Taiwan Blacklists Chinese technology company that is designated as 'National Security Threat' by the US
Taiwan has blacklisted China's Huawei Technologies Co. and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. According to a report in Bloomberg, Taiwan's International Trade Administration has included Huawei, SMIC and several of their subsidiaries in an update of its so-called strategic high-tech commodities entity list, according to the latest version that was made available on its website on Saturday, June 14. This is said to deal a serious blow to the two companies spearheading China's efforts to develop cutting-edge AI chip technologies. The change, which was not publicly announced, requires Taiwanese companies to obtain government approval before exporting to listed entities.
When America designated Huawei as 'National Security Threat'
Both the companies are also banned by the United States of America (USA). In June 2020 the America's Federal Communications Commission (FCC) designated two Chinese companies -- Huawei Technologies Company (Huawei) and ZTE Corporation (ZTE), as well as their parents, affiliates, and subsidiaries -- as covered companies for purposes of the agency's November 2019 ban on the use of universal service support to purchase equipment or services from companies posing a national security threat. America has also placed SMIC and some of its subsidiaries on the US entity list, which has significantly limited the companies' ability to acquire foreign technology.
Citing Taiwan's regulations, the report noted that the new restrictions could significantly limit Huawei and SMIC's access to Taiwan's plant construction technologies, materials, and equipment critical for producing AI semiconductors, such as those manufactured by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) for companies like Nvidia. The updated list also includes Huawei's units in Japan, Russia, and Germany.
In 2023, Bloomberg News reported that several Taiwanese firms were assisting Huawei in developing a covert network of chip plants in southern China. This latest move by Taipei may disrupt those efforts, further constraining the Chinese companies' semiconductor ambitions.
The report highlighted that Taiwan had previously imposed blanket bans on exporting chipmaking equipment, such as lithography machines, to China but had not targeted specific Chinese tech firms on its entity list until now. TSMC, a key supplier for Apple and Nvidia, halted supplies to Huawei in 2020 due to U.S. export controls.
Huawei and SMIC made headlines in 2023 by unveiling a 7-nanometer chip made in China, surprising U.S. policymakers. Despite global restrictions, the companies remain China's best hope for bridging the AI chip gap left by limited access to Nvidia's advanced semiconductors.
The restrictions come amid escalating tensions, with Taiwan President Lai Ching-te earlier this year labeling China a 'foreign hostile force' and introducing measures to counter infiltration, Bloomberg reported. China, which claims Taiwan as its territory and has threatened unification by force, has not yet responded to the new measures.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Surat police uncover cryptocurrency trail in cross-border cyber scam
Surat: In a major breakthrough, the Surat Detection of Crime Branch (DCB) has unearthed an international cybercrime racket with suspected links to China, Pakistan, and Myanmar. The operation came to light after a raid at a hotel in the Mahidharpura area, where two youths from Jodhpur were arrested. The accused — Ramswarup Bishnoi and Sagar Bishnoi, both 20 — were staying in Room 409 of Janta Inn Hotel near Surat railway station. Acting on a tip-off, DCB officials detained them and seized eight mobile phones, bank account kits, SIM cards, Aadhaar cards, diaries, and other suspicious documents. Preliminary investigation revealed financial transactions amounting to several crores of rupees, including large sums in cryptocurrency (USDT). Police said the duo had travelled to Surat to procure bank account kits to be used in fraudulent online operations. An FIR has been lodged against six people — five from Jodhpur and one from Surat. Analysis of the seized mobile phones revealed each device contained up to 19 email IDs linked to various bank accounts and transactional records. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo Several banking applications were installed and investigators found statements pointing to transactions running into crores. Accounts were found to be associated with several banks, including City Union Bank, Northeast Small Finance Bank, Federal Bank, State Bank of India, Bank of Maharashtra, and Ujjivan Small Finance Bank. Cryptocurrency wallets linked to high-value USDT transactions were also recovered. Police said digital evidence suggested coordination with international cybercrime syndicates operating through Telegram channels. One such group, named 'Bookkeeping Robot Ram,' was allegedly used by the network to share bank account details. According to investigators, the accused came in contact with the key conspirator, Pramod Bishnoi of Jodhpur, in Feb 2025. Pramod reportedly lured them with the promise of high returns in cryptocurrency trading and introduced them to Sanjay Gabu, a Surat-based contact who allegedly sold them 193 bank accounts. The accused then forwarded the bank kits and MPINs to Gnan Bishnoi and Shyam Bishnoi in Jodhpur, who uploaded the details to the Telegram group operated by Chinese handlers. Once money was deposited in the accounts, it was withdrawn and routed to Jodhpur via courier Vishnu Angadiya. The amount was then converted into cryptocurrency and transferred abroad using the Binance app. DCB officials have also raided multiple locations in Surat and detained additional suspects. BOX Levis-Jack and Jones products found In addition to digital evidence, DCB officials also seized branded merchandise including shoes, jeans, t-shirts, shirts, and bags from labels such as Levi's and Jack & Jones. A total of 68 articles valued at approximately Rs 2.28 lakh were confiscated. According to police, the accused admitted to purchasing these items from malls and retail outlets in Surat. They would allegedly damage the products and then contact the respective companies to claim refunds. Instead of returning the items, the accused would retain them and sell them for profit after securing the refund.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
AI experts divided over Apple's research on large reasoning model accuracy
A recent study by tech giant Apple claiming that the accuracy of frontier large reasoning models (LRMs) declines as task complexity increases, and eventually collapses altogether, has led to differing views among experts in the artificial intelligence (AI) world. The paper titled 'The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity' was published by Apple last week. Apple, in its paper, said it conducted experiments across diverse puzzles which show that such LRMs face a complete accuracy collapse beyond certain complexities. While their reasoning efforts increase with the complexity of a problem till a point, it then declines despite having an adequate token budget. A token budget for large language models (LLM) refers to the practice of setting a limit on the number of tokens an LLM can use for a specific task. The paper is co-authored by Samy Bengio, senior director, AI and ML research at Apple who is also the brother of Yoshua Bengio, often referred to as the godfather of AI. Meanwhile, AI company Anthropic, backed by Amazon, countered Apple's claims in a separate paper, saying that the 'findings primarily reflect experimental design limitations rather than fundamental reasoning failures.' 'Their central finding has significant implications for AI reasoning research. However, our analysis reveals that these apparent failures stem from experimental design choices rather than inherent model limitations,' it said. Mayank Gupta, founder of Swift Anytime, currently building an AI product on stealth, told Business Standard that both sides have equally important points. 'What this tells me is that we're still figuring out how to measure reasoning in LRMs the right way. The models are improving rapidly, but our evaluation tools haven't caught up. We need tools that separate how well an LRM reasons from how well it generates output and that's where the real breakthrough lies,' he said. Gary Marcus, a US academic, who has become a voice of caution on the capabilities of AI models, said in a best case scenario, these models can write python code, supplementing their own weaknesses with outside symbolic code, but even this is not reliable. 'What this means for business and society is that you can't simply drop o3 or Claude into some complex problem and expect it to work reliably,' he wrote in his blog, Marcus on AI. The Apple researchers conducted experiments comparing thinking and non-thinking model pairs across controlled puzzle environments. 'The most interesting regime is the third regime where problem complexity is higher and the performance of both models have collapsed to zero. Results show that while thinking models delay this collapse, they also ultimately encounter the same fundamental limitations as their non-thinking counterparts,' they wrote. Apple's observations in the paper perhaps can explain why the iPhone maker has been slow to embed AI across its products or operating systems, a point on which it was criticised at the Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) last week. This approach is opposite to the ones adopted by Microsoft-backed OpenAI, Meta, and Google, who are spending billions to build more sophisticated frontier models to solve more complex tasks. However, there are other voices too who believe that Apple's paper has its limitations. Ethan Mollick, associate professor at the Wharton School who studies the effects of AI on work, entrepreneurship, and education, mentioned on X that while the limits of reasoning models are useful, it is premature to say that LLMs are hitting a wall.
NDTV
4 hours ago
- NDTV
US-China Trade Talks Leave Military-Use Rare Earth Issue Unsettled: Sources
Beijing: The renewed US-China trade truce struck in London left a key area of export restrictions tied to national security untouched, an unresolved conflict that threatens a more comprehensive deal, two people briefed on detailed outcomes of the talks told Reuters. Beijing has not committed to grant export clearance for some specialized rare-earth magnets that US military suppliers need for fighter jets and missile systems, the people said. The United States maintains export curbs on China's purchases of advanced artificial intelligence chips out of concern that they also have military applications. At talks in London last week, China's negotiators appeared to link progress in lifting export controls on military-use rare earth magnets with the longstanding US curbs on exports of the most advanced AI chips to China. That marked a new twist in trade talks that began with opioid trafficking, tariff rates and China's trade surplus, but have since shifted to focus on export controls. In addition, US officials also signalled they are looking to extend existing tariffs on China for a further 90 days beyond the August 10 deadline agreed in Geneva last month, both sources said, suggesting a more permanent trade deal between the world's two largest economies is unlikely before then. The two people who spoke to Reuters about the London talks requested not to be named because both sides have tightly controlled disclosure. The White House, State Department and Department of Commerce did not immediately respond to requests for comment. China's Foreign and Commerce ministries did not respond to faxed requests for comment. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the handshake deal reached in London between American and Chinese negotiators was a "great deal," adding, "we have everything we need, and we're going to do very well with it. And hopefully they are too." And US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said there would be no "quid pro quo" on easing curbs on exports of AI chips to China in exchange for access to rare earths. China Chokehold But China's chokehold on the rare earth magnets needed for weapons systems remains a potential flashpoint. China dominates global production of rare earths and holds a virtual monopoly on refining and processing. A deal reached in Geneva last month to reduce bilateral tariffs from crushing triple-digit levels had faltered over Beijing's restrictions on critical minerals exports that took shape in April. That prompted the Trump administration to respond with export controls preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, jet engines for Chinese-made planes and other goods to China. At the London talks, China promised to fast-track approval of rare-earth export applications from non-military US manufacturers out of the tens of thousands currently pending, one of the sources said. Those licenses will have a six-month term. Beijing also offered to set up a "green channel" for expediting license approvals from trusted US companies. Initial signals were positive, with Chinese rare-earths magnet producer JL MAG Rare-Earth, saying on Wednesday it had obtained export licences that included the United States, while China's Commerce Ministry confirmed it had approved some "compliant applications" for export licences. But China has not budged on specialized rare earths, including samarium, which are needed for military applications and are outside the fast-track agreed in London, the two people said. Automakers and other manufacturers largely need other rare earth magnets, including dysprosium and terbium. Big Issues Remain The rushed trade meeting in London followed a call last week between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Trump said US tariffs would be set at 55% for China, while China had agreed to 10% from the United States. Trump initially imposed tariffs on China as punishment for its massive trade surplus to the United States and over what he says is Beijing's failure to stem the flow of the powerful opioid fentanyl into the US Chinese analysts are pessimistic about the likelihood of further breakthroughs before the August 10 deadline agreed in Geneva. "Temporary mutual accommodation of some concerns is possible but the fundamental issue of the trade imbalance cannot be resolved within this timeframe, and possibly during Trump's remaining term," said Liu Weidong, a US-China expert at the Institute of American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. An extension of the August deadline could allow the Trump administration more time to establish an alternative legal claim for setting higher tariffs on China under the Section 301 authority of the USTR in case Trump loses the ongoing legal challenge to the tariffs in US court, one of the people with knowledge of the London talks said. The unresolved issues underscore the difficulty the Trump administration faces in pushing its trade agenda with China because of Beijing's control of rare earths and its willingness to use that as leverage with Washington, said Ryan Hass, director of the John L. Thornton China Center at the Brookings Institution. "It has taken the Trump team a few punches in the nose to recognise that they will no longer be able to secure another trade agreement with China that disproportionately addresses Trump's priorities," Hass said.
