logo
Salmond planned Independence town

Salmond planned Independence town

Yahoo21-02-2025

A candidate for the Alba Party's deputy leadership has said he and Alex Salmond planned a new Scottish town called Independence.
Chris McEleny said he and the former first minister shared a "vision for a new Scottish town" to accommodate people working in the energy sector.
McEleny is Alba's general secretary, though he was suspended earlier this month over claims of "gross misconduct".
Alba is currently choosing a new leader after Salmond died of a heart attack at a conference in North Macedonia last October at the age of 69.
Salmond led the country between 2007 and 2014 and his party's unprecedented majority in 2011 paved the way for the independence referendum three years later.
After quitting as first minister, he had a spectacular fallout with former first minister Nicola Sturgeon and set up the alternative independence supporting Alba Party in 2021.
Alba's sole MSP Ash Regan and former SNP MP Kenny MacAskill are vying for the leadership position ahead of a conference in March.
Infighting has dominated the party since Salmond's death and McEleny previously claimed he had chosen step down as general secretary to ensure the new leader was "free to run the party differently".
However, it was later confirmed that he was suspended from the role over allegations of gross misconduct.
The Scotsman reported that McEleny was accused of "disobeying direct orders from leadership and blocking office bearers from carrying out their duties".
He is also alleged to have misrepresented the party's views on asylum seekers and Donald Trump in media statements.
Alba chief suspended over gross misconduct claim
The former SNP councillor was a close friend of Salmond and has emphasised this link in his election campaign.
He said: "Alex Salmond and I had a vision for a new Scottish town and we could think of no better name than Independence."
McEleny said Scotland had an "abundance of renewable energy potential" but the UK government sent this south of the border "with no benefit to Scotland".
He added: "What we should be doing is using that energy to attract the industries of today and tomorrow to Scotland by using the incentive of cheaper energy anywhere else in Europe.
"Such an influx of highly skilled jobs would require the industries, the labour force and the infrastructure to all be mutually beneficial to each other - that is why a new town would make sense.
"A new Scottish town has not been designated since not long after the Second World War, now is the right time to begin a discussion to make a town called Independence a reality."
Five new towns were built across Scotland in the decades following the end of the war to ease overcrowding in the country's major cities, particularly Glasgow.
They were:
East Kilbride (designated 6 May 1947)
Glenrothes (designated 30 June 1948)
Cumbernauld (designated 9 December 1955, extended 19 March 1973)
Livingston (designated 16 April 1962)
Irvine (designated 9 November 1966)
They quickly became associated with poor planning and architecture that was hastily built from unattractive grey concrete.
Plans for a new sixth town at Stonehouse in South Lanarkshire were also drawn up in the 1970s, but the project was halted in 1976 after just 96 houses had been constructed.
A new town called Blindwells is currently under construction next to the A1 near Prestonpans in East Lothian.
Regan aiming to succeed Salmond as Alba leader
MacAskill to challenge Regan for Alba leadership

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU rights court says Italy not responsible for Libyan coast guard actions over migrant boat sinking
EU rights court says Italy not responsible for Libyan coast guard actions over migrant boat sinking

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

EU rights court says Italy not responsible for Libyan coast guard actions over migrant boat sinking

Judges at the European Court of Human Rights ruled Thursday that Italy could not be held liable for the actions of the Libyan Coast Guard, rejecting a case brought by a group of migrants rescued from the Mediterranean Sea in a fatal boat sinking in 2017. The Strasbourg court declared the case inadmissible, finding Italy did not have 'effective control' of the expanse of waters off the coast of Tripoli where a small ship carrying some 150 people sank in 2017. Twenty people died in the incident. Around 45 survivors onboard the ship said they were taken to Tajura Detention Center in Tripoli where they were beaten and abused. The judges found that the captain and crew of the Libyan vessel Ras Jadir had acted independently when they answered a distress signal in the early morning hours on Nov. 6. Italy has supplied the Libyans with funding, vessels and training as part of an agreement to slow the tide of migrants crossing the Mediterranean. The judges found, however, that this support did not prove 'Italy had taken over Libya's public-authority powers.' A group of migrants was rescued by the humanitarian organization Sea Watch and were taken to Italy. A ruling in favor of the 14 survivors who filed the complaint at the ECHR could have undermined international agreements made by several European Union countries with Libya, Turkey and others to prevent migrants from coming to European shores. The ECHR handles complaints against the 46 member states of the Council of Europe. The intergovernmental organization is not an EU institution and was set up after the Second World War to promote peace and democracy. Libya is not a member of the Council of Europe, so the court has no jurisdiction over the country's actions. ___ Follow AP's coverage of migration issues at

EU rights court says Italy not responsible for Libyan coast guard actions over migrant boat sinking
EU rights court says Italy not responsible for Libyan coast guard actions over migrant boat sinking

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

EU rights court says Italy not responsible for Libyan coast guard actions over migrant boat sinking

Judges at the European Court of Human Rights ruled Thursday that Italy could not be held liable for the actions of the Libyan Coast Guard, rejecting a case brought by a group of migrants rescued from the Mediterranean Sea in a fatal boat sinking in 2017. The Strasbourg court declared the case inadmissible, finding Italy did not have 'effective control' of the expanse of waters off the coast of Tripoli where a small ship carrying some 150 people sank in 2017. Twenty people died in the incident. Around 45 survivors onboard the ship said they were taken to Tajura Detention Center in Tripoli where they were beaten and abused. The judges found that the captain and crew of the Libyan vessel Ras Jadir had acted independently when they answered a distress signal in the early morning hours on Nov. 6. Italy has supplied the Libyans with funding, vessels and training as part of an agreement to slow the tide of migrants crossing the Mediterranean. The judges found, however, that this support did not prove 'Italy had taken over Libya's public-authority powers.' A group of migrants was rescued by the humanitarian organization Sea Watch and were taken to Italy. A ruling in favor of the 14 survivors who filed the complaint at the ECHR could have undermined international agreements made by several European Union countries with Libya, Turkey and others to prevent migrants from coming to European shores. The ECHR handles complaints against the 46 member states of the Council of Europe. The intergovernmental organization is not an EU institution and was set up after the Second World War to promote peace and democracy. Libya is not a member of the Council of Europe, so the court has no jurisdiction over the country's actions. ___ Follow AP's coverage of migration issues at Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

EU court says Italy not responsible for Libyan coast guard actions over boat sinking

timean hour ago

EU court says Italy not responsible for Libyan coast guard actions over boat sinking

Judges at the European Court of Human Rights ruled Thursday that Italy could not be held liable for the actions of the Libyan Coast Guard, rejecting a case brought by a group of migrants rescued from the Mediterranean Sea in a fatal boat sinking in 2017. The Strasbourg court declared the case inadmissible, finding Italy did not have 'effective control' of the expanse of waters off the coast of Tripoli where a small ship carrying some 150 people sank in 2017. Twenty people died in the incident. Around 45 survivors onboard the ship said they were taken to Tajura Detention Center in Tripoli where they were beaten and abused. The judges found that the captain and crew of the Libyan vessel Ras Jadir had acted independently when they answered a distress signal in the early morning hours on Nov. 6. Italy has supplied the Libyans with funding, vessels and training as part of an agreement to slow the tide of migrants crossing the Mediterranean. The judges found, however, that this support did not prove 'Italy had taken over Libya's public-authority powers.' A group of migrants was rescued by the humanitarian organization Sea Watch and were taken to Italy. A ruling in favor of the 14 survivors who filed the complaint at the ECHR could have undermined international agreements made by several European Union countries with Libya, Turkey and others to prevent migrants from coming to European shores. The ECHR handles complaints against the 46 member states of the Council of Europe. The intergovernmental organization is not an EU institution and was set up after the Second World War to promote peace and democracy. Libya is not a member of the Council of Europe, so the court has no jurisdiction over the country's actions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store