
To Make Your Workplace Fairer, Take Charge of Its Norms
Think of all the times you started a new job. You probably learned about key policies and formal processes around things like vacation time. But employee manuals don't teach other things, like whether you should advocate for a promotion or wait to be asked, how quickly colleagues expect email replies, or if meetings start on time or three minutes after the hour.
Norms shape both individual and collective behaviors and serve as symbols of organizational culture or 'how we do things here.' Employees pick up on these norms over time by noticing what people around them do and inferring what would be acceptable (e.g., 'Is it okay to disagree publicly with colleagues?'). Being intentional about setting and collectively valuing norms is key to removing ambiguity for employees—and it's especially critical for leaders in times of uncertainty and upheaval when employees need a North Star at work.
Fostering a fundamental norm of fairness—where all employees play on a level field where they can succeed, support is offered equitably, and rewards are allocated justly—can create a virtuous cycle. As fairness breeds fairness, with employees reciprocating with higher productivity and a stronger commitment to their employers, fairness is a norm that builds on itself and grows stronger over time. Of course, the reverse is also true, and unfairness can lead to a self-perpetuating cycle with bad outcomes, which is why it's crucial for leaders to foster the norm of fairness.
To do it, you can become a 'norm entrepreneur' for fairness—and create an environment where employees can do the same. Originally coined by legal scholar Cass Sunstein, norm entrepreneurs shape what we perceive to be normal, acceptable, and expected. Norm entrepreneurship is a potent tool in leaders' toolboxes because, in some cases, norms trump formal policies and processes as influencers of behavior. For example, a corporate policy such as unlimited vacation time isn't worth much if employees don't feel empowered to make use of it in practice because long leaves are frowned upon. Likewise, organizations proclaiming a 'speak-up culture' will not succeed in encouraging employees to raise concerns if they see colleagues sidelined, discredited, or penalized when they do. To create truly fair and high-performing workplaces, we must work on what we want to accept as normal.
Here are three ways leaders can influence workplace norms and encourage employees to act as norm entrepreneurs to build a fairer environment for all to thrive.
Change perceptions of 'how we do things here.'
Our perceptions of what others around us think and do are not always well calibrated, leading to inaccurate beliefs about what is acceptable or desirable—in other words, what the social norm is in a given context. For example, recent research reveals that a majority of Americans are in favor of diversity and inclusion initiatives, but they tend to underestimate the level of support among others.
At work, such 'pluralistic ignorance' often happens because we don't have complete information about people's private beliefs, and the information we do have—observations of other people's outward behavior—is not necessarily reflective of how they truly feel. However, mistaken beliefs should not keep people from utilizing opportunities at their disposal, so fairness entails providing the information people need to act.
Take parental leave, something that has only relatively recently become available to men in some countries. As such, the social norm regarding uptake is still evolving, and men might not avail themselves of the parental leave they're entitled to because they fear negative reactions from their colleagues. At Santander bank in the United Kingdom, for example, a survey revealed that only 65% of male employees expected their colleagues to be supportive of flexible work—even though when asked about their personal opinions, almost every man at Santander was in support of flexible work.
When some men were informed in an experiment of their peers' support for flexible working, their intentions to take between five and eight weeks of parental leave increased by 62%, or nearly 13 percentage points, compared to men who did not receive the information. Correcting inaccurate beliefs through information helped many men to behave more in line with their personal values and preferences. Because humans have an innate drive to fit in and go with the herd, correcting inaccurate beliefs in this way is a potent lever for changing behavior and keeping flawed norms from taking hold.
In addition to informational interventions, norm entrepreneurs can decrease ambiguity by role modeling desired actions to show they can be done successfully. Former transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg and Reddit cofounder Alexis Ohanian are examples of norm entrepreneurs who took parental leave and were vocal about their positive experiences, helping to dispel the myth that men do not or cannot take leave, at least in organizations where parental leave is available.
While senior leaders may have more privileges, influence, and power to make change, employees don't need to be in the C-suite to change norms in the workplace. Often, the people who shape our expectations the most are the ones closest to us, as equities sales trader Ronak Patel explained about his 16-week parental leave: 'The more men that do it, the less of a big deal it becomes.'
To change perceptions of prevailing norms, ask yourself:
What data might you be able to collect or share that could challenge employees' existing beliefs about an issue?
What behaviors can you role model that will shift your organization's culture in a positive direction?
What is something you're already doing that you wish more employees did as well—and how could you make those actions more visible in your workplace?
Find the right audience.
While everyone can be a norm entrepreneur, our efforts are particularly effective when we tailor them to the right audience that sees us as credible and compelling messengers. The case for fairness can be especially compelling when made by someone who benefits from the status quo—or, on the flipside, by someone who challenges stereotypes by succeeding in spaces they weren't expected to.
'Unusual suspects' can be the best norm entrepreneurs precisely because they're counter-stereotypical. Research shows that when white male executives and top managers hired more women and people of color, they were rewarded with higher performance evaluations; women executives and executives of color of all genders did not receive the same credit.
Similarly, Katherine Johnson, Mary Jackson, and Dorothy Vaughan, the protagonists of the film Hidden Figures, became famous not only because they were brilliant mathematicians, but also because they were 'firsts' in many ways at NASA in the 1960s. They started to change norms by breaking glass ceilings and paving the way for others.
In both cases, people became credible norm entrepreneurs because they did something counter-stereotypical: white men hiring women and people of color and Black women climbing up the career ladder in STEM.
To find the right audience for your norm entrepreneurship, ask yourself:
In which spaces, conversations, or contexts might I be an 'unusual suspect' for a cause?
Are there people different from me whom I could purposefully support or advocate for?
What are my sources of credibility (e.g., experience, authority, ability to inspire), and which colleagues do I have credibility with?
Whom could I tap as an unusual suspect to help advocate for my cause?
Leverage collective action.
Fairness is not an individual sport but a group effort. Often, for fairness to become a norm, coordination is required. Norms spread when more and more people take them up.
A company we worked with wanted to decrease ambiguity in hybrid meetings and decided that virtual participants should speak first, before in-person participants. Like many of us since the pandemic began, they had noticed that once in-person participants got into the flow of conversation in a room, it was very difficult for virtual attendees to get a word in. These leaders also knew that the new 'virtual-first' norm could not simply be mandated from above. So they recruited a group of meeting organizers to pilot the new approach, share feedback, and serve as role models. After a while, word about the new practice started to spread, and the company could shift its messaging to say that 'virtual-first' was an increasingly popular practice.
BBC journalist Ros Atkins followed a similar approach when he started scaling 50:50 The Equality Project, which aims to equalize representation of women and men in media coverage. After honing his data- and goals-based methodology—whereby journalists count the number of women and men featured in their content, aiming for parity— Atkins started sharing his approach with strategically selected, influential BBC colleagues. Given the grassroots nature of the project when it began in 2017, Atkins had no power to compel or even incentivize anyone to join him. But he had a proven track record of equitable results on his own show and credibility as a fellow journalist to make the simple pitch: 'We've found this helpful in our work, so maybe you'll want to give it a go, too.' Seven years later, more than 750 other BBC content creating teams had joined the 50:50 Project.
You may think that one person cannot change the norms of a large organization. But these examples show that when people start with what they can control—their own daily work—and recruit a small circle of colleagues to join them, even a single individual can spark meaningful action.
This is what happened when students from randomly selected American middle schools were encouraged to publicly advocate against bullying as part of an anticonflict intervention. Reported conflicts decreased dramatically, especially when the students who happened to be part of the intervention were socially influential. These so-called 'social referents' tended to be closely watched by their peers for cues on how to behave, and when they took a stance against conflict, their actions had outsized influence in shaping other students' perceptions of the norm.
Try it. Confer with your team to create a set of norms that you collectively agree to uphold, such as starting and ending meetings on time, scheduling social events during work hours, or doing weekly feedback check-ins. Then, make those norms visible and top-of-mind, such as by documenting them on posters in meeting rooms (for in-person meetings) or sharing them in email reminders for weekly feedback check-ins to create momentum. Team members could even take turns being the 'norm champion' who helps everyone uphold the norms and steps in when violations are about to occur. If you land on an approach that works, share it with a few other teams or units and encourage them to join you.
To leverage collective action as norm entrepreneur, ask yourself:
What is a norm that I would like to spread throughout my organization?
How can I prove the concept in my own work first?
Which (ideally influential) colleagues could I recruit to try the norm shift with me?
. . .
Clarity around organizational norms can ground us and provide stability during a time of uncertainty. Even more importantly, norm entrepreneurship can help you create a fairer workplace where everyone can contribute to their fullest—and have a better time doing it.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nucleus Genomics Launches Nucleus Embryo, Genetic Optimization Software Alongside Partnership with Genomic Prediction
Parents pursuing IVF now have a new level of choice to empower their family planning NEW YORK, June 4, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- With U.S. birthrates plummeting and IVF on the rise, Nucleus Genomics today launched Nucleus Embryo, the first genetic optimization software that lets parents see and understand a complete genetic profile to select an embryo. "Before there's a heartbeat, there's DNA," said Kian Sadeghi, founder and CEO of Nucleus. "One file containing DNA and genetic markers can tell you more about your baby's future than any other test a doctor could possibly run at this stage. Most clinics stop at whether an embryo will develop. For many parents, that's not enough. Patients have long asked for more transparency from clinics, and Nucleus Embryo is an important step toward complete data ownership for parents planning their families." The software enables parents to analyze and compare up to 20 embryos across over 900 hereditary conditions and 40 additional analyses beyond basic viability, spanning cancers, chronic conditions, appearance, cognitive ability, mental health, and more. To widen access to the software, Nucleus will partner with Genomic Prediction, the first company to offer genome-wide screening on embryos. The partnership sets a new standard in genetic medicine, continuing Genomic Prediction's decade-long history of giving hopeful parents the best possible chance of implanting healthy embryos. The company's analyses focus on hereditary conditions, acting as the first line of defense against chronic and rare diseases. "As an organization, we are committed to supporting patients' rights to their DNA and any information that can aid in their family-building journey," said Kelly Ketterson, CEO of Genomic Prediction. "We have a legacy of innovation aimed at providing patients with access to the best scientific resources. Our partnership with Nucleus opens access to information our patients have requested and allows us to uphold our commitment to this legacy." Nucleus' partnership with Genomic Prediction reflects a growing shift in how parents think about genetics as a tool to give children the best possible start in life. A wide-ranging study of Americans found the majority accepted the use of genetic technology to choose embryos based on health and personality traits. Four in 10 parents would use genetic optimization as another tool to understand their future child's cognitive abilities. Most women undergo three to six IVF cycles before successfully having a baby, with each cycle costing up to $25,000. Many embryos are unviable within days of being fertilized, leaving parents with few to choose from. Facing high stakes, clinicians often recommend genetic testing to optimize a couple's chances of a healthy pregnancy. But these tests typically stop at a select number of hereditary conditions and chromosome count. Now, advanced genetic analysis from Nucleus gives parents a new window into the health and well-being of their future child. Nucleus Embryo provides a comprehensive genetic profile for each embryo, encompassing hereditary genetic diseases, like cystic fibrosis and hemochromatosis, alongside genetic measures of cognitive ability, mental health, and risk for chronic diseases. Wide access to genetic insights for embryos can also help extend lifespan from the earliest stages of life. While more than half of all deaths annually in the U.S. are attributed to chronic, age-related conditions — such as Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, cancer, and heart disease — research shows embryonic selection can materially help reduce disease risk for these conditions. "We celebrate health optimization and the pursuit of longevity in every other part of life via our focus on training, supplements, and sleep," Sadeghi said. "We all know health isn't just the absence of disease. It's the ability to understand our bodies and genetic makeup to reach our full potential. Now we can apply this principle to life's inception." About Nucleus Genomics Nucleus builds software for generational health. Inspired by the loss of his cousin who died of a rare — yet preventable — genetic disease, Nucleus founder and Thiel Fellow Kian Sadeghi left an Ivy League university to build a product that could have saved her life. Our advanced DNA health test and analysis takes the guesswork out of your health, whether it's perfecting your protocols, knowing your risk for cancer, or planning for a healthy family. Follow us on social media @nucleusgenomics. About Genomic Prediction Genomic Prediction, Inc. is the frontrunner in advanced embryo screening. Our proprietary LifeView platform is state-of-the-art technology that assesses embryos for genetic health aimed at improved IVF outcomes. The LifeView Embryo Health Score Test (EHS) offers insight into the likelihood of developing conditions driven by multiple genes. It tests for significant health issues, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, certain cancers, and mental health conditions. The EHS results are derived from the same embryo sample used in the following PGT tests: PGT-A: Identifies chromosome abnormalities in embryos. PGT-A+: Pinpoints the origin (paternal, maternal, or embryonic) of chromosome abnormalities. PGT-M: Decreases the chances of passing on monogenic (single-gene) conditions. PGT-SR: Detects chromosome abnormalities and structural imbalances, providing clarity between normal and balanced chromosomes. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Nucleus
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks
Sky News understands that the Trump administration approached the UK government to ask if it would host round two of the US-China trade talks. This is a useful 'diplo-win' for the UK. The first round was held in Geneva last month. News of that happening came as a surprise. The Chinese and the Americans were in the midst of a Trump-instigated trade war. President Trump was en route to Saudi Arabia and suddenly we got word of talks in Switzerland. They went surprisingly well. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent and his Chinese counterpart He Lifeng, met face-to-face and agreed to suspend most tariffs for 90 days. But two weeks later, the Trump administration accused Beijing of breaking the agreements reached in Geneva. Beijing threw the blame back at Washington. On Wednesday, Donald Trump and Xi Jinping spoke by phone. The Chinese claimed this call was at the Americans' request. Either way, the consequence was that the talks were back on track. "I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, trade deal," President Trump said this week. From that call came the impetus for a second round of talks. A venue was needed. In stepped the UK at short notice. Beyond being geographically convenient, UK government sources suggest that Britain is geopolitically in the right place right now to act as this bridge and facilitator. The UK-China relationship is in the process of a "reset". Other locations, like Brussels or other EU capitals, would have been less workable. Crucially too, for the UK, this is also potentially advantageous as it seeks to get its own UK-US trade agreement, to eliminate or massively reduce tariffs, over the line. Talks on reaching the "implementation phase" have been near-continuous since the announcement last month, but having the American principals in London is a plus. Sideline talks are possible, but even the presence of the US team in the UK is helpful. Read more from Sky News:Man wrongly deported from US to El Salvador has been returned to face criminal chargesMore than 40 'narco-boat' drug smugglers arrested in major police sting For all the chaos that President Trump is causing with his tariffs, he has instigated face-to-face conversations as he seeks resets. Key players are sitting down around tables - yes, to untangle the trade knots which Trump tied, but this whole episode has pulled foes together around the same table; it has forced relationships and maybe mutual understanding. That's useful. And for this next round, between superpowers, the UK is the host. Also useful.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know
In February, President Donald Trump said he was considering a plan to pay out $5,000 stimulus checks to American taxpayers from the savings identified by billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Are they happening? No official plan or schedule for such a payout has been released, and a decision on the checks would have to come from Congress, which has so far been cool to the idea. And there have been questions as to how much DOGE has actually saved. The idea was floated by Azoria investment firm CEO James Fishback, who suggested on Musk's social media platform X that Trump and Musk should "should announce a 'DOGE Dividend'" from the money saved from reductions in government waste and workforce since it was American taxpayer money in the first place. He even submitted a proposal for how it would work, with a timeline for after the expiration of DOGE in July 2026. "At $2 trillion in DOGE savings and 78 million tax-paying households, this is a $5,000 refund per household, with the remaining used to pay down the national debt," he said in a separate post. Musk replied, "Will check with the President." "We're considering giving 20% of the DOGE savings to American citizens and 20% to paying down the debt," Trump said in a during the Saudi-sponsored FII PRIORITY Summit in Miami Beach the same month. DOGE has dismantled entire federal agencies, wiped out government contracts and led the firings of tens of thousands of federal workers, leaving many agencies struggling to continue operations. DOGE checks? Elon Musk dodges DOGE stimulus check question during Wisconsin rally: Here's what he said. Fishbeck suggested that the potential refund go only to households that are net-income taxpayers, or households that pay more in taxes than they get back. The Pew Research Center said that most Americans with an adjusted gross income of under $40,000 effectively pay no federal income tax. They would not be eligible. If DOGE achieves Musk's initial goal of stripping $2 trillion from U.S. government spending by 2026, Fishback's plan was for $5,000 per household, or 20% of the savings divided by the number of eligible households. If DOGE doesn't hit the goal, Fishback said the amount should be adjusted accordingly. 'So again, if the savings are only $1 trillion, which I think is awfully low, the check goes from $5,000 to $2,500,' Fishback said during a podcast appearance. 'If the savings are only $500 billion, which, again, is really, really low, then the [checks] are only $1,250.' However, while Musk talked about saving $2 trillion in federal spending during Trump's campaign, he lowered the goal to $1 trillion after Trump assumed office and said in March he was on pace to hit that goal by the end of May. At a Cabinet meeting in April, Musk lowered the projected savings further to $150 billion in fiscal year 2026. Musk left the White House at the end of May when his designation as a "special government employee" ended. DOGE, the advisory group he created, is expected to continue without him. That depends on who you ask. On its website, DOGE claims to have saved an estimated $175 billion as of May 30, "a combination of asset sales, contract and lease cancellations and renegotiations, fraud and improper payment deletions, grant cancellations, interest savings, programmatic changes, regulatory savings, and workforce reductions." The site says that works out to $1,086.96 saved per taxpayer. However, many of DOGE's claims have been exaggerated and several of the initiatives to slash agency workforces have been challenged in court. DOGE has been accused of taking credit for contracts that were canceled before DOGE was created, failing to factor in funds the government is required to pay even if a contract is canceled, and tallying every contract by the most that could possibly be spent on it even when nothing near that amount had been obligated. The website list has been changed as the media pointed out errors, such as a claim that an $8 million savings was actually $8 billion. On May 30, CNN reported that one of its reporters found that less than half the $175 billion figure was backed up with even basic documentation, making verification difficult if not impossible. Some of the changes may also end up costing taxpayers more, such as proposed slashes to the Internal Revenue Service that experts say would mean less tax revenue generated, resulting in a net cost of about $6.8 billion. Over the next 10 years, if IRS staffing stays low, the cumulative cost in uncollected taxes would hit $159 billion, according to the nonpartisan Budget Lab at Yale University. The per-taxpayer claim on the website is also inflated, CNN said, as it's based on '161 million individual federal taxpayers' and doesn't seem to include married people filing jointly. This article originally appeared on Florida Times-Union: DOGE dividends: Will American taxpayers get a $5,000 check?