logo
Legislative committee endorses prosecution of librarians who lend books deemed harmful to children

Legislative committee endorses prosecution of librarians who lend books deemed harmful to children

Yahoo19-02-2025

South Dakota Rep. Bethany Soye, R-Sioux Falls, testifies to a legislative committee on Jan. 17, 2025, at the Capitol in Pierre. Soye is the sponsor of a bill that would criminalize schools, universities, museums, libraries and their employees for allowing children to view material defined in state law as obscene or harmful to minors. (Joshua Haiar/South Dakota Searchlight)
A South Dakota legislative committee advanced a bill Wednesday at the Capitol in Pierre that would subject schools, universities, museums, libraries and their employees to criminal prosecution and jail time for allowing children to view material defined in state law as obscene or harmful to minors.
An opponent of the bill said it would put 'librarians in handcuffs' for lending a book to a child that some adults might consider inappropriate. One member of the House Education Committee who voted in favor of the legislation, Rep. Travis Ismay, R-Newell, suggested an arrest might be insufficient punishment.
'If a librarian rented this out to my son or daughter, you'd be lucky if you got hauled out of there in handcuffs,' Ismay said. 'So, yes, if they're breaking the law anyway, why would we have any problem with librarians getting hauled out of the library in handcuffs?'
Ismay and other committee members who voted for the bill focused some of their comments on the book 'Tricks,' which is marketed as a young adult novel from author Ellen Hopkins about five troubled teenagers who work as prostitutes. Several supporters of the bill criticized the book in their testimony as inappropriate for children and said it's available in many high school libraries in the state. They said parents have had difficulty convincing local school administrators and school boards to remove such books from school library shelves.
... If they're breaking the law anyway, why would we have any problem with librarians getting hauled out of the library in handcuffs?
– South Dakota Rep. Travis Ismay, R-Newell
Opponents of the bill said criminalizing the lending of a book with a class one misdemeanor is an out-of-proportion response to concerns about a book's content. Eric E. Erickson, a lobbyist for the South Dakota Library Association, said that's the same class of punishment applied to hiring a prostitute and committing simple assault, with a maximum penalty of one year in jail and a $2,000 fine.
'Locking up our librarians, our professors, our teachers, our museum curators is not the answer,' Erickson said.
Other bill opponents said some parents may not like the local procedures available to request the removal of a book from a school library, but those procedures are the appropriate venue for complaints. Rep. Mike Stevens, R-Yankton, who voted against the bill, said parents unhappy with the outcome of those procedures already have the ability to file a lawsuit.
Stevens sponsored a bill adopted by the Legislature last year that requires public schools and libraries to publish their policies for restricting minors from accessing obscene materials. He said that requirement, which took effect on Jan. 1 this year, is a better approach to the problem than the bill endorsed Wednesday by the committee.
The sponsor of the new bill, Rep. Bethany Soye, R-Sioux Falls, said last year's bill is ineffective because of the existence of another state law. That law exempts schools, colleges, universities, museums, public libraries and their employees from prosecution for disseminating material harmful to minors and related offenses. Soye's bill would repeal that exemption.
State law defines material harmful to minors as any description or representation of nudity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement or 'sado-masochistic abuse' if it predominantly appeals to a 'prurient, shameful or morbid interest,' is patently offensive to prevailing standards about suitable material for children, and is without 'serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.'
Soye said the protection for material with 'literary, artistic, political, or scientific value' is sufficient.
'This is not a ban on any books,' she said. 'If, specifically, we're talking about a public library, you can still have the books. Adults, obviously, can read anything they want. We're just saying this is material that's harmful to minors, so you can't check it out to a minor.'
Opponents of the bill said it would infringe on free speech and subject employees of the targeted institutions to prosecution for making subjective decisions.
'Many people will have a fundamental disagreement on what is defined as obscene,' said Sandra Waltman, of the South Dakota Education Association. 'Often it comes down to a difference in values — something that should not be criminalized.'
The committee voted 10-5 to send House Bill 1239 to the full House of Representatives.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘No Kings' protests planned in multiple South Dakota cities
‘No Kings' protests planned in multiple South Dakota cities

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

‘No Kings' protests planned in multiple South Dakota cities

Nicole Preble holds a sign during a protest against the Trump administration on April 23, 2025, in Rapid City. (Seth Tupper/South Dakota Searchlight) Nationwide protests against the Trump administration are planned this Saturday, including in at least eight South Dakota cities. 'No Kings' is the theme of the protests, which will coincide with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, Flag Day and the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary military parade in Washington, D.C. The D.C. events will cost an estimated $25 million to $45 million, according to Army spokesperson Heather Hagan, though the price tag for the parade alone was not specified. Protest organizers are calling attention to what they describe as the Trump administration's authoritarian overreach. 'They've defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights, and slashed our services,' the No Kings website reads. 'The corruption has gone too far. No thrones. No crowns. No kings.' The No Kings website lists the following protests planned in South Dakota: Spearfish: 11 a.m. Mountain time at North Main Street and West Jackson Street. Rapid City: noon Mountain at 300 Sixth Street. Pierre: 12:30 p.m. Central at 500 E. Capitol Ave. Watertown: 11 a.m. Central at 211 E. Kemp Ave. Brookings: 1 p.m. at Sixth Street and 17th Avenue. Sioux Falls: 11 a.m. Central at 300 N. Minnesota Ave. Yankton: 10:30 a.m. Central at 2000 Douglas Ave. Chamberlain: 10 a.m. Central at 100 King Street and Main Street. 'No Kings' is part of the 50501 Movement, founded to protest the Trump administration. Partners include the American Civil Liberties Union, 350 Action, Climate Defenders, Greenpeace, Human Rights Campaign, Vote Save America and many other advocacy groups. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Legislative decision on prison construction will come later than planned
Legislative decision on prison construction will come later than planned

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Legislative decision on prison construction will come later than planned

South Dakota Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden speaks during a press conference Feb. 6, 2025, at the Capitol in Pierre with Lt. Gov. Tony Venhuizen. (Seth Tupper/South Dakota Searchlight) South Dakota lawmakers will not convene to make the call on a new prison site on July 22, according to Gov. Larry Rhoden's office. Lt. Gov. Tony Venhuizen wrote a letter to Rhoden this week asking that the special session the governor had hoped to call on that date be pushed back. Lawmakers would be asked to back plans for a new prison at that session. Venhuizen leads the Project Prison Reset group, called into being in February via a Rhoden executive order and charged with deciding if the state needs new prison facilities, how large and where those facilities should be. Members voted during a Springfield meeting in late April to build a replacement for the South Dakota State Penitentiary, which is located in Sioux Falls. Pierre played host to the group's most recent meeting last week, where the group narrowed down locations to Mitchell or Worthing and existing prison campuses in Springfield and Sioux Falls, and voted to cap the cost of such a prison at $600 million. Elected officials in Mitchell including the mayor and sheriff have since come out against locating the prison near their community. Prison task force rejects original Lincoln County site, tightens budget for new facility This week, Venhuizen wrote that the group had made 'excellent progress,' but that the two weeks between the next Project Prison Reset meeting and the intended special session aren't enough. 'Even if the task force is able to adopt a specific proposal on July 8, we do not feel that two weeks provides adequate time for a final proposal to be completed with adequate detail, and for state legislators to learn about that proposal prior to the special session,' Venhuizen wrote. Rhoden, through spokeswoman Josie Harms, said the governor will 'accept the task force's request' and 'consult with leadership on a rescheduled date.' 'I'm eager to see what the task force can accomplish in their next meeting,' Rhoden wrote. The cost of the Rhoden administration's preferred solution to correctional overcrowding – a 1,500-bed, $825 million facility south of Harrisburg in Lincoln County – was among the primary concerns for the lawmakers who rejected the idea in February. A consultant hired on behalf of the task force to reevaluate the state's needs concluded that the state needs more beds than that, 1,700, immediately, to ease current crowding. A 1,700-bed prison wouldn't solve the state's problems long-term, however, according to the consultants. By the mid-2030s, the state would need yet another 1,500-bed prison. The task force ultimately rejected those conclusions, betting that $600 million would be enough to bulk up the system and replace the oldest parts of the Sioux Falls penitentiary complex. Lawmakers had put back more than $600 million for prison construction before the 2025 legislative session, and the fund had swelled larger than that with interest by winter. Ongoing construction bills at the site of a new women's prison in Rapid City – an $87 million project that earned legislative approval – have since come out of that fund, DOC spokesman Michael Winder told Searchlight on Thursday. The state's also paid some of the bills associated with site prep at the now-rejected Lincoln County site out of that fund. Lawmakers had approved the spending of up to $60 million in prison design and site prep for a men's prison in 2024, and the state spent or obligated $52 million of that money for the Lincoln County plan before it came to a halt. Subtracting the money spent since the last legislative session's end and adding the $23 million earned in interest this year that will be deposited in August, Winder said, the fund's available balance will sit at approximately $538 million by the end of summer.

Another man found dead in his cell at South Dakota State Penitentiary
Another man found dead in his cell at South Dakota State Penitentiary

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Another man found dead in his cell at South Dakota State Penitentiary

People hold signs at a protest on May 23, 2025, at the South Dakota State Penitentiary in Sioux Falls. (John Hult/South Dakota Searchlight) The state is investigating another death in Department of Corrections custody. Nicholas Skorka, 42, died at the South Dakota State Penitentiary on Tuesday, according to a press release. The release did not list a cause of death for Skorka. He is the 10th person to die in the department's custody this year and the fourth that will be subject to scrutiny by the state Division of Criminal Investigation, the investigative arm of the Attorney General's Office. 10 injured in prison violence days after protests over security and inmate treatment The death certificate for one of the investigated cases, that of 20-year-old Anthony Richards, lists the cause of his February death as an overdose of 'synthetic cannabinoid 5F-ADB,' a drug sometimes referred to as K2. Two other inmates, 39-year-old Jason Garreau and 24-year-old Joshua Arrow, died days apart late last month. Arrow's official death certificate has yet to be filed; Garreau's was filed last week and lists methamphetamine toxicity' as his cause of death. Wednesday's release did not say if Skorka's death is being investigated as drug-related. An autopsy for Skorka, whose body was found in his cell, will take place Thursday. 'DCI will do a thorough investigation, and we will determine what additional action is needed pending the results of that investigation,' Attorney General Marty Jackley said in the release. On May 29, Department of Corrections spokesman Michael Winder sent a notice saying the department had busted a drug ring at the penitentiary. Its staff seized shipments of drugs intended for delivery to Sioux Falls inmates via the mail and parcels delivered by visitors to inmates. 'If the results of the investigation warrant prosecution,' that day's news release said, 'criminal charges will be sought.' Jackley's spokesman Tony Mangan told South Dakota Searchlight on Wednesday that no charges have been filed for actions tied to the drug ring or in-custody deaths. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store