Milford Sound plans: 'We've got to get on with it'
The government has announced $15 million will go towards infrastructure upgrades and conservation projects at Milford Sound. File photo.
Photo:
123RF
Tourism operators are welcoming more clarity on the government's plans for Milford Sound, but say it is now time for action.
A 2021 masterplan for the popular tourist destination recommended banning cruise ships, closing the airstrip, a park and ride system and charging overseas visitors a fee.
The government announced on Wednesday that about $15 million would go towards infrastructure upgrades and conservation projects, while confirming
cruise ships and the airstrip will not be going anywhere
, and it was sticking with unrestricted road access.
Glenorchy Air managing director James Stokes said the update gave the local aviation industry much needed certainty.
"The overall emotion is one of relief that we are going to definitely have an airfield in the future. We were confident that that's the way it was going, but good to hear it finally confirmed," he said.
The funding was a good start as Milford Sound had some immediate infrastructure needs it could help to address, Stokes said.
The tourism and hospitality and conservation ministers held a call for stakeholders on the day to outline the plans, including wanting to address long-standing concession issues for tourism operators.
"I'm keen to see what this reform is going to look like and keen to see how they're going to make it easier for businesses to operate in national parks responsibly," Stokes said.
"Just want to get on with it and see the work actually happen. We can't afford another year of nothing happening. We've got to get on with it."
Trips and Tramps co-owner Steve Norris said the announcement had been a long time coming and was moving in the right direction.
But it left him with questions.
A key one was how the traffic and parking would be better managed now the government sought to attract more visitors to the area.
"The summer just gone, the carpark's full most days and they're not putting any controls on the road right now... which is fine," Norris said.
But in the long term, numbers were expected to increase and there needed to be a solution, he said.
Visitor numbers hit 870,000 in 2019, up from 430,000 in 2013.
Conservation Minister Tama Potaka said they now surpassed one million a year as Milford Sound was a magnet for tourists.
Potaka was also keen to address long standing concession issues for tourism operators as part of conservation reform.
It was an area Steve Norris also wanted to see addressed.
But he was pleased to hear they were replacing the boat ramp in Deepwater Basin for recreational boaties and local operators.
"Great news because that's probably 20 years past its use-by-date - the ramp that's in use at the moment - so that's very encouraging," he said.
Work on two of the projects that received funding - cleaning up Little Tahiti landfill and flood protections - had either wrapped up or was underway, so he hoped the money would go towards new projects.
The funding was coming from the international visitor levy and the Department of Conservation's capital works programme.
Initial policy documents released by DOC suggested that one-off investment costs of between $450-500 million were needed to cover new infrastructure, transport services, visitor facilities, experiences, walking, tracks, carparks, and roadside developments.
Tourism and Hospitality Minister Louise Upston said she wanted to attract more visitors to Piopiotahi while still protecting it.
"We do know it is a real focus point for visitors coming to New Zealand so we don't want to restrict access to it and actually if you then mean the only route in is by road, that creates other difficulties," she said.
When the masterplan was launched, the reasoning for removing the airstrip was because it was in a poor state, exposed to flooding and tsunami risks, expensive to rebuild and only carried about three percent of visitors.
Upston acknowledged they needed to look at work to upgrade the airstrip, which could involve more helicopter use in the future.
Tourism Industry Aotearoa chief executive Rebecca Ingram said the update addressed long standing uncertainty and gave direction to those wanting to invest in the region
"There are a lot of things that the industry can agree on when it comes to Milford and improving the experience and safety are two of them," she said.
"We have been strong advocates for a well-managed experience that is great for visitors, community, business and for the environment.
"We look forward to working with the Department of Conservation as the proposal goes from plan into action."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
24 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Māori, Pacific removed from extra education funding priorities
The Tertiary Education Commission warns it doesn't have enough money to cover enrolment growth next year. Photo: AFP The government will remove extra funding for Māori and Pacific enrolments in vocational courses, and trim funding for workplace training. The Tertiary Education Commission told institutions this week it was "reprioritising a small amount - approximately 8 percent - of learner component funding towards provider-based delivery rates, through the removal of Māori and Pacific learners as an eligible category". The weightings for Māori and Pacific enrolments were worth $152 for each student enrolling in work-based level 1-2 certificates and courses at levels 3-6, and $364 per student in non-degree level 7 courses. However, the $1327 weighting for disabled students and students with low prior educational achievement would continue. The payments were added to subsidies for courses offered by polytechnics and private providers, ranging from $6584 for humanities and business courses to nearly $11,786 for health, science, engineering and agriculture, and $19,753 for special agriculture. The commission said funding for work-based training and education would drop 10 percent, while also repeating warnings from earlier in the year that it would not have enough money to cover enrolment growth next year . "Current forecasts indicate the demand for funding will be greater than what we have available to allocate," it said. "Given the multi-year nature of much education and training, we will need to prioritise our future investment." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer on the longest suspension in Parliament
Debbie Ngarewa-Packer. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii This week, Parliament took the unprecedented step of suspending both Te Pāti Māori leaders - Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi - for 21 days. Te Pāti Māori MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke was suspended for seven days - but had also been punished with a 24-hour suspension on the day over a haka all three had performed in Parliament, against the Treaty Principles Bill, in November. It is against the rules of the House for members to leave their seats during a debate - which all three did. Ngarewa-Packer told Saturday Morning that the 21-day suspension, which was seven times harsher than any previous sanction an MP has faced, was not proportionate. "I think the backlash from the public, nationally and internationally, validates that," she said. Previously, the longest suspension for an MP had been three days, given to the former prime minister Robert Muldoon for criticising the speaker in the 1980s. While New Zealand First leader Winston Peters said the duration of the suspension would have been lessened if the Te Pāti Māori MPs had apologised, Ngarewa-Packer said that was never requested by the Privileges Committee. "What we have here is a situation where, and some are calling it Trumpism, we've been a lot more specific - we have an Atlas agenda that has not only crept in, it's stormed in on the shores of Aotearoa and some may not understand what that means, but this is just the extension of the attack on the treaty, on the attack on Indigenous voices. "We made the point the whole way through when we started to see that they weren't going to be able to meet us halfway on anything, even a quarter of the way, on any of the requests for tikanga experts, for legal experts when we knew the bias of the committee." Ngarewa-Packer added that the Privileges Committee process was not equipped to deal with the issue. "We hit a nerve and we can call it a colonial nerve, we can call it institutional nerve... "I think that this will be looked back on at some stage and say how ridiculous we looked back in 2025." Ngarewa-Packer also added that the language from Peters during the debate on Thursday was "all very deliberate" - "and that's what we're contending with in Aotearoa". "Everyone should have a view but don't use the might of legislation and the power to be able to assert your racism and assert your anti-Māori, anti-Treaty agenda." Peters had taken aim at Waititi on Thursday as "the one in the cowboy hat" and "scribbles on his face" in reference to his mataora moko. Rawiri Waititi. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii He said countless haka have taken place in Parliament but only after first consulting the Speaker. "They told the media they were going to do it, but they didn't tell the Speaker did they?" Peters added that Te Pāti Māori were "a bunch of extremists" and that "New Zealand has had enough of them". "They don't want democracy, they want anarchy," he said. "They don't want one country, they don't want one law, they don't want one people." Winston Peters. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Should I contribute to KiwiSaver or pay mortgage faster? Ask Susan
The short answer is it depends. Photo: RNZ I was wondering, is it better to invest more in your KiwiSaver or into your mortgage? We are lucky and have a little bit of extra cash every pay, so we have been making additional mortgage repayments. With the upcoming changes to KiwiSaver, we won't be able to continue to do this if we don't opt out. What is the better option? My thinking is the lower the mortgage, the less interest we pay, which would see us better off in the long term. Fisher Funds Kiwisaver general manager David Boyle says he has received questions like this over the years and the answer is: "it depends". "It's hard to know, without knowing the total financial position and how long they've got until they retire," he said. "Paying more off your mortgage and contributing to KiwiSaver are both smart choices, if you find yourself with a bit of money leftover before payday. "To help with this here are some things they should consider if they keep paying a bit more off the mortgage." It's probably worth talking to a financial adviser about this. If you opt to focus on paying your mortgage faster, you might need a plan to get you on track for retirement, once that loan is gone. The increase to contributions of 4 percent is stepped over the next couple of years. Are you likely to receive a pay rise over that period that will help you continue paying a bit off your mortgage, as well as contribute a bit more? You also have the option to temporarily lower your contribution rate back to 3 percent if you want. I am the epitome of being a victim of the government's totally unfair direct deduction policy. I should have started receiving my richly deserved superannuation when I qualified for it 9.5 years ago and the Winter Energy Payments seven years ago when they began. Consequently, over $300,000 has been stolen from me and I live in abject poverty as a result. I am a dual citizen from America. I have lived here 19.5 years, so on what legal basis has the government for denying the WEPs? Its written explanation is that it would be difficult to administer to NZ seniors not currently receiving a government benefit such as superannuation. That is mind boggling and I hope you see fit to write about this outrageous treatment of nearly 100,000 Kiwi seniors. Sorry, yes, I've checked with the ministry and it confirms that people who are not getting NZ Super because of an overseas pension cannot get the Winter Energy Payment. Generally, if your NZ Super entitlement has been eliminated by your overseas pension, it's because what you receive from overseas is more than the NZ Super payment. Send your questions to Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
