Frasers Property's privatising FHT does nothing for its minorities
[SINGAPORE] Minority investors of Frasers Hospitality Trust (FHT) are getting a second chance to exit their holdings by way of a privatisation offer.
FHT's sponsor Frasers Property recently proposed privatising the stapled group at S$0.71 per stapled security via a trust scheme of arrangement. In September 2022, Frasers Property's earlier attempt to privatise FHT at S$0.70 per stapled security narrowly failed to get requisite support from minority stapled securityholders.
Frasers Property's latest offer price is at a 10.7 per cent premium to FHT's end-March net asset value (NAV) per stapled security of S$0.6416.
The offer price represents a 18.3 per cent, 25.4 per cent and 36.3 per cent premium to the last-transacted, three-month and 12-month volume-weighted average price prior to Apr 23, respectively, when the boards of FHT's managers announced the managers were conducting a review of FHT's strategy.
Various reasons were cited as rationale for the proposed privatisation including macroeconomic headwinds and FHT's smaller scale relative to its peers.
Also, despite revenue per available room at FHT's assets recovering to pre-Covid levels, inflationary cost pressures and other macroeconomic challenges have constrained meaningful distribution per stapled security (DPS) growth.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights
Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Frasers Property's perspective
However, while FHT's minority investors are being given what looks to be a financially attractive offer, spare a thought for Frasers Property's minority shareholders.
Spending resources in trying to privatise FHT, which made its trading debut in 2014, may not help improve Frasers Property's financial or share price performance.
Frasers Property is facing macroeconomic headwinds while it has net debt of S$15.1 billion and net debt/total equity of 88.5 per cent as at end-March. Should it be raising its investment in FHT's portfolio of hospitality assets, whose prospects are challenging, when the property group ought to work harder to reduce leverage given a tough economic climate?
FHT owns hotels and serviced residences in Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, Japan, UK and Germany.
For the six months ended Mar 31, FHT's net property income declined 2.5 per cent from the year before because of elevated property taxes, utility costs driven by inflation and other property-related expenses. Due to lower net property income and higher finance costs, the trust's DPS fell 6 per cent year on year.
Can Frasers Property, which is active across various business lines, find better ways to deploy its capital than investing more in FHT? The stapled group owns various overseas assets in countries whose currencies may depreciate further against the Singapore dollar. Moreover, Frasers Property loses valuable recurring management fees from managing FHT should it be privatised.
Importantly, Frasers Property is trying to privatise FHT at a premium to book value, when the group itself trades way below book value. As at Friday (May 23), Frasers Property traded at a discount of 66 per cent to its end-March NAV per share of S$2.38.
In short, equity market investors implicitly apply a hefty discount to Frasers Property's hospitality assets – potentially all of FHT's assets plus other hospitality ones that the group owns outside of FHT.
Herein lies the critical need for Frasers Property's board of directors to clearly articulate what it plans to do with the FHT portfolio and its other hospitality assets.
Perhaps, Frasers Property can increase the pace of selling hospitality assets. The group recently completed the divestment of Capri by Fraser in Barcelona, Spain. Last year, Tuan Sing bought Fraser Residence River Promenade, a serviced apartment development with 72 units, three conservation warehouses and 47 car park lots, located at Jiak Kim Street, from Frasers Property for S$140.9 million.
Private fund option
Can Frasers Property do better holding its hospitality assets in private funds compared with listed trusts? Possibly, private funds may value the group's hospitality assets more richly than the listed space.
Maybe, Frasers Property can bundle its hospitality assets to sell to a private fund which the group holds a minority stake in and manages, based on latest independent asset valuations. In this way, Frasers Property lightens its balance sheet, earns management fee income and improves return on equity.
Besides being FHT's sponsor, Frasers Property is a sponsor of Frasers Centrepoint Trust and Frasers Logistics & Commercial Trust (FLCT), which are both members of the benchmark Straits Times Index. While the former trades well relative to book value, the latter trades way below its latest NAV per unit.
If the private fund route works, maybe FLCT can be privatised with its properties, then put into a private fund.
While Frasers Property deserves kudos for being a responsible sponsor by offering FHT's minority investors a clean exit on financially reasonable terms, the property group has to be accountable to its shareholders. Frasers Property might see hospitality as a core business and have a long-term investment view – still, it must work harder to improve capital efficiency to benefit its shareholders.
Ultimately, Frasers Property's board should emulate what the boards of FHT's managers did by conducting a review of Frasers Property's strategy.
Its free float is small – about 11 per cent of its shares are held by the public, based on its latest annual report. TCC Assets, which is linked to Thai tycoon Charoen Sirivadhanabhakdi, owns around 86.9 per cent of Frasers Property.
Given Frasers Property's small free float and deep discount to book value, the most plausible way to unlock value for its shareholders could be for Charoen to lead a consortium to privatise Frasers Property.
Might the local bourse soon lose not only FHT but also Frasers Property, which is active in mixed-use, residential, retail, office, business park, logistics and industrial properties and has footprints in Singapore, Australia, Europe, China and South-east Asia?
Privatisations and delistings are part of any functioning listed equities market. And minority investors of target entities will welcome receiving privatisation offers so long as these are not lowball ones.
As privatisations play out on the local exchange, stakeholders working on developing Singapore's equities market must work fast and hard to make the local bourse more vibrant.
(The writer owns shares in Frasers Property)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
F&B business closures: don't blame high rents.
[SINGAPORE] Singapore prides itself as a food haven. Residents and visitors love wining and dining at the wide range of food and beverage (F&B) outlets here. However, the local F&B scene is reeling from a spate of closures of F&B outlets. Might Singapore's status as a top food destination be undermined by the high failure rate in the F&B sector? Last year, the number of F&B business closures in Singapore hit a 20-year high at 3,047. And average monthly closures in the first quarter this year are above 300. Meanwhile, listed Japan Foods Holding – a leading Japanese restaurant chain in Singapore – posted a larger loss for the financial year ended Mar 31 compared with a year ago. Greedy landlords are perceived as the villains that are driving much-loved cafes, restaurants and bars to cease operations. Media reports highlight cases of landlords hiking rents for F&B outlets of 50 per cent or more when leases expire. My take is that landlords are not entirely to blame for the high rate of F&B business closures. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up Subdued growth in retail rentals One, growth in retail rents has been lacklustre over recent years. Based on data from the Urban Redevelopment Authority's Realis, the private sector rental index for retail space fell 22.1 per cent in the central region and 24 per cent in the fringe area between pre-Covid pandemic in Q4 2019 and Q1 2025. Certainly, some major retail landlords have been upping rents over time and continue doing so. For Q1, CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust (CICT) had positive rent reversion – which measures the average incoming rents versus the average outgoing rents – of 11.2 per cent for downtown retail spaces and 9.5 per cent for suburban retail spaces. In perspective, if rent increases by 10 per cent when a lease expires after three years, this represents growth at a compound annual growth rate of 3.2 per cent, which may be broadly in line with the inflation rate. Two, rental is not the only large cost component for an F&B business. Other major recurring costs include manpower and supplies. The initial investment in buying equipment and fitting out premises can also be substantial. For a typical F&B outlet here, the amount of revenue eaten up by rent might be in the low double-digits in percentage terms. Leading Singapore suburban mall owner Frasers Centrepoint Trust (FCT) reported retail portfolio average occupancy cost of 16 per cent for the financial year ended Sep 30, 2024, down slightly from that in pre-Covid pandemic in the financial year ended Sep 30, 2019. Occupancy cost refers to the ratio of gross rental including turnover rent paid by a tenant to the tenant's sales turnover excluding goods and services tax. Long-term greedy landlords Three, leading retail landlords including CICT and FCT are likely to be long-term greedy. A long-term focused landlord will prioritise achieving high occupancy levels and having retail tenants that succeed. As at end-March, committed occupancy at CICT's retail properties here, excluding the areas in IMM Building that are undergoing asset enhancement, was 98.8 per cent. And the tenant retention rate for CICT's retail spaces in Singapore, based on net lettable area of renewed versus expiring leases for Q1, was 79.2 per cent. A mall owner will aim to charge an F&B player high but hopefully sustainable rent. After all, the landlord would seek to avoid having high rental arrears from failing tenants or many tenants abruptly shutting operations. Indeed, a mall with many outlets shut is unappealing to shoppers. On the other hand, a mall with all its shops open for operations can draw higher shopper traffic. And tenants will flock to be in malls with high visitorship. Four, some F&B operators are mini-anchors for malls and thus well-placed to secure choice spots on favourable terms. Mall owners who value having the right tenant mix might pursue certain F&B brands or concepts to help position their property and draw visitors. Equally, an owner of a row of shophouses may be keen to lure the right F&B operator who can bring visitor traffic to the said properties. In short, sought-after F&B operators are in a strong bargaining position to secure choice spots. Five, intense competition among F&B players can result in players fighting hard to snare certain spots by offering high rents. For example, many F&B operators may seek to be in the most prime area of a popular mall or to have presence in an established dining enclave that has buzz. Thus, when choice F&B spaces become available, landlords are in the sweet spot of choosing among strong players who dangle juicy rents. Furthermore, new entrants to the local F&B scene, including Chinese brands, may bid aggressively for target spots in the hope of quickly making an impact with patrons who are spoilt for choice. Six, F&B operators that wish to minimise the risk of relocation from specific locations can consider measures such as signing longer leases than, say, a three-year lease or partnering a real estate player in said F&B outlets. A shophouse owner might be keen to take an equity interest in the restaurant or bar that occupies the property. Property giant Far East Organization invests in a varied portfolio of F&B concepts. The sector will always be tough for operators – in particular young, new entrepreneurs. Success is built on getting many things right such as concept, taste, presentation, ambience, logistics, manpower, supply chain, branding, marketing, pricing, location and so forth. Drawing and retaining customers is challenging as patrons have ample choice and are often mindful of getting value for their spending. Also, F&B businesses need to constantly adapt to changing tastes and business conditions. Still, the high spending power of residents and visitors here will draw new players to enter a ferociously competitive F&B scene. A high rate of F&B business closures may be inevitable – just don't blame rent for the sector's churn. Ultimately, as buzzing F&B outlets are a powerful driver of successful physical retail spaces, many landlords are as vested as F&B players in building a vibrant wining and dining scene in Singapore.

Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Morgan Stanley sees US dollar tumbling 9% over next 12 months on slowing growth
The US Dollar Index has dropped nearly 10 per cent since a February peak on Trump trade turmoil. PHOTO: REUTERS NEW YORK – The US dollar will tumble to levels last seen during the Covid-19 pandemic by the middle of 2026, hit by interest rate cuts and slowing growth, according to predictions by Morgan Stanley. The US Dollar Index will fall around 9 per cent to hit 91 by around this time in 2026, strategists including Matthew Hornbach predicted in a May 31 note. That will exacerbate a recent decline in the greenback, as trade turmoil weighs on the US currency. 'We think rates and currency markets have embarked on sizeable trends that will be sustained – taking the US dollar much lower and yield curves much steeper – after two years of swing trading within wide ranges,' the strategists wrote. The Morgan Stanley report adds to a chorus of voices questioning the outlook for the dollar, as traders and analysts weigh up US President Donald Trump's disruptive approach to trade. JPMorgan Chase & Co. strategists led by Meera Chandan told investors last week they remain bearish on the US currency, instead recommending bets on the yen, euro and Australian dollar. The US Dollar Index has dropped nearly 10 per cent since a February peak as Trump's trade policies dent sentiment on US assets and trigger a re-think on the world's reliance on the greenback. Still, the bearishness is far from historical extremes, underscoring the potential for more dollar weakness ahead, Commodity Futures Trading Commission data showed. The biggest winners from dollar weakness will be the euro, yen and Swiss franc, widely regarded as the greenback's rivals as global safe havens, the Morgan Stanley strategists wrote. They see the euro rising to around the 1.25 level next year from around 1.13 now as the dollar slides. The pound may also advance from 1.35 to 1.45, aided by 'high carry' – the return investors can get from holding the currency – and the UK's low trade tension risks. The yen, currently trading at around 143 per dollar, may strengthen to 130, the analysts said. The bank said that 10-year Treasury yields will reach 4 per cent by the end of 2025, and stage a much larger decline in 2026 as the Federal Reserve delivers 175 basis points of rate cuts. The dollar was lower against a range of currencies during early Asian trading on June 2, with a Bloomberg gauge of the currency around 0.2 per cent weaker. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
6 hours ago
- Business Times
Morgan Stanley sees dollar falling 9% on slowing US growth bets
[SINGAPORE] The US dollar will tumble to levels last seen during the Covid-19 pandemic by the middle of next year, hit by interest rate cuts and slowing growth, according to predictions by Morgan Stanley. A popular gauge of the US dollar will fall around 9 per cent from current levels by around this time next year, strategists including Matthew Hornbach predicted in a May 31 note. That will exacerbate a recent decline in the greenback, as trade turmoil weighs on the currency. 'We think rates and currency markets have embarked on sizeable trends that will be sustained – taking the US dollar much lower and yield curves much steeper – after two years of swing trading within wide ranges,' the strategists wrote. The Morgan Stanley report adds to a chorus of voices questioning the outlook for the US dollar, as traders and analysts weigh up US President Donald Trump's disruptive approach to trade. JPMorgan Chase strategists led by Meera Chandan told investors last week they remain bearish on the US currency, instead recommending bets on the yen, euro and Australian dollar. The US Dollar Index has dropped nearly 10 per cent since a February peak as Trump's trade policies dent sentiment on US assets and trigger a re-think on the world's reliance on the greenback. Still, the bearishness is far from historical extremes, underscoring the potential for more US dollar weakness ahead, Commodity Futures Trading Commission data showed. The biggest winners from US dollar weakness will be the euro, yen and Swiss franc, widely regarded as the greenback's rivals as global safe havens, the Morgan Stanley strategists wrote. They see the euro rising to around the 1.25 level next year from around 1.13 now as the US dollar slides. The pound may also advance from 1.35 to 1.45, aided by 'high carry' – the return investors can get from holding the currency – and the UK's low trade tension risks. The yen, currently trading at around 143 per US dollar, may strengthen to 130, the analysts said. The bank said that 10-year Treasury yields will reach 4 per cent by the end of this year, and stage a much larger decline next year as the Federal Reserve delivers 175 basis points of rate cuts. BLOOMBERG