Bereaved mothers seek answers as they welcome proposed inquiry into treatment of Indigenous detainees
Narelle King, whose son
Ms King has decried a lack of answers for bereaved mothers.
"To this day, I don't know what happened to my son, but every day I find the courage to fight for him,"
Ms King said.
"It's been nine years since my son passed away at [the Alexander Maconochie Centre], but today, I just feel like he is with me," she said after watching the debate in the assembly.
Ms King was scathing of the jail's treatment of her son and other Indigenous inmates who have similarly died in custody.
"It's not acceptable for any mother to hear that sort of news," she said, slamming the facility.
"
They don't care about our boys.
"
The ACT government on Wednesday backed a proposal to establish an independent inquiry into the treatment of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander detainees at Canberra's jail.
There has been a number of recent deaths of Indigenous detainees — including two within four days in February.
Independent MLA Thomas Emerson brought the motion to the assembly calling for a board of inquiry into the deaths in custody.
"It should not be the case in a progressive jurisdiction, with human rights legislation, that people are dying in prison and we don't hear why or how that is happening,"
Mr Emerson said.
'Deeply sorry'
Corrections Minister Marisa Patterson outside the ACT Legislative Assembly.
(
ABC News: Harry Frost
)
Corrections Minister Marisa Paterson told the assembly the government will consult on what a proposed board of inquiry should look like once an "imminent" review of over-representation of Indigenous people in the justice system is completed later this year.
"I want to put strongly on the record: To all the families — non-indigenous and indigenous — who have died in the custody of the [Alexander Maconochie Centre] since it opened, I am deeply sorry,"
she said.
"We know we can do better."
She said she planned to ask the ACT coroner to expedite relevant coronial inquiries currently underway.
"And then we can progress to a board of inquiry."
'More than alarm bells'
Bundjalung and Yorta Yorta man Joe Hedger supports a board of inquiry.
(
ABC News: Harry Frost
)
Bundjalung and Yorta Yorta man Joe Hedger is a local advocate and said the inquiry should not be "to point fingers but to get to the bottom of what's not working in the prison."
He said three deaths in custody within a six-month period have left the community reeling.
"That's more than alarm bells, that's a tragic circumstance, particularly for the families,"
Mr Hedger said.
"I think what we consistently hear is that there is a high degree of boredom for a lot of Aboriginal people who go into AMC, and we know that part of dealing with that boredom is the drugs … we need to make sure that we provide programs … and [help] to transition out of AMC," he said.
Distressing stories spur motion
Mr Emerson said he was spurred into action after hearing troubling claims of what has gone on within the prison.
"I'm hearing stories about people melting down nicotine patches and injecting them because of the tobacco ban in prison. It's really alarming,"
he said.
"[I'm told] there are needles being shared for 12 months at a time. There's huge rates of hepatitis in the AMC.
"That just doesn't meet community expectations. Action is needed.
"And If we can get culturally appropriate detainment right for Indigenous people in the AMC, that's going to translate to other detainees as well."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
4 hours ago
- News.com.au
High school ‘Tradwife' debate topic divides
A hot button topic put forward for Year 9 students to discuss during a statewide debate competition has caused a stir online. Debating SA, a non-profit organisation that runs debating competitions in South Australia, revealed its latest topics ahead of next week's debates. However, it was the topic for round three — 'The 'Trad Wife' movement is good for women' — that has raised eyebrows and sparked fierce discussion. The 'Trad Wife' movement has been popularised by the likes of influencer Hannah Neeleman, also known as Ballerina Farm, who has more than 10 million followers on Instagram, and Nara Smith, a US-based model and influencer with nearly 5 million followers. The movement is often rooted in 'traditional' values, based on the idea of a woman looking after the home and children while the woman's husband goes off to work and earn money. Typically, it is associated with conservative values where the woman is seen as submissive, however defenders say those who follow it, do so as a matter of personal choice. Debating SA's topic choice left many questioning whether it was appropriate for Year 9 students to research and discuss, let alone be aware of the phrase 'Trad Wife'. 'Personally I think being able to debate around a topic even one that is clearly terrible is still an important skill,' one social media user said. 'But the point of contention is that tradwife stuff promotes not only staying at home, but actual straight up misogyny. And it would always be controversial to debate 'is it okay to hate women?'.' Another said: 'This is a huge misstep by the debating orgs (and I'm saying this as a former high school debater and coach).' 'Sounds like those who champion 'critical thinking, cultural nous and debate' to set this topic have NFI of the current cultural implications of the 'tradwife' movement online, especially its direct pipeline to white supremacy and misogyny,' another added. But others argued there was no real issue. 'I thought one of the points of debating was arguing for a side you don't necessarily agree with. My son recently was involved with a school debate where the topic was 'Is the current climate change man made?'. I don't see a trad wife debate being much different,' one parent wrote. Another weighed in: 'Honestly, if the goal is to teach kids how to think critically about the content they're bombarded with online, this isn't the worst topic to explore. 'The tradwife movement is something they'll run into on TikTok or YouTube eventually, so better to unpack it in a guided, moderated classroom than leave them to figure it out through algorithm-fed echo chambers. Context and intent matter. If this was framed as a critical discussion — not an endorsement — then it's literally education doing its job.' Following the outrage, Debating SA sent a clarification to schools, saying that students 'must look critically at sources'. 'It goes without saying that any websites that denigrate women (or any person) are not a good source of information and are not relevant to the topic,' the clarification, which also appeared on its website, said. 'To avoid any confusion about the topic, the following definitions for the purpose of the debate apply: 'Tradwife is a portmanteau for 'traditional wife', a woman who embraces traditional gender roles, primarily focusing on home making and family care, while her husband is the primary breadwinner. This can include cooking, cleaning, child-rearing, and maintaining the home. 'This term is intended to be synonymous with the idea of a stay at home parent.' 'The tradwife movement is therefore a group of people who support a lifestyle such as the above. Note that this does not include any concept of 'submission' as some sources may define. 'Good for women generally refers to something that has a positive impact on women's lives and wellbeing. Note specifically that the definition does not infer 'all women'.' In a further email provided to Sonja Lowen, the chairman of Debating SA, said: 'The positive response to the topic and our organisation [has] been well expressed by a number of people in the mainstream media. 'The negative response from some of the public has been very illuminating in the way in which they chose to express not only their views. but also the idea that there can be no debate about this subject. It seems that thinking about a subject that they don't agree with has become a radical act. Shutting down discussion is not a good idea and is the antithesis of a free society.' Ms Lowen said it made her realise debate provides a regulated forum for students to be able to present a case in a measured way, 'something some of the public would do well to emulate'. 'We expect our debaters to present their case with evidence and reasoning. It is very necessary for young people to be able to develop the skills to navigate their way in what is now a very complicated social landscape and those skills are perfected and refined by debating,' she said. 'Debating is an intellectual and academic discipline that allows the participants to examine both sides of a topic regardless of their own personal beliefs. This ability to explore both sides makes us tolerant of other views. Thinking is hard work and we should not surrender our intellectual independence because a topic may be difficult or in this case deemed unacceptable by some of the public.' But some were not satisfied with the reasoning from Debating SA. 'This isn't moderated in class discussion, it's a discussion topic for a Debating Competition, and the organisers have said that they used trad-wife as a synonym for 'stay at home parent',' one said. 'Honestly, their excuse sounds pretty pathetic – trad-wife is not a synonym for stay at home parent, it's a controversial social movement with significant connections to right-wing politics and influencers.' Another added: 'They're engaged enough to know the term, but not the context. 'Tradwife' is absolutely not a synonym for 'stay at home parent'. They've gone awry from the outset.' 'The issue is them conflating SAHM with Trad Wife. Trad wife is a social movement. They are vastly not the same thing. And the Trad Wife may not necessarily have children,' another said.
News.com.au
4 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Three-pronged attack': Australia's commercial defence future analysed
Defence industry specialist Brent Clark discusses Australia's national defence future. 'Obviously, the Australian government has a three-pronged attack on this,' Mr Clark told Sky News host Ed Boyd. 'There are a variety of steps that each company must do to each of those elements, if you're a supplier that is different to being a company that wishes to be a builder, as such. 'I would suggest quite heavily that Australian companies are investing in infrastructure, skills, capabilities.'
News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
Trump AUKUS review: Expert urges Australian defence companies not to get ahead of themselves
Defence industry Specialist Brent Clark says it is not unusual for governments to do reviews of defence partnerships. This comes amid US President Donald Trump's upcoming review of the AUKUS security partnership. 'Quite clearly, Australian companies would be concerned about the review; however, I think it is important to not let ourselves get ahead of where we are right now,' Mr Clark told Sky News host Ed Boyd. 'It is not an unusual event for governments to do reviews. 'I would think that the Trump administration would be remiss if they actually weren't doing the review into AUKUS.'
