‘Doctor Who' Season Finale Surprises Fans with an Exit and a Familiar Face
A familiar face to 'Doctor Who' fans is rejoining the long-running British sci-fi series as Ncuti Gatwa exits the lead role after two seasons.
In Saturday's season finale, Gatwa's Time Lord regenerated and fans got a glimpse of Billie Piper, who played the character Rose Tyler for 35 episodes between 2005 and 2013. Tyler was a companion to versions of the doctor played by Christopher Eccleston and David Tennant.
Producers are keeping Piper's new role secret for now.
'Just how and why she is back remains to be seen,' the BBC said in a statement after the finale aired.
'It's an honor and a hoot to welcome her back to the TARDIS, but quite how and why and who is a story yet to be told,' showrunner Russell T Davies said in a statement.
Piper said 'Doctor Who' has provided some of her best memories and she couldn't pass up the opportunity to come back.
'It's no secret how much I love this show, and I have always said I would love to return ... but who, how, why and when, you'll just have to wait and see,' she said.
If Piper does indeed become the Doctor, she would be the third woman to fill the famous shoes.
The Rwanda-born, Scotland-raised Gatwa, 29, was the first Black actor to helm the show, but he wasn't the first Black Doctor — Jo Martin played 'Fugitive Doctor' in several episodes. Gatwa took over the role from Jodie Whittaker in 2023.
Whittaker was the 13th Doctor and the first woman to play the central galaxy-hopping, extraterrestrial Time Lord who regenerates into new bodies, taking over from Peter Capaldi in 2017. Martin was the second woman.
'Doctor Who' first aired from 1963 to 1989 and returned in 2005. In the US, new episodes air on Disney+.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
7 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Britain unveils radical defense overhaul to meet new threats
Britain said on Monday it would radically change its approach to defense to address threats from Russia, nuclear risks and cyber-attacks by investing in drones and digital warfare rather than relying on a much larger army to engage in modern combat. Responding to US President Donald Trump's insistence that Europe take more responsibility for its own security, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pledged the largest sustained increase to UK defense spending since the end of the Cold War. But with limited finances, the government's plan envisages making the army more lethal, not larger, by learning from Ukraine where drones and technology have transformed the battlefield. Defense Secretary John Healey said Britain's adversaries were working more in alliance and technology was changing how war was fought: 'Drones now kill more people than traditional artillery in the war in Ukraine and whoever gets new technology into the hands of their armed forces the quickest will win.' Starmer commissioned a Strategic Defense Review shortly after he was elected last July, tasking experts including the former NATO boss, George Robertson, and a former Russia adviser to the White House, Fiona Hill, with formulating a plan for the next 10 years. Despite cuts to the military budget in recent years, Britain still ranks alongside France as one of Europe's leading military powers, with its army helping to protect NATO's eastern flank and its navy maintaining a presence in the Indo-Pacific. But the army, with 70,860 full-time trained soldiers, is the smallest since the Napoleonic era and the government has said it needs to be reformed given the growing strategic threats. New defense age Under the plan accepted by the government, Britain will expand its fleet of attack submarines which are nuclear-powered but carry conventional weapons, and will spend 15 billion pounds ($20.3 billion) before the next election due in 2029 on the replacement of the nuclear warheads for its main nuclear fleet. It will build at least six new munitions plants, procure up to 7,000 British-made long-range weapons, and launch new communication systems for the battlefield. A Cyber and Electromagnetic Command will lead defensive and offensive cyber capabilities, after UK military networks faced more than 90,000 'sub-threshold' attacks in the last two years. But on the size of the armed forces, the review said it would not reduce numbers, even as a greater emphasis is put on technology, but increasing the total number of regular personnel should be prioritized when funding allows, likely after 2029. 'The moment has arrived to transform how we defend ourselves,' Starmer told workers at BAE Systems' Govan shipbuilding site in Scotland, saying he would 'end the hollowing out of our armed forces.' 'When we are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces, the most effective way to deter them is to be ready.' Starmer has already said defense spending will increase to 2.5 percent of GDP by 2027, from 2.3 percent, but critics and political opponents urged the government to put a date on when it would move to 3 percent of GDP. Reuters has previously reported that NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte wants members to raise defense spending to 3.5 percent of their GDP, and a further 1.5 percent on broader security-related items to meet Trump's demand for a 5 percent target. Starmer said he was '100 percent confident' that UK defense spending would hit 3 percent in the next parliament likely between 2029-2034 - something the review appeared to take into account when drafting its recommendations. The government described its policy as 'NATO first,' drawing on the strength of the alliance's members which meant it would never fight alone. Starmer has sought to cast the higher defense spending as a way to create jobs and wealth, as he juggles severely strained public finances, a slow-growing economy and declining popularity among an increasingly dissatisfied electorate. The announcement about new submarines helped lift the share prices of defense groups Babcock, BAE and Rolls Royce.
Arab News
13 hours ago
- Arab News
Trump-Putin stalemate stokes fears of global conflict
As a journalist, it has struck me in recent months how the people I meet — friends and acquaintances — have stopped discussing the state of the world whenever we sit down for a chat. At a recent gathering, there was even a rule to steer clear of politics, news and the chaos the world is witnessing. The few who still appeared to care revealed, in their questioning, a deep anxiety of what is to come, with some fearing the worst, including another world war. Amid the uncertainty and persistent fog of political discord enveloping our world, fatalistic thoughts have become dominant and a natural reaction is for people to evade the subject of conflict. However, polls reveal that war is on people's minds everywhere, especially in Europe. A recent survey by YouGov found that between 41 and 55 percent of respondents in France, the UK, Germany, Italy and Spain believe that another global conflict is likely in the next five to 10 years, with the vast majority also expecting that nuclear weapons will be used. In Britain, 89 percent of those questioned believed their country would be involved, while in Italy the figure was 66 percent. Russia is ranked by Europeans as the major obstacle to peace, with 82 percent seeing Moscow as a moderate to major threat Mohamed Chebaro According to the poll, Russia is ranked by Europeans as the major obstacle to peace, with 82 percent seeing Moscow as a moderate to major threat. Islamist terrorism came second, especially for people in Germany. But the surprise is that US President Donald Trump's controversial foreign policies, including threats to abandon Europe's defense, side with Russian leader Vladimir Putin against Ukraine and annex Greenland, have led people in Germany, France and Spain to rank the US as a threat to peace on the continent. Despite these fears, I believe that total war is still some distance away and is unlikely, unless a breakdown in communication takes place between the big powers. Nevertheless, all parties are hardening their postures and this is increasingly being felt by citizens, increasing anxiety levels and threatening participation and trust in traditional channels and institutions. The effects of the ongoing wars in Ukraine and Gaza, the avoidable conflicts elsewhere, the neglect of global warming and its implications, the widening gap between rich and poor, and an unrestrained digital realm magnifying discord are compounded by a political stalemate between the big powers. Recent outbursts by Trump directed at Putin increase this sense of uncertainty and fear. The US leader prides himself on being a deal-maker capable of stopping wars, knocking reason into hotheads and solving historically, geographically and geopolitically complex conflicts at the stroke of a pen. Trump's deal-maker image has been dented and his ability to live up to his own boasting is being threatened by Putin Mohamed Chebaro However, his recent emotional attack on the Russian leader reflects a realization that this deal-maker image has been dented and that his ability to live up to his own boasting is being threatened by none other than his Russian counterpart. People believed Trump was sincere about seeking peace, but his methods of achieving it seem warped, intensifying risks and threats, as sensed by those polled in Europe. A change of tack is urgently needed. As everyone is witnessing, the world cannot survive more chaos and shortcomings. The chaotic policymaking that characterized Trump's first administration is reaching new heights in his second. Cooperating with allies before foes could be a conduit for bringing conflicts to a close, or at least keeping them under control, offering the White House what Trump yearns for most — to be seen as presiding over a mighty America that can reduce the threat of world wars, not increase them.
Asharq Al-Awsat
13 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
UK PM Starmer Says Situation in Gaza ‘Getting Worse by the Day'
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Monday that the situation in Gaza was getting "worse by the day" and that it was important to ensure the Palestinian enclave receives more humanitarian aid urgently. "The situation is intolerable in Gaza, and getting worse by the day," Starmer told reporters in Scotland, when asked whether the UK would take any action over the issue. "Which is why we are working with allies ... to be absolutely clear that humanitarian aid needs to get in at speed and at volumes that it is not getting in at the moment, causing absolute devastation," he added.
