
Scammers target bars, cafes and restaurants
By Rachel Helyer Donaldson of RNZ
Fraudsters are targeting cafes, restaurants and bars, with at least two scams doing the rounds of the capital's dining scene, as well as some in Christchurch.
Hospitality NZ spokesperson Sam McKinnon says one scam doing the rounds in the capital involves a man claiming to be a diner, whose partner had become severely ill after eating there.
In several cases it was alleged the woman had gone into anaphylactic shock after eating onions which she was allergic to.
Another cafe was asked for a refund by a man who said his companion had had food poisoning.
The businesses realised it was the same person, after the scam was flagged up on a hospitality sector Facebook page, McKinnon said.
It was "disappointing and frustrating" for the sector, particularly in the tough economic climate, he added.
Fortune Favours venue manager Rachael Lee said she believed her bar was targeted by the same man earlier this month.
"He was claiming he'd ordered food and his wife, who was allergic to onions, had been given onions, and due to the fact that they weren't New Zealand citizens they had been over-charged hospital bills and now it was on us to pay them.
"We never want to have someone be over-charged, so we always try to check receipts and look through past transactions. But there was never any proof, just demanding money without providing any evidence."
Her suspicions were confirmed when she heard other venues had been targeted by similar scams. She was aware of about 10 bars targeted by the onions scam and thought at least several of them fell for it, which could have been potentially costly, she added.
"Some people have smelt a rat and said no, go away. But others have been called out and handed over the money."
None of the stories matched, she said. "If I hadn't seen the [Facebook group] post that he had already hit other bars, we probably would have been scammed out of a lot of money."
Maura Rigby - the co-owner and director of Beach Babylon and Little Beer Quarter - said both venues had been targeted by people running "the overcharging or double charging scam" at least twice in the past six months.
Staff had been alerted to two attempts to get refunds based on fabricated credit card statements, she said. "We're talking about $200 to $300, not huge numbers, when you compare it to large scams like bank fraud. But for the hospitality industry, it's a nuisance and it's a significant amount of money."
When the person making the claim was asked for extra evidence, "we found that the person just disappeared". The same thing had happened this year, although she was not sure if it was a different person, or group of people, she said.
"We're a customer service industry, we want to please our customers and put any problems, anything not done right, as quickly as possible.
"Initially we're always really receptive to hear if there was a mistake and we thoroughly investigate it. But now we'll just be asking for a little bit more information so that we can ensure that it actually matches up with transactions that happened at our businesses, rather than just people targeting us because we like to please our customers.
"It's not a great time for us. I guess other people are doing it tough too, and that might be why there's a rise of scams like this. But we don't have the margins to withstand extra expenses like this at the moment."
Restaurant Association chief executive Marisa Bidois said it had been alerted to the scams by members in both Wellington and Christchurch. The association was sending out a notice to alert others who may not have heard about it, she added.
Scams put additional stress on restaurants in challenging economic times. "Having to deal with this and figuring out what's genuine and what's not can be a bit of a minefield."
It was important for companies dealing with these sorts of complaints to request a receipt, establish the details correctly, and have a clear refund and complaints policy, she said.
"It is surprising how often people will claim to have been in a restaurant and eaten a certain dish, and then later on the owner will discover they definitely weren't here, as they didn't serve that dish that night. In some cases, we've seen people stating that they've consumed something that isn't even on the menu. It definitely pays to gather all the information."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Man took sleeping pills before crash
A Dunedin father and road-safety advocate has admitted crashing his car on the motorway, wiping out 200m of the wire barrier. Mark David Cummings, 49, appeared in the Dunedin District Court last week and pleaded guilty to threatening to kill, posting harmful digital communication, possessing cannabis, two charges of assaulting police, two charges of resisting police, two charges of speaking threateningly and refusing to undergo a compulsory impairment test. In 2019, the defendant's 15-year-old daughter Jayde Amy Cummings was killed instantly when the driver of the ute she was in failed to stop at the intersection of Church Rd West and Huntly Rd, in Outram. The incident resulted in a prolonged road safety campaign by Cummings and he was vindicated by a coroner's report last year. The police summary revealed that on March 22, Cummings was driving his Ford Ranger south on Dunedin's Southern Motorway. He drifted into the metal wire centre barrier and witnesses said he made no attempt to brake. About 200m of the centre barrier was wiped out, and his vehicle became entangled in the wire. While being transported to Dunedin Central Police Station, Cummings was falling asleep. He admitted to officers he had taken 10 sleeping pills and used cannabis before driving. About 8pm Cummings was taken back to his home but 30 minutes later he showed up at his mother's house, acting aggressively, and police were called again. When they arrived, the defendant yelled at them before a struggle ensued between him and two constables. Once police restrained him, he was found to be holding a lighter and a small bag with 0.78g of cannabis. Cummings told one officer that he would remember him, he was going to "get it" and he would "make him pay". Police assisted the defendant to regain his balance before he put his feet on to the couch and jumped back in an attempt to "body slam" the constable into the wall. Back at the police station Cummings continued to be belligerent and attempted to rip two pairs of underwear. Yesterday, the defendant also admitted that on February 9 he posted a threatening message on his Facebook profile which ended with "I will see u soon c...". The next month, he turned up at the victim's place of work, smacked the corner of his desk and said "10 grand on the corner of this desk by 4 o'clock today, or else I am going to break your kneecaps and whatever else I have to. The boys will be here as well". Cummings was remanded on bail and scheduled to appear for sentencing in October. In December 2021, Cummings was sentenced to nine months' intensive supervision after he used a wooden baton to smash a hole in a lawyer's office and damaged the Dunedin City Council building. The outburst was a response to reading a media article that the teen driver who caused his daughter's death had been discharged by the Youth Court. At the time, Judge Evangelos Thomas told Cummings: "Nobody can hold your grief or your rage against you ". , Court reporter

1News
a day ago
- 1News
Five revealing moments from Erin Patterson's cross-examination
The prosecution has stepped up its questioning of Erin Patterson - the Victorian woman accused of killing three people and attempting to kill a fourth by serving them a meal laced with poisonous mushrooms. After days of giving evidence in her own defence, Patterson has now faced cross-examination from prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC, who has challenged her on everything from deleted photos and cancer claims to the exact wording of her emoji use in private messages. Australia Correspondent Aziz Al Sa'afin explains some of the biggest moments from the cross-examination so far. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT 1. 'You knew they were death cap mushrooms' Nanette Rogers began by suggesting Patterson knew she had cooked with death cap mushrooms and deliberately got rid of the evidence. 'You knew that they were death cap mushrooms that you'd been dehydrating, correct?' 'No, I didn't know that,' Patterson replied. The prosecution then accused her of deliberately disposing of the food dehydrator to cover her tracks. 'You were very keen to dispose of any evidence that might connect you with the possession of death cap mushrooms?' 'No, I didn't,' Patterson said again. ADVERTISEMENT (Source: 1News) 2. Photos allegedly show mushrooms being weighed Rogers showed the jury a series of images from Patterson's phone showing sliced mushrooms on a dehydrator tray, balanced on kitchen scales in her home. Expert evidence has previously suggested the mushrooms pictured were consistent with Amanita phalloides - the deadly species known as death caps. 'I suggest you were weighing these mushrooms so you could calculate the weight required for... a fatal dose,' Rogers said. 'I disagree,' Patterson replied. She also denied claims that she foraged those mushrooms after seeing a post online about local sightings on the iNaturalist website. ADVERTISEMENT 3. Internet searches raise questions about cancer claim The prosecution questioned Patterson over her claim to her lunch guests that she had cancer - a lie she now says was a cover for planned weight-loss surgery. Court documents showed images and search results related to ovarian and brain cancer stored on Patterson's devices. 'I suggest this information from the internet would allow you to tell a more convincing lie,' Rogers said. 'That's theoretically true, but it's not what I did,' Patterson replied. She said she'd worried about her health in late 2021 and early 2022, but denied conducting searches in 2023 to support a fabricated illness. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT 4. Emoji use and 'eyerolls' spark courtroom debate The court was also shown Facebook messages Patterson sent to friends, in which she referenced her in-laws and used eye-roll and neutral-face emojis when talking about their religious advice. Rogers argued the tone was mocking. Patterson disagreed. 'There's a better eyeroll emoji than these,' Patterson said. 'I can't see anything about eyes rolling in there. I wasn't mocking, I was frustrated.' 5. Prosecution questions Patterson's use of the word 'panicked' and 'foraging' Patterson had previously told the court she panicked in the days after the fatal lunch, which led her to lie and destroy evidence. But Rogers challenged this, suggesting Patterson was not reacting emotionally, but acting to avoid detection. ADVERTISEMENT 'Can you please alert me to the answer that I gave where I said I panicked when I learnt that everyone was unwell?' Patterson asked during one exchange. Rogers paused before continuing: 'Certainly.' In a continued moment of back-and-forth, Rogers questioned Patterson on her use of other language - specifically whether she understood what 'mushrooming' meant. Patterson replied: 'I think it could mean a couple of things… foraging, but also other uses of mushrooms that are not eating.' When asked what she would call picking mushrooms for food, she said: 'Pick and eat.' She maintained she never used the word 'mushrooming' and would have said 'foraged' if that's what she meant. Patterson denies the charges and the trial continues next week. ADVERTISEMENT Aziz Al Sa'afin looks at the key questions in the trial Aziz Al Sa'afin answers your most asked questions about the mushroom trial (Source: 1News) Who is Erin Patterson and what is this trial about? Erin Patterson is a 50-year-old woman from Leongatha, Victoria, who is accused of murdering her former in-laws Don and Gail Patterson and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson. She is also charged with the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson, a local pastor who survived the same meal. All four guests became seriously ill after eating a beef wellington lunch prepared at Patterson's home in July 2023. What is she accused of doing? Prosecutors allege that Patterson used death cap mushrooms - one of the most poisonous fungi in the world - in the meal she served her guests. The Crown claims she knowingly poisoned them. The Defence says it was a tragic accident and Patterson has pleaded not guilty to all charges. What are death cap mushrooms? ADVERTISEMENT Death cap mushrooms (Amanita phalloides) are deadly fungi that can be easily mistaken for edible varieties. Even a small amount can cause liver failure or death. They are not typically sold in stores and are often found in the wild. Cooking them does not neutralise their toxicity. What has Erin Patterson said in court? She has told the jury that she did not mean to harm anyone and believes the poisoning was a tragic accident. She admitted to lying in a police interview about foraging mushrooms and using a food dehydrator, which she later dumped. She said she panicked and was scared she'd be blamed. Why does she say she lied to police? Patterson has admitted to lying about key details during her initial police interview. She said she was overwhelmed and frightened, particularly after learning two of her guests had died. She told the court: 'It was a stupid kneejerk reaction… I was scared, but I shouldn't have done it.' What does the prosecution say? The prosecution has accused Patterson of deliberately cooking with death cap mushrooms and trying to cover her tracks. They've pointed to deleted photos, dumped kitchen equipment, and online searches they allege were used to create a convincing cover story, including a lie about having cancer. ADVERTISEMENT What has she said about the cancer claim? Patterson admitted lying to her lunch guests about having cancer. She told the court she said it to cover up a planned weight-loss surgery and described feeling ashamed of her body. The prosecution says she researched cancer online to make her story more believable. Patterson denies that. Why has this trial received so much attention? The unusual and shocking nature of the case - involving a homemade meal, rare poisonous mushrooms, and a family tragedy - has made headlines around the world. The fact that Patterson is giving evidence in her own defence is also highly unusual in a murder trial. True-crime podcasters and filmmakers have descended on the town of Morwell to cover this trial only adding to the hype. What does the jury have to decide? The jury must decide whether Erin Patterson is guilty of murder or attempted murder beyond reasonable doubt. This means they must be sure of her guilt based on the evidence presented in order to return a guilty verdict. In a Victorian criminal trial, the jury's verdict must be unanimous - all 12 jurors must agree. They will be pushed until they can reach a unanimous verdict of guilty or not guilty. In the rare instance they can't, the judge may declare a hung jury, which could lead to a retrial. What if Erin Patterson is found guilty? ADVERTISEMENT If found guilty of murder, Patterson faces a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. The judge would determine her sentence at a later date. What happens if Erin Patterson is found not guilty? If Patterson is found not guilty, she will be acquitted of the charges and released from custody. An acquittal means the jury was not satisfied of her guilt beyond reasonable doubt and that the legal threshold for conviction was not met. What happens next? The trial is ongoing and has now lasted for six weeks. Cross-examination is underway, and Patterson is expected to remain on the stand into next week. Closing arguments will follow, then final instructions from the judge before the jury deliberates. The trial could stretch into late June.

1News
3 days ago
- 1News
Missing QLD teen Pheobe Bishop's housemates moved body twice
The housemates of Pheobe Bishop allegedly murdered the missing teen before moving her body from a national park, police say. James Wood, 34, and Tanika Bromley, 33, will face Bundaberg Magistrates Court in southern Queensland on Friday charged with 17-year-old Pheobe's murder. Wood and Bromley were arrested on Thursday night, three weeks to the day after Pheobe missed a flight and vanished. Wood and Bromley were also charged with two counts each of interfering with a corpse. Pheobe was last seen near Bundaberg airport about 8.30am on May 15 after booking a trip to Western Australia to see her boyfriend. ADVERTISEMENT James Wood, 34, and Tanika Bromley, 33. (Source: Nine) Police allege Wood and Bromley drove Pheobe in a grey Hyundai ix35 to Airport Drive in Bundaberg but no one exited the car. Pheobe was allegedly murdered and her body was moved more than once from the Good Night Scrub National Park, an hour's drive from Bundaberg airport. Police had searched the park extensively during their investigation into Pheobe's disappearance, saying evidence may have been moved from the national park before officers arrived. Items were seized during the search for forensic information. Pheobe's remains are yet to be located but police suspect it is in the national park, Detective Inspector Craig Mansfield told reporters on Friday. "We're back to a particular area where we are suspecting that we may locate Pheobe, but again, it is a broad, unforgiving, large area," he said. ADVERTISEMENT Telephone data led police to focus on the national park with search operations restarting on Friday after efforts were scaled back on Wednesday. "We hope that we'll have a resolution over the coming days," Det Mansfield said. Police also believe they understand the motive for Pheobe's murder. "We do have information that would suggest some form of motivation," Det Mansfield said. Wood's SUV was seized by police for forensic examination on Thursday night. He has been living in the vehicle after the Gin Gin property he shared with Bromley and Pheobe was declared a crime scene following the teen's disappearance. "There is a vehicle that we believe Pheobe was transported in, but I will not disclose that at this point in time," Det Mansfield said. ADVERTISEMENT Detective Mansfield said he shared the devastation Pheobe's mother Kylie Johnson was experiencing. "Whilst we always hoped to find Pheobe alive, our investigation as it progressed quite clearly showed us that that was not going to be a viable outcome," he said. Kylie Johnson with her daughter Pheobe Bishop. (Source: Facebook / Kylie Johnson ) Johnson, who regularly shared updates begging for her daughter's whereabouts, said on Thursday night that her family had been "shattered". "Our world has just been shattered into the most horrific place I've ever been…" she wrote. "I need my baby home to put her to rest! I'm absolutely begging anyone that knows anything to come forward. "We need to put her to rest, we need to put her to peace." ADVERTISEMENT Wood had previously been taken into custody on Wednesday but was released several hours later without charge. Parliament punishment, free money?, getting wicked again (Source: 1News) Wood and Bromley had earlier been charged with unrelated weapons offences. Police allegedly found a shortened firearm, ammunition, and two replica handguns during a search of Bromley's grey Hyundai ix35 and further ammunition in the pair's Gin Gin home. Mansfield said he could not speculate until Pheobe's body was found on whether the weapons located were used in her murder.