Ald. Ted Mesiacos and Jazmine Garcia, who recently suspended her campaign.
Aurora residents will each get to vote for one mayoral candidate, and the two candidates with the highest number of votes in the Feb. 25 primary will move on to the April 1 general election.
Each of the mayoral candidates agreed to an interview with The Beacon-News. During Karina Garcia's interview, she said that she was running to show the community that it can have representation in local government and that people don't have to be under leadership that is not focusing on their needs.
Karina Garcia said she is different from other candidates because of her connection to the city's grassroots, which she said helps her better understand the community and come up with solutions.
Garcia was originally born in Mexico City but immigrated to the area when she was 9 years old with her sister and parents. Primarily she grew up in West Chicago, where she also graduated high school, which she said was nice because a majority of people were Hispanic, so it was easy to find Mexican food and people who were bilingual.
Immediately after high school, Garcia started attending the College of DuPage studying business, but she had to drop out to support herself and her children, she said. From there she worked a variety of jobs, eventually settling on Aurora's East Side in 2000, where she said she found a very different lifestyle than the one she had in West Chicago because of the shootings and gangs.
'To me, it was like, you only see that in movies,' Garcia said. 'But it was real life at that point.'
The job she said that gave her the most experience was working for Dan Wolf Automotive Group, where she eventually found herself representing the company and networking with the various chambers of commerce in the area, she said.
That's how Garcia said she was first introduced to the Aurora Regional Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, which she 'fell in love with.' Her father had previously opened his own business, and she 'felt like my dad needed a lot of help,' so she was excited to see a group helping people like her father in their own language, she said.
Garcia was looking for a career change to spend more time with her children around the same time that the executive director position for the chamber came open, she said, so she took the job even though it was a big pay cut.
In 2016, Garcia left the chamber to open up her own business that helped people with their immigration paperwork, she said. Then, in 2017, she went to work for the city in the Community Services Department until 2021, she said.
After leaving the city, Garcia went back to work for the Aurora Regional Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, this time as its president and CEO, a position she still serves in. There, she helps guide the chamber's efforts to provide services to local businesses, host workshops, connect businesses to resources and help them get licenses or permits, among other things, she said.
The Aurora Regional Hispanic Chamber of Commerce did not merge with the other local chambers of commerce and other economic development-focused organizations into the recently-launched Aurora Regional Economic Alliance, in part because the Hispanic Chamber does not duplicate any services that were offered by the other organizations, according to Garcia.
Plus, Garcia said the merger looked to her like the city just wanted more control over these organizations, and since the Hispanic Chamber often has to help businesses deal with the city, joining in the merger would have taken 'the voice away from the local businesses, and we wouldn't have been able to support them or stand up for them.'
Her run for mayor this year is the first time Garcia has stepped into politics herself, but she said other candidates have often come to her when they campaign because of her connection to Aurora's grassroots. While other candidates in this race bring experience in politics, she brings relationships with local businesses and residents, she said.
And, it's not just Hispanic businesses that she represents, according to Garcia. She said that she sits on a number of different local boards, and as mayor she would work with those organizations to find solutions for Aurora residents.
It's long-term solutions that Garcia most wants to bring to the city, she said. While the city currently knows the community's needs and points them out, she said, there aren't any plans to address them long-term, especially for low-income families.
Small businesses' needs must also be met with long-term solutions, but many businesses instead feel like they are being targeted by the city, according to Garcia. As an example, she pointed to the food truck ordinance, which she said she advocated against.
She suggested that aldermen should each study their own ward to find out what problems exist. The city focuses too much on 'how great everything is going' and should instead be bringing up issues to fix them, she said.
The second thing Garcia said she would want to do as mayor is to continue to work on filling empty buildings around the city, and not just in downtown.
Also, Garcia would work to make it affordable for Aurora residents to stay here, especially seniors, by working on taxes and affordable housing, she said.
Previously, Garcia and several other mayoral candidates had legal challenges to their spots on the ballot. While others were never taken off the ballot, Garcia was taken off at first through a decision by the Aurora Electoral Board, but that decision was later overturned by a Kane County Circuit Court judge and she was placed back on the ballot, according to past reporting.
An appeal to that Kane County judge's decision was made, but Garcia told The Beacon-News during her recent interview that the Second District Appellate Court had sided with her and kept her on the ballot. The whole process was unfair, she said, because the mistake she made that caused the legal challenge was so minor.
She believes that the legal challenge was actually a plan to force her to spend down campaign funds and keep her distracted, since it was hard for her to ask people to vote for her if she didn't even know if those votes would count, she said.
rsmith@chicagotribune.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Protests Are Just Starting
The Protests Are Just Starting

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Protests Are Just Starting

The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. For months, as Donald Trump has hollowed out the executive branch, defied courts, and worked to suppress dissent, his critics have rightly worried about the lack of visible public opposition. Democratic Party leaders are still obsessing over the 2024 election; outside organizations are fatigued; and mass protests such as those seen in the early months of Trump's first term have been missing. That began to change over the past few days, as demonstrations arose in Los Angeles over immigration-enforcement operations by federal agents. As they begin to spread to other cities, these protests look like the first mass movement against the second Trump administration. And with events scheduled this weekend to serve as counterprogramming to Trump's birthday military parade, they have the potential to grow. Yet as this moment begins, some members of the anti-Trump coalition worry that these demonstrations will bring about disaster. Protests are messy; even when the majority of participants are peaceful, just a few bad actors can produce instances of violence, and big protests always draw a few bad actors. Observers have also worried about the optics of protesters carrying Mexican flags, lest the protests be seen as unpatriotic or anti-American. One overriding concern is that even minor missteps by Trump's critics will give him an excuse to overreach further. 'Trump is expecting resistance,' my colleague Tom Nichols wrote over the weekend. 'You will not be heroes. You will be the pretext.' These concerns are understandable, and they are offered in good faith by dyed-in-the-wool Trump critics, who don't hesitate to call him a budding authoritarian. They're correct that Trump is welcoming confrontation. Trying to convince anti-Trump allies about the most effective tactics can feel much more productive than appealing to Trump to respect protests or the rule of law, especially because his actions are frequently erratic and irrational. But the focus on specific tactics, or on trying to predict how the president will respond, overlooks how effective large protests have been—not just historically, but also during Trump's first term. The same could be true now. None of this is to excuse violent protests, which are dangerous and destructive, and also usually politically counterproductive in America. Actual violence in Los Angeles appears to be limited and small in scale, and Trump's decision to federalize thousands of National Guard members and deploy hundreds of U.S. Marines is, as I wrote yesterday, both legally dubious and wildly disproportionate. The most heralded victims so far have been some Waymo driverless taxis, and local authorities blamed scattered violence on provocateurs who are tangential to the protests. Most protesters appear to be on the streets simply to witness and to speak out against the administration's immigration raids. Take the president's word for it: Even Trump says the situation is 'very well under control.' The existence of large demonstrations, which are spreading into other cities, is itself a sign of Trump's vulnerability. His turn to the military to try to enforce his will, less than six months into his term, is a gesture of authoritarianism, but it's also an indication of his weak sway over the public. Plenty of experience shows that Trump almost always folds. Besides, Trump definitely wins if people disperse because they don't want to provoke him. Peaceful protests can be very effective at changing policy and public opinion, and the biggest win for Trump might be for people to be so scared of what he'll do next that they do nothing at all. As the journalist Asawin Suebsaeng noted on Sunday, you would be hard-pressed to find Americans counseling protesters in repressive nations—such as Iran or Burma or Hungary—to stop protesting just because their leaders might be spoiling for a fight. Furthermore, gaming out strategy and predicting how things might end here (or anywhere) is very difficult. This applies to everyone involved. Some advising caution are worried that protests will give Trump cover to intensify a crackdown, but he hardly needs an excuse, and his reactions are unpredictable. Meanwhile, people around Trump are very confident that they're in a winning position on immigration. 'We couldn't script this any better,' someone 'close to the White House' told Politico. 'Democrats are again on the '20' side of an 80–20 issue.' But why should anyone believe them? The story of Trump's career is overreach followed by public opposition—including on immigration—and sometimes that opposition sways him. During his first term, Trump reversed his family-separation policy in summer 2018 because of widespread horror. Trump and his advisers were also convinced that protests against police brutality, which turned violent in cities such as Kenosha, Wisconsin, and Portland, Oregon, were going to win them the 2020 election, and they were proved wrong about that. The backlash has come even faster this term. Although Trump won the election with a campaign that focused intensely on immigration enforcement, Americans have been less enthusiastic about the results now that they're experiencing their effects. Lots of people support deporting criminals, but they don't like it when beloved community members such as Carol Hui, the woman whose story became a rallying point for a conservative Missouri town, are removed. (She has since been released. TACO.) In April, a Washington Post / ABC News / Ipsos poll found that a majority of people disapproved of Trump's immigration policies. A CBS News / YouGov poll taken before the L.A. protests found him slightly higher—but at just 50 percent approval. The data journalist G. Elliott Morris finds that coverage of the improper deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador hurt Trump's approval ratings. YouGov polls conducted since the protests began have found that pluralities of Americans disapprove of Trump deploying both the National Guard and the Marines. None of these polls should be taken as gospel, but they should give pause about drawing conclusions as to how the public at large will view what's happening in Los Angeles. They are also a reminder that public opinion is not immutable—it's dynamic and can be shaped. The anti-Trump movement can much more easily figure out what it stands for than it can predict what Trump might do next, or how other people will react. Related: Trump's gross misuse of the National Guard Tom Nichols: Trump is using the National Guard as bait. Here are three new stories from The Atlantic: Republicans have a revenue problem. Get ready to hear a lot more about your mitochondria. Hitler used a bogus crisis of 'public order' to make himself dictator. Today's News The Pentagon doubled the number of California National Guard members in Los Angeles and deployed about 700 Marines to the city's protests yesterday. A shooter killed at least 10 people at a high school in Graz, Austria, according to police. The State Department ordered diplomatic missions on Friday to resume processing visas for Harvard University students and exchange visitors. Evening Read The Wyoming Hospital Upending the Logic of Private Equity By Megan Greenwell After years of trying to improve his hospital in Riverton, Wyoming—first as a doctor, then as a board member and volunteer activist—­Roger Gose was ready to give up … 'You want to leave a place better than you found it,' he told me. And for a long time, he felt like he had. But that was before LifePoint Health, one of the biggest rural-hospital chains in the country, saw his hospital as a distressed asset in need of saving through a ruthless search for efficiencies, and before executives at Apollo Global Management, a private-equity firm whose headquarters looms above the Plaza Hotel in Midtown Manhattan, began calling the shots. That was before Gose realized that, in the private-equity world, a hospital was just another widget, a tool to make money and nothing more. Read the full article. More From The Atlantic Red tape isn't the only reason America can't build. Trump's crypto playbook is now clear. Musk and Trump still agree on one thing. The revolutionary idea that remade the new world Culture Break Watch (or skip). Ballerina, the new John Wick spin-off (in theaters now), succeeds as a piece of junky fun—but it also shows the trap of the cinematic side quest, David Sims writes. Examine. As Donald Trump prepares to host the musical Les Misérables at the Kennedy Center, a Victor Hugo scholar explores the real message behind the novel. Play our daily crossword. Stephanie Bai contributed to this newsletter. Explore all of our newsletters here. When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic. Article originally published at The Atlantic

Trump reverses Army base names in latest DEI purge
Trump reverses Army base names in latest DEI purge

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump reverses Army base names in latest DEI purge

President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that he plans to revert the names of seven major Army bases back to the Confederate leaders for which they were originally named. 'We are also going to be restoring the names to Fort Pickett, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Rucker, Fort Polk, Fort A.P. Hill and Fort Robert E. Lee,' Trump said. 'We won a lot of battles out of those forts, it's no time to change.' Trump's announcement, during a speech to soldiers at Fort Bragg, follows Biden-administration era alterations in 2023 that changed the installation names to honor new, non-Confederate individuals. Those included changing Fort Hood to Fort Cavazos, for the Army's first four-star Hispanic general. The Army previously redesignated Fort Liberty, previously known as Fort Bragg, to its original name, but honoring Private First Class Roland L. Bragg, a World War II hero instead of the Confederate general Braxton Bragg. The service also redesignated Fort Moore, after Gen. Hal Moore and his wife Julia Compton Moore, for Fred G. Benning, who won the Distinguished Service Cross during World War I. The Army is taking the same approach for the bases tapped for renaming on Tuesday, finding award-winning soldiers with the same last names as the Confederate leaders to name the bases after, according to a statement released by the service after the president's speech. The president gave no timeline for the name changes and it was not immediately clear whether the Army's bases would be renamed after Confederate leaders or soldiers from different eras. One army official, granted anonymity because they weren't authorized to speak, said they were caught off guard by the rapid-fire developments, which could take months to Army did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Though the Trump administration insisted the redesignations were in-line with laws that prevent the Pentagon from naming bases after Confederate leaders or battles, Ty Seidule, a retired Army brigadier general who was the vice chair of the Congressional Naming Commission, which is tasked with relabeling bases and U.S. military assets, said that Trump's decision went against the spirit of the new rule enacted after the George Floyd protests. 'The bottom line is he's choosing surname over service,' said Seidule, who's now a visiting professor at Hamilton College. 'It is breaking the spirit of a law that was created by the will of the American people through their elected representatives.' Seidule said that the commission, which was made up of three Republicans, one Democrat and four retired flag officers, spent 20 months seeking input from the public and got 33,000 responses to change the names of Army bases and other installations and assets named after Confederates, including several U.S. Navy ships. But he said the decision still reflected that the Trump administration 'realizes that Confederates chose treason to preserve slavery, and they are unworthy of having bases named for them in America in 2025.' On Tuesday, Trump criticized Biden at several points during his speech, which was full of asides about immigration, transgender Americans and the spending bill currently being debated in Congress. His political comments in front of hundreds of soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division led to a smattering of boos from the mostly uniformed audience when he criticized former President Joe Biden. Audience members also jeered when Trump mentioned California Gov. Gavin Newsom, whom the president clashed with over protests in California that were sparked by the Trump administration's immigration raids. Presidents normally avoid giving political speeches to military personnel. 'Do you think this crowd would have showed up for Biden,' Trump said at one point in his remarks. 'I don't think so.' 'We will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean and safe again,' Trump said, claiming parts of the city are under the control of international criminal gangs. The president has ordered 4,000 California National Guard soldiers and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, though so far only about 300 guardsmen have entered the city. The Marines are positioned outside Los Angeles, where they're undergoing training on crowd control, said one defense official who was granted anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media. The move to rename Army bases comes just days after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth moved to relabel a Navy vessel named after gay rights activist Harvey Milk as well as other ships named after civil rights leaders and women. Seidule, the retired Army brigadier general who served on the Biden-era naming commission, said that Trump's decision creates the risk that future administrations could take turns renaming the Army's bases. 'What happens if some other administration would name something after someone that one party thinks is just absolutely beyond the pale,' said Seidule. 'I think that this could absolutely be a tennis match.' Sam Skove contributed to this report.

The Justice Department wants to end an agreement it reached with a Pa. bank it accused of redlining in Philly
The Justice Department wants to end an agreement it reached with a Pa. bank it accused of redlining in Philly

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

The Justice Department wants to end an agreement it reached with a Pa. bank it accused of redlining in Philly

Two years ago, the U.S. Department of Justice accused a Pennsylvania bank of redlining - avoiding lending in majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in and around Philadelphia. ESSA Bank & Trust, based in Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, denied the accusations but entered into a settlement agreement with the federal government in which the bank had to give more than $2.9 million in loan subsidies to homebuyers in formerly redlined communities. The bank also agreed to devote resources to soliciting mortgage applications from Philadelphia residents in neighborhoods it was accused of ignoring, to include Philadelphians in its program for low- and moderate-income homebuyers, to work with local groups to provide homebuyer education, and to target historically excluded neighborhoods with its advertising. On Friday, the Justice Department asked the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to allow it to end the five-year agreement three years early. The court filing is in line with other recent Justice Department moves across the country to end similar fair-housing and antidiscrimination settlement agreements. Lisa Rice, president and CEO of the National Fair Housing Alliance, said in a statement that by taking these actions, "this administration is empowering bad actors and leaving millions of our nation's most vulnerable unprotected and exposed." The Justice Department said in its motion Friday that ESSA Bank "has demonstrated a commitment to remediation," including disbursing required loan subsidies, and is "substantially in compliance" with other terms of the court order. The bank did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday. The department noted that its motion was "unopposed." But on Monday, the National Fair Housing Alliance and local civil rights organizations filed a motion asking to join the case and opposing cutting short the legal agreement. "This effort would strip West and Southwest Philadelphia communities of the hard-won protections they were promised just two years ago," Rachel Wentworth, executive director of the nonprofit Housing Equality Center of Pennsylvania, said in a statement. "For decades, banks of all kinds have used redlining to deny neighborhoods of color access to wealth and opportunity, and ending this consent order sends a devastating message to these communities." The Philadelphia-based Public Interest Law Center and the law firm Stapleton Segal Cochran LLC, which has offices in Philadelphia and Marlton, are representing the Housing Equality Center, the National Fair Housing Alliance, and POWER Interfaith, the Pennsylvania faith-based community organizing network, as they oppose the Justice Department's motion to end the agreement. Eli Segal of Stapleton Segal Cochran said in a statement that "the rule of law demands more here than vague assurances of 'substantial compliance.' It demands court-ordered action." Olivia Mania, attorney and Penn Carey Law Catalyst Fellow at the Public Interest Law Center, said in an interview that "communities in and around Philadelphia deserve access to a lending market that's free from discrimination." "This isn't just about one bank," Mania said in a statement. "It's about whether the federal government will honor its role in dismantling structural racism in the housing market - or walk away when the cameras are off. The parties should be held to the terms of the consent order to ensure real, lasting change." Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store