Trump Mobile's Long-Term Viability Questioned by Expert
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Trump Organization's new phone product may put "America First," but an expert told Newsweek that brand could face several long-term problems in the U.S. market.
The "Trump Mobile," which was announced by President Donald Trump's elder sons on Monday, comes in two parts: a gold phone, and a wireless network provider, both of which present issues to the Trump Organization in a crowded market.
Newsweek has contacted the Trump Organization via email for comment.
The Context
Trump Mobile was first announced on Monday at an event spearheaded by Donald Trump Jr., EVP of the Trump Organization and the president's eldest son. The pitch is a "purely American-made smartphone" backed by a 5G service through all three major cellular carriers. The "T1" model, coated in gold coloring, is priced at $499, and said to be available by September 2025.
What To Know
The new mobile hardware is not changing anything drastic in the Trump Organization's playbook. Opulent gold branding and a label closely associated with the president has been a mainstay of the company's aesthetic for years.
However, an expert told Newsweek that the mobile network industry was a very different beast to the markets the Trump family has traditionally targeted, and that what works in one area might not work in another.
"It is important to distinguish between the phone and the service because the only apparent differentiator between the Trump product is the Trump affiliation," Professor Kenneth Wong, a marketing expert at the Queen's University School of Business in Northern Ireland, told Newsweek.
"The difference is that the phone is 'conspicuously consumed'—if you have one, everyone who sees you with it knows you have it.
"The service, by contrast, is 'invisibly consumed'. So while the phone's appeal is potentially 'augmented' by the Trump association, the service will be bought on its own merits. And I see few merits."
Wong said that the Trump branding would do little for a more intangible product like mobile service, especially as the competitors in the space already have advanced infrastructure that the Trump Organization could struggle to match.
Promotional images of the Trump Mobile Phone, June 16, 2025.
Promotional images of the Trump Mobile Phone, June 16, 2025.
Trump Mobile
Trump Mobile plans to offer a plan at $47.45 a month, in reference to its namesake's status as the 47th and 45th president.
"I do not see anything distinctive about the service: in fact, since mobile service is generally bought on the basis of price and reliability and coverage, such as how many bars, the Trump service is a weak competitor," Wong said.
"Will it sell? Of course it will…but not necessarily in big numbers. Celebrities like the Korean boyband (KT) Justin Bieber (donuts) and Ryan Reynolds (breakfast fast food) have received big waves of initial sales based on fan support and people 'investing' in the hope the containers become collectibles.
"But those sales don't sustain for very long. I see an initial wave of acceptance from Trump's biggest fans and supporters and 'investors,' but not much beyond that."
Furthermore, the claim that the phone will be manufactured in America has raised eyebrows over the price of the phone, advertised at $499.
Tinglong Dai, a supply chain expert and professor at the Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, told Newsweek: "a phone truly made in the U.S. today would likely cost well over $1,000. Without access to Asia-based manufacturing and scale, the economics simply don't work."
A similar issue was raised earlier in Trump's second term, when the president put pressure on Apple to move iPhone manufacturing entirely to the U.S. However, complex technology like smartphones requires both international supply chains and a wealth of tech talent—which the U.S. does not have on the same scale as other countries.
The popular conception is that companies go to China because of low labor costs, Tim Cook, Apple's CEO, said in 2018 when asked why he did not manufacture iPhones in the U.S., as Trump wants to do.
"China stopped being the low labor cost country many years ago and that is not the reason to come to China from a supply point of view.
"The products we do require really advanced tooling. And the precision that you have to have in tooling and working with the materials that we do are state-of-the-art. And the tooling skill is very deep here.
"In the U.S. you could have a meeting of tooling engineers and I'm not sure we could fill the room. In China you could fill multiple football fields."
What Happens Next
The Trump Organization has said the first model of the phone will be available before the end of 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
35 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Canada will impose new counter-tariffs against U.S. if it can't make a trade deal in 30 days, Mark Carney says
OTTAWA — Canada will impose a new wave of counter-tariffs if it cannot reach a deal within 30 days to resolve the trade dispute with the Trump administration, says Prime Minister Mark Carney. Speaking in Ottawa on the eve of a key meeting tomorrow between the negotiating teams, Carney announced a suite of new countermeasures, including adjusting existing counter tariffs on U.S. steel and aluminum products on July 21, at the end of that 30-day period. 'In other words, we're going to adjust them to levels consistent with the progress that's made at that point on the broader trading arrangements with the United States,' he said. Carney also announced a Buy Canadian policy for steel and aluminum used in federal procurement. 'Only Canadian producers and producers from trading partners that provide Canada with tariff free reciprocal access through trade agreements, can compete for federal government procurement of steel and aluminum,' he said. Carney wants an immediate end to the so-called 'border emergency' tariffs and the sectoral tariffs on autos, steel and aluminum that U.S. President Donald Trump has hit Canada with. But he said, 'it's a negotiation,' acknowledging there may not be an immediate lift to all of them. 'There is still some room to travel, so to speak, before we get to that point. But we have a deadline in order to achieve that, and if it's in Canada's interest, we'll sign it,' Carney said. With the move, the Carney government is putting more pressure on Canadian and U.S. negotiators to outline the path to a more predictable trade relationship. Carney also announced new tariffs of 100 per cent on foreign imports of steel from 'non-free trade agreement partners to stabilize the domestic market and prevent harmful trade diversion as the result of the U.S. actions that are destabilizing markets.' He said Trump did not ask him to institute the anti-dumping measure, but it has been a call made by steel producers in Canada. Ottawa also signalled that its digital services tax, which Trump calls an unfair trade practice and wants to eliminate, will apply even as Carney's team is in pitched negotiations to reach a deal. Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne told reporters, 'This was voted by Parliament so we're going ahead with the DST. 'But obviously, you know, all of that is something that we're considering as part of broader discussions that you may have, but the DST is in force and it's going to be applied.' Champagne said he and other G7 finance ministers have discussed different regimes of taxation that affect Big Tech at length with the Americans. 'This is not the big thing. The big thing is all the (value-added taxes) and other type of taxes you have around the world,' he said. 'And we had a discussion at the G7 about a few weeks ago, and even in Washington last time, to explain to our American colleagues that, a lot like the VAT they have in Europe and the GST we have in Canada, is neutral, so that it applies to goods … there's no distinction in terms of imports and exports. So we're going to continue to have these discussion and make our case.' Asked if retaining the digital services tax is a red line for Canada in the current trade dispute with the U.S., Champagne said, 'Listen, the tax is in Canada, the tax applies and will apply.' Carney's surprise scheduling of a news conference Thursday afternoon set back a planned news conference by the Canadian Steel Producers Association and the United Steel Workers, who were set to outline their urgent call for immediate action as the 50 per cent steel tariffs Trump imposed are squeezing domestic producers. They have previously called for the full imposition of tit-for-tat counter-tariffs against U.S. steel without any exemptions. During the election campaign, the Carney government authorized exemptions for Canadian imports of U.S. steel and aluminum products — called remissions — that amount to about $8 billion. But most of those exemptions favour importers of American steel, which Canadian steel producers say has given their competitors an advantage.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
6 top issues to review in US-Mexico-Canada trade
The second Trump administration has come out swinging on trade. New tariffs — some targeted, others startlingly wide-ranging and broad — have reignited uncertainty across global supply chains and forced America's economic allies to find ways of placating the White House. For Canada and Mexico, Washington's partners in Trump's U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, this has been a stark reminder of how easily trust can erode, even in the most integrated trade relationship in the world. But the first formal review of the agreement in 2026 offers the opportunity to not only overcome this uncertainty but also to build for a stronger shared future. In terms of trade, the stakes could not be higher: Mexico and Canada are the United States' no.1 and no. 2 trading partners. In 2024, U.S.-Mexico trade reached $840 billion; with Canada, the number was $761 billion (compared with $582 billion in two-way trade with China). These are intricate trading relationships, and the review process will be more than a box-checking exercise. Anxiety over the process is already rampant in Washington and among investors. But the U.S.-Mexico-Canada partners don't just trade enormous amounts with each other; they build things together and export them to the world through complex supply chains. Therefore, the review process is also a chance to modernize North America's trade architecture, reinforce strategic industries, and rebuild the foundations of regional trust and cooperation. America's competitiveness depends heavily on the integrated North American manufacturing platform, and thus on the success of Mexico and Canada, its partners. There are many contentious issues requiring resolution, too many to mention here. However, we can currently identify six key areas where substantial effort will be necessary. Addressing these areas holds the potential for significant improvements in regional competitiveness and economic security. A foreign investment committee for North America. The issue of competition with China was marginally addressed in Article 32.10 of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement with a provision concerning trade with 'non-market economies,' but the topic of Chinese investment in the region was not covered. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, an interagency body, is tasked with that role to assess and mitigate national security risks within the U.S., while Canada has a similar entity. Mexico, however, has not established such a mechanism. Implementing a trilateral or regionally coordinated investment screening system, tailored to the shared interests and legal frameworks of the U.S., Canada and Mexico, could address this gap effectively. Rules of Origin Are Only as Good as Our Tools to Enforce Them. The North American agreement's stronger rules of origin, especially for automotive and steel products, were a signature achievement. But enforcement remains a weak link. Self-certification and uneven oversight have created loopholes for transshipped and misclassified goods. To address this, North America should move toward a shared product passport system — a digital framework that enables real-time verification of supply chain data and regional content. Without it, even the best rules risk being undermined by outdated systems and bad actors. A Reinvigorated Approach to Energy and Critical Minerals. Chapter 8 of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement was a compromise: The U.S. and Canada sought more liberalization and investment protections in the energy sector, while Mexico prioritized sovereignty. The review must establish commitments to cooperation, regulatory coordination and investor protections, especially in Mexico, where uncertainty has hindered investment. But just as importantly, there is now an opportunity to establish institutionalized cooperation between the partners in building regional critical minerals supply chains, a key area of strategic competition with China. Dispute Resolution Must Be Enhanced. When the USMCA replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement, dispute settlement mechanisms were seriously weakened. Over the past six years, the need for stronger investor protections and legal recourse in the face of expropriation and regulatory abuse has become clear, especially in the case of Mexico. The agreement's dispute settlement systems must be strengthened to ensure they are timely, impartial and resilient against political pressure. If North America wants to remain an attractive investment environment, confidence in the rules must go hand in hand with confidence in how they're enforced. Labor Standards and the Gap Between Words and Action. The current agreement's labor provisions marked a leap forward from NAFTA. But implementation is inconsistent, to say the least. Labor reforms in Mexico are still catching up with commitments. The review is an opportunity to close the implementation gap — and to make enforcement credible across all three countries, for the good of workers across the region. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum should seize the opportunity to advocate for better working conditions for her people. Don't Ignore Digital Trade. The current agreement's digital trade provisions, contained in Chapter 19, are already aging. They lack the clarity and scope needed for today's data-driven economy, especially on cross-border flows and artificial intelligence. Mexico lags far behind the U.S. and Canada, but has a dynamic startup and entrepreneurial culture in some of its major cities, in part spurred on by digital nomads now living there. Harnessing the combined potential of the three countries and setting common standards and rules will benefit the entire regional economy and greatly assist in the intensifying tech race with China. The early days of the Trump administration's second term have strained North American cooperation, but the review is a chance to reverse that trajectory. It can help the U.S., Canada and Mexico recommit to a shared vision of prosperity, one grounded in transparency, innovation, and resilience. In 2020, the U.S-Canada-Mexico Agreement was sold as a modernization of NAFTA. In 2026, its review must become a modernization of our shared commitment to lead. Let's not settle for maintenance. Let's build something stronger. Duncan Wood is CEO of Hurst International Consulting and an independent analyst focused on North American trade, energy, and supply chain security.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
India's high-tech ambitions get a boost from Apple and US tariffs
Even before Trump's latest trade war, India was gunning for a greater slice, not only of the smartphone industry, but the entire supply chain, hoping to lure more international businesses away from China. Now, with Apple announcing it will build all US-bound smartphones in India, and US tariffs potentially handing it a competitive advantage, India is seeing new momentum. CNN's Clare Sebastian visits a city outside Delhi that has been transformed by India's hi-tech ambitions. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
