EU presses North Macedonia to make 'era-defining' decisions for membership
The European Union's top foreign policy official on Friday urged North Macedonia to take 'era-defining' decisions to advance its bid for EU membership.
Speaking in the capital Skopje alongside Prime Minister Hristijan Mickoski, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas reaffirmed the bloc's support but stressed that progress depends on multiple domestic reforms.
'The road to membership is not easy, so my message today is to stay on the course and to take next steps necessary towards the opening of the negotiations," Kallas said. 'North Macedonia faces era-defining choices for its citizens and its future.'
Key among those steps is a constitutional amendment to formally recognize a Bulgarian minority — a condition set by EU neighbor Bulgaria to lift its veto of North Macedonian membership. The issue has become a political flashpoint in North Macedonia, where the conservative government insists that EU accession should not be affected by bilateral disputes.
Although the European Union has not accepted any new members since Croatia's accession in 2013, the war in Ukraine and concerns for broader European stability have refocused efforts to advance membership bids.
'The integration of the Western Balkans into the EU is the best recipe for peace and security,' Kallas said. 'We are ready to support North Macedonia in strengthening the rule of law, fighting corruption, and modernizing public administration.'
North Macedonia and Albania began membership talks with the EU in 2022 after years of delays, largely driven by Bulgaria's veto over cultural and historical disagreements with Skopje. Albania has since moved ahead in the process.
Mickoski reiterated his position that Bulgaria must first approve North Macedonia's membership before any constitutional change.
'We belong in the EU not because someone owes it to us, but because we've built a democracy based on European values,' the prime minister. 'We expect fair treatment and consistent leadership from the Union.'
Kallas' visit to Skopje was part of a broader two-day tour of the Western Balkans. Six regional countries are at various stages of EU accession. Montenegro and Albania lead the process, while Bosnia, Kosovo, Serbia, and North Macedonia lag behind.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Keir Starmer and Labour are accused of standing in the way of a ban on cousins marrying each other - after poll shows British people want it axed
Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour party are standing in the way of a ban on cousins marrying each other, after a new poll showed an overwhelming majority of Britons want to see it axed, a Conservative MP has claimed. Conservative MP Richard Holden last year introduced a private members' bill to ban the practice, which would bring cousin marriages into the same bracket as marrying a parent, child, sibling or grandparent. Now a new YouGov poll has revealed the British communities that are most likely to back first cousin marriages, with a large majority thinking the practice should be outlawed. The former Cabinet Minister and Conservative Party Chairman told MailOnline: 'This YouGov poll is clear. 'The overwhelming majority of Brits, including those of Pakistani heritage, want to see first cousin marriage banned. 'The fact Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour Party are standing in the way of ending an outdated practice rooted in misogynistic cultural practices shows that he's more interested in promoting cultural relativism than in ending practices that have no place in our country and isolate both individuals and communities from each other. 'If Starmer really believed in British values he'd back my bill, just like every community in Britain does.' Pakistani and Bangladeshi Britons are most likely to support the first cousin marriages, with 39 percent of those polled saying it should be legal. While 47 percent of the community say the practice should not be legal, this compares to just eight percent of white Britons who support first-cousin marriage. Six percent of black Britons say marrying a cousin should be legal, with nine percent of Indian Britons holding the same view. While marrying close relatives including siblings and half-siblings is illegal in the UK, marrying a first cousin is technically legal. Some 77 percent of white and Indian Britons believe marrying a cousin should be made illegal, compared to 82 percent of black Britons. Currently the UK follows the practice of 'genetic counselling', in which first cousins who are in a relationship are offered education about the risk of having children together and encouraged to receive extra checks during pregnancy. It is estimated that children of a first-cousin union have a six percent chance of inheriting a recessive disorder such as cystic fibrosis or sickle cell disease - double the risk of the general population. But some have warned that outlawing the practice completely risks stigmatising those already in first cousin marriages in the UK. Amongst these was Independent MP Iqbal Mohamed, who drew huge criticism last year for defending cousin marriage. Instead of banning it outright, he said a 'more positive approach' involving advanced genetic tests for prospective married cousins would be more effective in addressing issues around it. One of Britain's foremost experts on child health also defended the right for first cousins to marry, dismissing concerns about inbreeding. Professor Dominic Wilkinson, an NHS neonatologist and ethics expert at the University of Oxford, argued a ban would be 'unethical'. Instead, Professor Wilkinson backed calls for such couples to be offered special screening on the NHS to help them decide if they should have children. Such tests can cost £1,200 privately. They are designed to spot whether prospective parents are carriers for the same genetic conditions, such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy. It comes as data from 2023 showed in three inner-city Bradford wards, 46 percent of mothers from the Pakistani community are married to a first or second cousin, according to data published in 2023. The overall estimate for the cousing marriage capital of the UK in Pakistani couples was 37 percent ten years ago, and this figure has since dropped. Reasons behind the fall are thought to include high educational attainment, stricter immigration rules and changes in family dynamics. It compares to just one percent of white British couples. YouGov's data also revealed that those in London are most likely to support first cousin marriage, at 15 percent. The north followed at 12 percent, while in the Midlands it was ten percent. The south of England and Wales were the least likely to support it being legal, at six and seven percent respectively. Historically, first cousin marriages were extremely common amongst royalty and the British upper classes. It was seen as a way of firming up alliances and keeping wealth and land in the family. MailOnline recently revealed that no-one is tracking the rate of cousin marriages in the UK, with councils not recording any data on the issue. Studies have put Pakistan as having one of the highest rates globally at 65 percent of unions. This is followed by Saudi Arabia (50 percent), Afghanistan (40 percent), Iran (30 percent) and Egypt and Turkey (20 percent).
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Kemi Badenoch says office managers should be able to ban women from wearing face coverings
Office managers should be able to ban employees from wearing burkas, Kemi Badenoch has said. The Tory leader hit out at the Islamic traditional dress and said she had 'strong views about face coverings' and would not allow people into her constituency surgeries if they wore them. Her remarks came after Reform's chairman Zia Yusuf quit following a row over the subject after his colleague MP Sarah Pochin urged the Prime Minister to ban the burka 'in the interests of public safety'- before rejoining on Saturday night. Mrs Badenoch said Britain could enforce a ban on burkas but what needs to be addressed are pressing issues around integration. She added that sharia courts and first-cousin marriage are an 'insidious' barrier to integration. She said: 'If you were to ask me where you start with integration – sharia courts, all of this nonsense sectarianism, things like first cousin marriage – there's a whole heap of stuff that is far more insidious and that breeds more problems. 'My view is that people should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear.' She added: 'If you come into my constituency surgery, you have to remove your face covering, whether it's a burka or a balaclava. 'I'm not talking to people who are not going to show me their face, and I also believe that other people should have that control. 'Organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear; it shouldn't be something that people should be able to override.' France is just one of a number of countries that have already banned the burka. But Mrs Badenoch said: 'France has a ban and they have worse problems than we do in this country on integration. So banning the burka clearly is not the thing that's going to fix things.' If employers started to tell staff to remove any religious clothing, they could face legal issues under equality and human rights laws on the grounds they were being discriminating. An organisation would have to demonstrate its ban was for a legitimate reason, such as ensuring health and safety or enabling effective communication.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
So much for smashing the gangs! Starmer claims the secret to solving the small-boat crisis is a crackdown on people smugglers, but soft-touch French judges let them walk free from court with merely a slap on the wrist
French judges were last night accused of 'going soft' on criminals orchestrating a wave of small-boat crossings to Britain after a string of convicted people smugglers were allowed to dodge prison. An investigation by The Mail on Sunday can today expose how criminals convicted of involvement in people trafficking have been allowed to walk free with a slap on the wrist by French courts – even when they were caught red-handed. In one of the most shocking cases, a married couple were last week handed suspended sentences and allowed to return home to Germany despite being caught with an inflatable dinghy, 50 life jackets and phones full of the numbers of migrants willing to pay thousands of pounds to make the perilous Channel crossing to England. And in another astonishing verdict, a suspected Iraqi people smuggler allegedly involved in last weekend's record number of small-boat crossings was 'given the benefit of the doubt' and acquitted by a French court, even though police found a 20-seat inflatable boat in the boot of the car he was in. A delighted Ibrahim Hussein, 36, blew kisses at the three judges who cleared him. Details of the extraordinary leniency by judges in northern France come as Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch last night demanded the freedom to deny migrants benefits – a move currently restrained by European human rights laws. Writing in today's MoS, Mrs Badenoch said it was 'fundamentally unfair' that after five years migrants can claim the same benefits as UK citizens regardless of whether they have paid taxes. French police officers were last weekend photographed on a beach idly watching as dozens of migrants waded into the Channel and climbed on to a dinghy. Writing in today's MoS, Mrs Badenoch said it was 'fundamentally unfair' that after five years migrants can claim the same benefits as UK citizens regardless of whether they have paid taxes France is reportedly poised to demand millions of pounds in extra cash to help intercept Channel migrants. Ministers are close to agreeing a deal to lift a ban on French police stopping boats in shallow water. But president Emmanuel Macron is expected to demand that the UK stump up even more money to pay for the law enforcement. The UK is already paying Paris £480million over three years to stop the Channel crossings. Now our exclusive investigation of the French courts can reveal: A man from Azerbaijan was convicted of people smuggling after being caught delivering an 18ft inflatable boat and its engine – but walked free from court in Dunkirk with a suspended sentence. A Bosnian who admitted transporting four boats to smugglers escaped with an eight-month suspended sentence. The woman, 19, who lived in Germany, said she had just passed her driving test and 'wanted to get away to France'. A 19-year old from Chad also got a suspended sentence in Boulogne on Wednesday after collecting hundreds of thousands of pounds from UK-bound migrants. Critics last night warned the paltry sentences risked torpedoing Keir Starmer's repeated pledge to 'smash the gangs' in a bid to secure the UK's borders. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'So much for Starmer's vow to smash the gangs. Despite being paid hundreds of millions of pounds, the French are clearly barely lifting a finger to stop this evil trade in illegal immigrants which has led to dozens of deaths. 'The French are taking Starmer and the UK taxpayer for a ride.' And Alp Mehmet, of Migration Watch UK, said French judges had 'gone soft', adding: 'It's a disgrace. These pathetic and weak judgments make it open season for these ruthless criminals.' There were extraordinary scenes in a court in Dunkirk last Monday when Afghans Idris Osman, 37, and his wife Tahmina, 36, walked free after being convicted of involvement in a people smuggling operation. Family members, who had travelled from their home in Germany, cheered after the couple were handed eight-month suspended sentences and banned from France for ten years. Three days earlier, they were arrested after their German-registered Mazda was seen close to a beach at Leffrinckoucke, near Dunkirk. A search revealed an inflatable boat, outboard motor, cans of fuel and 50 life jackets. Brazen Idris Osman attempted to blame his wife, saying: 'She's the one who has the contacts with the man who organised the trip – a Kurd named Djmal. I thought we were going to Belgium for a wedding and that we were transporting a recreational boat.' The couple were paid around £3,600 for the trip, the court heard. On the same day, Syrian Taher Al Arrag, 45, and Iraqi Ibrahim Hussein, 36, appeared in a French court accused of offences related to people smuggling last weekend. Some 1,200 migrants arrived in the UK last Saturday – a record for a single day this year. Pictured: a group of people believed to be migrants carry a boat which may be used to cross the Channel. The social media footage comes as Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch last night demanded the freedom to deny migrants benefits – a move currently restrained by European human rights laws French gendarmes stopped the pair in an Opel Vectra in Neufmoulin, near Abbeville. In the boot, police found five 20-litre cans of fuel, a 20-seat inflatable boat, an outboard engine and 35 life jackets. Both said they were going to use the boat to get to Britain themselves, despite leaving their families in Germany. Hussein, who had been in the passenger seat, was acquitted after judges gave him the 'benefit of the doubt'. Al Arrg was convicted of 'aiding the illegal movement of foreigners' and jailed for a year, with the possibility of parole after two months. In another case, a man from Azerbaijan, referred to only by the initials RR, was arrested on May 25 after his car spun out of control during a police chase. Officers found a boat, fuel and 42 life jackets in the car. He was also arrested on May 18 while delivering a boat and its engine to a beach. But at a court in Dunkirk on May 30, judges gave him a one-year suspended sentence. Germany is a key part of the supply chain for boats used by the gangs. Boats from Turkey with Chinese-sourced engines are transported to German warehouses before being covertly moved to the French coast.
