logo
Boynton Beach man escaped Nazi Germany — with help from a future U.S. president

Boynton Beach man escaped Nazi Germany — with help from a future U.S. president

Yahoo23-04-2025

Two months. That was the time between life and death for Jack Abramowitz.
Abramowitz, a resident of Boynton Beach, was given the gift of an American visa two months before Germany attacked Russia in 1941 and leaving the country became impossible. He was just a child then. Born four months before World War II officially began in 1939, he spent his infancy and toddlerhood in Hitler-led Germany.
Abramowitz says three Godly acts allowed him to survive and be here to tell his story, which he has been doing since his arrival in Florida 25 years ago. As part of the executive board of the Alpert Jewish Family Service in West Palm Beach, Abramowitz visits Palm Beach County schools to share his experience escaping Nazi Germany, a story that he titled, 'Why I believe in God.'
'God intervened to save my family when 6 million of us were murdered and destroyed throughout Europe,' Abramowitz says.
It was three acts of God, but also the heroism of three people in his life: his father, who made the difficult decision to leave for America; his mother, who refused to deny her Judaism; and a newly promoted U.S. Army colonel who would later become president of the United States.
Abramowitz's father, Ben, who moved to Germany from Poland at 13 years old for an apprenticeship, found success in the hat-making industry and eventually opened a business. When Adolf Hitler came into power and enacted The Nuremburg Race Laws in 1935, his business was confiscated. As the situation continued to worsen for Jews, Ben Abramowitz turned to his younger brother, who was already living in the United States.
As a young, single man, his brother could only sponsor one member of the family in Germany, which also included Abramowitz's 9-year-old sister. Realizing this could be the only chance to save his family, Ben Abramowitz decided to leave Germany, alone, and head to the United States on Nov. 10, 1938.
As he prepared for his journey overseas in the morning, Kristallnacht, or the 'Night of Broken Glass,' began on Nov. 9. Nazis attacked Jews and their property, and Ben Abramowitz was arrested and thrown into Gestapo headquarters in Berlin, Abramowitz says.
Remembering the visa waiting in their home, Abramowitz's mother, Rose, who was pregnant with him at the time, headed to the prison accompanied by a neighbor whose husband was also taken. The women walked through the doors and handed a commander the visa.
'He could have just as easily just ripped up the visa and said, 'The hell with this. He's not going anywhere,'' Abramowitz says. 'But very fortunately, he read the visa, looked at it, and thought for a moment.'
Then he pulled out a gun.
As Abramowitz tells it, the commander walked over to his pregnant mother and simply said, 'Tell me, Mrs. Abramowitz, that you are not a Jew.' After some thought, his mother replied, 'Mr. Commander, but I am a Jew.' He proceeded to hit her across the head with the gun, knocking her to the ground before turning to the neighbor and asking the same question.
When the neighbor responded 'I am not a Jew,' the commander shot her in the head, killing her on the spot.
'Had my mother given the wrong answer, we would not be talking today,' Abramowitz says.
His father left for the United States the following day. He found work at a hat-making company in the Garment District in Manhattan, which had a contract with West Point making hats for cadets and military officers. Meanwhile, his family was left in Germany, hiding in their apartment and dependent on food brought over by Christian neighbors, he says.
'The thought was that we would keep a very low profile and wouldn't leave the apartment that we lived in,' Abramowitz says. 'The Nazis at that time weren't going after women and children. They wanted the men for the workforce.'
And that thought became their reality for three years, during which Abramowitz's mother gave birth to him. His father continued to try to get his family visas, but as the war raged on, it became more and more difficult.
It would be the third and final act of God — and heroism — when a U.S. Army colonel walked into the Manhattan hat shop and asked Ben Abramowitz directly to make him a new hat to commemorate his military promotion.
Upon hearing his accent and learning he was from Germany, the man asked about his family, learning they were still stuck in the country.
'He says to my father, 'Gee, I'm very sorry, but here's what I want you to do. I want you to make a hat for me.' And he hands my father an embroidered handkerchief that his mother had made for him and he said, 'Mr. Abramowitz, when you make the hat for me, I would like you to take these embroidered initials and work it into the hat,'' said Abramowitz.
Half of Holocaust survivors alive today will be gone in 6 years, new analysis finds
Today in History: April 11, the liberation of Buchenwald
80 years after Auschwitz, kosher food will be sold in its town of Oświęcim
Together in harmony: Gay Men's Chorus to perform for Holocaust Remembrance Day
Boca man's gift part of Anne Frank exhibit: It's 'somewhere where people can see it'
Those initials were DDE. His father was making a hat for the future 34th president of the United States, Dwight D. Eisenhower.
In 1941, Eisenhower returned to the factory to retrieve his hat. Upon entering, he noticed Ben Abramowitz crying in a corner. He proceeded to show Eisenhower a letter from the State Department, which was a final denial for visas for his family. Eisenhower, according to Abramowitz, grabbed the letter and walked out of the factory.
Three weeks later, Abramowitz was on a ship headed for the United States along with his mother and sister.
'What General Eisenhower at the time did, he made some phone calls, whatever it was, it was an act of God that put us all into this particular situation,' says Abramowitz. 'The war was now raging in Germany, but we got visas and we arrived in the United States on April 15, 1941.'
Just over two months later, on June 22, 1941, Germany attacked Russia and the world closed up.
Abramowitz and his family lived in The Bronx, New York, for the remainder of his childhood, moving to Brooklyn when he was 18 years old. He graduated from The City College of New York and got his master's from Adelphi University in Garden City.
He went on to have a successful career as an aerospace engineer. He and his wife, Phyllis, who passed in 2022, have three sons and nine grandchildren. He dedicates his retirement to sharing this story, spreading Holocaust awareness, and helping provide food and housing for South Florida survivors through his work with the Alpert Jewish Family Service of Palm Beach County.
After President Eisenhower died in 1969, Ben Abramowitz would always say the Kaddish, the mourner's prayer, for him during Yom Kippur services. His son continues that tradition today.
'I feel absolutely lucky that [I was saved],' Abramowitz says. 'It was a stroke of God's good luck.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Members of the Fulbright scholarship board resign, accusing Trump of meddling

time28 minutes ago

Members of the Fulbright scholarship board resign, accusing Trump of meddling

All 12 members of the board overseeing the prestigious Fulbright scholarships on Wednesday resigned in protest of what they call the Trump administration's meddling with the selection of award recipients, according to a statement. A statement published online by the board members said the administration usurped the board's authority by denying awards to 'a substantial number of people' who already had been chosen. Another 1,200 award recipients who were already approved to come to the U.S. are undergoing an unauthorized review process that could lead to their rejection, the board members said. 'To continue to serve after the Administration has consistently ignored the Board's request that they follow the law would risk legitimizing actions we believe are unlawful and damage the integrity of this storied program and America's credibility abroad,' the statement reads. Congress established the Fulbright program nearly 80 years ago to promote international exchange and American diplomacy. The highly selective program awards about 9,000 scholarships annually in the U.S. and in more than 160 other countries to students, scholars, and professionals in a range of fields. A message seeking comment was left with the State Department, which runs the scholarship program. The resignations were first reported by The New York Times. The intervention from the Trump administration undermined the program's merit-based selection process and its insulation from political influence, the board members wrote. 'We believe these actions not only contradict the statute but are antithetical to the Fulbright mission and the values, including free speech and academic freedom, that Congress specified in the statute,' the statement said. 'It is our sincere hope that Congress, the courts, and future Fulbright Boards will prevent the administration's efforts to degrade, dismantle, or even eliminate one of our nation's most respected and valuable programs.' Award recipients are selected in a yearlong process by nonpartisan staff at the State Department. The recipients who had their awards canceled are in fields including biology, engineering, medical sciences, and history, the board members said. The announcement comes as the Trump administration ratchets up scrutiny of international students on several fronts. The administration has expanded the grounds for revoking foreign students' legal status, and recently paused scheduling of new interviews for student visas as it increases vetting of their social media activity. The government also has moved to block foreign students from attending Harvard as it pressures the Ivy League school to adopt a series of reforms. ___ standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

Judge sides with city of Austin in lawsuit involving former American-Statesman site
Judge sides with city of Austin in lawsuit involving former American-Statesman site

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Judge sides with city of Austin in lawsuit involving former American-Statesman site

A judge this week ruled in favor of the city of Austin in a case involving the former American-Statesman site just south of downtown along Lady Bird Lake. The ruling denied a motion for summary judgment in a lawsuit filed by the Save Our Springs Alliance, an environmental watchdog group. The lawsuit alleged that the Austin City Council violated key provisions of the Texas Open Meetings Act in 2022 when it approved a special type of zoning known as a planned unit development, or PUD, for the former Statesman site. The lawsuit sought to void the council's Dec. 2, 2022 vote to approve the PUD, based on the alleged open meetings violations. The Statesman moved several years ago from the site at 305 S. Congress Ave. to a new location near the airport. In arguing their case before District Judge Jan Soifer on May 15, Save Our Springs attorneys Bobby Levinski and Bill Bunch contended that the council granted the PUD zoning in violation of two key mandates of the Texas Open Meetings Act: proper public notice, and a reasonable opportunity for the public to speak before the vote was taken. Levinski said today that the Save Our Springs Alliance might appeal the ruling. "Given the importance of this case for governmental transparency and proper enforcement of the Texas Open Meetings Act, we'll be evaluating our options for appeal," Levinski said. "This case ultimately impacts the ability of residents to weigh in on important matters that affect their community, including the relocation of the Hike and Bike Trail and removal of the natural, tree-lined aesthetic of the Lady Bird Lake shoreline. Every case has its challenges, and we may need to work on it a little longer to ultimately prevail." More: Lawsuit seeks to halt planned redevelopment of former Statesman site on Lady Bird Lake Casey Dobson and Sara Wilder Clark represented the landowner, the Cox family of Atlanta, along with Austin-based Endeavor Real Estate Group. The Cox family hired Endeavor several years ago to create plans to redevelop the prime waterfront site. The site formerly housed the newspaper offices and printing plant. Cox sold the Statesman but retained ownership of the 18.9-acre site, a property many developers had long coveted and said was ripe for new development. Dobson did not immediately respond to an email for comment about the ruling and what it means for future plans to transform the property into a mixed-use project with high-rise buildings and other uses, which could include housing, office and retail development. Richard Suttle Jr., an Austin attorney and the spokesperson for the planned redevelopment, said he hasn't seen a final judgment yet in the case, so couldn't comment on what it might mean for the future planned redevelopment. Dan Richards represented the city in the lawsuit. Richards said Soifer's ruling, signed Monday, means "the trial court case is basically over." At last month's hearing, Richards told Soifer that voiding the PUD could jeopardize the developer's ability, in the current economic climate, to secure a new amendment offering the same level of community benefits — such as 6.5 acres of green space — at the site. At the same hearing, Dobson and Wilder Clark said the PUD zoning change was properly noticed, and the public was given sufficient opportunity to speak at nine different meetings. However, Levinski said that, while the PUD was listed on the council agenda as a zoning item, that posting was misleading because it failed to provide "full disclosure of the subjects to be discussed." The proposed PUD ordinance encompassed "numerous provisions that extend well beyond traditional zoning regulations," Levinski told Soifer. Those included "sweeping changes" to environmental protections and other city land-use codes, including a failure to disclose height limits, setbacks and the elimination of two restrictive covenants. "There are so many different parts of this (PUD) ordinance that are not zoning, yet it was sold to public as a rezoning," Levinski said. The zoning changes included modifications to the Lady Bird Lake shoreline; the relocation of the Ann and Roy Butler Hike and Bike Trail inland away from the lake; the removal of more than 90 mature trees; code waivers; and "amendments to almost every chapter of Austin's land development code," Levinski told Soifer. In arguing their case before Soifer, Leviniski and Bunch said that the Texas Open Meetings Act requires a public notice identifying these major changes to city standards and a public 'right to speak' on them before council granted the approvals. The Cox owners and Endeavor have the right to build high-rises — up to 725 feet tall — within 140 feet of Lady Bird Lake. The development would be "forever exempt from a plethora of water quality, parkland and lakeshore rules and regulations," according to the Save Our Springs Alliance. "The key here is the Statesman PUD went beyond zoning," Levinski said. "This didn't give sufficient notice to the public to say what is occurring with this zoning." Among other issues, he said the PUD included "non-zoning provisions, including items the council doesn't have authority over." There was a way the city could have described with greater detail what was occurring with the zoning case, "but they chose not to, and it's deceptive that they chose not to," Levinski said. The level of specificity "gets enhanced" when the issue involves matters of "significant public interest," Levinski said. "It's not enough to rely on the assumption that the general public may have knowledge of the subject matter." Dobson and Wilder Clark, however, told Soifer that the public notices complied with the Texas Open Meetings Act. The notices properly and adequately disclosed the subject of the PUD at various meetings on the council's printed public agenda, Dobson and Wilder Clark said. Moreover, all the details that Save Our Springs claims were lacking from the notice were available at "the click of a link" in backup materials on the council's online agenda, Wilder Clark said. "Not only did (the public) get to talk in meetings, but they got to submit written testimony," Wilder Clark said. She also noted that the council postponed meetings on the case. Showing slides of newspaper articles, Dobson said the proposed redevelopment of the Statesman site was front-page news. He said the case was "noticed out of the wazoo." "(Opponents) think this was done in the dark of night, with adequate notice to nobody," Dobson said. "In fact, the polar opposite happened." Dobson said no special notice was required, and opponents "didn't need it. They wrote letters, they spoke at length to (the city) Planning Commission and City Council. This did not take place under the shroud of secrecy," Dobson said. Countering the city's arguments, Bunch said the city "invented out of whole cloth" its position that it upheld the open meetings act, saying "there's no support for that in the entire body of open meetings cases." Early in the hearing, Dobson showed a photo of the current Statesman site "in all its glory," showing a low-slung building surrounded by a near vacant parking lot with lots of asphalt and concrete. Attorneys for the city and the developer stated that "virtually no one" opposes the proposed development, which may include condominiums, apartments, a hotel, office space and retail areas. Noting the site's popularity as a prime location for viewing the famed bat colony under the Ann Richards Congress Avenue Bridge, they emphasized the new development will enhance the bat viewing area. Additionally, they said the project has the support of bat conservation groups. Last year, the Save Our Springs Alliance won a lawsuit contesting the city's creation of a special financing district, a so-called tax increment reinvestment zone, to fund infrastructure improvements within the proposed Statesman redevelopment project. A judge ruled that financing method unlawful. This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Judge rules for city in case involving former Statesman site

History Shows the Danger of Trump's Health Policies
History Shows the Danger of Trump's Health Policies

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

History Shows the Danger of Trump's Health Policies

U.S. President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. attend an event in the East Room of the White House on May 22, 2025 in Washington, DC. Credit - Chip Somodevilla—Getty Images On May 11, 2023, President Joseph Biden ended the COVID-19 public health emergency, calling an finish to the pandemic. By the end of 2023, COVID-19 claimed the lives of over 20 million people around the world. But through international cooperation and evidence-based science, vaccines were developed and the world moved on. Indeed, perhaps the biggest success of the period was the quick production of a COVID-19 vaccine. The research behind the mRNA vaccine had been ongoing since the 1970s, but the emergency of the pandemic and international sharing of knowledge helped bring the vaccine to fruition. Today, the COVID-19 vaccine has been credited with saving 2.4 million lives around the world. But now, the U.S. is choosing competition over cooperation. With President Donald Trump's day one executive order to leave the World Health Organization (WHO)—blaming their COVID-19 response—and the shuttering of USAID, the country is taking steps towards further dividing health efforts across the globe. Here in the U.S., a sudden end to $11.4 billion of covid-related grants is stifling national pandemic preparedness efforts on the local and state levels. And most recently, Health and Human Services Secretary RFK Jr. purged experts from the CDC Advisory Committee, putting lives at risk. Historical lessons demonstrate the need for global health infrastructure that works together, shares knowledge, and remembers that pathogens do not stop at borders. White House's Pandemic Office, Busy With Bird Flu, May Shrink Under Trump One of the greatest global health achievements of all time—smallpox eradication—provides a perfect example of what can be done with independent scientific research and international cooperation. During the Cold War between the U.S. and USSR, decades of tension brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. Yet, incredibly, the nations managed to find common ground to support the efforts of smallpox eradication. Indeed, they understood the strategic benefits that came from letting public health practitioners and scientists work outside of political divides. The WHO was founded after World War II in 1948. Its formation marked a move from international health, that focused on nations, to global health, that would serve humanity first. The WHO's first eradication effort was the failed, U.S.-backed, Malaria Eradication Program from 1955 to 1969. The Smallpox Eradication Program, with intensive efforts beginning in 1967, provided a chance for redemption for the U.S. and WHO. For the United States, investing in disease eradication and poverty helped to mitigate growing backlash against the Vietnam War. In June of 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson stated, 'I propose to dedicate this year to finding new techniques for making man's knowledge serve man's welfare.' He called for 1965—the same year he ordered ground troops to Vietnam to stop the spread of communism —to be a year of international cooperation that could bypass the politics of the Cold War. Previously, the USSR did not participate in the U.S. and WHO's first, failed global eradication plan for malaria. But upon rejoining the WHO in 1956, it was the Soviets who made the first call and investment into global eradication of smallpox in 1958. The WHO functioning as a mediator was crucial to allowing the USSR and the U.S. to work together. It allowed both nations to avoid giving credit to each other; rather success went to science itself. President Johnson called this 'a turning point' away from 'man against man' towards 'man against nature.' The limited role of politicians in the program proved to be key to its success. Scientists made decisions and worked together—no matter what country they came from—by focusing on disease and vaccination, not international tensions. The Soviet-initiated program was lead by Donald A. Henderson, a U.S. epidemiologist, who worked alongside the Russians until the last case of smallpox occurred in Somalia on October 26, 1977. During the 20th century, smallpox was responsible for an estimated 300 to 500 million deaths. Smallpox was officially declared eradicated by the WHO in October 1980, and is today still the only human disease to achieve this distinction. Less than a year after the declaration of smallpox eradication, the emergence of another pandemic, the HIV/AIDS crisis, reinforced the importance of science-first cooperation over politically-driven decision making. In June 1981, the first cases of a new unknown disease were reported in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. In short order, gay men were stigmatized and blamed in what would become one of the biggest public health disasters of all time. It took years of grassroots science-based activism to move beyond HIV/AIDS victim-blaming and find medical solutions. The Poster Child for AIDS Obscured as Much About the Crisis as He Revealed Too often, governments across the globe placed blame on the gay community for their 'sins' and did not provide needed support, leaving the sick to suffer and die. The pharmaceutical companies profited from the limited medications they had available and did not pursue sufficient development. The FDA process for new drugs was scheduled to take nine years, at a time when life expectancy after receiving an HIV/AIDS diagnosis was one year. These issues sparked activism, spawning the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP) in 1987. ACT UP organizers took science into their own hands and began educating themselves. Members began reading scientific journals religiously, learning the chemistry and epidemiology of drug manufacturing and clinical trials. Members learned how to translate these dense scientific messages to educate the community members on what was—and what was not—being done to help. Because of this work, the FDA changed policies to allow for new treatments to be tested at accelerated rates in times of emergency. ACT UP was able to shift the cultural blame showing that the issue was a result of politics getting in the way of scientific advancements. By 1990, ACT UP influenced the largest federal HIV program to pass Congress, the Ryan White CARE Act. This program was a vital precursor to the 2003 PEPFAR (The U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief) global initiative. Both of these histories offer a powerful lesson: global health is national health, and national health is local health. With the recent funding cuts from the U.S. government, the future of global health is going in an unknown direction. And yet, the occurrence of pandemics is expected to increase in frequency due to climate change, mass migration, urbanization, and ecosystem destruction. It has been estimated that there is about a 25% chance we will have another COVID-sized pandemic within the next 10 years. No matter how secure the world makes borders, history shows that it can not protect us from disease if we do not have a strong, interconnected public health infrastructure. Luke Jorgensen is a Master of Public Health student at Purdue University where his epidemiology research examines human migration and infectious disease. Made by History takes readers beyond the headlines with articles written and edited by professional historians. Learn more about Made by History at TIME here. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. Write to Made by History at madebyhistory@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store