logo
White Tears Incoming: America Welcomes Afrikaner ‘Refugees' To Rescue Whiteness

White Tears Incoming: America Welcomes Afrikaner ‘Refugees' To Rescue Whiteness

Source: SAUL LOEB / Getty
'Send me your bitter. Your huddled masses of racists. Your wretched, sun-worn, and paranoid, waving the flag of a dying empire, terrified of DEI, hallucinating about genocide, and teeming with desperation to Make Anywhere Great Again.'
The Neanderthalic Donald Trump is certainly no Emma Lazarus, the poet whose 1883 sonnet 'The New Colossus' is cast onto a bronze plaque on the Statue of Liberty and inspired the satirical flip I just delivered. But this is essentially what he said before rolling out the red carpet for a planeload of salty, land-losing colonizers who've been recast as 'refugees' because Black South Africans have the audacity to reclaim what was stolen from them generations ago.
These Afrikaner welfare recipients, who descended mainly from Dutch colonists, have received preferential treatment over many other groups who've been waiting in limbo in refugee camps and other dangerous conditions for years. The Afghan and Iraqi interpreters who risked their lives to assist American troops in wars. The Haitians being deported after fleeing violence and natural disasters. The Syrians still trapped in camps in Jordan, Turkey, and Lebanon. The Congolese languishing in East Africa, the Uyghurs from China, along with Somalis, Rohingya Muslims, Yemenis, South Sudanese, Central Americans from Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala, the Eritreans, and Ethiopians.
These Afrikaners aren't refugees. They aren't fleeing war. They aren't being persecuted based on their religion. They aren't stateless. They aren't politically dissident exiles. They haven't endured famine or climate collapse.
But Trump and top officials, including Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau, compared post-apartheid South Africa to Nazi Germany. Invoking his family's history, Landau said: 'My own father was born in Europe and had to leave his country when Hitler came in … We respect what you had to deal with these last few years.' He added: 'We're sending a clear message that the United States really rejects the egregious persecution of people on the basis of race in South Africa.' Where was this same energy during the apartheid era?
Trump went even further, accusing the South African government of committing 'genocide' against its white minority. But there is zero evidence of a genocide. Zero! What does exist is a slow, contested, and deeply uncomfortable effort to decolonize, undo historical injustice, and redistribute land, wealth, and opportunity. But the descendants of colonizers across the diaspora treat such developments as an existential threat. Source: The Washington Post / Getty
Racial equality is treated like a zero-sum game and a prelude to white annihilation. They even traffic in hyperbole by calling racial equality 'genocide.' Land reform becomes 'persecution.' Statistical parity equals 'reverse discrimination.' Reckoning with the colonial past feels like attempted extermination. But this ain't about actual danger to white lives. It's about the fear of no longer being able to dominate.
So, of course, the U.S., a white supremacist nation built on the bones of enslaved Africans and Indigenous genocide, is providing sanctuary to its colonial kin. Let's not split hairs and call this political maneuver what it really is—ideological rehoming of a people mourning the loss of racial hierarchy.
Be clear—that planeload of disgruntled Afrikaners is not on US soil because they are in danger. They've been imported as reinforcements with rage because whiteness is.
They've arrived at a moment in U.S. history when the president has engineered an aggressive full-scale white identity project. People of color in this country are being deported, snatched off streets, hidden away in secret prisons, displaced, and denied resources. We're also seeing government-sponsored fertility campaigns and abortion bans to push white women into birthing more white babies, regardless of the circumstances surrounding conception. These faux refugees are here to breed, vote red, promote white Jesus, and help fortify the architecture of a white ethno-state by any means necessary.
Emma Lazarus didn't write The New Colossus for this. And if Lady Liberty could move, she'd be giving that plane full of apartheid leftovers a hard side-eye. Her torch was meant to light the way for the suffering, not to guide entitled colonizers back to the throne.
But then again, the Statue of Liberty has always been more complicated than the poem at her pedestal. For generations, she welcomed European immigrants who were quickly consolidated into whiteness to reinforce its power. They came not as threats to the system, but as new blood for its preservation.
Perhaps Lady Liberty wouldn't flinch at all. Maybe she'd just tighten her grip on the torch, glance at the tarmac, and whisper into the Afrikaner ears: 'Rraight on toime. Mehyk Amerrrica Greyt Again.'
SEE ALSO:
Trump Prioritizes White Afrikaners Over Black and Brown Migrants
Trump's Brazen Takeover Of The Library Of Congress Is Another Direct Threat To Democracy
SEE ALSO
White Tears Incoming: America Welcomes Afrikaner 'Refugees' To Rescue Whiteness was originally published on newsone.com
Black America Web Featured Video
CLOSE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dear Fashion CEOs, Stop Undermining Climate Action
Dear Fashion CEOs, Stop Undermining Climate Action

Business of Fashion

time8 minutes ago

  • Business of Fashion

Dear Fashion CEOs, Stop Undermining Climate Action

We have reached a pivotal moment in the fashion industry's understanding of what true climate leadership means. Leadership was once defined by voluntary corporate commitments — a new sustainability pledge or climate goal. But these voluntary efforts have done little to move the needle, rarely graduating beyond pilot programmes, and often amounting to little more than greenwashed marketing. Short-term self-interest and a market that rewards quarterly growth have driven many players to underinvest or stall action. The result is collective stagnation. For the last few years, the belief among climate advocates and progressive executives has been that regulators would step into this void and drive momentum in the movement. Now that is on shakier ground. In the US, the Trump administration is dismantling environmental programmes, even as individual states forge ahead with their own regulations. In the EU, which has led the way on green legislation, concerns about competitiveness are threatening to erode policies that have already been formed. In a period of economic and political uncertainty, businesses are stepping back, greenhushing and deprioritising climate programmes. It is clear change won't come without political support. Real climate leadership from brands means recognising this, speaking out and calling for regulatory change. Instead, many trade groups — including those that represent brands with publicly progressive climate policies — are actively lobbying to undermine tougher environmental regulations, leaning into the political narrative that stiffer oversight is bad for business. Brands that are already doing the work know this is not true. Smart regulation can be a way to level a playing field that is currently stacked against companies that operate more responsibly, while also incentivising and accelerating change. But it won't happen if companies and their lobbyists don't step up to loudly and boldly declare their support for the regulatory change that will enable more meaningful action. As the industry convenes this week at the Global Fashion Agenda's annual sustainability summit in Copenhagen, it's an opportunity for leaders to move beyond the climate blah blah and chart a path forward. The issue is increasingly urgent. In the last six months alone, we've witnessed climate impacts that make inadequate action indefensible: historic wildfires in California, temperatures reaching 48°C in India and Pakistan, and a glacier collapse wiping out a Swiss village. The stakes are not theoretical. I saw the corporate doublespeak firsthand while testifying in Sacramento, California in support of the Fashion Act, a bill that aims to address the climate and chemical footprint of the industry. Alongside me was a persuasive college student; in opposition were business lobbies the California Chamber of Commerce, the California Retailers Association and the American Apparel and Footwear Association. Their argument? That requiring companies to set and meet absolute emission reduction targets would mean increased costs for consumers, even though companies like Gap, VF, and Nike have already made voluntary commitments to such targets. We brought data from McKinsey showing that industry-wide decarbonisation, once co-ordinated, is not only feasible but affordable. The Committee listened, the bill progressed, though it must still pass through several other stages of approval by January in order to make it into law. In New York, lawmakers have been working on a similar legislative proposal since 2022. This is why brands who say they favour a greener industry need to step up. The Fashion Act is gaining traction in California. But to move it across the finish line and into law, we need industry voices to be present in the room and use their platforms to publicly support it. That's why New Standard Institute, the industry think tank I run, has launched an advocacy arm — to enable us to meet anti-regulation lobbying with equal force. This is a model not just for the Fashion Act, but for future legislation that sets smart incentives — both sticks and carrots — aligned with the sustainability commitments many brands already claim. To the companies that have signed on to support the bill, thank you. In the months ahead, we invite more of you to move beyond pledges and pilot programs. We also call on current supporters to step up their engagement: be public, be vocal, and advocate clearly for the Fashion Act. Join us in supporting infrastructure that can match lobbying power with lobbying power. Show legislators that industry — the forward-looking, innovation-driven side of it — is ready to lead. Navigating the turbulence of tariffs and shifting global standards is a challenge. But leadership isn't about waiting for clarity. It's about showing up in the storm. Let's lead. Maxine Bédat is the founder and director of fashion think tank New Standard Institute. She has helped spearhead bills focused on regulating fashion's environmental impact in California and New York. The views expressed in Op-Ed pieces are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Business of Fashion. How to submit an Op-Ed: The Business of Fashion accepts opinion articles on a wide range of topics. The suggested length is 700-1000 words, but submissions of any length within reason will be considered. All submissions must be original and exclusive to BoF. Submissions may be sent to opinion@ Please include 'Op-Ed' in the subject line and be sure to substantiate all assertions. Given the volume of submissions we receive, we regret that we are unable to respond in the event that an article is not selected for publication.

Trump's 50 per cent steel and aluminum tariffs go into effect
Trump's 50 per cent steel and aluminum tariffs go into effect

Hamilton Spectator

time9 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Trump's 50 per cent steel and aluminum tariffs go into effect

WASHINGTON - Tariffs on imports of steel and aluminum to the United States are increasing to 50 per cent today after President Donald Trump followed through on his plan to double the duties. Trump signed an executive order Tuesday to increase the levies from their previous rate of 25 per cent, saying it was necessary to protect national security and industries in the United States. Prime Minister Mark Carney says the tariffs are both unlawful and unjustified and that Canada is intensively negotiating with the U.S. to have tariffs removed under a new economic and security deal. The latest steel and aluminum increase doesn't apply to imports from the United Kingdom, which remain at 25 per cent while the Trump administration works out details of a trade deal announced last month. About a quarter of all steel used in the United States is imported and Canada is its largest supplier. The Canadian steel and aluminum industries say doubling the tariffs will have a devastating impact while economists warn the higher tariffs could also lead to cost increases for Americans. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 4, 2025.

Dollar edges down as trade tensions simmer ahead of jobs data
Dollar edges down as trade tensions simmer ahead of jobs data

CNBC

time13 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Dollar edges down as trade tensions simmer ahead of jobs data

The dollar drifted lower on Wednesday as the market looked ahead to U.S. employment data for immediate trading cues, while waiting on developments in President Donald Trump's tariff negotiations with key trading partners including China. The Trump administration has given a Wednesday deadline for countries to submit their best offers on trade, the same day a doubling of duties to 50% on imported steel and aluminum comes into effect. Trump is also tipped by the White House to have a call this week with Chinese President Xi Jinping after the two sides accused each other of violating the terms of an agreement last month to roll back some tariffs. In the meantime, macroeconomic indicators have returned as a driver of the U.S. currency this week, even if trade frictions remain center stage. The dollar slumped 0.8% against major peers on Monday following a contraction in manufacturing, only to rebound by almost the same amount overnight after a surprise increase in U.S. job openings. Early on Wednesday, the dollar was down 0.09% at 143.82 yen and the euro was up 0.13% at $1.1385. The dollar index, which measures the currency against those two peers and four other counterparts, was flat at 99.159. Traders will have an eye on the ADP employment report later in the day, in the run-up to crucial U.S. monthly payrolls figures on Friday. "Job openings were much stronger than expected," Commonwealth Bank of Australia analyst Joseph Capurso said of the overnight JOLTS data, which is closely watched by the Federal Reserve. "The low estimate for ADP means the USD and U.S. bond yields have a small hurdle to climb for a positive surprise tonight." Elsewhere, the Australian dollar was little changed at $0.6460 ahead of the release of GDP figures. South Korea's won strengthened about 0.2% to 1,375.25 per dollar after the victory of liberal candidate Lee Jae-myung in the country's presidential election.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store