logo
Residents sue energy companies after massive toxic battery fire at Moss Landing

Residents sue energy companies after massive toxic battery fire at Moss Landing

After a massive lithium-ion battery storage site exploded into flames in Monterey County — spewing toxic gases into the air and scattering heavy metals over the ground — residents have filed a lawsuit accusing multiple energy companies of failing to maintain adequate fire safety at the facility.
The blaze began Jan. 16 after a fire suppression system failed inside a battery storage area at the Moss Landing Power Plant, according to local officials. It smoldered for four days at the facility, which is 18 miles up the coast from the city of Monterey, prompting the temporary evacuation of more than 1,200 residents.
The suit was filed by four residents Thursday against Texas-based Vistra Energy, which owns the storage facility that burned; LG Energy Solution, which installed the lithium-ion batteries at the facility; and Pacific Gas & Electric, which owns an adjacent battery storage facility, according to the complaint.
It accuses the companies of 'putting profits over people' by failing to properly maintain fire suppression systems and comply with the latest fire safety standards. The recent blaze was the fourth fire at the facility since 2019 and one that the lawsuit alleges demonstrates a failure to address longstanding safety concerns.
'Time and again, we see companies cut corners on safety, only for communities to suffer the consequences,' said environmental advocate Erin Brockovich, who is working with law firm Singleton Schreiber on the suit. 'We will not stand by while families breathe in toxic air and worry about the long-term health effects of this disaster. They deserve transparency, justice and real protections.'
In the fire's aftermath, heavy metals have been measured at levels 100 to 1,000 times higher than normal in soil within a mile of the facility, and residents have reported experiencing skin, eye and respiratory irritation. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ruled that the level of particulate matter and hydrogen fluoride gas released into the air during the fire did not pose a risk to public health.
LG declined to comment, and Vistra could not be immediately reached for comment. A spokesperson for PG&E said the utility was aware of the lawsuit but that the fire was not a PG&E incident.
'The Moss Landing power plant is located adjacent to — but walled off and separate from — PG&E's Moss Landing electric substation,' said a spokesperson for the utility in a statement. 'PG&E systems and personnel at our Moss Landing substation began emergency response procedures when the Vistra battery fire was detected.'
Lithium-ion battery fires are notoriously hard to extinguish because the use of water can trigger a chemical reaction that causes more batteries to ignite. As these batteries burn, they release a toxic cocktail of gases, including hydrogen fluoride, carbon monoxide and volatile organic compounds.
Despite the EPA's reassurances about air quality during the incident, the lawsuit alleges that the fire caused residents to suffer nasal and eye irritation, difficulty breathing, headaches, nosebleeds, burning lungs, dizziness, shortness of breath, sores, skin irritation and more. It also alleges that residents properties were covered by soot, ash and toxic chemicals as a result of the fire.
Residents are seeking compensatory and punitive damages for expenses including property damage, health conditions, loss of income during evacuations and future environmental remediation costs. They are also calling for an investigation into the root causes of the fire and industrywide adoption of updated safety standards and fire prevention measures.
Lead attorney Gerald Singleton called the fire a wake-up call for the energy storage industry.
'Communities living near these facilities deserve better safeguards, transparency, and accountability,' he said in a statement. 'Energy sustainability should never come at the expense of public safety.'
A spokesperson for Vistra previously said the company was completing its own investigation into the fire and environmental monitoring around the plant.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Seat 11A: Is it the safest seat on a plane? Experts say it depends
Seat 11A: Is it the safest seat on a plane? Experts say it depends

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Seat 11A: Is it the safest seat on a plane? Experts say it depends

(NewsNation) — The crash of Air India Flight 171 has travelers worldwide wondering: Are there some seats on a plane that are safer than others, and if so, which seats are they? The crash, which took place shortly after takeoff Thursday from the Ahmedabad airport, killed 241 passengers and crew members. As investigators probe the crash and families mourn those killed, attention has turned to Ramesh Viswashkumar. Viswashkumar, 40, was the only person to survive the crash. The Latest: A single passenger survived the Air India crash, hospital says The British national was in seat 11A at the time of the crash, leading many to wonder if that particular seat is safer than others. The badly injured Viswashkumar struggled Thursday to describe what he experienced as people died in front of his eyes. NBC News reported that Viswashkumar was able to escape from the broken emergency exit door just moments before the fuel-loaded plane exploded in a fireball. 'Emergency door is broken. My seat is broken,' Viswashkumar told DD India in an interview. 'Then I see the space a little bit and I will try to come out.' 'Little bit of fire, after I'm out, then blast.' Air India's sole crash survivor narrates his escape So, is seat 11A the safest in a crash? It depends on multiple factors, according to experts. Seat 11A on a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner is typically located near the front of the Economy Class cabin. Depending on the airliner's configuration, it is a window seat in the first or second row of that cabin. According to The Times in London, seat 11A on Flight 171 was the first economy seat, adjacent to the bulkhead emergency exit. There were seven other emergency exits on the plane. What to know about the Air India plane crash that killed more than 240 people Aviation experts say that determining the safest seats on a plane is not a straightforward task. 'Each accident is different, and it is impossible to predict survivability based on seat location,' Mitchell Fox, a director at Flight Safety Foundation, told Reuters. Ron Bartsch, chairman of the Sydney-based AvLaw Aviation Consulting, told the news agency that seat 11A's location may have made it a safer choice on this particular flight, but that will not always be the case. Sitting next to an emergency exit also does not guarantee survival. Despite seven other emergency exits on Flight 171, there were no other survivors. Air India black box recovered after crash that killed 241 onboard and several others on the ground Emergency exits might not work following a crash, or they might be blocked by debris, experts say. Sitting in an aisle seat could offer a faster escape, but there is the threat of luggage falling into the aisles or hitting survivors as it tumbles from an overhead bin. A 2015 analysis by Time magazine found that passengers in the rear third of an aircraft have a better chance of surviving a lower-impact crash, according to The Times. The front of the plane typically takes the brunt of the impact. Seats near the wings may offer more protection, both because of their proximity to emergency exits and because of the structural reinforcements in that section. Those seats are closer to the fuel tanks, however. Sitting near an emergency exit also comes with added responsibility because passengers in exit row seats are asked to help fellow passengers evacuate the plane in a crisis. A look at previous plane crashes in India Viswashkumar, who was filmed walking away, bloody and bruised, from the crash, never had that chance. Reuters reported that he initially believed that he would perish with his fellow passengers. 'But when I opened my eyes, I realized I was alive, and I tried to unbuckle myself from the seat and escape from where I could. It was in front of my eyes that the air hostess and others (died),' he said. According to Reuters, it is vital for passengers to pay attention to the safety briefings that the cabin crew provides at the start of any flight. Compliance with the crew's instructions is credited with saving the lives of 379 passengers and crew aboard a Japan Airlines flight last year. Along with paying attention to the safety briefing, the Federal Aviation Administration advises that passengers keep their seat belts buckles whenever the seat belt light is lit up. Seat belts, designed to be worn low and tight on the hips, keep passengers safe during takeoff and landing and during instances of air turbulence. Children under 40 pounds should be restrained in an approved child safety seat. Passengers should also follow the airline's carry-on policies to help prevent injuries. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Feds seek to protect a key Texas aquifer and its at-risk species
Feds seek to protect a key Texas aquifer and its at-risk species

E&E News

time5 hours ago

  • E&E News

Feds seek to protect a key Texas aquifer and its at-risk species

Half-a-billion dollars and a decadeslong commitment could be needed to save seven imperiled species that rely upon a significant central Texas aquifer, according to a final Fish and Wildlife Service recovery plan. The ambitious plan encompasses one plant, two beetles, one fish, one crustacean and two salamanders listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act. They include the likes of the Texas blind salamander, Peck's cave amphipod and Comal Springs riffle beetle. The protected species inhabit the state's two largest spring systems in Comal and Hays counties. The springs are fed by groundwater from the Edwards Aquifer, which also provides drinking water for more than 1.7 million Texas residents. Advertisement 'This area is experiencing rapid development, which is expected to increase the extent of threats to water quality and quantity,' the FWS said upon releasing the final plan Wednesday, adding that 'safeguarding the Edwards Aquifer is crucial not only for the survival of these species but also for the human communities that depend on the groundwater.'

Joy and grief for lone India crash survivor's family
Joy and grief for lone India crash survivor's family

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Joy and grief for lone India crash survivor's family

The UK-based family of the lone survivor of the Air India crash were torn on Friday between joy at his miracle escape and grief at the loss of his brother. "We are happy Vishwash has been saved, but on the other hand we are just heartbroken about Ajay," his cousin told AFP outside the family home in central Leicester. Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, 40, is believed to be the only person to have survived the crash when Air India Flight 171 plummeted from the sky shortly after taking off from the northern Indian city of Ahmedabad. His brother, Ajay Kumar Ramesh, was on the same flight, but is believed to have perished in the disaster. There were 242 passengers and crew on the plane, including 53 British citizens. At least 24 people were killed on the ground, officials said, after the aeroplane landed on a canteen building where students were having lunch. Since Thursday's tragedy, the small Leicester street where Ramesh's parents and younger brother lived has been flooded with visitors. Ramesh lives not far away with his wife and son, his cousin Hiren Kantilal, 19, told AFP. Ajay also lived in the town, one of the oldest in England, and the two brothers ran a confectionary business together. "They are wonderful people, and heartful people. They are greatest men I have ever seen in my life, both of them," said Kantilal. The brothers were returning to the UK after spending a few weeks on holiday in India, and the family had been waiting to go and pick them up at Gatwick airport. - 'I am totally fine' - Shortly after the crash, they were shocked when Ramesh, who had reportedly been in seat 11A, called his father to say he was alive. Ajay was seated at the other end of the row. "Our plane has been crashed," Ramesh told his dad, according to his cousin. "He was bleeding all over him, in the face and everything, and he said: 'I am just waiting for my brother and I don't know how I get out of the plane'. "He said: 'do not worry about me, try to find about Ajay Kumar' and he said: 'I am totally fine'." Kantilal said his cousin had waited for about 10 to 15 minutes seeking his brother, and then was whisked away to hospital by the rescue services. Images which went viral on social media apparently showed Ramesh walking away from the wreckage of the 787-8 Boeing Dreamliner, and have been splashed across the front pages of British media along with a photo of him in his hospital bed. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi paid a visit to Ramesh on Friday at the hospital where he is being treated for burns and other injuries, footage on his YouTube channel showed. "Everything happened in front of me, and even I couldn't believe how I managed to come out alive from that," Ramesh said from his hospital bed, speaking in Hindi to national broadcaster DD News. His parents had also been desperately trying to contact his brother Ajay on Thursday. "The call was going through, but no-one was answering the call," Kantilal said. At the family home, relatives were frantically scanning their phones to try to buy a flight to Ahmedabad later on Friday afternoon. Downing Street said that the foreign ministry had been in touch with Ramesh to offer him consular assistance. mhc/alm/jkb/bc

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store