
Letter from Trumpland — an Indian boarding school near Pennsylvania reopens an old ache
The Carlisle Indian Industrial School was the first Indian boarding school deliberately established off-reservation, with a specific mission to cleanse students of their home cultures. For four decades it also served as a flagship for similar cultural-assimilationist schools across the US and Canada.
'Kill the Indian, Save the Man.' That was the grisly, unapologetic motto of the North American Indian Boarding School Movement, from the 1870s until the 1960s.
Today, Donald Trump may be on a mission to sanitise US history as he issues executive orders requiring publicly funded museums to celebrate an 'unparalleled legacy of advancing liberty'.
Yet no matter how much white Americans may want to look away, history's darkness keeps sounding a tragic undertone to the cheery amusement park melodies of much of contemporary US life – the 100,000 STEAM games, the city-sized malls, the yachts, ski resorts and recreational vehicles.
Recently, I visited the Carlisle Indian Industrial School, located about an hour away from my adoptive home of Sunbury, Pennsylvania.
This school, founded in 1879 and operational until 1918, was the first Indian boarding school deliberately established off-reservation, with a specific mission to cleanse students of their home cultures. For four decades it also served as a flagship for similar cultural-assimilationist schools across the US and Canada.
In recognition of its importance, in December 2024 President Joe Biden proclaimed the old grounds of the Carlisle Indian Industrial School to be a national monument.
The Carlisle school was founded by Richard Henry Pratt, no relative of the South African David Pratt who shot and wounded Hendrik Verwoerd. Richard Pratt, a former military officer, was inspired by his experiences teaching Native prisoners of war to assimilate Indigenous youth into white American culture, believing that this would offer these children their best life opportunities.
The school was founded on a former military camp from the US Civil War, and after the school was closed the site returned to being a military barracks. Today, the monument is co-administered by the National Parks Service and the US Army.
I began my visit at the Cumberland County Historical Society, on a leafy street in the quaint, 300-year-old centre of Carlisle. I went there to buy a copy of their booklet titled 'Walking Tour of Grounds of the Carlisle Indian Industrial School', the only such guidebook currently in print.
It was on something of a whim that, after my purchase, I took the lift up to the second floor to view their small museum. There, amid the displays of folk art wood carvings and antique clocks, to my surprise I found an entire room dedicated to the industrial school, with information about its accomplishments in sports, music and vocational training.
But it was the wall-sized picture that caught my attention. Here, I also got my first clue that this exploration was going to be less a dispassionate intellectual journey than an emotionally charged confrontation with my South African past.
Looking out at me was a sea of several hundred faces, Indigenous children all in the woollen, buttoned-down uniforms of the Carlisle school. Some certainly looked happy: say, the debonair boy with a tuft, towards the back middle of the crowd
But then there were the majority: the young girl with frizzy hair, apparently on the verge of tears. The young boy, so numbed out he seemed on the verge of falling asleep.
And then, most horrifying of all, a second young boy, staring into the camera, shaved head, wide-eyed, his face communicating, what exactly? A vast, almost incomprehensible loneliness. The trauma of being torn from those who loved him.
I had my own brush with boarding school suffering, from ages 12 to 17, a much shallower wound than those of the children I was now looking at, but enough, now, to reopen an old ache in my chest, and to leave me uncontrollably weeping at this vision of mass mistreatment of children. (Luckily I had the museum to myself, and I could cry away beneath the display cases of moccasins and athletics trophies and the photograph of legendary Carlisle football player Jim Thorpe kicking up at a near-vertical angle).
My parents lived in Skukuza village, in the Kruger National Park. Those were the final years of apartheid, and the nearest white, English-speaking high school was an hour and a half away, in Nelspruit. So every Monday and Friday I climbed on a green and white bus, for the trip down the R40, to or from Lowveld High Hostel, with its tall brick buildings and wire fences.
To me, it was a nightmare. Older boys were responsible for maintaining discipline in the passages, and they did so by administering daily beatings with cricket bats. Somehow they pegged me, correctly, as gay, and so they subjected me to a special range of humiliating initiations, designed to cure me of my effeminacy: thrashings with pillow slips filled with athletics spikes; baking summer afternoons, confined to bed under piles of blankets, and surrounded with electric heaters.
I had no idea what steamroller of hatred had hit me. In the early mornings, I climbed to the top storey of the east classroom building, and looked towards my parents' home, fantasising about the angels who might grab me if I jumped, and ferry me home across koppies and savannahs.
Carlisle Indian Industrial School was famous, too, for its violent punishments. When children spoke their own languages, teachers washed their mouths out with lye soap. Teachers caned boys and girls for mistakes on tests, or for forgetting their homework.
For fun, the younger boys were made to run 'belt lines' where they were whipped by older lads. If students sneaked off the school grounds to, say, perform their cultural rituals in the woods, they were locked for days in the guard house, with nothing to eat but bread and water.
I gathered myself emotionally over lunch, then drove out to the Carlisle Barracks where I followed signs to the office where visitors undergo a background check before receiving a pass to visit the monument.
Lucky for me, I'm a dual citizen of South Africa and the US. Later that weekend, at an academic conference focused on the legacy of the Carlisle Indian Industrial School, I would meet an Italian museum curator who was denied entry because the office was unable to complete an FBI background search. But after getting my clearance in five quick minutes, the guard at the gate waved me right into a miniature, fenced-off suburb, with a commissary, human resources building, athletics stadium, hospital and the US Army War College.
Presidential proclamation be damned: I could not see a single sign to the historical monument. Nor was the map on the inner back cover of the Historical Society booklet much help. It simply showed the base as a giant, featureless semi-rectangle, with the old school grounds protruding from the bottom left.
After driving around for a few minutes, I parked in a visitor's bay and decided to ask for directions. But then I ran into what I struggle, in hindsight, to see as anything other than the great American habit of historical erasure. I asked, first a young man in uniform, carrying a book satchel; then a blond middle-aged man cleaning his car; and finally an elderly fellow mowing the football fields.
'No clue,' said the student, even when I showed him the booklet with the pictures of the buildings still standing.
'Never heard of it,' said the car washer.
The lawn mower just shook his head.
Laboriously, I oriented myself with the map, then, at last, I was in luck. Outside the post office, a soldier said: 'Just keep going down this road until you hit the guard house.'
And once I found the old school, the booklet came into its own. There are 14 buildings still standing out of an original 32, all of them now repurposed. The old hospital has become an army hotel. The teachers' quarters have become flats for junior officers. Only the sports centre, with a display honouring Jim Thorpe, remains a gymnasium.
And now, again to my surprise, I found something oddly familiar, even comforting, in the buildings themselves. There, right on the edge of the base stood the coach's house, looking cute and inviting, with its white siding and Greek-revivalist porch pillars. In later years at Lowveld High, I got invited into teachers' homes like these, with my friends. I remembered the vice-principal having me over for supper; the hostel head teacher inviting me to watch PW Botha's 'Rubicon' speech in his living room, and saying after it: 'God knows what happens now.'
Likewise, viewing the Carlisle school's old music centre, I remembered practising at Lowveld High for a cameo appearance in Strauss's Die Fledermaus. In one scene, I accidentally kicked a beach ball off stage into the audience, and someone batted it back to me.
Music, like literature, was a corner of that community where I could be myself. Was that true, too, for members of the Carlisle Indian Industrial School Band, which performed at presidential inaugurations? More importantly, did some of the devastated-looking kids from the photographs eventually find a measure of peace even in this place of cultural genocide? Did they eventually return home to build fires in their Southwestern kivas, or dance for the green corn harvest in the Appalachian mountains?
I finished the tour and returned to my car. There, I plugged the address of my hotel into Google Maps. One block forward, one right turn and I'd left the army base by a back route, no papers or checks in the outgoing direction.
When we sneaked out at boarding school, we always had to climb out of a window, then down a fire escape and through a hole in the fence. The 20-minute walk to the Nelspruit restaurants was both exhilarating and terrifying, the latter because of the canings that would come our way if someone saw us.
'If you want to see me well and strong again,' wrote Luzena Swaney to her mother, a Cherokee living more than a day's train ride away, in North Carolina, 'you will have to help get me away from here.'
But for many Carlisle students home was unreachable – half a continent away. In addition to the cultural assimilation, the US government appreciated the leverage boarding schools gave the government over adult Native communities. After all, no Apache warriors or Choctaw protesters were going to oppose the federal government too vigorously with their children held hostage in Carlisle's dormitories. As a result, boarding school officials discouraged trips home, even over long summer breaks.
When Richard Henry Pratt died in 1944, he was buried in Arlington National Cemetery, alongside presidents and generals. By contrast, the approximately 180 children who died at Carlisle Indian Industrial School – of tuberculosis, influenza, homesickness and suicide – were buried on-site.
Today, their graves line Claremont Road; commuters drive past them to the skyscrapers of nearby Harrisburg. Many names are misspelled. All the graves are adorned with crosses, whether or not the children they commemorate worshipped their conquerors' gods. These children, at least, never recovered. They never got to go home, to heal, grow or reclaim their cultures.
I imagined them lying, close to death, in that hospital that is now a hotel. I pictured them, praying in Cherokee, Navajo or Ojibwe, to the Great Spirit: 'Please, get me out of here. Please send me an ancestor to lift me up and take me home.' DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
16 minutes ago
- IOL News
The fallout from Trump's Afrikaner project on Ramaphosa's National Dialogue agenda
President Cyril Ramaphosa has defended BEE as an engine of growth. Image: GCIS President Cyril Ramaphosa's upcoming national dialogue aims to tackle critical issues facing the country, including the divisions sparked by US President Donald Trump's controversial offer of resettlement to white Afrikaners, alongside pressing concerns regarding unemployment and poor governance. On Wednesday, Ramaphosa announced the appointment of an 'eminent persons group,' comprising 31 South Africans, who will spearhead the National Dialogue scheduled for August 15. One of the eminent persons, who requested anonymity, said the dialogue can be seen as a response to concerns, aiming to address the country's challenges and promote national building. 'The issue should definitely come up, although everybody has a choice to leave the country. "We are way beyond the colour lines now and should focus on nation building with the people who are in the country, instead of dwelling in the past. 'Sure, it's a bone of contention but we do have bigger problems," she said. However, not all are on board with Ramaphosa's dialogue initiative. The uMkhonto weSizwe Party has rejected the dialogue as an "elitist farce," saying it is a "staged theatre for the political elite". In a statement its spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndhlela, asked why there were no ordinary South Africans, such as shack dwellers, represented? 'The so-called Eminent Persons Group, handpicked by the very same ruling class responsible for mass unemployment, deepening poverty, collapsing infrastructure and the ongoing betrayal of the Freedom Charter, is a mockery of the suffering endured daily by millions of destitute and despondent South African,' Ndhlela wrote. The EFF has also expressed skepticism, questioning the government's motives and the selection process for the Eminent Persons Group. "The challenges Ramaphosa's National Dialogue seek to address are not a product of triumph of human sacrifice against evil, which require collective national reconstruction, but are a product of man-made destruction and corruption of which he and the party he leads have been at the centre of," the EFF said in a statement. The DA's national spokesperson, Willie Aucamp, welcomed the National Dialogue saying his party would embrace the opportunity. 'I think it's high time that we as a nation get together and discuss collectively what we see as a road forward for this country,' he said. Build One South Africa (BOSA) described the announcement as a positive and necessary step forward for the country at a time of great political uncertainty, public anxiety, and economic malaise. The GOOD Party's general secretary Brett Herron said it was long overdue as the wait had been frustrating.


The Citizen
18 minutes ago
- The Citizen
‘Bring all to dialogue': Experts insist national dialogue must be people-driven
Political analysts stress the need for land restitution and broad participation to ensure a meaningful and effective national dialogue. Experts say the envisaged national dialogue must not be a top-down process, but people-driven and discuss contentious issues like land and racial polarisation. But more importantly, said one expert, the dialogue required full commitment from various actors to find a collective solution to the country's myriad problems. Political analyst and scholar Dominic Maphaka from North-West University said the dialogue was necessary to unite the diverse and divided country. National dialogue necessary to unite country He said, as outlined by President Cyril Ramaphosa, stakeholders, including business, labour, civil society, communities, youth and people with disabilities, should form part of the dialogue to chart the way forward. 'But the dialogue will require a commitment from various actors to form part of a collective solution to the myriad problems faced by the country,' Maphaka said. ALSO READ: Thandiswa Mazwai says she would've accepted invite to national dialogue had Ramaphosa sent it He alluded to the fact that, due to the vibrant civil society, nonstate actors were often at loggerheads with government and opposing its development policies. 'Despite having divergent ideologies, it is not far-fetched that South Africans share common problems in many areas. I therefore think that ideologies should not take precedence in the dialogue; instead, stakeholders should deliberate and find common policy solutions to address common policy problems,' Maphaka said. Ramaphosa yesterday said he would call a National Convention on 15 August, which would set the agenda for the National Dialogue. National Convention to set agenda A follow-up convention would be held early next year. He said the convention would be a representative gathering, bringing together government, political parties, civil society, business, labour, traditional leaders, religious leaders, cultural workers, sports organisations, women, youth and community voices. Some experts believed people and civil society, not government and political parties, should lead the planned dialogue process, including the convention. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa urges caution as floods claims lives in Eastern Cape Political analyst Lesiba Teffo said the national dialogue was not supposed to be driven by the state because that was where the seeds of its failure lay. 'It was contested from inception and some of the initiators are now in the periphery. A reasonable modality would be to start in the provinces whose reports would feed into the national convention. Otherwise, you are likely to end up with another voluminous, glossy and expensive National Development Plan 0.2 Vision 2040,' Teffo said. The need for an all-inclusive national dialogue was first proposed by former president Thabo Mbeki. Mbeki, assisted by Jacob Zuma, was the ANC's first chief negotiator at the pre-1994 Convention for a Democratic South Africa (Codesa) talks before they were replaced by Ramaphosa and Mohammed Valli Moosa. Need for national dialogue first proposed by Mbeki There seemed to be a common view that dialogue should involve various roleplayers – from civil society, to state, business, trade unions and political parties. It is understood that the struggle stalwarts' foundations were involved in consultations to kick off the process, while Nedlac was identified to play a role as one of the facilitators due to its composite nature with business, trade unions, community and government. ALSO READ: 'A meaningless publicity stunt by a limping president': EFF slams Ramaphosa's national dialogue call Political and heritage analyst George Tsibani, who supports the idea of a national dialogue, said such a gathering should address the question of land in its proper perspective. He said democratic South Africa was a result of a negotiated settlement that was underpinned by Sunset Clauses that were a compromise and did not address the land question. 'If we pretend that there was no compromise, it would take the focus away from the land issue. The land redistribution and restitution must form the cornerstone of national dialogue,' Tsibani said. Previous Codesa process failed The previous Codesa process failed to address many issues due to the Sunset Clause that allowed for the continuation of white control of the state. 'So Codesa 2 must address the land issue in its totality, meaning there must be a deliberate restitution of land for the people who lost their land during the colonial and slavery periods,' Tsibani said. NOW READ: Ramaphosa, Chief Justice mourn passing of Judge Temba Sangoni

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Ramaphosa and Trump to discuss trade relations at G7 Summit
President Cyril Ramaphosa and his US counterpart Donald Trump are set to meet, for the second time, at the G7 Summit expected to be held in Canada this weekend. Image: Supplied / GCIS President Cyril Ramaphosa is set to meet with US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the Group of Seven (G7) Summit in Canada this weekend. The meeting will focus on key issues, including the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) and US-SA tariffs. Ramaphosa's meeting with Trump comes after South Africa submitted a revised framework proposal to the US, aiming to expand trade and investment relations between the two countries. The US imposed tariffs on South African imports in April, with a 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs of 30% against South African exports. The tariffs were part of a broader set of 'liberation day' tariffs imposed by Trump on all US trading partners. However, they were later reduced to a base rate of 10%, with the expectation that countries would use the 90 days to propose solutions addressing the US's trade deficit concerns. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ramaphosa's meeting with Trump will be his second in about three weeks, following their tense encounter at the White House last month. During their previous meeting, Ramaphosa emphasised the importance of the US's role in the G20 Summit and invited Trump to attend the G20 Leaders' Summit in Johannesburg later this year. Trump agreed to attend, and Ramaphosa sees this as a positive development for bilateral relations. According to sources close to Ramaphosa, the meeting agenda will include discussions on AGOA, providing duty-free access to the US market for some African products. The agreement is set to expire in September, and South Africa is eager to see it renewed. Ramaphosa will also raise concerns about US-SA tariffs, urging the US not to increase them beyond the current 10% if negotiations on a new trade framework are not concluded by July 9. The sources further said the meeting between Ramaphosa and Trump was significant, given the current state of US-SA trade relations. 'The business sector has expressed concerns about the rise of tariffs, and Ramaphosa is under pressure to come up with answers. A successful meeting could help to ease tensions and pave the way for improved trade relations between the two countries,' the source added. Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya did not respond to questions as to what to expect at the upcoming meeting. However, Ramaphosa, while speaking to journalists on Tuesday after he announced the date for the National Dialogue on various issues affecting the country, confirmed that he would be meeting Trump, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Ramaphosa said he was invited by Carney, who holds the presidency of the G7, and would also use the opportunity to talk about the G20 Summit to be hosted by South Africa in November, where Trump will take over the presidency. 'We're going to use it as a platform to begin to consolidate what we want to achieve in November when the leaders' summit takes place here (in Johannesburg),' he said. Last month, Ramaphosa and his delegation included Minister of Trade and Industry Parks Tau, Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen, and International Relations Minister Ronald Lamola. His goals for that meeting included resetting US-SA relations and beginning serious engagement with the US on trade and investment. He emphasised that South Africa did not 'go kowtowing' to the White House but rather took the initiative to engage with the US. 'For us, it's important for us as a nation to reposition ourselves in the very turbulent geopolitical architecture or situation that we have,' Ramaphosa said at the time. Cape Times