'New way forward' for youth hub as school moves in
A neglected Paignton community youth hub is to be brought back to life as part of a radical new strategy for local children.
Mayfield School, a school for children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND, will become the main long-term user of the building known as New Parkfield.
The centre was built in 2011 with £4.8m from the government's MyPlace funds as a hub for community youth services and included a BMX track, sports hall, climbing wall, recording studio, cafe and skate park.
Mayfield's headteacher Stuart Heron said the bay faced a "perfect storm" of demand for SEND services and New Parkfield could provide a solution.
He said: "A venue like this could be such a life-enhancing opportunity – a place where young people can go and feel safe."
The building off Colin Road has never been fully used, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
It was most recently home to the Medical Tuition Service, for children who cannot attend other schools because of their medical needs.
The lease is being handed to the People's Parkfield community interest company, which already manages the track and skate park.
Mayfield will be the main tenant and will use the building during school hours, with People's Parkfield running it during evenings and weekends.
Torbay councillor Chris Lewis (Con, Preston) said: "New Parkfield has lost its way. This is a new way forward."
He paid tribute to the company's work on the rest of the site and added: "In the past few years it just hasn't been used."
Conservative Nick Bye, who represents Wellswood, told the council's cabinet: "This is a new beginning – the start of a new deal for our children and young people. It is important that we do things differently.
"We absolutely have to do better for our children and young people."
He said New Parkfield never lived up to its expectations as a centre for youth activities.
Follow BBC Devon on X, Facebook and Instagram. Send your story ideas to spotlight@bbc.co.uk.
Activity centre may open up to all young people
Teenage activity centre is opened
MyPlace programme
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
Is AI About Relationships?
In a way, the new technologies that we are seeing really highlight the role of humans in our world. Sure, we're using them to build things autonomously. There will be job displacement. But at the same time, there are stakeholder relationships that really make a difference day to day. For now, humans are still in the driver's seat. Navin Chaddha runs Mayfield, an investment firm that invests in seed rounds and A rounds, as well as B rounds of funding. The company boasts 120 IPOs and over 225 mergers and acquisitions. I interviewed Chaddha at Imagination in Action in April about the moving parts involved in making AI -related deals. One thing that came through is that as an investor, Chaddha wants to invest with partners early. 'The basic idea is, how do we become partners of entrepreneurs at the ideation stage, primarily when they are coming up with an idea, and help them create a company?' he said. 'We start with people, because our belief is people build products. People build companies. It's not the other way around.' Other suggestions offered by Chaddha in investment strategy involved looking for products that fit solutions, and valuing an approach over a time frame. He mentioned AI-native design as a goal. 'Our belief is (that) AI will manifest digital companions who collaborate with humans to help elevate them to become super-humans,' he said, promoting an idea he described as 'collaborative intelligence as a service' or, alternately, 'teammates as a service.' AI Teammates Karen Lee 'Every business function, every consumer function, is going to have a buddy, a teammate,' he said. At one point, talk turned to how humans and machines will communicate in the years ahead. After the iPhone, Chaddha suggested, it's hard to have a new user interface, but verbal chat, he imagined, could become the way of the future, for no-hands communication. 'The interface will be natural language,' he said. Evolution of User Interfaces Karen Lee We also talked about what I called 'the cognitive economy' and augmented intelligence. '(AI is) allowing humans to have cognitive capabilities, and together we're going to be able to do things which we weren't able to do before,' Chaddha said, invoking the ideas of superhuman speed and superhuman cognition. 'AI is a tool. It's a technology. We are the jockey, we're not the horse.' I also wanted to talk about Chaddha's assertion that we should be doing more events about AI in these years. 'We invest in relationships,' he said. 'Let's grow the pie. Let's bring the brightest people to the right relationships.' That jibed with me, as I want to continue putting on these events and setting up the broadest tent possible. I'll be bringing you more from IIA's April event soon, to showcase all of what went on, and why it matters. More resources here: Navin's World Economic Forum article on AI Teammates and a deep dive into Collaborative Intelligence as a Service.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Government struggles to cut foreign aid spent on asylum hotels
The government is struggling to cut the amount of foreign aid it spends on hotel bills for asylum seekers in the UK, the BBC has learnt. New figures released quietly by ministers in recent days show the Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of overseas development assistance (ODA) this financial year - that is only marginally less than the £2.3bn it spent in 2024/25. The money is largely used to cover the accommodation costs of thousands of asylum seekers who have recently arrived in the UK. The Home Office said it was committed to ending asylum hotels and was speeding up asylum decisions to save taxpayers' money. The figures were published on the Home Office website with no accompanying notification to media. Foreign aid is supposed to be spent alleviating poverty by providing humanitarian and development assistance overseas. But under international rules, governments can spend some of their foreign aid budgets at home to support asylum seekers during the first year after their arrival. According to the most recent Home Office figures, there are about 32,000 asylum seekers in hotels in the UK. Labour promised in its manifesto to "end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds". Contracts signed by the Conservative government in 2019 were expected to see £4.5bn of public cash paid to three companies to accommodate asylum seekers over a 10-year period. But a report by spending watchdog the National Audit Office (NAO) in May said that number was expected to be £15.3bn. Asylum accommodation costs set to triple, says watchdog Asylum hotel companies vow to hand back some profits On June 3, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told the Home Affairs Committee she was "concerned about the level of money" being spent on asylum seekers' accommodation and added: "We need to end asylum hotels altogether." The Home Office said it was trying to bear down on the numbers by reducing the time asylum seekers can appeal against decisions. It is also planning to introduce tighter financial eligibility checks to ensure only those without means are housed. But Whitehall officials and international charities have said the Home Office has no incentive to reduce ODA spending because the money does not come out of its budgets. The scale of government aid spending on asylum hotels has meant huge cuts in UK support for humanitarian and development priorities across the world. Those cuts have been exacerbated by the government's reductions to the overall ODA budget. In February, Sir Keir Starmer said he would cut aid spending from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3% by 2027 - a fall in absolute terms of about £14bn to some £9bn. Such was the scale of aid spending on asylum hotels in recent years that the previous Conservative government gave the Foreign Office an extra £2bn to shore up its humanitarian commitments overseas. But Labour has refused to match that commitment. Gideon Rabinowitz, director of policy at the Bond network of development organisations, said: "Cutting the UK aid budget while using it to prop up Home Office costs is a reckless repeat of decisions taken by the previous Conservative government. "Diverting £2.2bn of UK aid to cover asylum accommodation in the UK is unsustainable, poor value for money, and comes at the expense of vital development and humanitarian programmes tackling the root causes of poverty, conflict and displacement. "It is essential that we support refugees and asylum seekers in the UK, but the government should not be robbing Peter to pay Paul." Sarah Champion, chair of the International Development Committee, said the government was introducing "savage cuts" to its ODA spending, risking the UK's development priorities and international reputation, while "Home Office raids on the aid budget" had barely reduced. "Aid is meant to help the poorest and most vulnerable across the world: to alleviate poverty, improve life chances and reduce the risk of conflict," she said. "Allowing the Home Office to spend it in the UK makes this task even harder." "The government must get a grip on spending aid in the UK," she said. "The Spending Review needs to finally draw a line under this perverse use of taxpayer money designed to keep everyone safe and prosperous in their own homes, not funding inappropriate, expensive accommodation here." Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: "Labour promised in their manifesto to end the use of asylum hotels for illegal immigrants. But the truth is there are now thousands more illegal migrants being housed in hotels under Labour. "Now these documents reveal that Labour are using foreign aid to pay for asylum hotel accommodation – yet another promise broken." A Home Office spokesperson said: "We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure, and continue to take action, restoring order, and reduce costs. This will ultimately reduce the amount of Official Development Assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. "We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4bn by 2026." Is the government meeting its pledges on illegal immigration and asylum?

Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Carney launches ‘One Canadian Economy' Act to unify trade, approvals
-- Prime Minister Mark Carney unveiled sweeping legislation Friday aimed at accelerating the approval of infrastructure projects and removing long-standing internal trade barriers, part of a broader effort to boost Canada's economic potential amid mounting global uncertainty. The One Canadian Economy Act, a centerpiece of the Carney government's pro-growth agenda, seeks to consolidate regulatory processes and create a unified domestic market across the national landscape. 'Canada's a country that used to build big things,' Carney said at a press conference. 'But in recent decades it's become too difficult to build in this country.' To address these concerns, the bill would cut federal project approval times from five years to two by creating a one-stop permitting office and applying a 'one-project, one-review' standard to infrastructure proposals. Projects deemed 'nation-building' by federal cabinet, such as railways, ports, pipelines, and transmission lines, would undergo streamlined assessments focused not on justification, but implementation. These proposals must satisfy at least some of five criteria, including economic benefit, Indigenous engagement, and contributions to climate goals, though officials stress these are considerations rather than strict thresholds. The new approach was partially galvanized by concerns over regulatory paralysis that has slowed Canada's ability to bring natural resources to global markets. 'When federal agencies have examined a new project, their immediate question has been: Why?' Carney said Friday. 'With this bill, we will instead ask ourselves: How?' The legislation also tackles internal trade barriers, which economists estimate cost tens of billions of dollars in lost productivity and economic output annually. A major provision of the bill would recognize provincial standards for goods, services and labor certification as meeting the federal benchmark, though actual interprovincial mobility will still require the cooperation of provincial governments. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has expressed skepticism over the bill's broader impact, calling the internal trade components 'a small step.' 'It's baby steps when we needed a giant leap,' Poilievre said Friday, while suggesting provinces be offered cash incentives to dismantle remaining trade barriers. While some provinces have already commenced bilateral trade agreements, others remain hesitant. The federal government says its own contributions include the elimination of all exemptions to the Canadian Free Trade Agreement by July 1, with the broader hope that harmonization efforts will follow across jurisdictions. Related articles Carney launches 'One Canadian Economy' Act to unify trade, approvals US job growth in May tops forecasts, but Macquarie warns cracks are emerging Fed's Harker says rate cuts this year still possible