Successful Childhood Immunisation Programme Delivering Results
Minister of Health
A successful programme to help Māori health providers lift childhood immunisation rates will be renewed, Health Minister Simeon Brown says.
"The Immunising our Tamariki programme, originally launched in 2023 by Hon Dr Shane Reti, invested $50 million in Māori health providers to deliver targeted, community-based immunisation outreach. It aims to lift childhood immunisation rates for babies and children who may not be reached through traditional health channels such as GPs or pharmacies."
'Since March 2024, the programme has delivered 41,719 scheduled childhood immunisations for children under 24 months, including 3,301 in May – the highest monthly total since it began,' Mr Brown says.
'In total, more than 132,000 vaccinations have been administered through the programme, with a record 18,555 given in April 2025 alone as part of preparations for winter – including influenza and other immunisations. It's a clear example of how backing local health providers and frontline workers delivers better outcomes for the communities they know best.
'The Immunising our Tamariki programme focuses on reaching children and families who are yet to receive their immunisation through traditional pathways such as GP practices, particularly in communities with historically low immunisation rates.
'We know we need to significantly lift immunisation rates for Māori to meet the Government's target of 95 per cent of children being fully immunised by 24 months of age. Targeted, localised outreach services are critical to achieving that goal.
'About 40 per cent of people immunised through the programme are also non-Māori, reflecting the essential role that community providers play in delivering low-cost, trusted health services for all New Zealanders.'
As part of the programme's renewal to 30 June 2026, Health New Zealand will implement several changes to maximise its impact:
All funding will go directly to frontline service delivery and qualified immunisation staff.
Newly commissioned services must include clinical capacity to vaccinate – such as authorised vaccinators and cold chain infrastructure – so new providers can begin immunising immediately.
Support will continue for Māori health providers to build trust and momentum in communities with high-needs, building on the groundwork laid during the COVID-19 response.
'These improvements will help deliver tens of thousands more immunisations in the year ahead, while relieving pressure on GPs and hospitals.
'One of the most important things we can do to protect children and families is to stay up to date with immunisations. This programme is a smart, targeted way of doing just that,' Mr Brown says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Do I have to pay for my partner's care?
Photo: RNZ Send your questions to If one person in a de facto relationship needs permanent medical care, does the Government require the other partner to pay for the care once the unwell patient's funds run out? The basic answer to your question is that when your partner is being assessed for their ability to pay for their care, your income and assets will usually be taken into account. If you're referring to medical care in a rest home setting, your assets and personal income affect whether your partner will qualify for a residential care subsidy. "People who need residential care are required to pay for it themselves, if they can afford to do so. If they cannot afford it, they may be eligible for a residential care subsidy, which Health New Zealand pays directly to the care provider," said Ministry of Social Development group general manager for client service delivery Graham Allpress. "MSD's role is to check whether people qualify for this subsidy by performing a 'financial means assessment'. "To get the subsidy, a person's income and assets must be under a certain amount. If they are in a relationship, the combined income and assets of both parties must be under a certain amount." People can qualify for the subsidy if they are 50 to 64, single and without dependent children, or over 65 and meet the income and means test. That means, even if your partner's funds have run out, your assets could still be taken into account. If only one partner needs care, the couple combined need to have assets of no more than $155,873 not including the family home and car, or $284,636 if you do want the home and car in the assessment. If it's other types of care that you're thinking of, it could be a good idea to contact Health NZ for a needs assessment. There are options such as the supported living payment but eligibility for this is assessed on a household income basis, too. I'm currently a NZ tax resident living in NZ, but previously lived in Australia (over a decade ago) and purchased shares on the ASX that I continue to own and receive dividends for (which I declare as part of my income). If I sold these shares now, worth about $150,000, what taxes would they be subject to? Specifically, would I have to pay a capital gains tax on the increased share value (as I would if I were an Australian tax resident). This is probably a question for an accountant with expertise in Australian tax. Based on information available online, it seems that you potentially should have paid tax on the shares in Australia when you stopped being an Australian resident. Assuming that didn't happen, the Australian Tax Office is likely to be expecting capital gains tax to be paid on them when they are sold. You aren't likely to have any New Zealand tax obligations. Tax experts tell me that the authorities have access to a lot of data these days so it's possible that the Australian Tax Office will find out about any share sale and might get in touch with you. I am 78 years of age and still work part time and also still contribute to my KiwiSaver. Am I eligible for the government contribution? Sorry, no. While the government said it was going to start making contributions to 16 and 17-year-olds' accounts, it hasn't budged on the upper limit of 65. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
6 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Good food is only right
Food is a human right, but beyond that, is the right to food sovereignty. Hagar Ozri talked to two wāhine Māori to find out what it can look like. Sovereignty is a word we need to contemplate — it means authority or autonomy — in a world where the opposite is the lived reality for the most vulnerable, as skyrocketing food prices make the availability of good food slip away. The right to food is the most basic human right. Food is more than a physical need, it is a cultural and spiritual need too, this complexity reflected in the term "food sovereignty". If we listen to the indigenous knowledge and conversations around the issues, would we have some healing and answers to the most pressing issues of our time? I draw inspiration from women leaders. Vandana Shiva, from India, is a fierce advocate for local farmers and the local economy. She fights against corporate take-over of local farms and calls sustainable agriculture "a gratitude agriculture", gratitude to Mother Earth, a non-violent sacred agriculture. New Zealand's Kay Baxter is doing amazing work at Koanga Institute, teaching permaculture and collecting heritage seed varieties. Their seed catalogue says: "We are the seeds of your ancestors, the seeds that have nourished you forever, the seeds that give you life, the seeds that you pass on down as your responsibility to the next generation". I am not Māori, but I find hope from the knowledge of tangata whenua because they link me to this whenua — this land in which I live. I interviewed two inspirational wāhine here in Ōtepoti — doing good work in the community through kai — helping whānau forging connections to the whenua — for social, mental and physical health and wellbeing. Sue Smith is a co-ordinator of a māra kai project, growing food for the Puketeraki Marae and whānau. Rongowai Papuni is a mental health practitioner who developed a programme for healing through working in the garden, learning to grow food. Both women incorporate Te Hua Parakore knowledge in their work — a decolonising indigenous farming framework, regaining knowledge of farming and growing home gardens based on these pillars: (From Jessica Hutchings' website • Whakapapa (genealogical connections); • Wairua (spirituality) • Mana (authority); • Māramatanga (enlightenment); • Te Ao Tūroa (the natural world); • Mauri (life-force) SUE SMITH Sue Smith was involved in permaculture in Sydney for a number of years and completed the certificate in permaculture design in New Zealand in 2021. "I am a member of the Kati Huirapa rūnaka based in Karitane. I spent a lot of time working in permaculture, just as a hobby, just as a fun thing to do ... you always want other people to connect with what you think is a good thing, but sometimes you just have to do it for yourself, and then things happen anyway, if you're open to sharing and conversing and communicating," she says. I started by asking her about food sovereignty. Q. What does food sovereignty mean to you? A. On the micro level, for me, is to have control over the food that I want to eat and knowing that I'm accessing high-quality nutritious kai, so growing my own at home and growing for whānau. On the macro level, what bothers me is that we're not in touch with our local growers. We don't really know where our food comes from, and the food itself, which is a basic human right, everyone should have access to good quality kai, has been commercialised and is in the hands of people that are only doing it for a profit. So, food shouldn't be a commodity, it's a basic human right ... So I suppose for me, food sovereignty means that you've got control over the food for you and your whānau, that you know you're giving them good quality kai that you can access easily, and access to culturally appropriate food that nourishes and doesn't poison you. Q. What is the work that you do at the māra kai in Karitāne? A. I am involved in a rūnaka-based project called Kete Kai Ora. This project is about getting fresh vegetables and wild venison to our whānau as a way of building connections to our whenua. Colonisation has led to our people being disconnected from our land and our traditional kai sources. Kete Kai Ora is some small way to fill that void. Kind of a contemporary mahika kai approach. We also have a once-a-month harvest where a few of us will go out there and gather as much as we can, get the meat, which is processed by a butcher, Matanaka Meats, and get that to the whānau by a navigator's role, who drives into town, because most of our kaumātua don't live at Karitāne, and drops food from their whenua to their homes. Our people know that it's good quality, nutritious vegetables and that the venison is good organic meat. The other aspect is seedlings — we've just built a seedling grow house. We're going to grow excess seedlings and share those with whānau so they can perhaps build that level of food security or sovereignty in their own backyards without having to spend a lot of money. We make a lot of our own compost, so hopefully we'll have our own seed-raising mix next year so we can ensure that our families are getting good quality seedlings. It is the process of building that level of self-sufficiency and resilience for our whānau who aren't able to come out to the whenua, actually accessing the whenua in a different way. Q. Do you bring other aspects of hua parakore into your work at the māra kai? A Well, yeah, at the moment we've been exploring the hua parakore framework as a whānau or as a small group. Essentially, that guides us how to interact with the soil and how you interact with the plants and the people. It's really about the food that's shared with people, the manaakitanga that sits with food and the mana that sits with being able to provide our people with good quality food if you're the grower or you're the cook. So there's a whole spiritual aspect to growing food that recognises the impact of the environment around you, right down to the microbial lifeforce that sits in the soil, and how that also sits back with the creation story of Hine-ahu-one and Papatūānuku and Tangaroa and Ranginui and all those elements that sit within the soil and the world around you and that goes into your food. So you're actually feeding your soul or your spirit with good high-quality food. I think there's a damaging effect on our psyche when we're eating rubbish. So, then that goes deep and that is, to me, the help that we really need, to bring in all that content and purpose. It is the deeper meaning behind claiming our right to food and sovereignty. RONGOWAI PAPUNI Q. What does food sovereignty mean to you? A. For Māori, food sovereignty, I think it is a massive topic, so it's hard to condense it into a couple of sentences ... It is reclamation, reclaiming whenua, reclaiming space, reclaiming identity, reclaiming processes and tikanga and the knowledge around kai, around mahinga kai, mahika kai. Those practices are all coming back now, which is great, but you can see there were a lot of generations where it was just lost. Q. How do you implement that in your work, in the mental health field? A. When I think about people we're working with, coming together for a purpose, like a māra kai rōpu, we're bringing people into the whare and we have a process, and the process wouldn't be just come and eat some food, it's come and be a part of growing this food. It's hard looking at "how do you take the skills that we're going to learn here in this space and then take them home", so we get the pen and paper out and get people to sketch out their whare, their house, and how much land they have and kind of start from there and look at what kind of things they would want to be eating so that they can grow those things. So, then that's empowerment and sovereignty, taking those kinds of skills home. We grow things also on site, and whatever was produced people can take home some kai. At the end of the growing season we would have kai. Q. So, it's not just the eating of natural food feeding the physical — also the mental, the spiritual, that is the process of decolonising and giving people mana? A. Yeah, absolutely. The connection. Yes, people would get really excited about it and people are humbled by receiving kai. And in terms of community, we'd have people coming from different ages, different stages of life, different iwi, different backgrounds, and some people would be isolated and then come into the space where they would get to have kōrero and waiata and karakia, and after that learn some gardening skills, and then actually go outside and put some of those skills into action. I think that comes alongside that, having skills, your own skills and knowing how to grow your own foods. It is mana enhancing, so you've got a new skill set from, you know, how do you start, use that, it's giving them connection to the whenua. We think about Papatūānuku and connection with atua. We think about Papatūānuku and Tamanuiterā, Ranginui, Tāwhirimātea, so we've got the wind factor. Tāne Mahuta, and te taiao also, our nature, our atua, are all there, so there's connection happening, not only with other people, but our environment too. Q. So when you work with mental health, what is your method? A. The programme that I developed is based over three months, one growing season. We had a bit of funding from Te Pūtahitanga (tēnā koutou — thank you to them) and from then I was, like, OK, what do we need? We need tools, we need soil, it was all from the ground up, and then I need to design a programme. OK, so what method are we going to use in the garden. And we didn't have a lot of space so I just thought we'd go with a crop rotation process. So, we had three garden beds and then we just brought in the soil, we got seeds for whatever we wanted to grow and then we planted the seeds and then we watched them grow over the period of three months and, in between that, we learned about soil quality, soil health, pest management, crop rotation and what that means and how you do it. The sessions would start with karakia, followed by a waiata, then a learning session, we learned about maramataka and then we'd look at what mahi we needed to do, what work needed doing in the maramataka. You have the skills now to take this back to your whānau. You got me thinking about Te Whare Tapa Whā when you talked about pillars and, yes, that's like taha whānau, taha tīnana, taha hinengaro and taha wairua so that's like your community or social spaces, the body, the mental space and the spiritual elements. Gardening, you can incorporate that into food sovereignty and food practices, as it's a health model that's utilised here. If you are well in your thinking, and you're well in your body, and you're well in your social spaces, they all link in and link up, so it just makes sense to me, if you're not feeling well, you need to go outside. And I think also, being Māori, māori means natural, to be natural. Tangata whenua means people of the land, and we don't live those ways any more. So, for me, everything in terms of healing just needs to go back to that ... but our environments today, social ways of being in the world are quite different to that, like, almost quite the opposite. So, it's just taking really small steps ... As small a thing as opening your door, going outside. Ginger, kumara and tofu pie This is inspired by the recipe for ginger crunch kumara cheesecake from Kai Feast, by Christall Lowe — this is a vegan version. Ingredients For the crust 250g (1 packet) gingernuts biscuits ¼ cup / 100g coconut oil For the filling 2 medium-sized kumara — to yield 2 cups, peeled, cooked and mashed — cooled 400g tofu — 1 block of soft natural tofu. I use the locally made tofu (can use silken, but do not use firm). 250g coconut cream 2 Tbsp tapioca flour (or cornflour) ¼-½ cup soft brown sugar (I like it not too sweet so I use ¼ cup) ¼ tsp salt 1 Tbsp orange zest 2 Tbsp freshly squeezed orange juice 2 tsp ground ginger Method To make the crust: • Oil a 22-24cm springform cake tin (line the bottom with baking paper). • Place a third of the biscuits in a food processor at a time and process to crumbs, place in a bowl. • Melt the coconut oil, add to the bowl and mix well into the biscuit crumbs. • Press the crumb mix on to the bottom of pie dish / cake tin. To make the filling • Add all ingredients into the food processor and blend well — start with the tofu and kumara then add the rest. • Place filling into prepared pie dish / tin. • Bake for 45 min at 180°C. • Drizzle with brown rice malt while hot. • Serve when completely cooled.
Scoop
12 hours ago
- Scoop
Experts Warn Regulatory Standards Bill Threatens Future Public Health Laws
Article – RNZ One of the experts said it would have a 'chilling effect' on public health measures. , Reporter Public health experts are worried the government's proposed Regulatory Standards Bill will act as a disincentive for future law-makers to limit harmful industries. A group of scholars in health and policy have worked together on a briefing, titled 'Regulatory Standards Bill threatens the public interest, public health and Māori rights'. It's authors are Jonathan Boston, Michael Baker, Andrew Geddis, Carwyn Jones and Geoffrey Palmer. The Regulatory Standards Bill was introduced to Parliament in May, and is now being considered by the finance and expenditure committee. It would set up a Regulatory Standards Board to consider how legislation measures up to the principles. It was part of ACT's coalition agreement, and in putting the bill forward, party leader David Seymour said: 'In a high-cost economy, regulation isn't neutral – it's a tax on growth. This government is committed to clearing the path of needless regulations by improving how laws are made.' The bill wants politicians to show their workings, he said. 'This bill turns the explanation from politicians' 'because we said so' into 'because here is the justification according to a set of principles'.' But Baker said the bill had prompted a large number of concerns, not least from a public health perspective. He said it was problematic that the bill failed to mention public harm in its ethical framework, which was needed to balance out private benefits. Another issue was the 'takings or impairment principle'. The bill in its current form would allow commercial interests, such as the tobacco or alcohol industries, to seek compensation – paid with public money – if any future legislation caused them to lose money. Baker explained this would have a 'chilling effect' on public health measures. He said it would make it less appealing for governments to create any new legislation aimed at protecting public health which could negatively impact harmful industries, which might then seek compensation. This could include the denicotinisation of cigarettes, alcohol restrictions like sponsorship bans, controls on unhealthy food and drink such as limiting marketing to children, and clean air provisions such as mandating emissions reductions by industry. This bill would mean taxpayers paid to compensate these businesses for the money lost because of moves to protect public health. 'And that's going to make it very difficult for any groups – even governments – promoting new public health laws and regulations, that are intended to protect the public interest.' The briefing notes that, rather than this being a by-product of the legislation's overall goal, it 'appears to be the Bill's intention'. Seymour response Seymour accused Baker of 'alarmism'. 'What the bill actually says is that if a politician or government department wants to pass a regulation that infringes on your private property rights, they'll need to justify why. Inconsistency with the principles does not prevent any new legislation from being passed. All it requires is transparency to the taxpayer. That's not radical, it's democratic accountability. If a policy is justified, it will stand up to scrutiny.' 'The Regulatory Standards Bill will help New Zealand get its mojo back. It requires politicians and officials to ask and answer certain questions before they place restrictions on citizens' freedoms. What problem are we trying to solve?' Seymour asked. 'What are the costs and benefits? Who pays the costs and gets the benefits? What restrictions are being placed on the use and exchange of private property?' 'This Bill turns 'because we said so' into 'because here's the evidence'.'
