US hits back at accounts Iran moved uranium
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump's administration hit back on Wednesday (Jun 25) at accounts Iran may have moved enriched uranium before US bombing, as a row grew on how much the strikes set back Tehran's nuclear programme.
Trump, seeking credit for ordering military action and then quickly announcing a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, has lashed out angrily at media accounts of a classified report that doubted the extent of damage to Iranian nuclear sites.
Another key question raised by experts is whether Iran, preparing for the strike, moved out some 400kg of enriched uranium - which could now be hidden elsewhere in the vast country.
"I can tell you, the United States had no indication that that enriched uranium was moved prior to the strikes, as I also saw falsely reported," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News.
"As for what's on the ground right now, it's buried under miles and miles of rubble because of the success of these strikes on Saturday evening," she said.
Vice President JD Vance, asked about the uranium on Sunday, had sounded less definitive and said the United States would discuss the issue with Iran.
"We're going to work in the coming weeks to ensure that we do something with that fuel," Vance told ABC News programme This Week.
The quantity of uranium had been reported by the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, with which Iran is considering severing cooperation after the Israeli and US strikes on its nuclear programme.
"The IAEA lost visibility on this material the moment hostilities began," the agency's chief, Rafael Grossi, told France 2 television.
But he added: "I don't want to give the impression that it's been lost or hidden."
TRUMP LASHES OUT
The US military said it dropped 14 GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs - powerful 13,600kg weapons - on three Iranian nuclear sites.
Trump has repeatedly said that the attack "obliterated" Iran's nuclear facilities, including the key site of Fordo buried inside a mountain.
But an initial classified assessment, first reported by CNN, was said to have concluded that the strike did not destroy key components and that Iran's nuclear programme was set back only months at most.
Trump furiously lashed out at the CNN reporter behind the story, taking to his Truth Social platform to demand that the network fire her.
Trump also said that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, whom he dubbed "war" secretary, would hold a news conference at 8am on Thursday to "fight for the dignity of our great American pilots" after the media accounts on the efficacy of the strike he ordered.
Trump's intelligence chiefs also pushed back on Wednesday.
CIA Director John Ratcliffe in a statement said that new intelligence from a "historically reliable" source indicated that "several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years."
Iran's government has said that its nuclear facilities were "badly damaged".
The uranium in question is enriched to 60 per cent - above levels for civilian usage but still below weapons grade.
The IAEA, in a report cited by the United States and Israel to justify their attacks, said that Iran was not complying with obligations but did not find that Tehran was making a nuclear bomb.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
3 hours ago
- AsiaOne
EU to canvass leaders at summit on resolving US tariff conflict, World News
BRUSSELS — European Union leaders are to tell the European Commission on Thursday (June 26) if they want a quick trade deal with the United States at the cost of Washington getting better terms, or to escalate the fight in hope of something better. A quick deal seems to be the preferred option for most, officials and diplomats said, as the EU can then seek to address the unfavourable bias with some rebalancing measures of its own. The Commission, which negotiates trade agreements on behalf of the EU, will ask leaders of the EU's 27 members meeting in Brussels how they want to respond to President Donald Trump's July 9 deadline for a deal, now less than two weeks away. The bloc has said it is striving for a mutually beneficial agreement, but as Washington looks set to stick to its 10 per cent across-the board tariffs on most EU goods and threatening higher rates with prolonged talks, EU diplomats said a growing number of EU countries were now favouring a quick resolution. "It is ...in everyone's interest that the trade conflict with the United States does not escalate further," German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Tuesday in parliament. "I know that the European Commission is negotiating with great caution in this regard, and it has our full support. I hope that we will reach a solution with the United States by the beginning of July," Merz said. The bloc is already facing US import tariffs of 50 per cent on its steel and aluminium, 25 per cent for cars and car parts, along with a 10 per cent tariff on most other EU goods, which Trump has threatened could rise to 50 per cent without an agreement. The United States' only completed trade deal to date is with Britain, with the broad 10 per cent tariff still in place. US officials say it will not go lower for any trading partner. Some 23 of the leaders will come to Brussels straight from the Nato summit in the Hague. Few will want to follow accord there with an economic war. "There is a group of EU countries that want to protect companies by seemingly accepting something they have gotten used to — a 10 per cent baseline," one EU diplomat said. Rebalancing measures One question EU leaders face is whether it should respond with its own measures to such a baseline tariff. "We are also prepared for that with a range of options," Merz said. [[nid:719163]] The European Union has agreed, but not imposed, tariffs on 21 billion euros (S$31 billion) of US goods and is debating a further package of tariffs on up to 95 billion euros of US imports. Some EU countries favour watering it down. "The Commission has rightly said that some member states are nibbling away too much, which would weaken these rebalancing measures," one EU diplomat. Among the EU rebalancing options is a tax on digital advertising, which would hit US giants like Alphabet Inc's Google, Meta , Apple , X or Microsoft and eat into the trade surplus in services the US has with the EU. The bloc has a trade surplus with the US in goods. The Commission has proposed an EU-US deal to cut respective tariffs on industrial goods to zero, along with potential further EU purchases of liquefied natural gas and soybeans. Washington has shown little obvious interest, preferring to highlight items it considers as barriers, such as EU value-added tax, environmental standards and rules on online platforms, on which the EU does not want to move. On the sidelines of the summit, EU leaders will also seek to allay the concerns of Slovakia and Hungary over ending their access to Russian gas as foreseen by the EU's plan to phase out all Russian gas imports by the end of 2027. EU diplomats said EU leaders' assurances over gas should allow the two countries to back the EU's 18th package of sanctions against Russia, which they are now blocking. The sanctions could be adopted by EU governments on Friday. But the EU might have to drop from the package its proposal to lower the price cap on Russian seaborne oil to US$45 (S$53) per barrel from the current US$60, because the measure has failed to win the support of the US and EU countries with big oil shipping industries — Greece, Malta and Cyprus — are also against it. [[nid:719106]]
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
China takes action on key US fentanyl demands
Beijing previously defended its drug control record and accused Washington of using fentanyl to 'blackmail' China. PHOTO: MERIDITH KOHUT/NYTIMES BEIJING - China has taken a series of actions in the past week on counter-narcotics, in a sign of cooperation with US demands for stronger action on the synthetic opioid fentanyl, a key irritant in the bilateral relationship. US President Donald Trump imposed 20 per cent tariffs on Chinese imports in February over Beijing's alleged failure to curb the flow of precursor chemicals for fentanyl, which has caused nearly 450,000 US overdose deaths. Those tariffs have remained in effect despite a fragile trade truce reached in Geneva in May. Beijing has defended its drug control record and accused Washington of using fentanyl to 'blackmail' China. Both sides were in a stalemate over the issue for months, despite China sending its vice public security minister to the Geneva talks. China has balked at some of Washington's demands, which include publicising the crackdown on precursors on the front page of the Communist Party mouthpiece People's Daily, educating Party members and tightening regulation of specific chemicals, among other actions. On June 26, China's State Security Ministry accused a 'certain country' of 'deliberately launching unwarranted attacks on China over the fentanyl issue', in a veiled swipe at the US. But on June 20, Beijing added two precursors to a list of controlled chemicals, according to a government statement. The chemicals, 4-piperidone and 1-boc-4-piperidone, were 'considered fundamental to resolving the fentanyl issue', raising hopes that the 20 per cent tariffs could be eventually lifted, according to a source familiar with US government thinking. The move came after US Ambassador David Perdue had a rare meeting with China's Minister of Public Security Wang Xiaohong on June 19 in Beijing, at which Mr Wang expressed willingness to work with Washington on drug control, according to a Chinese statement. China's Foreign Ministry said the action on precursors was an 'independent measure' taken by Beijing in line with the UN Drug Convention and 'demonstrates China's attitude of actively participating in global drug governance'. Working-level conversations on fentanyl remain ongoing, and Mr Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping discussed the topic in a June 5 phone call. Chinese immigration officials seized 2.42 tonnes of drugs and arrested 262 suspects for drug smuggling so far in 2025, state media reported on June 26, as Beijing vowed to crack down on drug trafficking and 'intensify anti-drug propaganda' in border areas and ports. In addition, Chinese officials announced on June 25 they had prosecuted more than 1,300 people and arrested over 700 more nationwide for drug-related money laundering offences between January and May 2025, a 2.1 per cent year-on-year increase. Beijing will 'cut off the criminal interest chain and destroy the economic foundation of drug crimes', Mr Miao Shengming, a senior official at the Supreme People's Procuratorate said during a press conference. On June 23, a court in the southeastern province of Fujian handed a suspended death sentence to former drug control official Liu Yuejin for bribery, state media reported. Liu, a former director of the Ministry of Public Security's narcotics control bureau, was convicted of illegally receiving bribes worth over 121 million yuan (S$21.6 million) between 1992 and 2020. The US Embassy in Beijing did not respond to a request for comment. The Chinese government statements did not mention the US. Chinese scholars acknowledge that fentanyl's central position in the US-China trade war comes with a lot of political baggage for Beijing. 'The US views the fentanyl issue as a sign of poor governance on China's part and has exerted pressure on China as a result, politicising the issue of drug control,' said Professor Liu Weidong, a US-China expert at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. 'This context is certain to influence China's approach to addressing the fentanyl issue.' REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
EU to canvass leaders at summit on resolving US tariff conflict
BRUSSELS - European Union leaders are to tell the European Commission on Thursday if they want a quick trade deal with the United States at the cost of Washington getting better terms, or to escalate the fight in hope of something better. A quick deal seems to be the preferred option for most, officials and diplomats said, as the EU can then seek to address the unfavourable bias with some rebalancing measures of its own. The Commission, which negotiates trade agreements on behalf of the EU, will ask leaders of the EU's 27 members meeting in Brussels how they want to respond to President Donald Trump's July 9 deadline for a deal, now less than two weeks away. The bloc has said it is striving for a mutually beneficial agreement, but as Washington looks set to stick to its 10% across-the board tariffs on most EU goods and threatening higher rates with prolonged talks, EU diplomats said a growing number of EU countries were now favouring a quick resolution. "It is ...in everyone's interest that the trade conflict with the United States does not escalate further," German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Tuesday in parliament. "I know that the European Commission is negotiating with great caution in this regard, and it has our full support. I hope that we will reach a solution with the United States by the beginning of July," Merz said. The bloc is already facing U.S. import tariffs of 50% on its steel and aluminium, 25% for cars and car parts, along with a 10% tariff on most other EU goods, which Trump has threatened could rise to 50% without an agreement. The United States' only completed trade deal to date is with Britain, with the broad 10% tariff still in place. U.S. officials say it will not go lower for any trading partner. Some 23 of the leaders will come to Brussels straight from the NATO summit in the Hague. Few will want to follow accord there with an economic war. "There is a group of EU countries that want to protect companies by seemingly accepting something they have gotten used to – a 10% baseline," one EU diplomat said. REBALANCING MEASURES One question EU leaders face is whether it should respond with its own measures to such a baseline tariff. "We are also prepared for that with a range of options," Merz said. The European Union has agreed, but not imposed, tariffs on 21 billion euros of U.S. goods and is debating a further package of tariffs on up to 95 billion euros of U.S. imports. Some EU countries favour watering it down. "The Commission has rightly said that some member states are nibbling away too much, which would weaken these rebalancing measures," one EU diplomat. Among the EU rebalancing options is a tax on digital advertising, which would hit U.S. giants like Alphabet Inc's Google, Meta , Apple , X or Microsoft and eat into the trade surplus in services the U.S. has with the EU. The bloc has a trade surplus with the U.S. in goods. The Commission has proposed an EU-US deal to cut respective tariffs on industrial goods to zero, along with potential further EU purchases of liquefied natural gas and soybeans. Washington has shown little obvious interest, preferring to highlight items it considers as barriers, such as EU value-added tax, environmental standards and rules on online platforms, on which the EU does not want to move. On the sidelines of the summit, EU leaders will also seek to allay the concerns of Slovakia and Hungary over ending their access to Russian gas as foreseen by the EU's plan to phase out all Russian gas imports by the end of 2027. EU diplomats said EU leaders' assurances over gas should allow the two countries to back the EU's 18th package of sanctions against Russia, which they are now blocking. The sanctions could be adopted by EU governments on Friday. But the EU might have to drop from the package its proposal to lower the price cap on Russian seaborne oil to $45 per barrel from the current $60, because the measure has failed to win the support of the U.S. and EU countries with big oil shipping industries - Greece, Malta and Cyprus -- are also against it. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
