
Children can have more than two legal parents, Quebec court says
By
Some children have more than two parents, a Quebec Superior Court judge has ruled, and the province must update its laws to recognize that.
Justice Andres Garin found in an April 25 decision that the province's Civil Code, which only allows children to have two legal parents, violates constitutional protections against discrimination.
While family status isn't one of the characteristics specifically named in the section of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms that guarantees equal protection and benefit of the law, Garin ruled it is an immutable characteristic that is sufficiently similar.
'In fact, from the child's point of view, the family to which they belong is a completely immutable personal characteristic. One thing's for sure, you don't choose your parents!' he wrote. The children involved 'didn't choose the nature of their multi-parent families. They each have three parents. That's their reality and they can't do anything to change that.'
Each of the individual parents also chose to raise a child with two other people for profoundly personal reasons, which represents a personal characteristic that should be considered immutable, he wrote.
Garin struck down more than 40 articles of Quebec's Civil Code, but he suspended that decision for one year to give the government time to change the law.
The ruling combines two separate cases involving a total of three families. In each, three people consider themselves the parents of a child or children. The parents cannot be named due to a publication ban that forbids identifying people in family law cases that relate to the interests of a child.
One of the families involves a married man and woman who entered into a romantic relationship with another woman, who had a child with the man. While all three are raising the child, born in 2022, only the biological mother is listed on the birth certificate.
In another case, a lesbian couple wanted to have children, but wanted the biological father to be involved. A child was born to one of the women in 2011, fathered by a friend, and while the couple broke up in 2015, they want the former couple and the father to be recognized as parents of the child.
In the third case, a woman became infertile due to leukemia treatment, but still wanted children. Her male partner had a child with one of their friends, a woman who was divorced and also wanted children. The three are raising the child together. Another child was born to the couple, who had frozen an embryo before the cancer treatment, through a surrogate and they want the woman with whom they are raising their other child to also be considered a legal parent of the second child.
Mona Greenbaum, founder of the LGBT+ Family Coalition, which helped bring one of the cases, said that while little will change immediately, the ruling is a major step for the families involved and others like them.
'These families exist and the children in these families need to have the same protections as kids in any other families,' she said.
Legal recognition means that all the parents involved will have the same legal rights and responsibilities, Greenbaum said.
'For instance, something as simple as getting a report card from school for your kid, or travelling with your child, or making a medical decision, all those things require that you're the legal parent,' she said.
It will also ensure that children can inherit from a parent who dies without a will and that if there is a breakup, children will still have access to all the people who have parented them and that parents won't be able to just leave and not pay child support, Greenbaum said.
'It's an amazing judgment, because it redefines what will be socially, legally recognized as a family, so it's expanding the definition to reflect what actually exists in reality,' she said.
The Quebec government had opposed the challenge on the grounds that recognizing at most two legal parents didn't violate anyone's rights.
Asked if the government will appeal, a spokesperson for Justice Minister and Attorney General Simon Jolin-Barrette said the government is analyzing the decision and declined to comment further.
Laws in Ontario and Saskatchewan allow children to have more than two legal parents, and a similar bill has been tabled in the Yukon. British Columbia allows more than two parents to be recognized in family situations involving assisted reproduction, though court rulings in that province, as well as in Newfoundland and Labrador, have ordered three people to be legally considered the parents of a child in specific cases.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Cision Canada
13 hours ago
- Cision Canada
Ombudsman to investigate Ontario's response to incident at Maplehurst Correctional Complex Français
Paul Dubé: Significant concerns raised about accountability and inmates' rights TORONTO, June 9, 2025 /CNW/ - Ontario Ombudsman Paul Dubé today announced a new investigation into the Ministry of the Solicitor General's response to a December 2023 incident at Maplehurst Correctional Complex, due to significant public concerns about transparency, accountability and inmates' rights. The incident involved Maplehurst's Institutional Crisis Intervention Team (ICIT), and its response to an assault on a correctional officer at the complex in Halton Region, which houses nearly 1,500 inmates in medium and maximum security. "Several inmates and members of the public have contacted us to express concerns about the treatment of inmates by the ICIT over two days in December 2023," Mr. Dubé said. "The Ministry has already investigated the incident. What my investigation will cover is the steps the Ministry took as a result, and what it is doing to make sure something like this does not happen again." During the two days that ICIT correctional officers were deployed at Maplehurst, inmates in Unit 8 were stripped to their boxer shorts and forced to sit on the floor and face the wall with their wrists zip-tied, while correctional officers in tactical gear patrolled behind them. Some of these inmates have subsequently had their sentences reduced by judges who have raised concerns about this treatment. In one case, the prosecution acknowledged that an inmate's rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms were violated during the ICIT incident. "When an incident occurs in an Ontario correctional facility that impacts the administration of justice and the rights of inmates, it is imperative that we understand why it happened and what is being done to ensure that it does not recur," the Ombudsman said. The Ombudsman's Office receives thousands of complaints related to correctional services every year, and engages actively with the Ministry of the Solicitor General to address these cases and underlying systemic issues. The Ombudsman received some 60 complaints about the ICIT incident at Maplehurst, including from inmates who were directly involved. Now that the Ministry has had the opportunity to complete its internal investigations of this matter, the Ombudsman has determined that an investigation by his Office is warranted in order to ensure transparency and accountability, and adequate safeguards for the future. The investigation will focus on the Ministry's response to the incident and what safeguards can be put in place to prevent something similar from happening in future. The investigation will not examine personnel or disciplinary matters related to individual correctional staff. Given the significant public interest in this issue, the Ombudsman has committed to completing the investigation as efficiently as possible. Anyone who has information that they believe may be relevant to the investigation is invited to contact Ombudsman Ontario by filing a confidential complaint form at by calling 1-800-263-1830 or emailing [email protected]. Media please note: As this investigation is in its early stages, the Ombudsman will not be available to discuss it publicly. About Ombudsman Ontario: The Ombudsman, established in 1975 to help protect the rights of all Ontarians, is an independent and impartial officer of the Legislature. Under the Ombudsman Act, the Ombudsman reviews and resolves complaints and inquiries from the public about provincial government organizations, as well as French language services, child protection services, municipalities, universities and school boards. The Ombudsman's systemic investigations have prompted widespread reforms benefiting millions of people across the province.


Winnipeg Free Press
3 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Bucharest gay pride march turns 20 as LGBTQ+ Romanians face growing hostility from right-wing groups
BUCHAREST, Romania (AP) — Thousands of LGBTQ+ supporters took to the streets of Romania's capital Saturday for its annual gay pride parade, following a tense election cycle marked by an increase in hate speech against the community. Marchers of all ages walked through Bucharest's streets and down the central Victory Avenue, as many waved colorful flags, blew whistles and held placards that read: 'Be proud, be bold, be you!' Held since 2005, the event marked Bucharest Pride's 20th anniversary. This year's parade comes on the heels of a highly divisive and chaotic election cycle that saw a rise in support for far-right and conservative political figures and parties in the European Union member, one of the bloc's most religious countries. Victor Ciobotaru, executive director of ACCEPT Association, an LGBTQ+ rights group, told The Associated Press that throughout the 2024-2025 election cycle, the organization registered 'a huge increase' in hate crimes against the LGBTQ+ community. 'We had more people complaining about being harassed on the streets or being attacked,' he said. 'This hate speech doesn't remain without effect, we can feel the tension within the society … We are going to continue to fight for our rights, no matter the political climate.' Earlier on Saturday, right-wing groups who advocate for traditional family values and oppose same sex marriage held an anti-LGBT countermarch in the capital, with many waving the country's tricolor national flags and others holding placards depicting religious icons. Ahead of the parade, the ACCEPT association also reported a large 'STOP LGBT' banner that had been draped over an abandoned Bucharest apartment block, which was later removed. 'These types of actions are now more legitimized by the hate discourse which was spread all during these years, during these electoral campaigns,' Ciobotaru added. 'We will not be afraid to go on the streets.' This year marks 24 years since Romania, a country of about 19 million, decriminalized homosexuality. In ILGA-Europe's 2025 Rainbow Map, which assesses the legal and policy landscape for LGBT people across Europe, Romania ranked last among all 27 EU countries, followed by Poland and Bulgaria, the advocacy group found.


Edmonton Journal
3 days ago
- Edmonton Journal
Man who killed four members of Ontario Muslim family appealing convictions: doc
Article content The document says Veltman is challenging his convictions and seeking a new trial on grounds that the trial judge erred in admitting the 'ideological evidence,' and in admitting his statements to police, which it says were obtained in breach of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It also argues the trial judge, Superior Court Justice Renee Pomerance, erred in dismissing a defence application for mistrial. Veltman was sentenced in February 2024 to life in prison with no chance of parole for 25 years after he was convicted of four counts of first-degree murder and one count of attempted murder for hitting the Afzaal family with his truck on June 6, 2021, while they were out for a walk in London, Ont. Forty-six-year-old Salman Afzaal; his 44-year-old wife, Madiha Salman; their 15-year-old daughter, Yumna; and her 74-year-old grandmother, Talat Afzaal were killed in the attack. The couple's nine-year-old son was seriously hurt but survived. Pomerance ruled the murders, committed by a self-described white nationalist, were an act of terrorism. The case was the first time Canada's terrorism laws were put before a jury in a first-degree murder trial.