
Right Side of the Prairie: My Country ‘Tis of Thee
By William H. Kittelson
Ordinarily I refrain from responding to the 'Left Side of the Prairie' column. However, when Mr. Lapadat felt compelled to publicize that the United Nations had once again declared Norway to have the world's 'Best Standard of Living,' I was driven to do a little research rather than rely on the likes of the sonorous, powder milk biscuit chomping, left-leaning Garrison Keillor for the last word.
In the 1840s, my ancestors escaped the true drudgery of 19th century Norwegian living standards by sailing to America and settling in these parts, where we have toiled, rejoiced, and slowly reproduced ever since. Irrationally, I take pride in my Norwegian heritage – probably because I owe my strikingly handsome good looks and stratospherically high intelligence to a gene pool known for a love of fishing, farming, inhospitably cold weather, and an occasional plundering of neighboring tribes.
Whatever, Norway today is full of nice people who do enjoy a very high standard of living albeit rather socialist. I don't think their standard of living is due to socialism. I think it's because Norway is chock full of small town Christians! In fact, 86 percent are Evangelical Lutheran – Norway's official national religion.
Their ridiculously homogenous population numbers a scant 4.6 million, about the same as the population of Detroit. Furthermore, one-sixth of all Norwegians live in Oslo, the other 84 percent live in small towns and villages, places where people know their neighbors pretty well. Could it be these demographics go a long way toward explaining the Mayberry-like lack of crime situation alluded to by Mr. Lapadat? Maybe, but Norway is not crime-free. No sir! In fact, Norway has the eighth highest crime rate in the world, although most are petty, nonviolent crimes.
And, yes, Mr. Keillor, as the world's second largest exporter of gas and oil, Norway's pension piggy bank is growing plumper every day; especially since they don't spend much to field a military capable of helping defend the Free World against groups of fanatic terrorists or supply billions in aid to third-world countries, as we do.
Looking through the prism of the Heritage Foundation's 'Economic Freedom Index,' Norway ranked 30th in economic freedom with a score of 70 out of 100 points, while the United States ranked fourth (82); Hong Kong led with 89 points.
So, while Norway may have the best standard of living in the eyes of the United Nations and other socialists, I still say we are the best. I believe our national superiority is built upon our basic building blocks: the Constitution and the Bill of Rights (derived from our founders' largely Judeo-Christian beliefs), private property rights, and free enterprise in a capitalist economic system. These unique qualities are why we are the best nation on earth – with a very high standard of living, to boot!
Sure, we have our faults and sometimes our priorities get out of whack. The I-35W bridge collapse is a painfully tragic example of where we had, perhaps, focused too much time and money building something non-essential (the light-rail system). The billion dollars spent on light-rail serving only a few could have gone a long, long way toward making our 'structurally deficient' bridges structurally sound and reliably safe, benefiting everyone.
Then, too, we allow our judicial system to boomerang on us with disastrous effects. Witness the passengers on board the airliner departing from MSP International exercising their common sense, alerting authorities to threatening behavior by a group of Muslim imams … those concerned citizen/passengers were immediately slammed with a lawsuit! Behavior such as exhibited by those imams should be just as illegal as breathing the word 'bomb' while in an airport or onboard a commercial flight, shouldn't it? Or, why should it be 'OK' to purposely desecrate the American flag, or religious artifacts from non-Muslim faiths, but maliciously submerging a Koran in a toilet is now punishable as a felony?
In last month's column I referred to a pending 'potential (negative) cultural paradigm shift.' Specifically, I see an ominous clash developing in the United States between our Rule of Law and the laws expressed in the Koran: Sharia law. Muslims, mostly recent emigres, are demanding religious accommodations throughout our society.
These demands would be unthinkable coming from atheists, Buddhists, Christians, Taoists, or Unitarians. Whose law is going to prevail? Ours – as codified in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, or that of the Muslims as codified in the Koran? We must decisively act in favor of our founding documents and the Rule of Law or risk the loss of our culture once the critical mass of the growing foreign element within our society becomes sufficiently large enough to abruptly – like the I-35W bridge collapse – bring an end to our cherished individual freedoms.
Eden Prairie resident William Kittelson's column, 'Right Side of the Prairie,' appears on the second Thursday of the month. 'Left Side of the Prairie,' by Bill Lapadat, appears on the first Thursday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
UN to vote on resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire, hostage release and aid access
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. General Assembly is expected to vote Thursday on a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the release of all hostages held by Hamas, and the opening of all Israeli border crossings for deliveries of desperately needed food and other aid. The resolution, drafted by Spain and obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press, 'strongly condemns any use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare.' Experts and human rights workers say hunger is widespread in Gaza and some 2 million Palestinians are at risk of famine if Israel does not fully lift its blockade and halt its military campaign, which it renewed in March after ending a ceasefire with Hamas. Last week, the U.N. Security Council failed to pass a resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza and calling on Israel to lift all restrictions on the delivery of aid. The United States vetoed the resolution because it was not linked to the release of the hostages, while all 14 other members of the council voted in favor. There are no vetoes in the 193-member General Assembly, where the resolution is expected to pass overwhelmingly. But unlike in the Security Council, assembly resolutions are not legally binding, though they are seen as a barometer of world opinion. After a 10-week blockade that barred all aid to Gaza, Israel is allowing the United Nations to deliver a trickle of food assistance and is backing a newly created U.S. aid group, which has opened several sites in the center and south of the territory to deliver food parcels. But the aid system rolled out last month by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has been troubled by near-daily shootings as crowds make their way to aid sites, while the longstanding U.N.-run system has struggled to deliver food because of Israeli restrictions and a breakdown of law and order. The draft resolution being voted on Thursday references a March 28 legally binding order by the top United Nations court for Israel to open more land crossings into Gaza for food, water, fuel and other supplies. The International Court of Justice issued the order in a case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of acts of genocide in its war in Gaza, charges Israel strongly denies. The resolution stresses that Israel, as an occupying power, has an obligation under international law to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches those in need. It reiterates the assembly's commitment to a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with the Gaza Strip as part of a Palestinian state. The assembly is holding a high-level meeting next week to push for a two-state solution, which Israel has rejected. The resolution supports mediation efforts by Egypt, Qatar and the United States aimed at implementing a January ceasefire agreement. When the U.S. vetoed last week's Gaza resolution, acting Ambassador Dorothy Shea said it would have undermined the security of Israel and diplomatic efforts to reach a ceasefire 'that reflects the realities on the ground.' Like the failed Security Council resolution, the resolution to be voted on Thursday also does not condemn Hamas' deadly attack in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which ignited the war, or say the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza. Both are U.S. demands. The Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 251 hostage. About 55 hostages are still being held. Israel's military campaign has killed over 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. It says women and children make up most of the dead, but doesn't distinguish between civilians and combatants. Israel says it has killed more than 20,000 militants, without providing evidence.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
UN to vote on resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire, hostage release and aid access
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. General Assembly is expected to vote Thursday on a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the release of all hostages held by Hamas, and the opening of all Israeli border crossings for deliveries of desperately needed food and other aid. The resolution, drafted by Spain and obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press, 'strongly condemns any use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare.' Experts and human rights workers say hunger is widespread in Gaza and some 2 million Palestinians are at risk of famine if Israel does not fully lift its blockade and halt its military campaign, which it renewed in March after ending a ceasefire with Hamas. Last week, the U.N. Security Council failed to pass a resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza and calling on Israel to lift all restrictions on the delivery of aid. The United States vetoed the resolution because it was not linked to the release of the hostages, while all 14 other members of the council voted in favor. There are no vetoes in the 193-member General Assembly, where the resolution is expected to pass overwhelmingly. But unlike in the Security Council, assembly resolutions are not legally binding, though they are seen as a barometer of world opinion. After a 10-week blockade that barred all aid to Gaza, Israel is allowing the United Nations to deliver a trickle of food assistance and is backing a newly created U.S. aid group, which has opened several sites in the center and south of the territory to deliver food parcels. But the aid system rolled out last month by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has been troubled by near-daily shootings as crowds make their way to aid sites, while the longstanding U.N.-run system has struggled to deliver food because of Israeli restrictions and a breakdown of law and order. The draft resolution being voted on Thursday references a March 28 legally binding order by the top United Nations court for Israel to open more land crossings into Gaza for food, water, fuel and other supplies. The International Court of Justice issued the order in a case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of acts of genocide in its war in Gaza, charges Israel strongly denies. The resolution stresses that Israel, as an occupying power, has an obligation under international law to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches those in need. It reiterates the assembly's commitment to a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with the Gaza Strip as part of a Palestinian state. The assembly is holding a high-level meeting next week to push for a two-state solution, which Israel has rejected. The resolution supports mediation efforts by Egypt, Qatar and the United States aimed at implementing a January ceasefire agreement. When the U.S. vetoed last week's Gaza resolution, acting Ambassador Dorothy Shea said it would have undermined the security of Israel and diplomatic efforts to reach a ceasefire 'that reflects the realities on the ground.' Like the failed Security Council resolution, the resolution to be voted on Thursday also does not condemn Hamas' deadly attack in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which ignited the war, or say the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza. Both are U.S. demands. The Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 251 hostage. About 55 hostages are still being held. Israel's military campaign has killed over 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. It says women and children make up most of the dead, but doesn't distinguish between civilians and combatants. Israel says it has killed more than 20,000 militants, without providing evidence.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
UN to vote on resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire, hostage release and aid access
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. General Assembly is expected to vote Thursday on a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the release of all hostages held by Hamas, and the opening of all Israeli border crossings for deliveries of desperately needed food and other aid. The resolution, drafted by Spain and obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press, 'strongly condemns any use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare.' Experts and human rights workers say hunger is widespread in Gaza and some 2 million Palestinians are at risk of famine if Israel does not fully lift its blockade and halt its military campaign, which it renewed in March after ending a ceasefire with Hamas. Last week, the U.N. Security Council failed to pass a resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza and calling on Israel to lift all restrictions on the delivery of aid. The United States vetoed the resolution because it was not linked to the release of the hostages, while all 14 other members of the council voted in favor. There are no vetoes in the 193-member General Assembly, where the resolution is expected to pass overwhelmingly. But unlike in the Security Council, assembly resolutions are not legally binding, though they are seen as a barometer of world opinion. After a 10-week blockade that barred all aid to Gaza, Israel is allowing the United Nations to deliver a trickle of food assistance and is backing a newly created U.S. aid group, which has opened several sites in the center and south of the territory to deliver food parcels. But the aid system rolled out last month by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has been troubled by near-daily shootings as crowds make their way to aid sites, while the longstanding U.N.-run system has struggled to deliver food because of Israeli restrictions and a breakdown of law and order. The draft resolution being voted on Thursday references a March 28 legally binding order by the top United Nations court for Israel to open more land crossings into Gaza for food, water, fuel and other supplies. The International Court of Justice issued the order in a case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of acts of genocide in its war in Gaza, charges Israel strongly denies. The resolution stresses that Israel, as an occupying power, has an obligation under international law to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches those in need. It reiterates the assembly's commitment to a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with the Gaza Strip as part of a Palestinian state. The assembly is holding a high-level meeting next week to push for a two-state solution, which Israel has rejected. The resolution supports mediation efforts by Egypt, Qatar and the United States aimed at implementing a January ceasefire agreement. When the U.S. vetoed last week's Gaza resolution, acting Ambassador Dorothy Shea said it would have undermined the security of Israel and diplomatic efforts to reach a ceasefire 'that reflects the realities on the ground.' Like the failed Security Council resolution, the resolution to be voted on Thursday also does not condemn Hamas' deadly attack in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which ignited the war, or say the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza. Both are U.S. demands. The Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 251 hostage. About 55 hostages are still being held. Israel's military campaign has killed over 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. It says women and children make up most of the dead, but doesn't distinguish between civilians and combatants. Israel says it has killed more than 20,000 militants, without providing evidence.