logo
Villa Colombo Personal Care Workers Strike for Paid Sick Days and Benefits

Villa Colombo Personal Care Workers Strike for Paid Sick Days and Benefits

National Post28-05-2025

Article content
TORONTO — Personal Care Workers at Villa Colombo Homes for the Aged Inc. are on strike as of Wednesday, May 28. CUPE 5525 members in the Supportive Housing Unit have been negotiating with Villa Colombo for over a year and have reached an impasse with the employer.
Article content
Article content
'Throughout the pandemic, Villa Colombo staff worked tirelessly to keep residents healthy and safe,' said CUPE Ontario President Fred Hahn. 'Now the employer is proposing to keep part time workers excluded from existing health benefits and reducing paid sick days for full-timers. Sick employees should not be forced to work with vulnerable residents.'
Article content
Proper health benefits and paid sick days are crucial to protecting vulnerable residents from infection.
Article content
Despite full awareness of the risks of having staff work while sick, Villa Colombo is pushing to reduce paid sick days for full-time workers and keep part-time workers' sick days at zero. As it stands, workers would be penalized with lost wages by making the responsible decision to stay home when they are ill.
Article content
Further, the employer wants to keep part-time workers excluded from existing health and benefits plans and make significant and disruptive changes to the existing scheduling system.
Article content
Article content
Article content
Article content
Article content

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Smartest Growth Stock to Buy With $1,000 Right Now
The Smartest Growth Stock to Buy With $1,000 Right Now

Globe and Mail

time25 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

The Smartest Growth Stock to Buy With $1,000 Right Now

Quick, think about soda companies. What brand comes to mind? Probably Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO). That makes sense, given that Coca-Cola is one of the largest and best-known consumer staples brands in the world. But is it the smartest growth stock to buy if you have $1,000 to invest right now? Don't hit the buy button until you read about this high-yield alternative. What does Coca-Cola do? From a big-picture perspective, Coca-Cola makes food, even though its products get their own category with the consumer staples space. Beverages are still a life necessity, even if its eponymous product is more for pleasure than need. The company is an industry powerhouse. Not only is Coke one of the best known, and most beloved, beverage brands, but Coca-Cola happens to have a massive distribution network, impressive marketing skills, and powerful research and development chops. The company's scale, meanwhile, gives it the wherewithal to act as an industry consolidator, buying up smaller brands and beverage concepts to round out its product portfolio. That, in turn, helps to keep Coca-Cola's brands relevant with consumers. The company's business is so strong that it has been a longtime holding of Warren Buffett within Berkshire Hathaway 's stock portfolio. If Buffett has put billions into Coca-Cola, why shouldn't you put in $1,000? There's one notable reason: Investors have fully priced Coca-Cola's shares. The stock's price-to-sales ratio and its price-to-earnings ratio are both above their five-year averages, and the dividend yield is near 10-year lows. The business is doing relatively well right now, but virtually everyone seems to know it. There's another option in the beverage space One of the other factors that sets Coca-Cola apart is its status as a Dividend King. But it isn't the only Dividend King beverage company. Direct competitor PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP) has increased its dividend annually for 53 years and counting. Meanwhile, PepsiCo's price-to-sales and price-to-earnings ratios are below their five-year averages, and its yield is toward the high end of its historical range. So, unlike Coca-Cola, PepsiCo looks cheap. PepsiCo stands out on the valuation front, but it also stands out on the diversification front. Like Coca-Cola, it has a globally diversified business. But PepsiCo operates in the salty snack and packaged foods spaces, too. That gives it more levers to pull to support long-term growth and more businesses to lean on when one of its divisions is facing difficulty. And make no mistake, every company, no matter how good, eventually faces hard times. The best companies, which include Dividend Kings, are the ones that successfully manage through the hard times. While Coca-Cola is performing quite well today, PepsiCo isn't. That's why its yield is a historically high 4.3% and its stock price has lost a third of its value since early 2023. But PepsiCo isn't giving up. In fact, it is leaning on its successful playbook and buying smaller brands (Siete and Poppi) that are more relevant with consumers right now. That should, in time, help PepsiCo to get back on the growth track. PepsiCo could be the contrarian play you've been looking for If you're looking at Coca-Cola today, you should probably give PepsiCo a closer look. But don't just think about how each business is performing this very second. Think about their valuations in relation to their performance and, just as important, what each company is doing to ensure they succeed. They both have solid businesses and are working on a bright future, but PepsiCo isn't getting any credit for it because it is facing some near-term headwinds. If you can think long term, putting $1,000 into PepsiCo today could end up being a huge win for your future wealth. Note that one of the keys to Buffett's investment approach is buying good companies when they look attractively priced. Between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, it is PepsiCo that passes that simple screen. Should you invest $1,000 in Coca-Cola right now? Before you buy stock in Coca-Cola, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Coca-Cola wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $660,341!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $874,192!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to173%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025

Ex-CEO of Alberta health authority asks for quick ruling in wrongful dismissal suit
Ex-CEO of Alberta health authority asks for quick ruling in wrongful dismissal suit

Globe and Mail

time39 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Ex-CEO of Alberta health authority asks for quick ruling in wrongful dismissal suit

The former head of Alberta's health authority wants a judge to rule on her lawsuit against the provincial government, which she alleges fired her improperly, without the case going to trial. Athana Mentzelopoulos, Alberta Health Services's former chief executive, on Monday applied for a summary judgment in her dispute with the government. The application, filed in the Court of King's Bench in Edmonton, alleges the health minister usurped power accorded to AHS directors when she ordered Ms. Mentzelopoulos's firing in January. Ms. Mentzelopoulos is effectively asking the court to rule on the legality of how the government terminated her employment, rather than the validity of her allegations about why she was fired. The former executive alleges Premier Danielle Smith's government put pressure on her to sign deals that were to the benefit of private companies. Ms. Mentzelopoulos further alleges the government fired her for investigating the terms of some of the health authority's contracts and questioning how some deals came to fruition. The Globe and Mail first reported those allegations in February. Ms. Mentzelopoulos's $1.7-million lawsuit sparked multiple investigations, including an RCMP probe, and created a political headache for Ms. Smith's government. Exclusive: Alberta Justice Minister has personal relationship with man whose businesses are tied to AHS investigation Kyle Warner, a spokesman for the newly created ministry of primary and preventative health services, said the government intends to oppose Ms. Mentzelopoulos's application to forgo a trial. 'It is legally baseless and contains a litany of misinformation and false claims,' he said in a statement Tuesday. Ms. Mentzelopoulos's latest court filings contain fresh allegations about the government's interactions with the health authority's board. She alleges Adriana LaGrange, then the health minister and now the minister of primary and preventative health services, decided to fire her despite not having the authority. The former executive alleges only the board or its chair could terminate her contract because she was employed by AHS and reported to its directors, not the government. The government fired Ms. Mentzelopoulos on Jan. 8. But first Ms. LaGrange tried to persuade the board to oust the executive, Ms. Mentzelopoulos alleges. Ms. Mentzelopoulos alleges on Jan. 6 she informed the health ministry that she had a meeting scheduled for Jan. 10 with the Auditor-General, to update him on her investigations at the agency. After informing the ministry about the meeting, Ms. Mentzelopoulos alleges she heard Ms. LaGrange was organizing an informal meeting with directors for Jan. 7. 'The purpose of the meeting was to have the AHS Board agree to terminate my employment with AHS,' Ms. Mentzelopoulos alleges, adding that the directors refused. Ms. Mentzelopoulos claims she was not invited to the meeting but later learned what happened from others. 'When Minister LaGrange was asked why she wanted me terminated, she could give no substantive reason and gave none,' Ms. Mentzelopoulos alleges. When some directors said they would not sign off on the firing, the minister said she would have Andre Tremblay do it, the former executive alleges. At the time, Mr. Tremblay served as the deputy minister of health and an AHS board member. Ms. Mentzelopoulos's application for a summary judgment claims supporting evidence could be provided by compelled examination of three of the four board members who were not part of government. The three named in the filings are Paul Haggis, Lyle Oberg and Sandy Edmonstone. Mr. Haggis declined to comment, citing confidentiality requirements. Mr. Oberg and Mr. Edmonstone did not acknowledge requests for comment. The fourth independent board member, Angela Fong, also did not acknowledge a request for comment. Ms. LaGrange dissolved the board at the end of January. Ms. Mentzelopoulos alleges Ms. LaGrange wanted her to stop investigating the health care system's contract and procurement processes, but she refused. She alleges she was fired for pursuing the investigations. The Alberta government, in previous court filings and public statements, disputes Ms. Mentzelopoulos's allegations. The government alleges she was fired for incompetence. Further, Alberta alleges the former CEO resisted the government's strategy to reduce surgical waiting times by increasing the number of operations performed at private facilities. None of the allegations have been tested in court. The Premier in early March appointed a former chief judge of the Provincial Court of Manitoba to conduct an independent review based on Ms. Mentzelopoulos's allegations. Raymond Wyant was scheduled to deliver an interim written report by May 30 and a final report and recommendations by June 30. However, the government and Mr. Wyant agreed to extend the timeline, according to a press release from the province on May 30. Now, the interim report must be delivered by Sept. 24, with the final version and recommendations due Oct. 15. The United Conservative Party has restructured Alberta Health Services and the Premier, in a cabinet shuffle in May, created the ministries of hospital and surgical health services; and primary and preventative health services. Four ministers are now responsible for Alberta's health care system: Ms. LaGrange oversees primary and preventative health services; Matt Jones is in charge of hospital and surgical health services; Rick Wilson leads mental health and addiction; and Jason Nixon handles assisted living and social services.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store