Rigging charge after loss is absurd: Poll body rubbishes Rahul Gandhi's claim
The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Saturday dismissed Rahul Gandhi's claims of last year's Maharashtra Assembly election results being rigged as vague and "completely absurd", issuing a point-by-point rebuttal to the Congress leader's voter fraud allegations."After any unfavourable verdict by the voters, trying to defame the Election Commission by saying that it is compromised is completely absurd," the poll body said in its strongly worded reply.advertisementEarlier in the day, Rahul Gandhi, while sharing his op-ed in The Indian Express, claimed that the Maharashtra Assembly polls were conducted in a manner that favoured the BJP, alleging that the voter lists were inflated with fake voters. The Congress MP further alleged that the law surrounding the appointment of the Election Commissioners and the Chief Election Commissioners was amended to heavily tilt it towards the Centre's favour, by dropping the Chief Justice of India (CJI) from the panel to select Election Commissioners and the Chief Election Commissioner.
Calling Rahul Gandhi's allegations "unsubstantiated," the poll panel reiterated that it had already replied to the similar charges raised by the Congress last year, shortly after losing the Maharashtra Assembly elections."The Election Commission had brought out all these facts in its reply to INC on 24th December 2024 itself which is available on ECI's website. It appears that all these facts are completely being ignored while raising such issues again and again...", said the ECI.advertisement
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
36 minutes ago
- The Print
Rahul slams EC's ‘unsigned' rebuttal of his Maharashtra poll rigging charge—'show voter rolls'
Earlier in April this year, ECI sources termed similar claims made by Rahul in the United States—first, in his address before the Indian diaspora in Boston, and second, at Brown University—as 'absurd'. In a social media post, the Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition (LoP) retorted that responses to 'serious questions' through 'unsigned, evasive notes' were unbecoming for a constitutional body such as ECI. 'Evasion won't protect your credibility. Telling the truth will,' Rahul posted on X. New Delhi: Not for the first time, Rahul Gandhi clashed with the Election Commission of India (ECI) Saturday over his allegation of 'industrial scale-rigging' during the Maharashtra assembly elections. The ECI indirectly clapped back at the Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition, reiterating that his charges were 'absurd', on the same day. However, this time, Rahul countered on X, saying: 'If you have nothing to hide, answer the questions in my article and prove it by: Publishing consolidated, digital, machine-readable voter rolls for the most recent elections to the Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas of all states, including Maharashtra.' He also demanded the release of CCTV footage from inside the polling booths recorded from 5 pm on the counting day before the Maharashtra assembly election results. But, ECI is not required to do what he says under the law. In December 2024, the Centre amended the Conduct of Election Rules, effectively removing electronic footage—earlier open to public inspection—from the polling process by stamping it out from the definition of 'election papers'. On earlier occasions, Rahul Gandhi has represented the amendment as indicative of the ECI becoming 'compromised'. In opinion pieces published in different languages in different newspapers, the LoP Saturday repeated the allegations he has been making against the ECI for some time now. Rahul laid out a 'step-by-step' playbook of election rigging in his pieces. 'Step 1: Rig the panel for appointing the Election Commission. Step 2: Add fake voters to the roll. Step 3: Inflate voter turnout. Step 4: Target the bogus voting exactly where BJP needs to win. Step 5: Hide the evidence,' he wrote. Sharing his write-up on X, Rahul also appealed to people to go through the 'evidence', judge for themselves, and demand answers. 'Because the match-fixing of Maharashtra will come to Bihar next, and then anywhere, the BJP is losing.' Assembly elections are due in Bihar later this year. The LoP, through his writing, also sought to substantiate his allegation of rigging in the Maharashtra assembly polls by raising questions on the increase in registered electors in the state from 9.29 crore during the LS polls to 9.70 crore during the assembly polls. 'A crawl of 31 lakh in five years, then a leap of 41 lakh in just five months,' Rahul wrote. 'So incredible was this leap that the registered voter total of 9.70 crore was even greater than the 9.54 crore adults in Maharashtra according to the government's own estimates.' He also raised suspicions about the rise in total voter turnout between 5 pm and the final figures released by ECI, calling the huge difference a major red flag. 'The polling turnout at 5 pm was 58.22 percent. Even after voting closed, however, [the] turnout kept increasing more and more. The final turnout was reported only the next morning to be 66.05 percent … The unprecedented 7.83 percentage point increase is equivalent to 76 lakh voters—much higher than previous Vidhan Sabha elections in Maharashtra,' Rahul stated. Hours after the piece came out, the ECI, without naming anyone, relayed through its sources that 'defaming the poll panel after receiving an unfavourable verdict from the voters is absolutely absurd'. The ECI sources said the rise in total voter turnout is not abnormal in the slightest way and that Rahul's allegations about the electoral rolls had no substance. 'After the finalisation of the electoral rolls for the Maharashtra election, as against the 9,77,90,752 (over 9.77 crore) electors, only 89 appeals were filed before the first appellate authority—the district magistrate concerned—and only one was filed before the second appellate authority—the state chief electoral officer,' according to the sources. Therefore, the ECI sources added, it was amply clear that the Congress or any other political party had no grievance before the Maharashtra assembly elections, which it supervised in 2024. Asserting that the ECI has replied to all the allegations levelled by the Congress earlier on 24 December 2024, the ECI sources added that over one lakh booth-level officers of Maharashtra are waiting for the 'wild allegations' to turn into 'at least one single real appeal before district magistrates' in line with the election laws that exist to avoid discrepancies in the list of electors. (Edited by Madhurita Goswami) Also Read: Time to 'retire lame horse'—Rahul Gandhi hints at massive revamp of MP Congress unit
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Ex-min Netam switches stand on delisting of tribals, questions Cong
Raipur: Former Union minister and senior tribal leader Arvind Netam after attending a Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh ( ) event in Nagpur, said that the visit offered him a new perspective on the Sangh's inner workings. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Speaking to the mediapersons on Saturday in Raipur, Netam said he discussed measures to reduce the ideological distance with tribal people. Netam also thanked RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat for inviting him. Netam announced a change in his position on the issue of delisting, which refers to the removal of individuals from the Scheduled Tribe list if they convert to another religion. He said that although he once opposed delisting, he "now supports it as a way to check forced or induced religious conversions among tribal people". Responding to the criticism from Congress MP Deepak Baij, who questioned Netam's growing proximity to the RSS, Netam hit back by asking whether Baij himself had "converted to Christianity". Netam further challenged the Congress party to clearly state its position on religious conversions. He brought up the protection of tribal land, forests, and water resources as another major concern. He argued that land acquisition for industrial use must not result in the permanent loss of tribal-land ownership. Instead, he suggested that such land be provided on lease, allowing tribal families to retain their rights and connection to their land.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bengaluru stampede: Panel gets one month to probe stampede
Bengaluru: Karnataka govt Saturday gave retired high court judge Justice John Michael D'Cunha, who heads a one-member judicial commission, one month to investigate the stampede near Chinnaswamy Stadium that left 11 people dead and 75 injured. The govt issued a fresh notification on June 5, assigning priority to the probe into the tragedy that occurred during RCB's IPL victory celebrations. Justice D'Cunha was already heading a commission investigating two sensitive cases — the alleged Covid-era medical procurement scam and deaths of patients due to suspected oxygen shortage at Chamarajanagar district hospital. Initially appointed on Aug 25, 2023, the commission's term was extended in Oct 2024 till July 31, 2025. To accommodate the stampede inquiry, the govt has now extended the panel's term by another month. "Since the commission needs to prioritise the stampede incident and submit its report in a month after completing probe, the term has been extended from Aug 1 to Aug 31, 2025, as it may need extra time to look into the case," the government order stated. The Congress govt has launched a three-tier investigation into the incident — judicial, magisterial and by Criminal Investigation Department (CID). While Justice D'Cunha leads the judicial inquiry, a magisterial probe is being conducted by deputy commissioner of Bengaluru Urban, and CID is holding a parallel investigation. Multiple probes confusing: HD Kumaraswamy Union minister HD Kumaraswamy of JD(S) slammed the govt's approach, calling out the multiple probes as overlapping and confusing. "The govt wants to show that it has taken measures before the high court takes up the suo-motu PIL into the issue. The govt first ordered a magisterial probe, then appointed a commission headed by a retired HC judge, and the case was also handed over to CID. Which report are you going to accept?" he asked.
