logo
Women's magazines still thriving despite closure of The Lady, the ‘journal for gentlewomen'

Women's magazines still thriving despite closure of The Lady, the ‘journal for gentlewomen'

The Guardian06-04-2025

It launched in 1885 as a 'journal for gentlewomen', a place where classified advertisements always attracted the right calibre of domestic staff: one who was savvy enough to buy and read The Lady.
Today, the classified ads for housekeepers and butlers remain, accompanied in the April edition by horoscopes, puzzles, a column praising nightingales, a recipe for grapefruit creams and an article on how to help dogs enjoy road trips.
But not for much longer. Despite claiming to have a 'robust' readership of 11,000 'affluent' subscribers, The Lady – one of Britain's longest-running magazines – is expected to close imminently after the Times and Daily Mail reported that it was going into liquidation.
Far from heralding the end of women's magazines, however, publishing experts believe the demise of The Lady after 140 years actually highlights the remarkable success of print titles that continue to attract female readers in a digital age.
'In today's world, you need to address your niche – and the problem for The Lady is that their niche evaporated,' said Jeremy Leslie, founder of magCulture, which stocks more than 700 magazines at its London shop. 'We have plenty of examples here which are specialist, have a loyal readership and encourage the belief that there's a very bright future for magazines.'
During its heyday in the late 19th and early 20th century, The Lady was a classic example of a beautiful magazine with a clear-cut community of readers, he said – rather like the women's magazine The Gentlewoman today.
'The Gentlewoman is the perfect foil to a magazine like The Lady,' he said. 'The name implies that it's perhaps part of the same milieu as The Lady once was. But it couldn't be more different. Their readers are younger, self-motivated, successful women who enjoy fashion while also having a serious career.'
Penny Martin, editor in chief of The Gentlewoman, said: 'I'm sorry to see any women's title go. At the same time, I don't know any woman who would want to be addressed as a 'lady'.'
The Gentlewoman, which has a circulation of 90,000 copies per issue, does not see its readers as consumers who fall into a particular lifestyle category or class, Martin said, but as people who share a 'mutual interest in the same subjects and a love of quality journalism and print culture'.
She added: 'I think publications that continue to deliver that magazine craft will continue to thrive.'
The first periodicals marketed at female readers were published in the 1690s, but it wasn't until the 1770s that they began to resemble modern women's magazines, according to University of York professor of English Jennie Batchelor. 'That's when you can have a high-calorie recipe on one page and an article on how to keep yourself looking gorgeous on the next.'
The readership of women's magazines, which has always included men, greatly expanded during the 18th and 19th centuries as women became more literate, she said. 'Magazines played a hugely important role in giving women access to information and knowledge they couldn't get in other forms.'
Female writers managed to make a name for themselves in women's magazines, before journalism was considered a viable profession for women.
By the 1880s, editors were vying for readers in an 'incredibly overpopulated, really competitive' marketplace. 'One of the ways they succeed is by specialising and finding their readers – and that could be by special interest, like gardening or literary fiction, or it could be along class lines,' Batchelor said.
Just as The Lady once did, new women's magazines thrive today when they can speak to a 'really quite specific' target market about their interests and ideas in a 'very authentic way that nobody else can', said Steven Watson, director of Stack, a magazine subscription service that surprises readers with a different independent title each month.
The best magazines make readers feel part of a community of people who share the same worldview, enabling their publishers to charge higher prices and still retain a loyal subscriber base, said Watson.
Mother Tongue, a biannual print magazine which interrogates and celebrates modern motherhood, charges £20 per issue. Worms, a female-led literary magazine dedicated to amplifying marginalised voices, charges £17.50.
By contrast, a subscription to the monthly Stylist magazine, the second most popular women's magazine in the UK after Good Housekeeping, costs £5.75 a month.
'When your audience can see that you care about the things she cares about, and you're using your platform to do something about that, it really makes sense why you exist in her life,' said Stylist editor-at-large Alix Walker. The title recently ran a campaign to improve support for women who suffer miscarriage and baby loss. 'There's so much content coming at all of us today, you've got to fight for your bit of her attention.'
Walker said that knowing your reader is crucial to a magazine's survival. 'As soon as you lose sight of who she is, you lose her.'
The journalist and author Rachel Johnson, a former editor of The Lady from 2009 to the end of 2011, said last week that she had tried – and failed – to halve the average age of the magazine's readers, which was 78 when she started her tenure.
'It's very hard to keep reinventing something, endlessly, to adapt,' Leslie said. 'In the case of The Lady, perhaps the surprise is that it's managed to last this long.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chelsea warn AC Milan over Mike Maignan deal as transfer talks drag on
Chelsea warn AC Milan over Mike Maignan deal as transfer talks drag on

Metro

timean hour ago

  • Metro

Chelsea warn AC Milan over Mike Maignan deal as transfer talks drag on

Chelsea will not revisit a deal for AC Milan goalkeeper Mike Maignan if the move is not completed before Tuesday's transfer deadline. The Blues have been in negotiations with the Serie A giants for the French stopper as they haggle over a transfer fee. An opening offer of €15million (£12.6m) was rejected by Milan and it is believed that a deal could be struck for just €18m (£15m), meeting in the middle as the Italians value him at €25m (£21m). In the grand scheme of football transfer fees it seems like a tiny hurdle to overcome, but a deal is proving more difficult than you might think. Sky Sports report that negotiations have been continuing throughout Monday and an agreement has not been reached. Wake up to find news on your club in your inbox every morning with Metro's Football Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your team in the link we'll send you so we can get football news tailored to you. The report states that unless a transfer has been finalised by 7pm on Tuesday June 10 then Chelsea will walk away from a deal. Chelsea offered one of Djordje Petrovic or Kepa Arrizabalaga to Milan in a proposed swap deal for Maignan, but the Rossoneri have no interest in either goalkeeper, favouring a cash-only agreement. The 32-cap France international is out of contract at the San Siro in 2026 and could leave on a free transfer next summer. The transfer window closing on Tuesday evening is unusual and has been brought in to allow clubs participating in the Club World Cup to bring in players before it starts. There are now two transfer windows this summer, with the first running from June 1-10 before the Club World Cup starts on June 15. There is then a second window which runs from June 16 till September 1. The Sky Sports report states that the Maignan deal is different to the one that Chelsea are pursuing for Borussia Dortmund's Jamie Gittens in that Tuesday's deadline is not a final one. More Trending Discussions are ongoing over a move for the English winger and the Blues are happy to revisit them after the first transfer window closes if the transfer is not done in time. Dortmund turned down an initial bid worth €35m (£29.5m) for the 20-year-old and want a significantly bigger offer, closer to €50-60m (£42-50m). Much like with Maignan, it is just the transfer fee that is the issue, with Gittens keen on the switch to west London. Personal terms have been agreed between Chelsea and the winger, but club-to-club negotiations have some way to go. MORE: Man Utd, Liverpool and Tottenham battling it out for Bournemouth standout MORE: Arsenal struggle for breakthrough in latest Benjamin Sesko talks with RB Leipzig MORE: Chelsea told to sign 'exciting' €28m Norway international star in summer window

North missed £140bn of transport investment during last government
North missed £140bn of transport investment during last government

The Herald Scotland

time3 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

North missed £140bn of transport investment during last government

It reached the figure, which it said was enough to build seven Elizabeth Lines, by considering the amount of spending per person across the different English regions over that period. While England as a whole saw £592 spent per person each year, London received double that amount with £1,183 spent per person, the IPPR said. The entire North region saw £486 spent per person, with the North East and North West seeing £430 and £540 spent per person respectively. This amounted to £140 billion of missed investment for the North, more than the entire £83 billion estimate of capital spending on transport in the region since 1999/2000, according to the analysis. The region with the lowest amount of investment over the period was the East Midlands with just £355 spent per person. Among the most divisive transport investment projects for the previous government was the HS2 rail project, which was axed north of Birmingham in October 2023. Then-prime minister Rishi Sunak pledged to 'reinvest every single penny, £36 billion, in hundreds of new transport projects in the North and the Midlands', including improvements to road, rail and bus schemes. Earlier this week, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a £15.6 billion package for mayoral authorities to use on public transport projects across the North and Midlands ahead of the spending review. It is expected to include funding to extend the metros in Tyne and Wear, Greater Manchester and the West Midlands, along with a renewed tram network in South Yorkshire and a new mass transit system in West Yorkshire. Rachel Reeves has set out plans for new transport investment in the North and Midlands (Peter Byrne/PA) Marcus Johns, senior research fellow at IPPR North, said: 'Today's figures are concrete proof that promises made to the North over the last decade were hollow. It was a decade of deceit. 'We are 124 years on from the end of Queen Victoria's reign, yet the North is still running on infrastructure built during her rein – while our transport chasm widens. 'This isn't London bashing – Londoners absolutely deserve investment. But £1,182 per person for London and £486 for northerners? The numbers don't lie – this isn't right. 'This Government have begun to restore fairness with their big bet on transport cash for city leaders. 'They should continue on this journey to close this investment gap in the upcoming spending review and decades ahead.' Former Treasury minister Lord Jim O'Neill said: 'Good governance requires the guts to take a long-term approach, not just quick fixes. So the Chancellor is right in her focus on the UK's long-standing supply-side weaknesses – namely our woeful productivity and weak private and public investment. 'Backing major infrastructure is the right call, and this spending review is the right time for the Chancellor to place a big bet on northern growth and begin to close this investment chasm. 'But it's going to take more than commitments alone – she'll need to set out a transparent framework for delivery.' Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester, said: 'For too long, the North of England has been treated as a poor relation to the South when it comes to government spending on transport infrastructure, and this analysis makes stark reading – exposing the vast scale of underfunding over many years. 'The Chancellor's announcement of £2.5 billion funding for transport in Greater Manchester will be a game-changer for our city-region, enabling us to expand the Bee Network, and deliver the UK's first, zero emission, integrated, public transport system by 2030. 'We have also made the case for a new Liverpool-Manchester railway, which would further rebalance infrastructure investment, and could boost the UK economy by £90 billion by 2040.'

North missed £140bn of transport investment during last government
North missed £140bn of transport investment during last government

South Wales Argus

time3 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

North missed £140bn of transport investment during last government

Independent analysis by think tank the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) looked at Treasury figures between 2009/10 and 2022/23, during which time the Conservatives were in power. It reached the figure, which it said was enough to build seven Elizabeth Lines, by considering the amount of spending per person across the different English regions over that period. While England as a whole saw £592 spent per person each year, London received double that amount with £1,183 spent per person, the IPPR said. The entire North region saw £486 spent per person, with the North East and North West seeing £430 and £540 spent per person respectively. This amounted to £140 billion of missed investment for the North, more than the entire £83 billion estimate of capital spending on transport in the region since 1999/2000, according to the analysis. The region with the lowest amount of investment over the period was the East Midlands with just £355 spent per person. Among the most divisive transport investment projects for the previous government was the HS2 rail project, which was axed north of Birmingham in October 2023. Then-prime minister Rishi Sunak pledged to 'reinvest every single penny, £36 billion, in hundreds of new transport projects in the North and the Midlands', including improvements to road, rail and bus schemes. Earlier this week, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a £15.6 billion package for mayoral authorities to use on public transport projects across the North and Midlands ahead of the spending review. It is expected to include funding to extend the metros in Tyne and Wear, Greater Manchester and the West Midlands, along with a renewed tram network in South Yorkshire and a new mass transit system in West Yorkshire. Rachel Reeves has set out plans for new transport investment in the North and Midlands (Peter Byrne/PA) Marcus Johns, senior research fellow at IPPR North, said: 'Today's figures are concrete proof that promises made to the North over the last decade were hollow. It was a decade of deceit. 'We are 124 years on from the end of Queen Victoria's reign, yet the North is still running on infrastructure built during her rein – while our transport chasm widens. 'This isn't London bashing – Londoners absolutely deserve investment. But £1,182 per person for London and £486 for northerners? The numbers don't lie – this isn't right. 'This Government have begun to restore fairness with their big bet on transport cash for city leaders. 'They should continue on this journey to close this investment gap in the upcoming spending review and decades ahead.' Former Treasury minister Lord Jim O'Neill said: 'Good governance requires the guts to take a long-term approach, not just quick fixes. So the Chancellor is right in her focus on the UK's long-standing supply-side weaknesses – namely our woeful productivity and weak private and public investment. 'Backing major infrastructure is the right call, and this spending review is the right time for the Chancellor to place a big bet on northern growth and begin to close this investment chasm. 'But it's going to take more than commitments alone – she'll need to set out a transparent framework for delivery.' Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester, said: 'For too long, the North of England has been treated as a poor relation to the South when it comes to government spending on transport infrastructure, and this analysis makes stark reading – exposing the vast scale of underfunding over many years. 'The Chancellor's announcement of £2.5 billion funding for transport in Greater Manchester will be a game-changer for our city-region, enabling us to expand the Bee Network, and deliver the UK's first, zero emission, integrated, public transport system by 2030. 'We have also made the case for a new Liverpool-Manchester railway, which would further rebalance infrastructure investment, and could boost the UK economy by £90 billion by 2040.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store