
Mexicans elect their judges under shadow of crime, corruption
Mexicans chose their judges Sunday in unprecedented elections that sharply divided opinion in a country plagued by rampant crime, corruption and impunity.
The government and its supporters said the reform making Mexico the world's only nation to select all of its judges and magistrates by popular vote was needed to clean up a rotten justice system.
Arturo Giesemann, a 57-year-old retiree, said his main motivation for voting was "the disgust I have with the current judiciary because of its corruption."
Turnout appeared to be low as many voters struggled to choose from hundreds of largely unknown candidates.
"We are not very prepared," said Lucia Calderon, a 63-year-old university teacher. "I think we need more information."
In the western state of Jalisco, 63-year-old housewife Maria Estrada said she used her "intuition" as she did not know the candidates.
Experts were concerned that the elections would politicize the justice system and make it easier for criminals to influence the courts with threats and bribery.
AFP | Alfredo ESTRELLA
While corruption already exists, "there is reason to believe that elections may be more easily infiltrated by organised crime than other methods of judicial selection," Margaret Satterthwaite, the United Nations special rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, told AFP.
Hundreds of opponents of the reforms marched through Mexico City waving flags and banners with slogans including: "Hands off our democracy" and "No to electoral fraud."
The elections send the judiciary "to its grave," said Ismael Novela, a 58-year-old company worker.
"It was the last counterweight we had against the totalitarianism of the executive branch."
- 'Regime of corruption' -
President Claudia Sheinbaum hit back at her critics on the eve of the vote.
"Those who want the regime of corruption and privileges in the judiciary to continue say this election is rigged. Or they also say it's so a political party can take over the Supreme Court," she said in a video message.
"Nothing could be further from the truth," she insisted.
The run-up to the vote was not accompanied by the kind of violence that often targets politicians in Mexico.
But "it is logical that organised criminal groups would have approached judges and candidates who are important to them," said consultant Luis Carlos Ugalde, a former head of Mexico's electoral commission.
Rights group Defensorxs has identified around 20 candidates it considers "high risk," including Silvia Delgado, a former lawyer for Sinaloa Cartel co-founder Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman.
Another aspiring judge, in Durango state, spent almost six years in prison in the United States for drug crimes.
- 'Good reputation' -
Voters were tasked with choosing around 880 federal judges -- including Supreme Court justices -- as well as hundreds of local judges and magistrates. Another election for the remainder will be held in 2027.
AFP | Rodrigo Oropeza
Candidates are supposed to have a law degree, experience in legal affairs and what is termed "a good reputation," as well as no criminal record.
To do a good job, voters "would have to spend hours and hours researching the track record and the profiles of each of the hundreds of candidates," said David Shirk, a professor at the University of San Diego.
He believes that most of the corruption in Mexico's judicial system is in law enforcement agencies and public prosecutor's offices.
"If you can avoid being prosecuted, you don't have to worry about the judge," said Shirk, who heads the Justice in Mexico research project.
The judicial reforms were championed by Sheinbaum's predecessor and mentor, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who frequently clashed with the courts before stepping down last year.
The main reason for the elections seems to be "because Lopez Obrador had a grudge against the judges," Shirk said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Trump's false claims: challenging negative narratives with the warmth and beauty of the 'rainbow nation'
US President Donald Trump uses an image taken in Congo as proof of his claims that there is a genocide against Afrikaner farmers in South Africa. Image: AFP Amidst the backdrop of misinformation surrounding South Africa's socio-political landscape, South African Tourism invites the world to experience the country's rich diversity and vibrant culture, challenging negative narratives with the warmth and beauty of the 'Rainbow Nation'. This comes in the wake of a controversial meeting between President Cyril Ramaphosa and US President Donald Trump, where unfounded claims regarding genocide against Afrikaner farmers in South Africa were raised. During their meeting last month in the Oval Office, Trump labelled the situation facing Afrikaner farmers as one of 'genocide". However, Ramaphosa denied these claims, asserting that while South Africa faces significant crime challenges, they affect citizens across all racial backgrounds and he asked for assistance to address the high levels of crime. As international scrutiny mounts, a second wave of Afrikaners landed in the US last week under Trump's controversial resettlement programme that will eventually see 8,000 individuals relocating. In 2018, during his first term in office, Trump referred to countries on the African continent as 'shithole countries'. According to reports, in addressing concerns about false narratives affecting South Africa's global image, Michael Delaney, general manager of Radisson RED Johannesburg-Rosebank, cautioned against narratives seeking to make South Africa look bad and argued the importance of highlighting the country's positive attributes. 'Many of the misconceptions can be countered by showcasing the friendliness of its people, natural beauty, and cultural diversity,' he said, noting that most international visitors' perceptions of South Africa tend to improve significantly once they arrive. Trump's religious advisor, Pastor Mark Burns, visited South Africa to investigate the alleged genocide of white Afrikaner farmers. He later dismissed the EFF and Julius Malema as attention seekers for chanting 'Kill the Boer, kill the farmer.' Tourism bodies and an international relations specialist responded to inquiries about the actions taken and necessary measures needed to challenge Trump's genocide narrative. Toni Gumede, manager in the office of the CEO of Brand South Africa, said since Trump took office, Brand SA has consistently responded to his statements in line with the country's values. 'Ours is to continually drive messaging that not only balances whatever the narrative may be in the environment, but to highlight facts from misinformation in all our touchpoints domestically and internationally,' she said. She said Brand SA's nation branding mandate encompasses the promotion of South Africa's image, competitiveness, institutional credibility, and attractiveness for investment, tourism, trade, and skills mobility. 'Brand South Africa is tasked with improving how South Africa is perceived globally. The objective is to position the country as an attractive destination to invest in, visit, work, study, or do business with,' she said. Gumede said as an organisation, Brand SA continuously implements both proactive and reactive strategies through communications, marketing, and stakeholder engagements across the globe to ensure that we influence perceptions about the country. 'We work with and through a broad spectrum of partners and stakeholders, including business, civil society, and government,' she said. Some of the issues that Brand SA has addressed is South Africa's Expropriation Act of 2025 and the legacy of land dispossession among others. Gumede said Brand SA also drives a domestic programme called Play Your Part to get South Africans involved in positive social impact, including those in the diaspora, our very own Global South Africans, and ensure visibility/messaging about South Africa at global platforms like WEF, the recent SA-France investment Forum, and many others. 'According to the 2025 Global Reputation Study conducted by Bloom Consulting and Brand SA, South Africa's global brand equity is on an upward trajectory, with five out of six key dimensions showing improvement: Exports, Investment, Tourism, Work, and Study,' she said. Gumede said taken together, these results affirm the strategic value of Brand South Africa's interventions globally. 'Nearing or exceeding global affinity thresholds in Exports and Investment, and showing resilience across other dimensions, the nation brand is increasingly seen as credible, competitive, and globally connected which is a critical enabler for trade, tourism, and human capital attraction,' she said. Global manager PR and communications for South African Tourism, Thandiwe Mathibela, said South Africa stands ready to welcome travellers from across the globe. 'We invite the world to discover the joy of South Africa - for a memorable, long-lasting experience,' she said. Home to over 60 million people, Mathibela said South Africa celebrates unity in diversity. 'The spirit of ubuntu — shared humanity — defines our national character. South Africa's social fabric is defined by the everyday coexistence of people from diverse backgrounds, reflecting the stability and cohesion that support our broader economic and tourism environment.' In 2024, Mathibela said over 8.5 million international visitors chose South Africa, with continued growth from markets including the US, UK, Germany, China, and the rest of Africa. 'As we prepare to host the G20 Leaders' Summit in November this year, our ability to deliver secure, high-level global events has been reaffirmed,' she said. Mathibela emphasised that safety is a priority, and that the government is actively investing in traveller safety through expanded safety monitor programmes and infrastructure upgrades. 'South Africa continues to invest in quality-assured tourism facilities to ensure high service excellence and seamless sustainable visitor experience.' International relations expert André Thomashausen argued that South Africa should rely on facts and refer to the recently updated "Investigative Report on White Murders in South Africa Since 1992" by the European Centre for Information Policy and Security ( He said this is an unbiased assessment that records 12,567 farm attacks over the past 3 decades and that this cannot be 'wished away.' The report states that in 2019 alone, there were 552 attacks and 57 murders, primarily targeting white farm owners and their families, and although white farmers are disproportionately affected due to their prevalence in commercial farming, farm workers and smallholders of all races are also victims. Robbery is the main motive, with racially or politically motivated attacks being rare. The report recommended improved intelligence, data transparency, crime prevention strategies, and balanced public communication to tackle farm attacks amidst South Africa's complex environment. 'The SA government count since 1994 indicates 3,398 murdered farmers. The Wikipedia entry on 'South African Farm Attacks' refers to a murder rate of 274 per 100,000 farmers, as against a national average of 61 per 100,000,' said Thomashausen. Thomashausen said South African farmers make up the profession suffering from the highest murder risk, in South Africa and even globally. 'It is good that the recent presidential meeting in Washington DC has refocused the debates on South Africa's inequality index, giving it [the] worst Gini coefficients recorded anywhere. This cannot be resolved by 'nationalising' relative and absolute wealth but only by an aggressive economic growth and employment policy,' he said. According to Thomashausen, the meeting in Washington DC behind closed doors focused on how to overcome the development failure in the South African economy. 'Hopefully this will reflect in the abolishment of tariffs on both sides and stronger foreign investment support for South Africa.' [email protected]


The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
The political struggles and aspirations of disabled youth in South Africa
SEDIBENG.- June, despite its winterisation in South Africa, remains a month of reflection and action, dedicated to the youth who have historically shaped the nation's political and social landscape. The definition of youth remains contested both globally and locally. While the United Nations generally defines youth as individuals between the ages of 15 and 24, South Africa's National Youth Policy broadly defines youth as persons between the ages of 14 and 35. These differences often stem from varying socio-economic contexts and developmental priorities. The UN's definition is often linked to global demographic trends and the transition from adolescence to early adulthood, while South Africa's broader age range acknowledges the extended period many young people face in terms of education, employment, and economic independence, often due to historical disadvantages. These differences also highlight the complex intersection of developmental, political, and cultural factors influencing the concept of youth in South Africa. Looking back, the youth of 1976 in South Africa, facing oppressive apartheid policies, fought for the right to express themselves freely, particularly through language and education. The Soweto Uprising, driven by student protests against the enforcement of Afrikaans as a medium of instruction, epitomized their quest for liberation and cultural affirmation. These courageous youths defied systemic barriers, risking their lives for the fundamental right to learn and speak in their own languages. The protest escalated into a nationwide movement for freedom. Many young people were killed, and some were maimed, permanently disabled by the state's violence. This group of politically conscious survivors laid the groundwork for the South African disability rights movement of 1984. Far from passive victims, these youth transformed their personal trauma into political action. They understood that disability was not just a medical condition but a consequence of structural violence and systemic exclusion. Their activism reflected a growing awareness that the fight for liberation could not ignore those disabled by the very system it sought to overthrow. These youth redefined disability as both a political and social issue, demanding recognition not only of physical access but also of voice, representation, and dignity. Within the disabled youth, however, there exists a significant divide, not just between those who attend special schools versus mainstream schools, but also in perceptions of identity and community. Special schools often promote a sense of community rooted in shared experiences of disability, whereas mainstream schools can foster integration but also feelings of marginalization. This concealed disunity undermines the collective strength needed for advocacy, potentially leading disabled youth to realize, in adulthood, that being labeled 'disabled' is more than a health condition, it is an identity rooted in social barriers and societal perceptions. Recognizing this, the fight for a barrier-free society must encompass both educational and societal reforms that unite all disabled youth under common goals. The disabled youth of today must seize both educational and vocational opportunities to empower themselves and shape their future. Examples of educational opportunities include pursuing higher education in various fields such as law, science, arts, or technology, often with the support of disability units in universities and colleges. Vocational opportunities encompass skills training in areas like IT, graphic design, entrepreneurship, trades, and various forms of self-employment. Furthermore, there is an urgent need to expand the 'disability intelligentsia', a body of knowledge and thought leadership driven by disabled individuals themselves. This means fostering critical thinking and research among disabled youth, enabling them to contribute to the development of new models of disability. While the medical model views disability as an individual deficit to be 'fixed,' and the social model frames disability as a result of societal barriers, there is a clear need for a synthesis. This hybrid model would acknowledge the diverse lived experiences of disabled individuals, recognizing both the biological realities of impairment and the profound impact of societal structures. In conclusion, youth remains a dynamic, flexible stage of life, capable of leaving lasting legacies for future generations. The resilience, activism, and innovation of disabled youth will significantly shape South Africa's journey toward an inclusive society. Their collective efforts can dismantle barriers, both physical and societal, and redefine what it means to have a disability in a free and equitable environment. As history has shown, when empowered, youth can be the catalysts for profound social transformation, an inheritance that continues to inspire generations to come. (Lucky Tumahole is a Disability Advocate, this is his opinion) At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!

The Herald
10 hours ago
- The Herald
Trump bans nationals from 12 countries, citing security concerns
US President Donald Trump signed a proclamation on Wednesday banning the nationals of 12 countries from entering the US, saying the move was needed to protect against 'foreign terrorists' and other security threats. The countries affected are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The entry of people from seven other countries: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela, will be partially restricted. The travel restrictions were first reported by CBS News. 'We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm,' Trump said in a video posted on X. He said the list could be revised and new countries could be added. The proclamation is effective on June 9 at 12:01am EDT (0401 GMT). Visas issued before that date will not be revoked, the order said. During his first term in office, Trump announced a ban on travellers from seven majority-Muslim nations, a policy that went through several iterations before it was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. Former President Joe Biden, a Democrat who succeeded Trump, repealed the ban in 2021, calling it 'a stain on our national conscience'. Trump said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbour a 'large-scale presence of terrorists', fail to co-operate on visa security and have an inability to verify travellers' identities, inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the US. 'We cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter the US,' Trump said. He cited Sunday's incident in Boulder, Colorado, in which a man tossed a petrol bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators as an example of why the new restrictions are needed. An Egyptian national, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, has been charged in the attack. Federal officials said Soliman had overstayed his tourist visa and had an expired work permit — though Egypt is not on the list of countries facing travel limits. Somalia immediately pledged to work with the US to address security issues. 'Somalia values its long-standing relationship with the US and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised,' Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the US, said. Trump's directive is part of an immigration crackdown that he launched at the start of his second term. He previewed his plan in an October 2023 speech, pledging to restrict people from the Gaza Strip, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen and 'anywhere else that threatens our security'. Trump issued an executive order on January 20 requiring intensified security vetting of any foreigners seeking admission to the US to detect national security threats. That order directed several cabinet members to submit a list of countries from which travel should be partly or fully suspended because their 'vetting and screening information is so deficient'. In March, Reuters reported that the Trump administration was considering travel restrictions on dozens of countries. Reuters