logo
Republican lawmakers ignore legal warnings to push forward with restrictions on trans people, flags

Republican lawmakers ignore legal warnings to push forward with restrictions on trans people, flags

Yahoo28-01-2025

Photo by Jerod MacDonald-Evoy | Arizona Mirror
Republican lawmakers are aiming to erase trans Arizonans from public life and ban government agencies from displaying LGBTQ pride flags, ignoring warnings from legislative attorneys that doing so could potentially violate the U.S. Constitution.
On Monday, a panel of five Republican state representatives and three Democrats voted along party lines to declare two bills that continue the GOP's recent trend of advancing discriminatory legislation are constitutional and fit for consideration by the full House of Representatives.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Across the country Republican attacks on LGBTQ people, particularly trans Americans, have escalated, each year breaking the last year's record since 2021. And with President Donald Trump in office, GOP lawmakers are more eager than ever to target LGBTQ Americans.
In Arizona, that hostility manifests in proposals that seek to greenlight discrimination against trans people in public spaces and block state agencies from expressing support for the LGBTQ community.
House Bill 2062 would enshrine a narrow definition of biological sex into state law based on a person's reproductive characteristics and allow schools and other state agencies to bar trans people from using the bathrooms or locker rooms that best align with their gender identity. Trans Arizonans would also be prevented from joining athletic teams or living in domestic violence shelters that reflect who they are.
House Bill 2113, meanwhile, would forbid the flying of any flag on a government building that isn't an Arizona state flag, an Arizona Indian Nations flag, a first responder flag, any version of the American flag or a blue star or gold star service flag.
House Rules Attorney Tim Fleming told lawmakers that both bills have the potential to embroil the state in legal challenges. The proposal advocating for a limited application of biological sex could lead to lawsuits from transgender Arizonans who experience discrimination as a result of state agencies that use the law to develop restrictive public facility policies.
'Policies (that) separate biological men from women could cause an issue with transgender persons who seek to use restroom facilities that match their gender identity,' Fleming said.
While he acknowledged that the legal landscape around transgender rights remains 'unsettled,' he pointed out that, for now, federal law and the U.S. Constitution shield Americans from gender-based discrimination. The 14th Amendment guarantees all Americans enjoy equal treatment under the law, whileTitle IX, which prohibits sex-based discrimination at any federally funded school, and Title VII, which covers employee civil rights, have long been interpreted as including gender identity in their protections.
And the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, under whose jurisdiction Arizona lies, temporarily blocked an Idaho law forcing trans students to use school facilities consistent with their biological sex while it considers the case's constitutional implications.
In the end, Fleming said a clearer legal picture will likely emerge in the next few years.
'We probably should talk more about these kinds of things in three or four years, and then we will know what the full state of the law is as it settles down,' he said.
Fleming also warned lawmakers that the bid to strictly limit which kinds of flags state buildings can display is in danger of violating the free speech protections that even government employees have.
'What's unclear from the bill as it was originally presented was whether there might be some overbroad application that might cut off a government actor's ability to fully express private thoughts,' he said.
Opponents of the proposal have pointed out that it's likely to jeopardize the ability of Arizonans to show off allegiance to their favorite sports teams or foreign language teachers to display the flag of the country whose language students are studying. Democrats have accused Republican lawmakers of attempting to censure Gov. Katie Hobbs for her move to fly the LGBTQ pride flag from the Ninth Floor for the first time in the state's history.
To remedy some of the bill's issues, Fleming said he and its sponsor have worked on an amendment that will exempt 'approved educational curricula' and the right of Arizonans to express 'civil and political liberties.'
While the bills are likely to earn the approval of the Republican majority legislature, they're almost certainly headed towards Hobbs' veto stamp. The Democrat has repeatedly vowed to reject any proposals that seek to curtail the rights of LGBTQ Arizonans, and a near-identical copy of the bill seeking to enshrine a limited understanding of biological sex into state law has already been vetoed by the governor last year.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

700 Marines deployed to Los Angeles amid major riots
700 Marines deployed to Los Angeles amid major riots

American Military News

time14 minutes ago

  • American Military News

700 Marines deployed to Los Angeles amid major riots

President Donald Trump's administration deployed 700 Marines to Los Angeles and the surrounding area on Monday in response to the city's massive riots against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations. In a Monday press release, U.S. Northern Command announced that it had activated the Marine infantry battalion that the Trump administration 'placed in an alert status over the weekend.' 'Approximately 700 Marines with 2nd Battalion, 7th Marines, 1st Marine Division will seamlessly integrate with the Title 10 forces under Task Force 51 who are protecting federal personnel and federal property in the greater Los Angeles area,' U.S. Northern Command stated. 'The activation of the Marines is intended to provide Task Force 51 with adequate numbers of forces to provide continuous coverage of the area in support of the lead federal agency.' According to the press release, Task Force 51 includes 700 active-duty Marines and roughly 2,100 National Guardsmen in Title 10 status. Northern Command noted that members of Task Force 51 have been trained in 'de-escalation, crowd control, and standing rules for the use of force.' 'Due to increased threats to federal law enforcement officers and federal buildings, approximately 700 active-duty U.S. Marines from Camp Pendleton are being deployed to Los Angeles to restore order,' Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth wrote in a statement on X, formerly Twitter. 'We have an obligation to defend federal law enforcement officers – even if Gavin Newsom will not.' READ MORE: Videos: 500 Marines ready to deploy to Los Angeles amid major riots Northern Command confirmed in the press release that there were roughly 1,700 soldiers from the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team in Los Angeles and the surrounding area as of Monday. On Monday evening, Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs Sean Parnell tweeted, 'At the order of the President, the Department of Defense is mobilizing an additional 2,000 California National Guard to be called into federal service to support ICE & to enable federal law-enforcement officers to safely conduct their duties.' According to The Associated Press, Trump's authorization for the Department of Defense to deploy an additional 2,000 National Guardsmen in response to the anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles brings the total number of National Guardsmen mobilized by the federal government in response to the riots to over 4,100. In a Tuesday morning statement on Truth Social, Trump said, 'If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now, much like 25,000 houses burned to the ground in L.A. do to an incompetent Governor and Mayor.'

Why Elon Musk turned against Trump's $5 trillion mega tax and spending bill
Why Elon Musk turned against Trump's $5 trillion mega tax and spending bill

CNBC

time19 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Why Elon Musk turned against Trump's $5 trillion mega tax and spending bill

President Donald Trump is pushing to pass a sweeping tax and spending bill by July 4, but the proposal is already sparking fierce internal GOP debate. The bill combines 2017 tax cut extensions with new Trump-era proposals, including deductions on American-made auto loans and changes to child tax credits. But not everyone is on board. Elon Musk has launched a high-profile feud with Trump over the bill, and key Republican senators are warning that the bill could add trillions to the national debt.

Washington Post editorial admits colleges must take 'strenuous action' to restore free exchange of ideas
Washington Post editorial admits colleges must take 'strenuous action' to restore free exchange of ideas

Fox News

time19 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Washington Post editorial admits colleges must take 'strenuous action' to restore free exchange of ideas

Harvard may win its legal battle against the Trump administration, but the fight to restore confidence in higher education as defenders of the "free exchange of ideas" would still be far from over, The Washington Post editorial board wrote on Tuesday. "In the past decade, trust in higher education has dropped precipitously. Ten years ago, a robust majority of Americans told Gallup they had a 'great deal' or 'quite a lot' of confidence in higher education; today, only one-third of Americans say the same," the editorial stated, highlighting similar concerns over an uptick in those who say they have "very little" or "no" confidence in higher education. That percentage rose to 32% from 10% a decade ago. Such discontent with higher education has created opportunities for Republicans to seize on the trend and "attack the foundations of academic independence," the board argued. A cocktail of problems, ranging from free speech concerns to rising costs and lower returns on investment, was said to have fed into the growing distrust. In one corner, conservative faculty members have reported self-censoring due to fear of how others might respond to their opinions. The Post argued this isn't isolated to one group, however, and that left-wing voices are also choosing to stay quiet when controversial topics are discussed. "In an academic community in which 'diversity statements' are required of new hires (and professors can be denied jobs merely for criticizing them), university administrations and disciplines issue official statements embracing social justice causes, journal editors apologize for or withdraw papers that offend the left, and conservative professors are becoming an increasingly endangered species, even moderates or those on the center-left can reasonably wonder what they're allowed to say, and universities can seem drastically out of step with mainstream society," the editorial said. The editorial board went on to say that institutions of higher education lack a solid foundation to demand that the government respect their "academic freedom" unless they demand the same from their own teachers and leaders. "The worst of this political fever might be behind us, but academia will have to take strenuous action to restore its reputation as defenders of the free exchange of ideas…" "Renaming the diversity, equity and inclusion office will not suffice; they need to foster a campus environment in which the frank discussion of ideas is the core value. If they do not, they will find the public yawning as conservative attacks intensify and courts struggle to contain the damage," the Post's editorial board continued.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store