
Complaint backfires for accountant who sued neighbour over fence that ‘interfered with picnic'
An accountant who sued her neighbours, claiming their new fence interfered with her back garden picnics has been ordered to rip out the central heating system and patio from her and her husband's £375,000 cottage after the complaints backfired.
Helen Faber and her partner Dominic Miles saw red in 2021 when returning to their idyllic country cottage in Oxfordshire after a period living in France to find a fence put in by next door neighbours, Richard and Katherine Reid, had "narrowed" a path leading to part of their back garden by 40cm.
They complained the fence was a "nuisance" because any narrowing of the 4-foot wide path would make it difficult for them to carry a "large picnic tray laden with food and drinks...without spilling the drinks" to their patio and second garden area at the end.
After angry scenes, including an incident in November 2021, "during which Mr Miles was very aggressive towards Mrs Reid," they sued their neighbours asking Judge Melissa Clarke at Oxford County Court to rule that the new fence created a "substantial interference" with their use of the shared right of way.
But the move backfired after the judge not only ruled that there was no "nuisance" caused by the fence, but additionally ordered them to rip up their back patio and remove an oil pipe feeding their central heating system - rendering it useless - after finding that both constituted "trespasses" on the Reids' property.
The two couples are now facing off in London's High Court, with lawyers for Ms Faber and Mr Miles appealing and arguing that it was wrong for the judge to order them to remove the pipe - leaving them with no heating and hot water system - and the patio, as well as continuing to insist the fence is moved.
But Mr and Mrs Reid say the county court judge got it right when ordering their neighbours to scrap their patio and heating system and dismissing their gripes about the fence.
High Court judge Mr Justice Richard Smith last week heard that Mr and Mrs Reid's home, Forge Cottage, in Wardington, Oxfordshire, adjoins Ms Faber and Mr Miles' house, Pear Tree Cottage next door, which online sources estimate to be worth £375,000.
The fence which sparked the row lies alongside part of a path which runs up the side of Pear Tree Cottage before turning and running along the back of both neighbours' main back gardens and ending at the second garden belonging to Pear Tree Cottage.
The path itself belongs to the owners of Forge Cottage, but both sets of neighbours have a right of way over it.
Ms Faber and Mr Miles complained that because of the "narrowing" of the shared right of way they were unable to "conveniently" use the path whilst carrying "a large picnic tray laden with food and drinks" to their second garden.
At the end of the Oxford County Court trial, Judge Melissa Clarke, while noting that "Mr Miles was very aggressive towards Mrs Reid" at one point during the row, ruled that the new fence "did not substantially interfere with the right of way".
Going on to order them to take out the oil pipe, disabling their heating system, she said: "An oil line running from an oil tank in the Pear Tree Cottage second garden is on, over and under parts of the right of way.
"The claimants now accept that the right of way is owned by Forge Cottage. The installation by the claimants of an oil line over the right of way is a trespass on the land of Forge Cottage and the defendants are entitled to an injunction requiring the claimants to remove it."
She said the pipeline is "susceptible to damage" and that, if damaged, any oil leaks would contaminate the Reids' land, which is a risk they "should not have to tolerate from trespass."
Last week, arguing that Judge Clarke made the wrong decision, Stephen Taylor, for Ms Faber and Mr Miles, said that the couple had informed their previous neighbours at Forge Cottage before installing the heating system and they had not objected.
He insisted that means their current neighbours cannot now demand its removal.
The court heard that there is no gas supply in the village and that Mr Miles and Ms Faber claim "modern" heating systems like heatpumps are "not suitable for use in a stone-built property more than three centuries old."
Mr Taylor told the judge that previous owners of the Reds' house had done nothing when the oil system was installed and "acquiesced" in Mr Miles and Ms Faber's actions.
"In those circumstances an estoppel arose, estopping the neighbours at the time from later raising an objection," he argued. "That estoppel binds Mr and Mrs Reid in the same way.
"By thanking the claimants for telling them about and not objecting to their plans regarding the installation of an oil pipe, the defendants' predecessor in title created an expectation in the claimants that they could lay their oil pipe under the right of way and not later face any complaint.
"It was their neighbours' tacit representation that laying an oil pipe was 'okay'. The defendants' predecessors created the estoppel which stops the defendants from complaining about the oil pipe now."
In relation to the fence, he added: "The judge wrongly concluded that by creating the two near 90 degree bends in the right of way and by narrowing it by about 33% there was no substantial interference.
"The judge was wrong because ...it cannot be said to be unreasonable for the claimants to insist on being able to use the disputed way when carrying a 1m wide chattel, for example a picnic tray with full glasses thereon.
"The pre-existing fence respected the 4ft width of the disputed way.
"The 2021 fence had reduced the disputed way to 2ft 3in at its narrowest point (and) rendered it difficult to traverse, particularly when transporting logs, garden waste and wheelie bins."
He argued that a 1944 plan showed that the right of way should be 4ft wide all along.
"A 4ft way can be conveniently used, for example to carry a large box along the way or a large picnic tray laden with food and drinks. If the box or tray is 3ft 11in wide it can just get through without spilling the drinks.
"It is submitted that even a small reduction in the width of a 4ft walkway amounts to a substantial interference...It cannot be described as unreasonable for the claimants to insist on being able to use the disputed way conveniently...when carrying a chattel."
He also claimed the judge was wrong in defining the boundary so that part of Ms Faber and Mr Miles' patio was on their neighbours' land and deemed a "trespass" which would have to be removed.
But Anya Newman, for Mr and Mrs Reid, argued that Judge Clarke was right in her ruling at the county court and that the fence should stay and the patio and pipe should be removed.
"The dispute arose after the respondents (Mr and Mrs Reid) replaced an old fence at the rear of their garden," she said.
"It was agreed that the route of the fence was somewhat different to the previous fence, it is now dog-legged instead of running at one angle.
"After initially being happy with the replacement fence, the appellants raised issue about its positioning.
"The respondents denied that the new fence, save for one small section, had changed position from the previous fence. However, they asserted that this change did not substantially interfere with the right of way.
"The judge concluded that...there was no substantial interference with the right of way, which was specified as a right to pass and re-pass on foot because the right of way 'on foot' does not give rise to a right to use bicycles, push-wheeled vehicles, carts or barrows along it.
"In any event, the factual evidence...was accepted that a wheelchair user could substantially and practically use the right of way as conveniently as before.
"There is an oil line running from the appellants' oil tank in their secondary garden to the appellants' property. The line runs under and over the right of way, on the respondents' property.
"The oil line was a trespass...The expert evidence was that the oil line is susceptible to damage and the judge accepted this, ordering the removal of the line.
"It cannot be the case that even if previous neighbours acquiesced to the oil line, they now have a right in perpetuity to site an oil line on their neighbours' land.
"Further, the appellants had also commandeered the end of the right of way, raising and re-paving it for use as a patio to their secondary garden. The respondents also claimed in trespass to remove the patio.
"Due to the decision on the boundary, the patio of the appellants' which they had used to place patio furniture and a gas canister was a trespass. The raised patio ought to be removed by the appellants."
Mr Justice Smith has now reserved his ruling on the case, to be given at a later date.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
31 minutes ago
- Sky News
Ballymena riots: Families flee 'locals' venting their feelings
Here we go again. It was not long after 8pm when a police announcement over a tannoy mounted on their armoured vehicles reverberated around for all to hear. "Force is about to be used against violent individuals," blasted from the speakers as locals, some masked, stood waiting for action. "You better be filming this," one man said as we captured the scenes for Sky News amid a growing sense from locals that the police were being heavy handed in their tactics. And then officers, holding their shields, surged forward as people edged back. The move seemed to further anger the residents who had gathered, almost goading them as tensions ran high. The pace of clashes was slower on this, the third night of conflict. But it was nevertheless just as ugly and messy. Eyewitness: It is hard to see where the violence will end Soon came the baton rounds, the firebombs, the water cannon. Those pelting the police seemed unfazed as they were battered with plastic bullets in return. The watching crowd cheered the rioters on. Police chiefs earlier defended their operation. A senior officer insisted he did have "a grip" on the unravelling situation when questioned by Sky News. The increased presence of officers was felt on the ground and was clear to see. The soundtrack of sirens swirled around this town once again as police lurched from incident to incident as pockets of violence flared up. Officers are on their way from Scotland, England and Wales to help bolster resources. And they won't be short of work. A leisure centre 25 minutes away in Larne came under attack on Wednesday evening after it emerged some of the foreign families fleeing the Ballymena chaos were being temporarily held there. A short drive around Ballymena's one way road system takes you on a journey through housing estates where people have flooded the streets with union jack flags and stuck yellow A4 sheets to their windows with the words, "LOCALS LIVE HERE". These colourful displays are being seen as a public noticeboard of the nationality of the occupants inside each home. A deterrent to make the angry mob to look elsewhere. And those failing to advertise whether they are a 'native' or not seem to be paying a price. I witnessed an upper floor flat with a window smashed, the guttering on fire and the ground outside ablaze. An older neighbour fled her home downstairs in her dressing gown. Earlier in the day two Romanian women were frantically examining their phones down an alleyway as their kids played on the trampoline in the garden. They were terrified and were bundling their belongings in the car and leaving for good. A sizeable chunk of people born in Ballymena are angry. They do not like the talk from police and politicians that taking to the streets following an alleged sex attack on a teenage girl equates to them being "racist thugs". They see this as an act of venting their feelings. And they are hellbent on continuing this campaign of carnage across Northern Ireland to ensure they prove their point.


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
The Documentary Podcast The tyre scandal
Every year the UK produces around 50 million tyres for disposal. They are supposed to be sent for recycling. Instead, big money is being made by diverting tyres to illegal and dangerous 'pyrolysis' plants where they are melted down to extract oil and steel. Together with a team of journalists from Source Material, a not-for-profit group specialising in climate and corruption, we follow the tyres from the UK to India using tracking devices. The team discovers just how large scale this largely illicit business has become. Earlier this year, a makeshift pyrolysis plant exploded near Mumbai, killing four people. It had been processing tyres from abroad. Reporter Paul Kenyon confronts a tyre trader in the north of England who admits to shipping his waste tyres to India for pyrolysis.


BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Diddy On Trial ‘Jane' questioned about sex drugs and underwear she ordered for ‘hotel nights'
Defence lawyer Teny Geragos continued her cross-examination of 'Jane' with more focus the messages between her and Sean 'Diddy' Combs. 'Jane' is the pseudonym being used to protect the identity of Diddy's ex-partner. She was asked about messages which suggest she was planning 'hotel nights' for her and Diddy, along with other men. Photos were also shown to the jury of 'Jane' and Diddy spending time together. Meanwhile the prosecution has asked for one of the jury members to be dismissed. Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty speaks to NPR music reporter Isabella Gomez-Sarmiento about the day in court. Sean 'Diddy' Combs is on trial in New York, facing federal charges of sex trafficking, racketeering with conspiracy and transportation for prostitution. He denies all the charges. The Diddy on Trial podcast is here to investigate the rumours, confront the theories, and give you the answers that you need. We also want YOU to be part of the conversation. Have you any questions about the case? Heard a theory that doesn't sit right with you? Get in touch now via WhatsApp: 0330 123 555 1. Details of organisations in the UK offering information and support with some of the issues raised are available at Presenter: Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty Series Producer: Laura Jones Sound Design: Mark Burrows Senior Digital Producer: Matthew Pintus Production Coordinator: Hattie Valentine Editor: Clare Fordham Commissioning Editor: Rhian Roberts Assistant Commissioner: Will Drysdale Commissioning Producer: Adam Eland Commissioning Assistant Producer: Rechmial Miller