Starmer and Trump strike trade deal to save UK car industry, but there's a catch…
A trade agreement between the UK and US has been struck, reducing tariffs for exports of British-made cars to America, but there's a catch – there's a limit to the number of cars that can be exported before the original tariff is reimposed, stifling the growth of UK carmakers.
In February, President Donald Trump announced sweeping 25 per cent tariffs on foreign-made cars being imported into the US. This caused ructions throughout the UK car industry as America is one of its largest export markets and both Jaguar-Land Rover (JLR) and Aston Martin paused US exports in response. Advertisement - Article continues below
Now, a deal has been struck between the two nations to reduce tariffs to 10 per cent for the first 100,000 cars exported from the UK to the US each year. Anything over that number will probably incur the 25 per cent tariff originally imposed by the President.
Nevertheless, Trump described the deal as part of 'an incredible day for America', going on to say that it was 'so good for both countries'.
It's worth noting that a 10 per cent tariff is still much heftier than the duties in place during the previous Biden administration. When questioned on this during a speech at JLR's plant in the West Midlands, Keir Starmer told journalists: 'The question we should be asking is, 'is it better than where we were yesterday?''
Furthermore, the 100,000-car limit does place a cap on growth somewhat. The UK exported as-near-as-makes-no-difference 100,000 cars to the US last year, meaning that firms won't have any headroom as it stands to increase sales without heftier tariffs being incurred.
In a statement, the chief executive of the UK's Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, Mike Hawes, said the deal provides some 'much-needed relief'. Hawes also remarked that No10 has 'recognised the importance of the automotive industry to UK exports and the economy, and has worked tirelessly with US counterparts to strike an agreement'.
'We hope that [this] will lead to broader and deeper cooperation that reduces barriers to trade still further, charting a path to economic growth for both nations,' he concluded.
Don't miss our next car video, subscribe to our YouTube channel today
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
-and-Elon-Musk.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Republicans call for an end to Trump-Musk feud: ‘I hope it doesn't distract us'
As the Republican Party anticipates potential fallout from Donald Trump's public dispute with Elon Musk, prominent lawmakers and conservative voices are calling for reconciliation, wary of the repercussions of a sustained conflict. The animosity between the two figures could pose challenges for the Republican agenda, particularly concerning tax and border spending legislation championed by Trump but criticised by Musk. Representative Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington, expressed hope that the disagreement would not impede progress on critical tasks. Speaking on the matter, Newhouse said: "I hope it doesn't distract us from getting the job done that we need to. I think that it will boil over and they'll mend fences." As of Friday afternoon, Musk had refrained from further engagement, focusing instead on promoting his various companies on social media. Senator Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, voiced optimism for a resolution, telling Fox News that, "I hope that both of them come back together because when the two of them are working together, we'll get a lot more done for America than when they're at cross purposes". Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, sounded almost pained on social media as Trump and Musk volleyed insults at each other, sharing a photo composite of the two men and writing, "But … I really like both of them.' 'Who else really wants @elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump to reconcile?' Lee posted, later adding: 'Repost if you agree that the world is a better place with the Trump-Musk bromance fully intact.' So far, the feud between Trump and Musk is probably best described as a moving target, with plenty of opportunities for escalation or detente. One person familiar with the president's thinking said Musk wants to speak with Trump, but that the president doesn't want to do it – or at least do it on Friday. The person requested anonymity to disclose private matters. In a series of conversations with television anchors Friday morning, Trump showed no interest in burying the hatchet. Asked on ABC News about reports of a potential call between him and Musk, the president responded: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump added in the ABC interview that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk at the moment. Still, others remained hopeful that it all would blow over. 'I grew up playing hockey and there wasn't a single day that we played hockey or basketball or football or baseball, whatever we were playing, where we didn't fight. And then we'd fight, then we'd become friends again,' Hannity said on his show Thursday night. Acknowledging that it 'got personal very quick,' Hannity nonetheless added that the rift was 'just a major policy difference.' House Speaker Mike Johnson projected confidence that the dispute would not affect prospects for the tax and border bill. 'Members are not shaken at all,' the Louisiana Republican said. 'We're going to pass this legislation on our deadline.' He added that he hopes Musk and Trump reconcile, saying 'I believe in redemption' and 'it's good for the party and the country if all that's worked out.' But he also had something of a warning for the billionaire entrepreneur. 'I'll tell you what, do not doubt and do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. "He is the leader of the party. He's the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era.'
The Sun
31 minutes ago
- The Sun
Huge fashion retailer with over 250 UK stores ‘drawing up radical rescue plan' with shops and jobs at risk
A HUGE fashion retailer with over 250 UK stores is reportedly drawing up a radical rescue plan which could see shops and jobs axed. The high street giant - which is being forced to restructure due to tough trading standards - employs around 5,500 people and was founded in London in 1948. 2 2 The chain's owners have brought in advisers from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) to come up with money-saving solutions, reports Sky News. The proposals are expected to be finalised in a matter of weeks, though sources have reportedly claimed no decisions have been green lit on the retailer's future. Accounts for River Island Clothing Co for the year ending December 30 2023 showed the firm made a £33.2 million pre-tax loss. Then the turnover during the following 12 months fell by more than 19% to £578.1 million. The firm's latest accounts at Companies House, warned of growing financial and operational risks. "The market for retailing of fashion clothing is fast changing with customer preferences for more diverse, convenient and speedier shopping journeys and with increasing competition especially in the digital space," it said. "The key business risks for the group are the pressures of a highly competitive and changing retail environment combined with increased economic uncertainty. "A number of geopolitical events have resulted in continuing supply chain disruption as well as energy, labour and food price increases, driving inflation and interest rates higher and resulting in weaker disposable income and lower consumer confidence." In January, River Island hired consulting firm, AlixPartners, to undertake work on cost reductions and profit improvement. It's understood PwC has now taken over. Why are so many pubs and bars closing? In recent months, a number of River Island stores have been closing, including in Corby and Chesterfield. Originally named Lewis Separates and then Chelsea Girl, the chain was founded by Bernard Lewis in 1948 and became influential during the 1960s fashion scene, including the iconic mini-dress trend. It was re-branded as River Island in 1988 and throughout the next two decades expanded to become a leading high street force in the UK. It now has a presence in over 125 worldwide markets, in stores and online. Why are retailers closing shops? EMPTY shops have become an eyesore on many British high streets and are often symbolic of a town centre's decline. The Sun's business editor Ashley Armstrong explains why so many retailers are shutting their doors. In many cases, retailers are shutting stores because they are no longer the money-makers they once were because of the rise of online shopping. Falling store sales and rising staff costs have made it even more expensive for shops to stay open. The British Retail Consortium has predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs from April 2025, will cost the retail sector £2.3billion. At the same time, the minimum wage will rise to £12.21 an hour from April, and the minimum wage for people aged 18-20 will rise to £10 an hour, an increase of £1.40. In some cases, retailers are shutting a store and reopening a new shop at the other end of a high street to reflect how a town has changed. The problem is that when a big shop closes, footfall falls across the local high street, which puts more shops at risk of closing. Retail parks are increasingly popular with shoppers, who want to be able to get easy, free parking at a time when local councils have hiked parking charges in towns. Many retailers including Next and Marks & Spencer have been shutting stores on the high street and taking bigger stores in better-performing retail parks instead. In some cases, stores have been shut when a retailer goes bust, as in the case of Carpetright, Debenhams, Dorothy Perkins, Paperchase, Ted Baker, The Body Shop, Topshop and Wilko to name a few. What's increasingly common is when a chain goes bust a rival retailer or private equity firm snaps up the intellectual property rights so they can own the brand and sell it online. They may go on to open a handful of stores if there is customer demand, but there are rarely ever as many stores or in the same places. The Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year.
The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
As Putin ramps up his summer offensive in Ukraine, will he succeed?
A peevish spokesman for Vladimir Putin bristled with indignation this week at Donald Trump 's description of Russia 's invasion of Ukraine as 'like kids fighting in the park'. It's not, Dmitry Peskov pouted, the conflict is an 'existential question' for Russia. 'This is a question of our security and the future of ourselves and our children, the future of our country,' continued Putin's spokesman who has grown more accustomed to preening with pleasure at the relentless assaults on Ukraine from the White House this year. He is right. Victory for Russia was once defined as regime change in Kyiv. But it really need only be a messed up Ukraine, unstable, violent and impoverished. Because a democratic Ukraine enjoying cultural renaissance, freedom, and economic growth with lots of Russian speakers shows Russia's population that there's an alternative to the kleptocratic autocracy they currently endure. As the summer fighting season gets underway in the fourth year of Putin's full scale invasion of its neighbour, Russia has clearly shifted its main effort to forever destabilising Ukraine. Kyiv, meanwhile, has demonstrated that it is no longer on the back foot, and that it is far from defeated. Indeed two years after its failed summer counter offensive, Kyiv is growing in strength and confidence. Ukraine doesn't have the capacity to drive Russia out of its lands this year. But it is hanging on and by next year may find it has the upper hand as European aid begins to come through to replace the military support that the US has withdrawn. Donald Trump has provided no new military support this year. About $3.85 billion remains unspent from previous allocations – after that… nothing. Russian forces have renewed their attacks around Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka on the eastern front. The aim here is to try to encircle Ukrainian forces and cut the supply routes to Kramatorsk, the administrative headquarters of Ukrainian held Donetsk province which Russia has mostly captured – and illegally annexed. Ukrainian military sources on the ground have reported a massive increase in the range and efficacy of Russian fiberoptic guided drones with a range up to 15 miles unspooling a filament of optical cable directly connected to an operator on the ground. The guidance system makes them invulnerable to jamming equipment used by Ukraine. Elite Russian drone forces have been deployed from the Russian counter attacks to drive Kyiv's forces out of Kursk to the eastern front, they said. The results have been very small advances by Russian troops, at enormous cost. Nato estimates that around 950 Russians are being killed every day. Although casualty figures are rarely accurate, live video feeds show small numbers of Russian and Ukrainian troops scrabbling for cover and dodging drones in the dust and rubble of apocalyptic landscapes - which are now believed to be responsible for more than 70 per cent of casualties. Ukraine has repeatedly offered an unconditional 30-day ceasefire and face-to-face meetings between Volodymyr Zelensky and Putin. The US efforts to broker an armistice have gone nowhere while Russia is trying to capture more of Ukraine. Putin may have given up on regime change but he wants to take all of the territories Russia has illegally annexed – Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, Luhansk and Donetsk, as well as hanging on to Crimea. If he manages this he may be able to convince European leaders that a peace along lines defined by the Kremlin is the least-bad outcome. This summer his main targets continue to be the central section of the eastern front but he is also driving hard on Ukraine's northern border with incursions and the capture of small border villages. This allows Moscow to add pressure on Kyiv – keeping the battle closer to Ukraine's centres of power by putting major cities, and regional capitals, like Sumy and Kharkiv under constant threat from artillery and short range rockets. Russia's wider air campaign has been drastically ramped up. More than 400 missiles and drones are now swarming Ukraine on an almost nightly basis with cruise and ballistic missiles getting through air defences in greater numbers because of a shortage of air defences – notably the US manufactured Patriot systems which are the most effective in downing Moscow's most dangerous long range weapons. On Saturday, the mayor of Kharkiv said citizens had faced the largest Russian bombardment of the city of the war, involving dozens of drones . 'Kharkiv is currently experiencing the most powerful attack since the start of the full-scale war,' Ihor Terekhov said on Telegram. But Nato has recently announced an extra €20 billion in military aid. Germany has said it will soon send Ukraine long-range bombs capable of striking deep into Russia. The UK has added £350 million in funding for 100,000 new drones and already delivered 144,000 rounds of artillery ammunition this year. Dutch defense minister Ruben Brekelmans said the Netherlands is giving €400 million euros including 100 naval vessels, including patrol boats, transport boats, interceptors, and special operations ships and more than 50 naval drones. Norway is stumping up $700 million in 'drone-aid' too. This shift to drone warfare has allowed Ukraine to regain initiative to offset the sheer mass of old-school military might that Russia has brought to bear. The 'meat grinder' assaults by Russian infantry have almost stopped. Ukrainian officers told The Independent that Russian artillery bombardments have fallen away as drones have easily tracked and destroyed the big guns of the traditional battlefield. And Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb, in which Kyiv claimed to have destroyed or damaged a third of Russia's strategic bombers along with some spy planes in a staggering long range long term operation that hit Russian airfields 5,000km apart, have greatly boosted morale. Along with ongoing long-range assaults with drones on Moscow's airports, its energy infrastructure, and commanders themselves, Ukraine has turned the tactics of hybrid warfare developed by Russia back on Putin. It is unlikely Ukraine will turn Trump back to outright support for the embattled democracy – he has gone too far in his public support for Putin to make that a credible ambition. But there are signs that America won't try to cripple Kyiv's war efforts as it has threatened to do. No wonder Putin's peeved.
